Pure Small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Transformation to Small Cell Lung Cancer of Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma: Clinicopathologic Analysis of Six Cases.

Background:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are considered the first line treatment for a subset of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Although transformation to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the known mechanisms of resistance to EGFR TKIs, it is not certain whether transformation to SCLC is exclusively found as a mechanism of TKI resistance in EGFR-mutant tumors.Methods:We identified six patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma that showed transformation to SCLC on second biopsy (n = 401) during a 6-year period. Clinicopathologic information was analyzed and EGFR mutation results were compared between initial and second biopsy samples.Results:Six patients showed transformation from adenocarcinoma to SCLC, of which four were pure SCLCs and two were combined adenocarcinoma and SCLCs. Clinically, four cases were EGFR-mutant tumors from non-smoking females who underwent TKI treatment, and the EGFR mutation was retained in the transformed SCLC tumors. The remaining two adenocarcinomas were EGFR wild-type, and one of these patients received EGFR TKI treatment.Conclusions:NSCLC can acquire a neuroendocrine phenotype with or without EGFR TKI treatment.

High pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts recurrence and poor prognosis for combined small cell lung cancer.

Compared to pure small cell lung cancer (SCLC), combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) has its own characteristics. High neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been shown to be related to poor prognosis in several types of tumors. The aim of this study was to explore the prognosis value of NLR and PLR in patients with C-SCLC. A total of 112 patients diagnosed with C-SCLC between January 2000 and March 2009 were enrolled in the study. The clinicopathological parameters, laboratory analyses, and survival time were collected and analyzed. The correlation between NLR, PLR, and clinicopathological characters was analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the prognostic significance of these parameters for C-SCLC. The pretreatment NLR was elevated in 37.5 % patients (NLR ≥ 4.15; n = 42; H-NLR). NLR was significantly related to disease stage (p = 0.033) and tumor recurrence (p = 0.014). The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly worse in the H-NLR group (OS: 22.0 months vs 11.7 months, p = 0.001; PFS: 11.1 vs 6.0 months, p < 0.001). However, PLR at diagnosis was not associated with OS or PFS. Multivariate analyses indicated elevated NLR (HR = 1.6; p = 0.001), disease stage (HR = 1.6; p = 0.001), and performance status (HR = 1.8; p = 0.015) as independent prognostic factors. High pretreatment NLR (≥4.15) is a potential useful indicator for C-SCLC recurrence and predicts a poor long-term prognosis for C-SCLC, which should be considered in defining the prognosis with other well-known prognosticators in C-SCLC patients.

Clinicopathological characteristics, diagnosis and treatment of combined small cell lung cancer

Combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) is a special subtype of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which has a low incidence and diagnostic rate. However, the incidence and diagnostic rate appear an increasing tendency recently. The clinical features of C-SCLC are similar to the pure SCLC, while it has a relatively limited stage. The main treatment pattern of C-SCLC is multimodality therapy, though the response to chemotherapy in C-SCLC is relatively poor. Survival between patients with C-SCLC versus SCLC is similar. KPS, stage, composite components, tumor location and diameter, surgery margin are prognostic factors. Radiotherapy can benefit for the patients with ⅢA/ⅢB disease, positive lymph nodes, or with more metastatic lymph nodes after surgery. Key words: Diagnosis; Therapy; Prognosis; Lung neoplasms

Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR is relevant to cellular proliferation, invasiveness, and clinical relapse in small‐cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a subtype of lung cancer with poor prognosis. To identify accurate predictive biomarkers and effective therapeutic modalities, we focus on a long noncoding RNA, Hox transcript antisense intergenic RNA (HOTAIR), and investigated its expression, cellular functions, and clinical relevance in SCLC. In this study, HOTAIR expression was assessed in 35 surgical SCLC samples and 10 SCLC cell lines. The efficacy of knockdown of HOTAIR by siRNA transfection was evaluated in SBC-3 cells in vitro, and the gene expression was analyzed using microarray. HOTAIR was expressed highly in pure, rather than combined, SCLC (P = 0.012), that the subgroup with high expression had significantly more pure SCLC (P = 0.04), more lymphatic invasion (P = 0.03) and more relapse (P = 0.04) than the low-expression subgroup. The knockdown of HOTAIR in SBC-3 cells led to decreased proliferation activity and decreased invasiveness in vitro. Gene expression analysis indicated that depletion of HOTAIR resulted in upregulation of cell adhesion-related genes such as ASTN1, PCDHA1, and mucin production-related genes such as MUC5AC, and downregulation of genes involved in neuronal growth and signal transduction including NTM and PTK2B. Our results suggest that HOTAIR has an oncogenic role in SCLC and could be a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target.

Prognostic Significance of Pretreatment Laboratory Parameters in Combined Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Despite the increasing incidence of combined small-cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) in recent years, there have not been many data on clinical prognostic factors predicting prognosis of C-SCLC patients. In present study, we sought pretreatment features especially basic laboratory parameters predicting survival of C-SCLC. We analyzed 613 small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients at our institution between January 2005 and December 2010. We identified 114 patients with C-SCLC. The pathologic and clinical characteristics of these patients were reviewed. Data of laboratory parameters obtained during regular examinations at diagnosis of these patients were examined. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rate and depict the survival curves. The Cox regression model was used to analyze the independent factors affecting the overall survival (OS). These data were compared with the results obtained from our 499 pure SCLC patients who presented during the same time period. Of the 613 SCLC patients analyzed, 18.6 % of the patients presented with C-SCLC. No difference in OS was observed in patients with C-SCLC and patients with pure SCLC (P = 0.995). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that poor ECOG-PS (P < 0.001), extensive disease (P < 0.001), pathologic subtype of SC/LC (P < 0.001), not receiving surgery (P = 0.001), elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P = 0.005), elevated NSE (P = 0.043), and elevated neutrophile-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P = 0.018) were associated with adverse prognosis of patients with C-SCLC. By multivariate analysis, OS was affected by ECOG-PS (hazard ratio 2.001, P = 0.012), disease extent (hazard ratio 3.406, P < 0.001), and NLR (hazard ratio 1.704, P = 0.030) in C-SCLC patients, while the risk factors that influenced the prognosis of the patients with pure SCLC were ECOG-PS (hazard ratio 2.132, P < 0.001), disease extent (hazard ratio 1.482, P < 0.001), and LDH (hazard ratio 1.811, P < 0.001). Patients with C-SCLC carry a similar prognosis than those with pure small-cell variety. Easily accessible pretreatment parameters such as NLR should be considered in defining the prognosis of C-SCLC patients besides disease extent and performance status.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) among patients who are never smokers.

7593 Background: Although most patients (pts) with SCLC are current or former smokers, SCLC has been reported in pts who are never smokers, most recently in pts with EGFR-mutant lung cancers who develop acquired resistance (AR) to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We describe clinical, pathologic, and molecular characteristics of never-smoking pts with SCLC at diagnosis and in the AR setting. Methods: We identified cases through systematic review of pts seen at MSKCC from 2005 – 2012. Smoking history was obtained prospectively. SCLC diagnosis was confirmed by expert pathology review. We collected age, sex, stage, treatment, and survival data. EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA, and ALK testing and next generation sequencing of 279 cancer genes was performed on available samples. Results: 2.2% (23/1040, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.3%) of pts with SCLC seen at MSKCC were never smokers: 61% women, median 64 years, 74% extensive stage, and 22% with brain metastases at diagnosis. 83% (19/23) had de novo SCLC, whereas only 17% had SCLC as AR to EGFR TKI after treatment for EGFR-mutant lung cancers, all of whom had persistent EGFR mutation confirmed at resistance. Median survival from SCLC diagnosis is 23 months (95%CI: 11-26) for all pts and 23 months (95% CI: 8–27) for the 19 pts with de novo SCLC. Pathologic review demonstrated 19 cases of pure SCLC and 4 mixed histology cases with SCLC and other histologies. Treatment history was available for 15/19 pts with de novo SCLC: 53% etoposide-platinum sensitive. ALK rearrangement and KRAS mutations were identified in 0/5 and 0/10, respectively. One pt with de novo mixed SCLC and adenocarcinoma had an EGFR mutation and another pt with de novo pure SCLC had EGFR and PIK3CA mutations. Mutations were identified in p53 and Rb1 with amplification in TERT in 1 sample to date tested with next generation sequencing. Conclusions: 2% of pts with SCLC are never smokers. While transformation to SCLC can occur in the setting of AR to EGFR TKI, de novo SCLC occurs in the majority of our never smokers with this disease. EGFR mutations uniformly exist in SCLC in the AR setting. EGFR mutations were rare, and we found no KRAS mutations or ALK rearrangements. Comprehensive, multiplexed genotyping can aid in providing optimal care and facilitate research in this unique population.

Update on small cell carcinoma and its differentiation from squamous cell carcinoma and other non-small cell carcinomas

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) comprises 14% of all lung cancers, and >30 000 new cases are diagnosed per year in the United States. SCLC is one of the most distinctive malignancies in the entire field of oncology with characteristic clinical properties, responsiveness to specific chemotherapy, genetic features and a highly reliable pathological diagnosis. SCLC is defined by light microscopy, and the most important stain is a good-quality hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained section. The vast majority of cases can be diagnosed on H&E alone; however, in problem cases, immunohistochemistry can be very helpful in making the distinction from other tumors. Cytology is also a powerful tool, often being more definitive than small biopsies with scant tumor cells, crush artifact and/or necrosis. As virtually all SCLCs present in advanced stages, most patients are diagnosed based on small biopsy and cytology specimens. Historically, there has been significant evolution in the histological subclassification of SCLC dating from 1962 when Kreyberg proposed the oat cell and polygonal cell types. The current subclassification recognizes only two subtypes: pure SCLC and combined SCLC. Pathologists need to do their best to make a diagnosis of SCLC or other histological types of lung cancer and this can be achieved in most cases. This review will address some of the diagnostic problems that occur in the minority of cases and outline practical ways to address them. Brief reference will be made to other neuroendocrine lung tumors with an overview of the molecular pathogenesis of this spectrum of tumors.

The significance of NSE and CEA as a differentiation marker for the cellular heterogeneity of small cell lung cancer.

Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in the culture supernatant of the 65 pulmonary carcinoma cell lines: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) 18, large cell carcinoma 14, squamous cell carcinoma 14, adenocarcinoma 14 and adenosquamous cell carcinoma 5, were measured by a radioimmunoassay (RIA). The mean value of NSE was 30.8+/-22.4 ng/ml and 9.2+/-8.7 ng/ml in SCLC and non-SCLC, respectively. The mean value of CEA was 15.1+/-20.9 ng/ml and 26.6+/-72.3 ng/ml in SCLC and non-SCLC, respectively. A significant difference in NSE levels was obtained between SCLC cell lines and non-SCLC cell lines. In SCLC cell lines, a significant inverse proportional correlation was observed between NSE and CEA levels. The CEA production tended to be higher in cells with low levels of NSE than in those with high NSE production. With respect to correlation between marker production and growth characteristics of SCLC cells in vitro, significantly higher NSE and lower CEA levels were found in cells growing with floating colony or neurite like characteristics (classic cell type) than those in cells with epithelial or intermediate growth characteristics (variant cell type). A significant positive correlation between NSE levels and the survival periods was found in follow-up studies of 10 patients who underwent surgery with complete resection of the primary tumor. All of 4 long term survivors over 3 years after surgery had significantly high NSE and relatively low CEA producing tumors. The relationship of these markers to clinical status of the patient suggests that an analysis for correlation of NSE and CEA levels in SCLC patients may be useful to discriminate between a pure neuroendocrine SCLC tumor and a mixed small cell/large cell tumor, and in monitoring therapeutic effect and prognosis of each patient.

Surgery for combined type small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUNDCombined type small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been reported to occur in, at most, 1% of all cases of SCLC. These tumours consist of SCLC with a component of...

Is there ever a role for salvage operations in limited small-cell lung cancer?

Combined modality treatment with chemotherapy and radiation produces tumor regression in most patients with small-cell lung cancer, but the impact on survival has been small, and less than 20% of patients with limited disease survive 2 years. Survival time is extremely short after failure to respond or relapse after treatment. Local control remains a problem, with one third of patients having recurrence only at the primary site. In an attempt to prolong survival and perhaps achieve cure, we undertook surgical resection in 28 patients with limited small-cell lung cancer who did not have complete remission with standard treatment or who had only local recurrence after treatment. There were 28 patients, 22 male and six female, median age 61 years (range 41 to 76). All patients had been treated with chemotherapy and 13 had received preoperative radiotherapy to the primary site and mediastinum. Eight patients underwent an operation for relapse after complete remission. Five patients had had no response to treatment, three had had a slight response followed by progression during chemotherapy, and 12 had achieved partial response but had greater than 3 cm residual masses. Twelve patients required pneumonectomy, 15 lobectomy, one patient had unresectable disease, and two had bulky residual masses after the operation. Three others had microscopic residual disease. Pathologic examination showed only small-cell lung cancer in 18 patients, mixed small-cell and non-small-cell in four, and only non-small-cell lung cancer in six. There were only four patients with stage I disease, 10 with stage II, and 14 with stage III. The median survival from the date of diagnosis for the entire group is 105 weeks and from the date of operation, 74 weeks. The projected 5-year survival rate is 23%. The two patients with residual masses died with local progression, and distant metastatic disease developed in 17 others. One patient died at 6 years without recurrent disease. Eight patients are alive 2 to 5 years after diagnosis. Seven of these patients required only a lobectomy, four had stage I disease, two had stage II, and two had stage III disease. Five had pure small-cell lung cancer and three had mixed small-cell and non-small-cell tumors. All of the patients with pathologic stage I disease remain alive compared with one of 10 with stage II disease and two of 14 with stage III. In summary, relapse or failure to respond to chemotherapy may be due to non-small-cell lung cancer or a mixed tumor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Combined small-cell and non-small-cell lung cancer.

Nine (2%) of 429 small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients seen at Vanderbilt University between 1977 and 1983 had a combined subtype SCLC at diagnosis (ie, small-cell carcinoma plus squamous cell or adenocarcinoma). Staging procedures and chemotherapy treatment were uniform for all 429 patients. The diagnosis of combined histology was established via bronchoscopy (six patients), needle aspiration biopsy (one), lymph node biopsy (one), and thoracotomy (one). The clinical characteristics of the combined subtype patients were similar to patients with other subtypes of SCLC (ie, there were no differences in median age, sex, performance status, and stage of disease). However, patients with a combined subtype histology had a higher incidence of peripheral lesions on chest x-ray (56% v 14%, P less than .001) and a lower median lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (301 IU/L v 341 IU/L, P = .0002) at diagnosis. The overall response to chemotherapy (57% v 78; P = .5) and the median survival (8 months v 10 months; P = .4) of the combined subtype patients were similar to patients with other subtypes of SCLC. Two (22%) combined histology patients survived greater than or equal to 5 years. Both had had surgical resection in addition to chemotherapy. These data suggest that the combined subtype of SCLC is clinically similar to pure SCLCs and that surgery may play a prominent role in the management of these tumors. The possibility of a combined histology tumor should be considered in patients thought to have SCLC on the basis of limited biopsy material, such as a needle aspiration or bronchial biopsy, and when the primary lesion is peripherally located on chest x-ray.