Screening For Pulmonary Disease Research Articles

Development and application of a rapid research prioritisation process for identifying health research priorities in low- and middle-income countries: the RAPID-RP stakeholder analysis

Background Health research should be locally prioritised by key stakeholders to ensure the best use of available resources, maximum likelihood of research leading to uptake into policy and practice and relevance to the needs of the potential beneficiaries. Established approaches are complex and time-consuming, therefore not feasible in settings where prioritisation is uncommon and time is limited. Objectives We developed and applied a simple, rapid research prioritisation approach to elicit the views of stakeholders. Setting and participants This was a collaboration between a multidisciplinary group of United Kingdom academics, the International Primary Care Respiratory Group and primary care respiratory researchers from four low- and middle-income countries: Brazil, China, Georgia and North Macedonia. We identified 10 topics for research prioritisation through workshops involving 26 topic, methods and local context experts, and considering the programme remit, to develop, adapt and evaluate culturally appropriate community and behavioural approaches for the prevention, early identification and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care. Design and methods In each setting, local research teams convened stakeholder groups of patients, clinicians, managers/policymakers and researchers. Each group briefly discussed the 10 potential research study topics. Discussions were facilitated using short vignettes for each topic, and participants were encouraged to consider importance, feasibility and equity. Individual participants rated each study on a three-point traffic light scale, then ranked them following a facilitated discussion on what drove the ratings. The research team rated then ranked each study considering three further criteria (international novelty, potential for future funding and capacity building on a five-point scale). Within each group, ranks were summed to create a final rank order which guided our research programme and provided insight for future projects. Results In each country, four to eight members attended each stakeholder group. The engagement process was completed in less than 4 hours and feedback was very positive, especially from patients who valued the opportunity to contribute to research decision-making about their own condition. Ranking varied to some extent between groups and settings, but there was consistency around topics that were prioritised among the top five in all groups (identifying efficient chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening test strategies, evaluations of lung age to aid smoking cessation, feasibility of locally adapted pulmonary rehabilitation, clinical education for primary care staff) and study topics that consistently ranked low (use of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation, weight management to improve chronic obstructive pulmonary disease symptoms and handwashing to reduce infections). Limitations Despite attempts to maximise inclusivity and diversity, stakeholders were mainly limited geographically to the centres where researchers were based, potentially limiting generalisability of views across the countries. Facilitator styles varied and may have influenced some of the discussions and potentially the ranking. Conclusions Despite some limitations, we demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of the rapid research prioritisation approach stakeholder analysis for identifying locally relevant research priorities in low- and middle-income country settings. Future work Further validation is needed for aspects of the process. We have identified some useful lessons from our evaluation of the process, to facilitate future use of this approach. Funding This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Global Health Research programme as award number 16/137/95.

Feasibility and performance of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population screener and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening questionnaire in a Chinese physical examination center.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects up to 13% of the Chinese population, though it is under diagnosed throughout China. Screening among asymptomatic individual as part of routine health checks in China can facilitate early diagnosis and intervention to prevent disease progress. The COPD Population Screener (COPD-PS) or COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ) has yet to be applied in Chinese physical examination centers (PECs) for COPD screening, and their feasibility and effectiveness should be clarified before full-scale implementation. This study is the first to apply the COPD-PS and COPD-SQ in a public hospital PEC in China to assess their feasibility and effectiveness and to identify their optimal cutoff values. People aged ≥40 years who attended the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University PECs from September 2021 to December 2022 were asked to complete the COPD-PS and COPD-SQ and to undergo spirometry. The optimal cutoff values of the two questionnaires at the maximal Youden index were found, and the sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Data from 198 participants were analyzed; mean [standard deviation (SD)] age of patients was 63.52 (10.94) years. Twenty-five participants (12.63%) were diagnosed with COPD. The number of COPD patients classified as Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades 1 to 4 were 8, 12, 4, and 1, respectively. The area under the curves (AUCs) of the COPD-PS and COPD-SQ were 0.730 and 0.738, respectively. The optimal COPD-PS cutoff value of 4 points corresponded to a sensitivity of 72.00% and a specificity of 60.10%. The COPD-SQ optimal cutoff value of 15 points corresponded to a sensitivity of 76.00% and a specificity of 63.60%. Applying the COPD-PS and COPD-SQ in Chinese PECs is feasible, cost-effective and effective. COPD-PS and COPD-SQ can facilitate the early diagnosis of COPD, and whether they can improve the participants' quality of life would benefit a further study. It is recommended that the COPD-PS or COPD-SQ questionnaires be added to the screening of the physical examination program in PECs as part of health checks for people over 40 years old.

Comparative Study on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Tools in Primary Healthcare Institutions in Beijing, China.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has a high incidence rate in China, but the diagnosis rate remains insufficient. This study aimed to explore and compare COPD screening tools for primary healthcare institutions in China. Exploring COPD Screening Tools and Their Combined Use for Primary Healthcare Institutions in China. From September 2022 to March 2023, a screening for COPD was conducted among residents aged 35 years and above in primary healthcare institutions in Beijing, China. The screening involved the use of the CAPTURE scale, COPD-SQ scale, and peak expiratory flow rate test. Any positive results from these screening tests were followed by further pulmonary function testing to confirm the diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for each screening tool alone and in combination. A total of 986 individuals completed the screening tests. The positive rates for the CAPTURE scale, COPD-SQ scale, and peak flow meter screening were 41.78%, 29.11%, and 52.03%, respectively. Of the participants, 166 (24.09%) underwent pulmonary function tests, with an average age of 61.69±13.68 years. The peak flow meter screening showed the highest sensitivity (83.78%) when used alone, while the COPD-SQ scale exhibited the best specificity (59.69%), positive predictive value (31.58%), and negative predictive value (58.56%). Significant differences (P<0.05) were observed between any two of the three screening tools. Among the combinations, the peak flow meter screening + COPD-SQ scale showed the highest accuracy, with a Youden index of 0.277 and an AUC of 0.638. There is variation in the accuracy of existing screening tools for COPD when used alone. For primary healthcare institutions, the optimal COPD screening tool is the combination of peak flow meter screening and the COPD-SQ questionnaire. If limited by screening equipment conditions, the COPD-SQ questionnaire can be used alone for screening.

EE114 Cost-Utility Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Combined With Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening

The cost-effectiveness of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer depends on contextual factors and the target screening program. Combined LDCT screening for the Big-3 diseases (lung cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)) could potentially increase health benefits at marginal additional costs. This study aims to estimate the cost-utility of Big-3 screening compared to usual care (no-screening).

Proactive Electronic Visits for Smoking Cessation and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening in Primary Care: Randomized Controlled Trial of Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy.

BackgroundMost smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have not yet been diagnosed, a statistic that has remained unchanged for over two decades. A dual-focused telehealth intervention that promotes smoking cessation, while also facilitating COPD screening, could help address national priorities to improve the diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and management of COPD. The purpose of this study was to preliminarily evaluate an integrated asynchronous smoking cessation and COPD screening e-visit (electronic visit) that could be delivered proactively to adult smokers at risk for COPD, who are treated within primary care.ObjectiveThe aims of this study were (1) to examine e-visit feasibility and acceptability, particularly as compared to in-lab diagnostic pulmonary function testing (PFT), and (2) to examine the efficacy of smoking cessation e-visits relative to treatment as usual (TAU), all within primary care.MethodsIn a randomized clinical trial, 125 primary care patients who smoke were randomized 2:1 to receive either proactive e-visits or TAU. Participants randomized to the e-visit condition were screened for COPD symptoms via the COPD Assessment in Primary Care to Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk (CAPTURE). Those with scores ≥2 were invited to complete both home spirometry and in-lab PFTs, in addition to two smoking cessation e-visits. Smoking cessation e-visits assessed smoking history and motivation to quit and included completion of an algorithm to determine the best Food and Drug Administration–approved cessation medication to prescribe. Primary outcomes included measures related to (1) e-visit acceptability, feasibility, and treatment metrics; (2) smoking cessation outcomes (cessation medication use, 24-hour quit attempts, smoking reduction ≥50%, self-reported abstinence, and biochemically confirmed abstinence); and (3) COPD screening outcomes.ResultsOf 85 participants assigned to the e-visits, 64 (75.3%) were invited to complete home spirometry and in-lab PFTs based on CAPTURE. Among those eligible for spirometry, 76.6% (49/64) completed home spirometry, and 35.9% (23/64) completed in-lab PFTs. At 1 month, all cessation outcomes favored the e-visit, with a significant effect for cessation medication use (odds ratio [OR]=3.22). At 3 months, all cessation outcomes except for 24-hour quit attempts favored the e-visit, with significant effects for cessation medication use (OR=3.96) and smoking reduction (OR=3.09).ConclusionsA proactive, asynchronous e-visit for smoking cessation and COPD screening may offer a feasible, efficacious approach for broad interventions within primary care.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04155073; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04155073

Changes in use of low-value services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant disruption, then recovery, of health care services use. Prior research has not examined the relative rates of resumption of high-value and low-value care. We examined the use of 6 common low-value services that received a D grade from the US Preventive Services Task Force compared with clinically comparable high-value services in a large commercially insured population nationwide from before the pandemic to April 1, 2021. We found that, overall, low-value services and high-value services were disrupted similarly. In aggregate, low-value care declined to 56.2% and high-value care to 53.2% in the initial month of the pandemic (April 2020) relative to baseline (number of visits in 2019 normalized by relevant enrolled population), then rebounded to 83.1% of baseline for low-value services and 95.0% of baseline for high-value services by January 2021. Substantial heterogeneity appeared across clinical contexts, such as prostate cancer screening for men 70 years and older rebounding to 111.8% of baseline and asymptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening remaining at 38.5% of baseline in January 2021. This suggests that although, on average, resuming lower-value services may have been perceived to be a lesser priority by providers and patients, the pandemic may have had heterogeneous effects on consumer and provider decision-making along the dimension of clinical value. This enhances our understanding of how disruptions affect the relationship between clinical value and usage of different services and suggests the need for more targeted interventions to reduce low-value care.

Accuracy of Six Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Questionnaires in the Chinese Population.

PurposeChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is under diagnosis in China. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of six COPD screening questionnaires for the early detection of COPD.Patients and MethodsWe recruited patients aged ≥35 years, presenting at the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University in 2021. All participants completed the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ), Revised COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (Revised-CDQ), COPD Population Screener (COPD-PS), COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ), COPD Assessment in Primary Care to Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk (CAPTURE), and Lung Function Questionnaire (LFQ). The patients underwent spirometry testing with further bronchodilator testing for those with FEV1/FVC values of <0.70. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were drawn for each questionnaire. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive (PPV), negative predictive (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) values of the optimal cut-off and previously reported scores were estimated and compared.ResultsOf 909 patients who completed the six screening questionnaires and spirometry testing, 330 patients were newly diagnosed with COPD. AUC values for the LFQ, Revised CDQ, COPD-PS, CDQ, COPD-SQ, and CAPTURE were 0.785 (95% confidence interval: 0.752–0.812), 0.762 (0.727–0.795), 0.745 (0.707–0.778), 0.731 (0.695–0.762), 0.703 (0.671–0.734), and 0.667 (0.635–0.702), respectively. The optimal cut-off scores for CDQ, Revised-CDQ, COPD-PS, COPD-SQ, CAPTURE, and LFQ were: 19, 19, 5, 17, 3, and 16 points, respectively. Compared with the previously recommended values, the present cut-off values for the CAPTURE and LFQ had better screening accuracy. The LFQ performed better than the CDQ, COPD-SQ, or CAPTURE. The Revised CDQ performed better than CAPTURE or COPD-SQ. The COPD-PS performed better than CAPTURE.ConclusionAll six questionnaires can discriminate between subjects with or without COPD. The LFQ performed particularly well. The CAPTURE and LFQ scores of 3 and 16 have better screening accuracy than the scores previously reported.

Discriminative Accuracy of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Instruments in 3 Low- and Middle-Income Country Settings

Most of the global morbidity and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) occurs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with significant economic effects. To assess the discriminative accuracy of 3 instruments using questionnaires and peak expiratory flow (PEF) to screen for COPD in 3 LMIC settings. A cross-sectional analysis of discriminative accuracy, conducted between January 2018 and March 2020 in semiurban Bhaktapur, Nepal; urban Lima, Peru; and rural Nakaseke, Uganda, using a random age- and sex-stratified sample of the population 40 years or older. Three screening tools, the COPD Assessment in Primary Care to Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk (CAPTURE; range, 0-6; high risk indicated by a score of 5 or more or score 2-5 with low PEF [<250 L/min for females and <350 L/min for males]), the COPD in LMICs Assessment questionnaire (COLA-6; range, 0-5; high risk indicated by a score of 4 or more), and the Lung Function Questionnaire (LFQ; range, 0-25; high risk indicated by a score of 18 or less) were assessed against a reference standard diagnosis of COPD using quality-assured postbronchodilator spirometry. CAPTURE and COLA-6 include a measure of PEF. The primary outcome was discriminative accuracy of the tools in identifying COPD as measured by area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) with 95% CIs. Secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Among 10 709 adults who consented to participate in the study (mean age, 56.3 years (SD, 11.7); 50% female), 35% had ever smoked, and 30% were currently exposed to biomass smoke. The unweighted prevalence of COPD at the 3 sites was 18.2% (642/3534 participants) in Nepal, 2.7% (97/3550) in Peru, and 7.4% (264/3580) in Uganda. Among 1000 COPD cases, 49.3% had clinically important disease (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease classification B-D), 16.4% had severe or very severe airflow obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 second <50% predicted), and 95.3% of cases were previously undiagnosed. The AUC for the screening instruments ranged from 0.717 (95% CI, 0.677-0.774) for LFQ in Peru to 0.791 (95% CI, 0.770-0.809) for COLA-6 in Nepal. The sensitivity ranged from 34.8% (95% CI, 25.3%-45.2%) for COLA-6 in Nepal to 64.2% (95% CI, 60.3%-67.9%) for CAPTURE in Nepal. The mean time to administer the instruments was 7.6 minutes (SD 1.11), and data completeness was 99.5%. This study demonstrated that screening instruments for COPD were feasible to administer in 3 low- and middle-income settings. Further research is needed to assess instrument performance in other low- and middle-income settings and to determine whether implementation is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening questionnaire and pulmonary function test among migrant workers exposed to dust

Objective: To analyze the application of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Screening Questionnaire and pulmonary function test in dust-exposed migrant workers. Methods: In May 2019, 149 cases of dust exposed migrant workers were selected as the research subjects through the free clinic in the countryside. COPD Screening Questionnaire and lung function test were carried out to analyze the high-risk groups and the influencing factors of positive pulmonary function test results. Results: Among 149 cases of dust-exposed migrant workers, 107 (71.8%) were positive for questionnaire screening, 73 (49.0%) were positive for pulmonary function test, 75 (50.3%) were diagnosed with coal worker's pneumoconiosis, and 101 (67.8%) were diagnosed with lung function injury. The positive rate of pulmonary function of migrant workers with positive questionnaire screening results was significantly higher than that of those with negative results (P<0.05) . The results of multivariate analysis showed that compared with non-pneumoconiosis, the risk of positive pulmonary function test results was higher in dust-exposed migrant workers with stage Ⅲ pneumoconiosis (OR=16.462, 95%CI: 3.390-79.946; P<0.01) . Compared with non-smoking, the risks of positive pulmonary function test results of dust-exposed migrant workers with smoking index of 11-20 package years and >20 package years were higher (OR=19.814, 95%CI: 3.854-101.883; OR=9.733, 95%CI: 2.310-41.008; P<0.01) . Conclusion: The risk of COPD in dust-exposed migrant workers is high, so we should strengthen the early examination of the high pneumoconiosis stage and smoking population. The screening questionnaire can better screen out the high-risk groups of COPD, and it can be used as a basic screening tool.

Pulmonary disease screening tools for chronic obstructive in primary care setting

Pulmonary disease screening tools for chronic obstructive in primary care setting

Hidden morbidity: The results of a collaborative community chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening initiative.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often goes unrecognised resulting in people living with the disease without a diagnosis. We investigated the characteristics, symptom burden and flow of participants in a community COPD screening initiative. Screening was undertaken during four events over 2-weeks. Participants completed symptom questionnaires and FEV-1/FEV-6 measurement. Patients with FEV-1 <80% predicted or FEV-1 ≥ 80% predicted and FEV-1/FEV-6 <0.72 were considered 'screen-positive' and invited to attend a 1-stop diagnostic clinic. Two hundred and fifty-seven individuals participated (mean ± SD age 58 ± 16, 24% current smokers). Seventy-seven were screen-positive with 27 ultimately attending a 1-stop clinic and 18 having confirmed COPD. The CAT score of participants with COPD was 19.3 ± 11.4. Two-thirds had moderate airflow obstruction on spirometry. The diagnosis rate in this screening initiative was comparable to trials of systematic case finding. Further research is required to explore the broader clinical impact of COPD screening.

A multicenter family practitioners' research on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease screening using the COPD Assessment Test.

Spirometry is known to be a gold standard for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is an eight-item questionnaire currently in use to evaluate patients with COPD. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate if CAT is an adequate tool for screening COPD. In total, 600 persons aging ⩾40 years old were randomly selected from three different family practice units located in the city center. CAT was asked to the participants and a spirometry was used to assess pulmonary obstruction. Pulmonary obstruction was defined as forced expiratory volume in first second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC)<70% and then COPD diagnosis was confirmed with the reversibility test. The relationship between CAT results and pulmonary function test values was evaluated. In this sampling, the prevalence of COPD was 4.2%. Reliability of the CAT in the study group was acceptable (Cronbach's α: 0.84). The CAT scores was significantly higher in patients with COPD (P<0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between CAT score and FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC ratio (r=-0.31, P<0.001; r=-0.26, P<0.001; r=0.18, P=0.001). Among smokers, phlegm was the predominating symptom (P=0.01). Sensitivity of CAT was 66.67% and its specificity was 75.15% to determine COPD. CAT is a reliable questionnaire and there is an apparent relationship between the total CAT scores and COPD. However, CAT's ability to screen COPD is limited since it may miss the symptom-free cases.

Public spirometry campaign in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening - hope or hype?

Underdiagnosis of COPD seems to be a relevant clinical and social problem. We hypothesized that active public spirometry campaign may help identify subjects with airflow limitation consistent with COPD. The aim of the study was (1) to evaluate the willingness of random smokers to undergo public spirometry, (2) to assess the ability to obtain an acceptable quality spirometry during a public campaign, and (3) to assess the relationships between the presence and severity of respiratory symptoms and readiness to undergo spirometry. Pedestrians aged > 40 years and a smoking history >10 pack-years were recruited by medical students to fill a questionnaire and perform spirometry. Those with obstructive or borderline ventilatory insuffciency were invited and encouraged to undergo stationary spirometry in a pulmonary outpatient department. Nine hundred and five subjects meeting the inclusion criteria were invited to the study. Only 178 subjects agreed to complete the questionnaire and undergo spirometry. Airway obstruction and borderline spirometry result (classified as possible airway obstruction) were found in 22 and 37 subjects, respectively. Of these, only 15 patients attended follow-up visit to verify public spirometry results. Extrapolation of the limited data showed the incidence of newly diagnosed airway obstruction as 10.7%. Public spirometry campaign does not seem to be an effective way of COPD screening. Smokers are reluctant to undergo complimentary spirometry even in the presence of pronounced respiratory symptoms. Our observations may be helpful in elaborating future screening programs for COPD.

Development and validation of the Salzburg COPD-screening questionnaire (SCSQ): a questionnaire development and validation study

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence rates are still high. However, the majority of subjects are not diagnosed. Strategies have to be implemented to overcome the problem of under-diagnosis. Questionnaires could be used to pre-select subjects for spirometry and thereby help reducing under-diagnosis. We report a brief, simple, self-administrable and validated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire to increase the pre-test probability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis in subjects undergoing confirmatory spirometry. In 2005, we completed the Austrian Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease-study in 1258 subjects aged >40 years. Post-bronchodilator spirometry was performed, and non-reversible airflow limitation defined by FEV1/FVC ratio below the lower limit of normal. Questions from the Salzburg chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening-questionnaire were selected using a logistic regression model, and risk scores were based on regression-coefficients. A training sub-sample (n = 800) was used to create the score, and a test sub-sample (n = 458) was used to test it. In 2008, an external validation study was done, using the same protocol in 775 patients from primary care. The Salzburg chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening questionnaire was composed of items related to “breathing problems”, “wheeze”, “cough”, “limitation of physical activity”, and “smoking”. At the >=2 points cut-off of the Salzburg chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening questionnaire, sensitivity was 69.1% [95%CI: 56.6%; 79.5%], specificity 60.0% [95%CI: 54.9%; 64.9%], the positive predictive value 23.2% [95%CI: 17.7%; 29.7%] and the negative predictive value 91.8% [95%CI: 87.5%; 95.7%] to detect post bronchodilator airflow limitation. The external validation study in primary care confirmed these findings. The Salzburg chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening questionnaire was derived from the highly standardized Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study. This validated and easy to use questionnaire can help to increase the efficiency of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease case-finding.

Survey and evaluation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening questionnaire suitable to the Chinese BMI classification

Objective To evaluate the validity of a questionnaire for Chinese body mass index (BMI) classification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) community screening. Methods A sample of 629 subjects (254 in COPD group, 375 in non-COPD group) were enrolled to undergo pulmonary function test (PFT) at our hospital. All subjects complete a postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio of <70% defined as COPD. A screening questionnaire was completed after PFT. And the data were collected and the measurement indices validated with the Chinese BMI classification. Results Area under curve-receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) of original screening questionnaire was 0.901 and the best cut-off value 19.5(20) points. Modifying BMI, the measurement indices of the questionnaire were better than before. AUC-ROC of the modified questionnaire was 0.916. The cut-off value was 16.5(17) points. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, Youden's index, positive predictive value, negative predictive value were 88.2%, 77.3%, 3.89, 0.15, 0.655, 72.5% and 90.6% respectively. Conclusions The item of BMI in COPD screening questionnaire is modified according to the Chinese BMI classification standard. And a cut-off value of 17 points is recommended. And it enhances the ability of questionnaire screening. Key words: Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive; Questionnaires; Body Mass Index

Development and validation of a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening questionnaire in China

To develop a brief, reliable screening questionnaire for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for use in primary care settings. We developed a COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ) using data collected from 19,800 subjects aged ≥40 years obtained from an epidemiological study of COPD in China in 2002 (Phase I). A stepwise logistic regression method was adopted for item reduction and scoring. We then assessed the COPD-SQ through a cross-sectional study (Phase II) among 3231 subjects aged ≥40 years. The final COPD-SQ consisted of seven items: age, smoking pack-years, body mass index, cough, dyspnoea, family history of respiratory diseases and exposure to biomass smoke from cooking. Using the questionnaire to screen for COPD in Phase II, we obtained high classification accuracy with an area under the curve of 0.812 (95%CI 0.786-0.838). The sensitivity, specificity and correct classification rates for COPD diagnosis were respectively 60.6%, 85.2% and 82.7% at a cut-off score of 16. The COPD-SQ can be used in first-level screening for COPD.

Pharmacist-managed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening in a community setting

To implement a spirometry-based chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) screening in a community pharmacy chain, determine whether pharmacists can accurately perform spirometry screenings and interpret results, and determine whether performing screenings improved enrollment in smoking cessation programs. Prospective study. Kroger pharmacies in the Cincinnati-Dayton Kroger Marketing Area and off-site screening events in Cincinnati, OH, from March to December 2010. Consenting individuals older than 35 years who met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Specially trained community pharmacists administered a validated COPD screening questionnaire and performed spirometry. The results were interpreted, given to the patient, and faxed to the primary care physician. Any patient who was currently smoking was offered smoking cessation counseling. Spirometry technical quality and interpretation accuracy, screening questionnaire scores in relationship to spirometry results, number of patients enrolled in smoking cessation programs. Of the 185 patients, 10 were excluded due to inability to perform spirometry. After review, 174 (99%) of the spirometries were judged acceptable and 157 (90%) demonstrated reproducible results. The mean (+/-SD) score on the COPD Population Screener questionnaire was 2.3 ± 1.6 (range 0-8). Airflow limitation (defined as forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity < lower limit of normal) was detected in 16 (9%) of the patients. Although 12 (75%) of these patients were former or current smokers, only 3 (19%) were at increased risk for COPD based on their screening questionnaire scores. Of the nine current smokers who participated in a follow-up interview, two had successfully abstained from smoking for 6 months after the screening and five others had made an attempt to quit. This study demonstrated that pharmacists are able to perform accurate and reproducible spirometry in a community pharmacy setting.

Validation of the respiratory toxics exposure score (RTES) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening

Our aim is to evaluate the validity of exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and of a newly-created score as markers of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The CO level was measured in a derivation subsample of a cross-sectional study and linked to COPD diagnosis; its predictors were evaluated, and a scale was constructed. It was evaluated in a validation subsample and in a clinical setting. Individuals with COPD had higher CO levels than healthy individuals. CO level significant predictors were cigarettes per day, waterpipes per week, lower age, male gender, living close to diesel exhaust, heating home with the use of diesel, and having indoor family smokers. A score composed of CO predictors was able to significantly predict COPD (Ora = 4-7.5). Coupled with the clinical judgment of physicians, this scale would be an excellent low-cost tool for screening COPD, in absence of spirometry.

Interstitial lung disease has a poor prognosis in rheumatoid arthritis: results from an inception cohort

Pulmonary complications of RA are well described. Although some are benign, interstitial lung disease (ILD) has a poor prognosis. Few RA inception cohorts have reported the natural history of ILD related to RA (RA-ILD). We examine its incidence, outcome and prognostic indicators. Extra-articular features and comorbidity have been recorded yearly in a well-established inception cohort of RA with a 20-year follow-up. Standard clinical, laboratory and radiological measures of RA were recorded at baseline and yearly. Details of deaths were provided by a national central register. Out of 1460 patients, 52 developed RA-ILD, half either at baseline or within 3 years of onset. The annualized incidence was 4.1/1000 (95% CI 3.0, 5.4) and the 15-year cumulative incidence 62.9/1000 (95% CI 43.0, 91.7). Incidence of RA-ILD was associated with older age, raised baseline ESR and HAQ. Evidence to implicate any drug effect (e.g. MTX) was lacking. Of these patients, 39 died, attributed to RA-ILD in 28. Median survival following diagnosis of RA-ILD was 3 years. RA-ILD is an important and early feature of RA. It is related to disease activity and has a poor prognosis. Further studies are required to determine whether screening for pulmonary disease would identify these patients at an earlier stage.

Psychological impact of computed tomography screening for lung cancer and occupational pulmonary disease among asbestos-exposed workers

The objective of this study was to investigate the psychological impact of screening for lung cancer and occupational pulmonary disease among asbestos-exposed workers. Altogether, 633 workers were screened with chest computed tomography (627 men, 6 women, mean age 64.5 years). Participants' views on the necessity of screening,awareness of asbestos-exposure risks, their perceived lung cancer risk, trial adherence intention, health anxiety,and worry about lung cancer were assessed. Health anxiety was reduced significantly after screening (P < 0.001). After 1 year, no significant long-term psychological differences were found between those who immediately received clear results and those who were submitted to additional examinations because of positive findings. In conclusion,computed tomography screening of pulmonary disease was well accepted and did not produce excessive long-term anxiety or other negative psychological effects,which could prevent the participation in the future screening programs.