Reviewed by: The Routledge Companion to Puppetry and Material Performance ed. by Dassia N. Posner, Claudia Orenstein, and John Bell Heather Denyer THE ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO PUPPETRY AND MATERIAL PERFORMANCE. Edited by Dassia N. Posner, Claudia Orenstein, and John Bell. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2014; pp. 352. Because of our increasing engagement with material objects in new technologies, today is “a puppet moment” (2), as Claudia Orenstein asserts in the introduction to this significant new volume, which argues that the time is ripe to reconsider puppetry as a serious discipline in theatre. Divided into three sections covering fifteen countries and handling topics from centuries-old rituals to cutting-edge robotics, this collection of essays takes on the ambitious project of demonstrating the field’s importance, while opening it up to new possibilities of inclusion under the rubric “material performance” (5). The result is a book that is impressive both in scope (it is the largest volume of puppetry scholarship in English) and conviction. The first part, “Theory and Practice,” introduced and edited by John Bell, includes significant contemporary puppetry theory, as well as personal reflections on the field by famed practitioners like Basil Jones of Handspring Puppet Company, Jim Lasko of Redmoon Theater, and Peter Schumann of Bread and Puppet. The voices of these puppet masters balance the theoretical chapters that start the book and the analytical chapters that make up the remainder of the volume. Margarite Williams’s “The Death of ‘the Puppet’?” starts off the volume with the provocative argument that puppetry as a term must be reconsidered to address the field of material performance today, in our current age of “post-puppet puppetry” (23). Adapting Hans-Thies Lehmann’s “post-dramatic theatre,” Williams considers three examples of puppets “performing suicide” as illustrations of the uncanny aspect of these anthropomorphic objects, be they carved wooden figurines or everyday objects like coffee beans. Stephen Kaplin also provides a noteworthy contribution, discussing shadow puppetry in terms of object, image, and “the architecture of light and shadow” (95) rather than engaging the term puppet. He connects ancient shadow traditions from Asia to new technologies in shadow theatre through material and spiritual aspects. Claudia Orenstein introduces the second part of the book, devoted to “Revisiting History” and “Negotiating Tradition.” Here, established scholars of traditional puppetry forms offer new writing on topics ranging from Indonesian Wayang Kulit (Matthew Isaac Cohen), to Korean puppetry (Kathy Foley), to Indian leather puppetry (Orenstein). These chapters emphasize the relevance of these traditions as they [End Page 375] are adapted and “re-deployed” in today’s societies (202). Discussions of puppetry traditions from England, Italy, Russia, and Eastern Europe by Amber West, Lisa Morse, Dassia Posner, and Ida Hledíková, respectively, round out the global wealth of the volume. Further expanding an understanding of what constitutes puppetry, Jane Marie Law’s chapter deals with a Japanese ritual that precedes the country’s popular puppetry traditions, and Debra Hilborn discusses the performative uses of the Catholic cross in medieval Europe. Posner introduces the third part of the book, which explores “Contemporary Investigations” in material performance and the “Hybridizations” of puppetry forms. Each chapter centers on a single performance, production, or project, and uses this focal point to readdress the role of the spectator in perceiving and defining the puppetry performances. New forms of puppetry include animation (Colette Searls), model trains (Mark Sussman), and puppets controlled by automatons, as demonstrated in Elizabeth Ann Jochum and Todd Murphey’s “Pygmalion Project.” Cody Poulton brings in a useful theoretical discussion based on Masahiro Mori’s “Uncanny Valley” to engage with new technology forms in her chapter on Japanese robot performers. Certain chapters in the volume are interesting if only for a single reading, while others stand out as particularly important in moving the field forward. In addition to the first chapter, Paul Piris’s “The Co-Presence and Ontological Ambiguity of the Puppet,” Eric Bass’s theorizing of the semiotics of puppetry and the coauthorship of the audience, and Bell’s consideration of “The Persistent Life of Lifeless Objects” will be useful reference points for scholars discussing the agency of material objects, the relationship between the puppet and the manipulator, and the spectator...
Read full abstract