Common Femoral Artery Puncture Research Articles

Inferior epigastric artery as a landmark for transfemoral TAVI. Optimizing vascular access?

This study sought to investigate whether the site of common femoral artery (CFA) cannulation in regard to the inferior epigastric artery (IEA) is associated with the incidence of vascular complications in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Vascular access complications are a main issue during TAVI and have been associated with significant increase of morbidity and mortality. The need for establishment of reliable predictors for these serious events remains important. A total of 90 patients, who had undergone TAVI, were retrospectively studied. Vascular complications were defined as major and minor according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) criteria. Patients were divided into high cannulation site (CS) group and low CS group depending on the common femoral artery puncture site position, in regards to the most inferior border of the IEA. Vascular complications were significantly more frequent in the high CS group versus the low CS group (32.3% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.039). High cannulation remained an independent predictor of vascular complications after adjustment for known risk factors (OR: 4.827, CI: 1.441-16.168; P = 0.011). In patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI, arterial puncture above the most inferior border of the IEA is associated with vascular complications.

MONGOLIAN AND HAN NATIONALITY RIGHT FEMORAL ARTERY BIFURCATION ANALYSIS BY ANGIOGRAPHY

ObjectivesTo analyze the variation of Mongolian and Han nationality in the site of femoral artery bifurcation relying on the femoral head and the pulic symphysis.MethodsMethods we retrospectively analyzed 540 patients...

TCT-410 Arteriotomy Location Guided by Fluoroscopy Plus Real-time Ultrasound: In Defense of the Femoral Approach

Vascular complications are increased by puncture above or below the common femoral artery (CFA). The FAUST study showed that real-time ultrasound guidance (USG) modestly increased accuracy over fluoroscopic guidance (86.4% vs 83.3% CFA punctures) and decreased vascular complications. We hypothesized

Antegrade Superficial Femoral Artery versus Common Femoral Artery Punctures for Infrainguinal Occlusive Disease

PurposeTo compare the outcomes of planned superficial femoral artery (SFA) and common femoral artery (CFA) antegrade punctures in patients undergoing endovascular interventions for infrainguinal occlusive arterial disease in a single center. Materials and MethodsBetween August 2010 and July 2011, consecutive patients who underwent antegrade puncture of CFA or SFA for infrainguinal occlusive disease were studied. Data including sheath size, rate of closure device usage, and complications relating to the arterial puncture were classified according to Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) classification and analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThere were 199 antegrade arterial punctures, of which 28 (14%) were planned SFA punctures, performed in 184 patients. All patients had ultrasound-guided puncture. The sheath size ranged from 4 F to 8 F. In 2 of 28 (7%) SFA punctures, a closure device was deployed compared with 43 of 171 (25%) CFA punctures. Six bleeding complications were noted in the CFA puncture group (6 of 171 [3.5%]), of which 2 required urgent operations (repair of a pseudoaneurysm and evacuation of retroperitoneal hematoma). In comparison, only one minor groin hematoma was noted in the SFA puncture group; this did not require any further treatment. No thromboembolic complications were associated with SFA puncture. ConclusionsPlanned antegrade SFA puncture under ultrasound guidance can be performed safely in selected cases with no added morbidity. Interventionalists should have a low threshold for considering antegrade SFA puncture as a first-line access site, especially in patients with a hostile groin.

Angiographic evaluation of a new technique for common femoral artery access: the inguinal ligament-guided

ObjectiveVarious techniques have been used to acquire common femoral artery (CFA) access which was proved to be safe with lower risk of complications in percutaneous catheterisation. In order to increase...

Femoral artery occlusion with a percutaneous arterial closure device after a routine coronary angiogram: a case report and literature review

Groin vessels are most commonly used to obtain vascular access for angiography because of their size and accessibility. Haemostasis at the puncture site can be achieved with manual compression alone or by using a vascular closure device. We highlight the case of a 68-year-old woman who developed acute claudication in the right leg after a routine diagnostic coronary angiogram when an Angio-Seal(™) device had been employed to close a relatively low arterial puncture. On exploring the common femoral artery, fragments of the device were found occluding the bifurcation. A patch angioplasty was carried out and the patient's claudicant symptoms improved. The Angio-Seal(™) device has a polylactide and polyglycolide polymer anchor, a collagen plug and a suture contained within a carrier system. Haemostasis is achieved by compressing the arterial puncture site between the anchor and the collagen plug. The manufacturer's recommended criterion for using the device safely permits its use only for common femoral artery punctures with an internal vessel diameter of 4mm. Anatomical confirmation of the puncture site and evidence of any arterial disease or stenosis in the artery is detected on fluoroscopy during the procedure. Recent meta-analyses have cast doubt on the assumption that vascular closure devices are superior to mechanical compression alone and serious complications do occur occasionally but are under-reported. Clinicians should be aware of the potentially serious problems that may occur when deciding to employ vascular closure devices, especially with an anatomically low puncture site.

Does ultrasound-guided lidocaine injection improve local anaesthesia before femoral artery catheterization?

To present the results of a prospective, randomized, single-centre study investigating local anaesthesia before percutaneous common femoral artery (CFA) puncture and catheterization with the use of ultrasound-guided injection of lidocaine versus standard infiltration by manual palpation. Patients scheduled to undergo diagnostic or therapeutic transfemoral catheter-based procedures gave informed consent and were randomized in two groups. In the first arm local anaesthesia with lidocaine hydrochloride 1% was performed under ultrasound guidance (group U/S), while in the second arm the standard method of manual artery palpation was applied (group M). In both groups, subsequent CFA catheterization was achieved under ultrasound guidance. The primary study endpoint was peri-procedural pain level evaluated with a visual-analogue scale (VAS score 0-10). Between January 2009 and 2010, 200 patients (161 men, mean age 63±12 years) were equally assigned to each group without any significant differences in baseline demographics. Patients in group U/S experienced significantly less pain during CFA catheterization in comparison with group M with a difference of three points in mean VAS score reported (1.6±1.6 versus 4.6±1.9, p<0.0001). In addition, significantly less volume of lidocaine was used in group U/S compared to group M (16±2.7 versus 19±0.8ml, p<0.001).Total vascular access time was similar in both groups (4.4±1.3 versus 4.5±1.3min). Overall complications included two small groin haematomas in each group. Ultrasound-guided local anaesthesia of the CFA prior to percutaneous transcatheter procedures is safe and achieves superior levels of analgesia with minimal patient pain and discomfort compared to the standard method of manual palpation.

Angio-Seal™ Evolution™ versus Manual Compression for Common Femoral Artery Puncture in Neurovascular Diagnostic Angiography : A Prospective, Non-Randomized Study

This prospective, non-randomized study compared the safety and efficacy of the Angio-Seal™ Evolution™ to that of manual compression for common femoral artery punctures in neurovascular diagnostic angiography. From June 2009 to September 2009, we performed 169 diagnostic trans-femoral cerebral angiographies, using either the Angio-Seal™ Evolution™ or manual compression to achieve hemostasis. We included 60 patients in this study, 30 in each group. We defined minor complications as those requiring no further treatment such as hematoma size less than 6 cm and bruise size less than 25 cm. Major complications were those requiring surgery of the femoral artery pseudoaneurysm and/or the second line increase of hospital stay even without further treatment. Mean time to hemostasis was 0.42±0.04 minutes for the angioseal and 15.83±1.63 minutes for manual compression (p<0.001). Overall complication rate did not differ between the 2 groups. After the patients were fully mobile, at 24 hours, the rate of onset of new complication differed significantly between the 2 groups (p=0.032). In the angioseal group, 5 (16.7%) of the 30 patients experienced the onset of a new complication after 24 hours, including 3 (60.0%) of the 5 who experienced major complications. The Angio-Seal™ Evolution™ is effective at decreasing mean time to hemostasis, like other closing devices. However, it may not be effective at producing early ambulation and discharge, compared to manual compression, because delayed complications may occur significantly after 24 hours.

Preventing vascular access site complications during interventional procedures

The common femoral artery is the most widely used route of access to the arterial system for coronary and peripheral percutaneous vascular interventions. This article addresses anatomical aspects relating to common femoral artery puncture, the choice of optimal puncture site and methods to increase the efficacy and safety of the common femoral artery puncture. Complications of vascular access relating to either manual compression or closure devices will be described. Tips and tricks to reduce the occurrence of vascular complications related to vascular access are discussed.

E0707 Totally percutaneous endovascular aortic repair

BackgroundsAortic diseases have been diagnosed and studied for centuries. In the current era, endovascular therapy with percutaneous stent-graft placement has become a viable therapeutic option and will surely improve with...

Efficacy and Safety of Antegrade Common Femoral Artery Access Closure Using the Angio-Seal Device: Experience With 1889 Interventions for Critical Limb Ischemia in Diabetic Patients

To report a retrospective evaluation of the 6-F Angio-Seal closure device in antegrade and retrograde common femoral artery (CFA) punctures during endovascular procedures in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). From January 2005 to March 2009, 2374 diabetic CLI patients underwent interventional procedures in the lower limbs at a single center under systemic anticoagulation (heparin 70 U/kg). In this population, 2016 patients (1184 men; mean age 69.6+/-9.1 years) had 2372 CFA punctures treated with either manual compression [205 punctures in 161 (8.0%) patients] or Angio-Seal deployment (2167 punctures in 1855 patients) and were eligible for this analysis. In the study cohort, there were 1889 antegrade CFA punctures closed with the device in 1626 (87.6%) patients compared to 278 retrograde punctures sealed in 229 (12.4%) patients. The complications from the antegrade CFA punctures were compared to those from retrograde closure and manual compression. The success rate for achieving hemostasis after antegrade and retrograde Angio-Seal placement was 97.9% and 97.8%, respectively. Major complications following antegrade Angio-Seal deployment, retrograde Angio-Seal deployment, and manual compression occurred in 20/1889 (1.1%), 5/278 (1.8%), and 4/205 (2.0%) cases, respectively. All complications developed within 24 hours of the procedure. No further complications were recorded in the 18-month follow-up (range 1-36). The overall complication rates after antegrade puncture closure, retrograde puncture closure, and manual compression at 30 days was 2.5%, 4.0%, and 4.9%, respectively (p = NS). This retrospective study shows that the 6-F Angio-Seal is a valuable and safe vascular closure device for percutaneous transfemoral antegrade access in diabetic patients undergoing interventional procedures for CLI.

Evaluation of the Optimal Site for Retrograde Common Femoral Arterial Puncture

Purpose: To determine the optimal skin site for retrograde common femoral arterial puncture based on the inguinal skin crease. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated CT arteriographic images of right groins in 200 patients. We measured the relative distances of the common femoral artery bifurcation and inguinal ligament from the inguinal skin crease, respectively. We calculated the rates of common femoral artery puncture at 1 mm intervals, above or below the inguinal skin crease. Results: The range in skin site where the rates of common femoral artery puncture were greater than 60%, 70%, and 80% were situated between 3 mm below to 27 mm above, 1 mm to 23 mm above, and 5 mm to 15 mm above the inguinal skin crease, respectively. The skin site of the highest puncture rate was 10 mm above inguinal skin crease (85.2%). Conclusion: The optimal skin site for retrograde common femoral artery puncture was above the inguinal skin crease, most optimally at 10 mm above the inguinal skin crease.

Common femoral artery access techniques: a review

The increasing burden of coronary artery disease has resulted in more percutaneous coronary artery interventions. The common femoral artery remains the most widely accepted site for percutaneous coronary artery access. Local access site, vascular complications remain a considerable source of morbidity during common femoral arterial puncture. This has prompted angiographers, over the years, to define various reliable landmarks and techniques to access the common femoral artery, in an attempt to minimize and avoid complications. In this discourse, we discuss the various techniques of obtaining common femoral arterial access, with their relative benefits and disadvantages. The literature supporting the various palpatory or radiographic landmark-guided methods is reviewed. There are limited data on the superiority of any individual method.

Total Percutaneous Aortic Repair: Midterm Outcomes

The purpose of this study was to examine the immediate and midterm outcomes of percutaneous endovascular repair of thoracic and abdominal aortic pathology. Between December 2003 and June 2005, 21 patients (mean age: 60.4 +/- 17.1 years; 15 males, 6 females) underwent endovascular stent-graft insertion for thoracic (n = 13) or abdominal aortic (n = 8) pathology. Preprocedural computed tomographic angiography (CTA) was performed to assess the suitability of aorto-iliac and common femoral artery (CFA) anatomy, including the degree of CFA calcification, for total percutaneous aortic stent-graft repair. Percutaneous access was used for the introduction of 18- to 26-Fr delivery devices. A 'preclose' closure technique using two Perclose suture devices (Perclose A-T; Abbott Vascular) was used in all cases. Data were prospectively collected. Each CFA puncture site was assessed via clinical examination and CTA at 1, 6, and 12 months, followed by annual review thereafter. Minimum follow-up was 36 months. Outcome measures evaluated were rates of technical success, conversion to open surgical repair, complications, and late incidence of arterial stenosis at the site of Perclose suture deployment. A total of 58 Perclose devices were used to close 29 femoral arteriotomies. Outer diameters of stent-graft delivery devices used were 18 Fr (n = 5), 20 Fr (n = 3), 22 Fr (n = 4), 24 Fr (n = 15), and 26 Fr (n = 2). Percutaneous closure was successful in 96.6% (28/29) of arteriotomies. Conversion to surgical repair was required at one access site (3.4%). Mean follow-up was 50 +/- 8 months. No late complications were observed. By CT criteria, no patient developed a >50% reduction in CFA caliber at the site of Perclose deployment during the study period. In conclusion, percutaneous aortic stent-graft insertion can be safely performed, with a low risk of both immediate and midterm access-related complications.

Safety and Effectiveness of Repeat Arterial Closure Using the AngioSeal Device in Patients with Hepatic Malignancy

To retrospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the use of the AngioSeal device for repeat arterial closure in patients with hepatic malignancy. A retrospective analysis of patients with hepatic malignancy who had undergone repeated arterial closure with the AngioSeal device was performed. All charts for patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization or TheraSphere radioembolization were reviewed for the method of hemostasis and the number of arterial closures. A total of 53 patients (58.5% men, 41.5% women; mean age, 58.7 years) had repeat AngioSeal arterial puncture closure after chemoembolization or TheraSphere treatment. Percutaneous closure of the common femoral artery with the AngioSeal device was performed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. The patients were examined for complications on follow-up. Effectiveness was defined by the ability to obtain satisfactory hemostasis. Safety was assessed by the absence of groin complications and by vessel patency on follow-up angiograms of the puncture site obtained at subsequent liver-directed therapy sessions. Fifty-three patients in this study group had a total of 203 common femoral artery punctures. There were a total of 161 closures with the AngioSeal device (79.3%): 58 (36%) single closures and 103 (64.0%) repeat closures. Of the 161 attempts at AngioSeal closure, there was one closure failure in the single-puncture group, yielding a success rate of 98.3%; and one closure failure in the repeat-puncture group, yielding a success rate of 99%. In these two patients, hemostasis was achieved with traditional manual compression without the need for any other device, and no complications were noted. The overall success rate of AngioSeal device closure was 98.7%. The repeat use of the AngioSeal closure device is safe and effective in patients with hepatic malignancy undergoing regional oncologic interventional procedures.

Comparison of Arterial Closure Devices in Antegrade and Retrograde Punctures

To compare the efficacy, primary failure rates, and complications for the Angio-Seal and Perclose closure devices in antegrade and retrograde common femoral artery (CFA) punctures during peripheral angioplasty procedures. A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted between April 2002 and June 2006 of all patients who had a CFA puncture and no other intervention planned during the same admission. Patients undergoing thrombolysis were excluded. Of 215 punctures in 191 patients, 123 closures in 97 patients (82 men; mean age 69.5 +/-10.4 years, range 41-93) were eligible for analysis. Of these, 49 punctures were antegrade and 74 were retrograde. An Angio-Seal device was used in 40 closures, while 83 punctures were closed with a Perclose device. Deployment outcomes and complications were compared between devices for each puncture direction and between antegrade and retrograde punctures. Seventy-eight (63.4%) of the 123 closures reached the primary endpoint of complication-free progress to discharge, comprising 30 (61.2%) of the 49 antegrade closures and 48 (64.9%) of the 74 retrograde closures. There was no significant difference between the devices for the primary endpoint. Twenty-two (17.9%) attempted closures failed. Forty-one (33.3%) closures had a complication after the procedure, but none required further intervention. In antegrade closures, Angio-Seal had a significantly lower rate of primary failure (11.1% versus 38.7% for Perclose, p = 0.038). Antegrade closures had a higher rate of primary failure (p<0.01); however, this did not translate into any significant differences in postprocedural complications. No significant differences in primary failure or complication rates were found between the devices when used in retrograde punctures. Angio-Seal had a lower rate of primary failure than Perclose in antegrade puncture closures. We believe this reinforces the need for larger studies to compare closure devices in antegrade punctures.

Clip-based arterial haemostasis after antegrade common femoral artery puncture

Background Given the frequent involvement of infra-popliteal arteries, an ipsilateral antegrade common femoral artery puncture (ACFAP) is usually preferred to a contralateral retrograde femoral access for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Because of the frequent difficulty to get a sufficient manual pressure on the puncture site, ACFAP is burdened by a high number of bleeding local complications, including retroperitoneal haematoma. We report a series of patients who consecutively received a clip-based arterial closure device after ACFAP and ipsilateral PTA for CLI. Methods Thirty patients (73 ± 6 years; 18 men; 100% diabetes) admitted to our hospital because of CLI consecutively underwent peripheral PTA after an ACFAP and received a clip-based arterial closure device. Time to haemostasis was defined as the interval elapsed between clip deployment and first observed haemostasis. All patients were mobilized after 6 h. Follow-up was 30 days. Results All patients were on double anti-platelet therapy. At the end of the procedure, Activation Clotting Time was 226 ± 37 s. Procedural success in delivering the clip was 100%. Time to haemostasis was 21 ± 19 s. No major local vascular complications and in particular no retroperitoneal bleeding were documented. All patients could be discharged within the following 3 days. No major complications were noted during a 30 days follow-up. Conclusions The use of a clip-based arterial closure device after ACFAP for peripheral PTA in CLI seems to be safe and effective.

Efficacy and Safety of the Angioseal Vascular Closure Device Post Antegrade Puncture

In this study, the efficacy and safety of the Angioseal vascular closure device post antegrade puncture of the common femoral artery (CFA) for lower limb vascular interventional procedures are evaluated. A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 60 consecutive patients who were referred for interventional procedures in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) or popliteal artery (popl. art.) was performed. Antegrade puncture was successfully performed in 58 of 60 patients (96.6%). Indications included right SFA angioplasty (n = 35), left SFA angioplasty (n = 17), right popl. art. angioplasty (n = 5), and left popl. art. angioplasty (n = 1). Hemostasis was achieved by, on an intention-to-treat basis, the Angioseal vascular closure device in 46 patients and manual compression in 12 patients. Manual compression was used instead of Angioseal because of severe calcified arterial wall plaques (n = 7), failed deployment of the Angioseal (n = 4), and left SFA dissection (n = 1). There were no major recorded complications in the Angioseal group despite the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications. Twenty-three (50%) of the patients in the Angioseal group were discharged within 24 h. Thirty-seven of the 46 patients who received an Angioseal device had undergone a previous ipsilateral CFA puncture (time range, 2 days to 56 months; mean, 6.2 months). Nine of these patients had undergone ipsilateral Angioseal deployment in the previous 3 months. We conclude that the Angioseal vascular closure device is a safe and efficient means of achieving hemostasis post antegrade puncture.

Embolization of Spontaneous Hemarthrosis Post Total Knee Replacement

Spontaneous nonhemophiliac hemarthrosis is an unusual entity, which has been little described. We present three cases of spontaneous recurrent hemarthrosis post total knee replacement (TKR) and successful management with embolization. Three male patients were referred to our service for angiography and treatment of recurrent hemarthrosis post TKR. In all three patients antegrade ipsilateral common femoral artery punctures and selective angiography of the geniculate branches were performed with a microcatheter. Abnormal vasculature was noted in all cases. Subsequent embolization was performed with Contour (Boston Scientific, Target Vascular, Cork, Ireland) embolization particles (150-250 and 250-355 microm) in two patients and microcoils in the third (TornadoR; Cook Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA). Technical success was 100%. One patient had a recurrence of symptoms requiring a repeat procedure 6 months later. No complications were encountered. Selective angiography and particle embolization is an effective technique for management of this unusual but problematic postoperative sequelae.

Subintimal Angioplasty of an Aortoiliac Occlusion:Re-Entry Site Created Using a Transseptal Needle Under Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance

To report the use of a transseptal needle to cross the intimal flap in subintimal angioplasty of a flush aortoiliac occlusion via a retrograde approach. A 53-year-old man with claudication of the right lower limb and an angiographically documented right aortoiliac occlusion was treated with subintimal angioplasty via an ipsilateral retrograde approach. After puncture of the right common femoral artery, a 0.035-inch hydrophilic guidewire was advanced via the subintimal space toward the aortic true lumen, but the wire could not re-enter the true lumen. A transseptal needle was used to puncture the intimal flap under intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance. Angioplasty/stenting was performed successfully, and the patient's symptoms were relieved. Computed tomography at 15 months revealed patent stents. The use of a transseptal needle to cross the intimal flap in total aortoiliac occlusions is technically feasible under IVUS guidance and enables successful angioplasty.