All too often, when physiologists and clinicians speak of the ‘the heart’, they are referring to the left side of the heart. A PubMed search completed in March 2021 reveals nearly an equal number of publications about the left and right ventricles (136,338 vs. 121,010, respectively). Nonetheless, in physiology and medical education, we teach cardiovascular physiology from the perspective of the left ventricle, with a nod to the fact that the right ventricle is structurally different and experiences different systolic pressures. Our references to ‘cardiac physiology’ when we mean ‘left ventricular physiology’ might perpetuate the misconception that the physiology we discover in the left ventricle is directly translatable to the right. It should not be surprising that the right and left ventricles respond differently to stress. They have different embryonic origins and patterns of development (Tan & Lewandowski, 2020). They are, indeed, anatomically dissimilar throughout the lifespan, have different metabolic requirements and supply structurally different vasculatures. In this issue of Experimental Physiology, Silva et al. (2021) reinforce the importance of evaluating the right and left ventricular responses to stress separately in a model of moderate, short-term alcohol consumption. The major finding of this work is that only 4 weeks of alcohol consumption caused remodelling of the pulmonary vascular bed, increased right ventricular systolic pressure and right ventricular hypertrophy. The right ventricle and pulmonary vasculature both showed increased protein expression related to tissue remodelling and evidence of oxidative stress. In contrast, the left ventricle was largely unaffected. As most provocative papers do, this manuscript raises as many questions as it answers. Is right ventricular hypertrophy the result of increased pulmonary vascular resistance in this model, or does ethanol drive parallel responses in the ventricle and vasculature that result in remodelling? Given that experiments were performed in male rats only, we wonder about sex differences (Shansky & Murphy, 2021). There is sexual dimorphism in the development of pulmonary hypertension (Zemskova et al., 2020). Male patients with pulmonary hypertension have more markers of necrosis and inflammation in the arterial wall, whereas female patients display more markers of apoptosis resistance and proliferation. Would these sex differences also be evident in this model? Given our own interests in early life events and cardiopulmonary development (Bates et al., 2020), we also cannot help but wonder about the impact of age on these intriguing differences between the right and left ventricular responses to ethanol. Would early life exposure have a durable impact on the development of the right ventricle? Are the effects of ethanol reversible in this model? What are the consequences of chronic exposure, and which ventricle fails first? As the authors point out in their discussion, we now have data for only two conditions at single time points: their moderate exposure model, in which the effects on the right ventricle precede the left ventricle, and an excessive consumption model, in which both the right and left ventricles are impaired. This paper made us wonder about the longitudinal impact of consumption on right and left ventricular function. Would we have asked the same number of questions if the authors had focused only on the right ventricle and had not also examined the left ventricle? This paper highlights the importance of future exploration and continued rationale to study the right heart as an organ that responds to stresses in a different manner from the left heart. We look forward to continued research in this area and thought-provoking discussions that arise when groups are careful to evaluate physiological responses in both the right and left ventricles. None declared.
Read full abstract