In this issue both Hackmann and Valentine (pp. 3-13) and Kasak (pp. 56-59) bring up the old saw that creating inter disciplinary teams and interdisciplinary block schedules are often forgone because they cost more than the depart mentalized alternatives. However, studies in three states provide data that challenge the oft-held belief that schools are too expensive to fully implement. All three studies document the reality that states and districts spend less per pupil to educate students in the grades than they do to educate elementary students in self-contained class rooms or secondary students in the presumed more efficient departmentalized ones. In the State of Florida the school-level per pupil expenditures reported by Nakib (1995) were these: grades K 3, $3167; grades 4-8, $2984; and grades 9-12, $3518. A study by Richards (1996) found similar pattern at slightly higher level of support among Baltimore City Schools: elementary, $4338; middle, $4026; and high school, $5553Three quarters of continent away in New Mexico the same pattern has been reported. Jordan, Garcia, Kops, and Jordan (1998) discovered mean expenditures per pupil to be grades 2-3, $2443; grades 4-6, $2251; and grades 7-12, $2607. Though each study was conducted for some other purpose than to find the relative cost of grades education, the data are consistent in pointing to the conclusion that grades edu cation is the least supported of the three K-12 levels of education. If early adolescence is the last best chance to avoid dimin ished future and middle grade schools are potentially society's most powerful force to recapture millions of youth adrift, are we, as nation, devoting the resources necessary to avoid a volatile mismatch...between the organization and curriculum of grade schools and the intellectual and emotional needs of young (Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development, 1989, p. 8)? Even if particular grades school did have to hire an additional teacher or two to make team organization or flexible interdisciplinary block schedules work, can anyone show that such additional expense would do anything more than move grades schools toward equity with their better financed elemen tary and secondary school partners? The preliminary data reported here would suggest that school finance formulas are inverted. If not, why would the very age group that most people agree is in need of the most instruc tional resources due to profound developmental changes be given the least amount of educational resources? In spite of the reforms that have been made in grades education over the past thirty years, equitable resource allocation is apparently not one of them. Middle level education is still the stepchild of American public education. Before we apologize or make excuses for the failure to fully implement those grades reforms which have proven to be effective in improving the lives of young adolescents, let us push for these youth to get their fair share of the educational dollars being distributed. Continuing pattern of past practices because they are cheaper is hardly the preferred way to educate America's young adolescents who have critical need.. .at this early age to acquire durable self-esteem, flexible and inquiring habits of mind, reliable and relatively close human relationships, sense of belonging in valued group, and sense of usefulness in some way beyond the self' (Carnegie Council, 1989, p. 10). □