Objectives: Cilnidipine is the novel calcium antagonist accompanied with L-type and N-type calcium channel blocking function used for the treatment of hypertension. The aim of present work is formulate and evaluate a press coated pulsatile release tablets of Cilnidipine using an admixture of hydrophilic polymers in order to achieve a predetermined lag time for chronopharmacotherapy of Hypertension. Methods: The pulsatile drug release tablets were prepared by compression coating method. The tablets prepared were evaluated for different properties like bulk density, tapped density, angle of repose and Carr’s index), hardness, thickness, weight variation, friability, drug content uniformity and in vitro drug release study. Results: All formulations have shown good flow properties. The hardness of tablets ranged between 4.93±0.08 to 5.96±0.11 kg/cm2, percentage friability of tablets ranged between 0.68±0.21 to 0.82±0.06. Maximum drug release was found to be 94.39%. Conclusion: Study concludes that the prepared pulsatile drug delivery system can be considered as one of the promising formulation technique for delivery of Cilnidipine. Formulation of batch CPT1was found to be optimum. Peer Review History: Received 15 September 2017; Revised 28 October; Accepted 5 November, Available online 15 November 2017 Academic Editor: Ahmad Najib, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia, ahmad.najib@umi.ac.id UJPR follows the most transparent and toughest ‘Advanced OPEN peer review’ system. The identity of the authors and, reviewers will be known to each other. This transparent process will help to eradicate any possible malicious/purposeful interference by any person (publishing staff, reviewer, editor, author, etc) during peer review. As a result of this unique system, all reviewers will get their due recognition and respect, once their names are published in the papers. We expect that, by publishing peer review reports with published papers, will be helpful to many authors for drafting their article according to the specifications. Auhors will remove any error of their article and they will improve their article(s) according to the previous reports displayed with published article(s). The main purpose of it is ‘to improve the quality of a candidate manuscript’. Our reviewers check the ‘strength and weakness of a manuscript honestly’. There will increase in the perfection, and transparency. Received file: Reviewer's Comments: Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 4.5/10 Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 7.0/10 Reviewer(s) detail: Dr. Viney Chawla, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Sadiq Road, Faridkot-Punjab 151203, drvineychawla@gmail.com Dr. Barkat Ali Khan, Kampala International University , Uganda, barki.gold@gmail.com
Read full abstract