Pullout Repair Research Articles

The distance between the tibial tunnel aperture and meniscal root attachment is correlated with meniscal healing status following transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear

BackgroundTo investigate the relationship between tibial tunnel aperture location and postoperative meniscal healing. MethodsWe enrolled 25 patients (20 women and five men, mean age: 62.5 years) who underwent transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus (MM) posterior root repair. The expected MM posterior root attachment center (AC) and tibial tunnel center (TC) were identified using three-dimensional computed tomography, and the minimum AC–TC distance was calculated. The meniscal healing status following transtibial pullout repair was assessed by second-look arthroscopy (mean postoperative period: 15 months) using a previously reported scoring system (meniscal healing score; range: 0–10). The association between AC–TC distance and meniscal healing score was investigated using univariate linear regression models. The optimal AC–TC distance cut-off for improved MM healing score (≥7) was determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. ResultsThe AC–TC distance and meniscal healing score were significantly associated (y = −0.42x + 9.48, R2 = 0.342; P = 0.002), with the optimum AC–TC distance being 5.8 mm. This cut-off had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 53%. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that AC–TC distance is significantly correlated with postoperative meniscal healing. Anatomical repair within 5.8 mm of the AC may result in improved meniscal healing.

Medial meniscus posterior root repair decreases posteromedial extrusion of the medial meniscus during knee flexion

BackgroundMedial meniscus (MM) medial extrusion in the coronal plane does not always improve, even after repair. This study aimed to determine the extent of posteromedial extrusion of the MM during knee flexion before and after MM pullout repair using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MethodsData from 14 patients (mean age, 63.4 years; 86% female) who had undergone MM pullout repair at the current institution between August 2017 and October 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The MRIs were performed pre-operatively and ≥3 months postoperatively. Three-dimensional MRIs of the tibial surface and MM were evaluated using Tsukada's measurement method before and after pullout repair. The expected center of MM posterior root attachment (point A), the point on the extruded edge of the MM farthest away from point A (point E), and the point of intersection of a line through the posteromedial corner of the medial tibial plateau and a line connecting points A and E (point I) were identified. Subsequently, the pre-operative and postoperative AE and IE distances were calculated and compared. ResultsPoint E was laterally shifted by the pullout repair, whereas point I showed no significant change. The postoperative IE distance (6.7 mm) was significantly shorter than the pre-operative one (9.1 mm, P < 0.01). The postoperative AE distance (29.3 mm) was significantly shorter than the pre-operative one (31.5 mm, P < 0.01). ConclusionsThe AE and IE distances significantly decreased after MM posterior root repair, suggesting that transtibial pullout repair may be useful in reducing posteromedial extrusion of the MM.

The Early Arthroscopic Pullout Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Is More Effective for Reducing Medial Meniscus Extrusion.

Clinical studies have demonstrated that transtibial pullout repair led to favorable midterm outcomes in patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) although medial meniscal extrusion (MME) continued to be present. It has been unclear whether these residual postoperative MMEs existed after the pullout repair or had progressed at the very short-term evaluation after surgery. We sought to determine which characteristics of patients with MMPRTs influence the incidence of postoperative MME. The cases of 23 patients whose date of injury was known were analyzed. All patients underwent MMPRT pullout fixation. Preoperative and 3-month postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were performed. MME was retrospectively assessed on the mid-coronal plane of MRI scans. The preoperative and postoperative MME values were 4.2±1.2 mm and 4.3±1.5 mm, respectively (p=0.559). Pullout repair surgery was performed significantly earlier after the MMPRT-specific injury in patients whose postoperative MME improved compared to the patients whose MME did not improve (p<0.001). Our findings demonstrated that an early transtibial pullout repair of an MMPRT was more effective in reducing MME than a late repair. Surgeons should not miss the optimal timing for the pullout repair of an MMPRT, considering the period from the injury and the preoperative MME.

Transtibial Pullout Repair Reduces Posterior Extrusion of the Medial Meniscus.

Medial meniscus posterior root tear causes rapid knee cartilage degradation by inducing posteromedial displacement of the medial meniscus. We evaluated medial meniscus posterior extrusion before and after pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear using magnetic resonance images. Twenty-eight patients with symptomatic medial meniscus posterior root tear were included. The inclusion criteria were: acute (< 3 months) or chronic (≥3 months) medial meniscus posterior root tear after painful popping events. The exclusion criteria were: other meniscus and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. We measured medial meniscus posterior extrusion and medial meniscus anteroposterior interval at knee flexion angles of 10° and 90° preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. The posterior extrusion at 90° knee flexion decreased from 4.42±1.38 mm preoperatively to 3.09±1.06 mm (p<0.001) postoperatively, while at 10° knee flexion it was -4.17±1.63 mm preoperatively and -3.77±1.72mm postoperatively, showing no significant change. The anteroposterior interval at 10° knee flexion increased from 19.74±4.27 mm preoperatively to 22.15±5.10 mm postoperatively (p<0.001); at 90° knee flexion, it increased from 16.81±4.51 mm preoperatively to 19.20±4.30 mm postoperatively (p<0.001). Medial meniscus posterior extrusion and movement decreased after pullout repair. Pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear improves medial meniscus posterior extrusion, especially at 90° knee flexion.

Meniscus Root Repair

Meniscal root tears defined as bony or soft tissue root avulsion injuries or radial tears within 1cm of the meniscal root attachment. If it is not treated properly can cause early development of osteoarthritis. The meniscal root tears leading to compromised hoop stress and decreased tibiofemoral contact area and increased contact pressures in the involved compartment. To confirm the diagnosis is through arthroscopic as a diagnostic and treatment and through magnetic resonance imaging. Not all meniscal root tears can be treated surgically, especially if they have multiple comorbidities or advanced age, severe osteoarthritis, non-symptomatic chronic meniscal root tears and significant mal-alignment of the affected compartment then the treatment of choice is to give a symptomatic treatment like non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug, and activity modification. Meniscectomy has been found to induce a high rate of arthritis progression postoperatively. There are two most common meniscal root repair techniques which are trans-tibial pullout repair and suture anchor repair that now preferred over meniscectomy. The most important thing to consider when repairing the meniscal root is the right anatomically repair. It has been proven that non-anatomical meniscal root repair will not able to restore to the normal function because the conversion of femorotibial loads into circumferential tension may be altered, with functional impairment of the knee. Anchor suture technique shows a greater degree of healing and better biomechanical outcome. The suture anchor technique uses “all-inside" fixation and avoids the need for a distal fixation which potentially places abrasive forces on the sutures used. The trans-tibial pullout repair can restore the attachment and contact pressure near normal value, also the tunnel drilling stimulating growth factors and progenitor cells from bone marrow and facilitate the ability of meniscus to convert axial load into hoop stress. The concern of trans-tibial pullout repair is its ‘bungee effect’ and repetitive loading resulted in the displacement of this repair complex and might compromise healing because of decreased stiffness and micromotion of the meniscus-suture complex.

Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Patients With Lax Healing After Medial Meniscal Root Repair: Comparison With Subtotal Meniscectomy

To compare radiologic and clinical outcomes between patients who underwent medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair and were subsequently classified as having lax healing based on second-look arthroscopy and patients who underwent subtotal meniscectomy for an MMPRT. The patients who received pullout repair or subtotal meniscectomy due to MMPRT between January 2011 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Among the patients who underwent MMPRT repair, those whose lax healing of the repair site was confirmed by second-look arthroscopy (repair/lax healing group) and among the patients who received subtotal meniscectomy, those who have varus deformity of <5° and a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of ≤2 (meniscectomy group) were included in the study population. Medial joint space width, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form score, and Lysholm Knee score were used for radiologic and clinical assessment. The meniscectomy group included 24 patients (average follow-up, 37.2months), and the repair/lax healing group included 21 patients (average follow-up, 39.2months). The 2 groups showed improved patient-reported outcomes postoperatively (P < .001). However, medial joint space width (P < .001) became narrow and Kellgren-Lawrence grade (P= .002 and P= .005, respectively) worsened. Comparison of the radiologic outcomes between the 2 groups revealed that the repair/lax healing group had less Kellgren-Lawrence grade progression than the meniscectomy group (P= .014). The grade progressed by ≥2 grades in 4 patients (16.7%) and 0 patients in the meniscectomy and repair/lax healing groups, respectively (P < .001). Although the repair/lax healing group showed improved functional outcomes on short-term follow-up, arthritic change progressed radiologically. Nevertheless, the repair/lax healing group showed better radiologic outcomes than the meniscectomy group, despite lax healing of the repair site. However, because of the small number of cases in this study, the results of this study could be associated with potential for type II or β errors. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Different Suture Materials for Arthroscopic Transtibial Pull-out Repair of Medial Meniscal Posterior Root Tears: A Human Biomechanical Study.

Background:Transtibial pull-out repair of the medial meniscal posterior root (MMPR) has been largely assessed through biomechanical studies. Biomechanically comparing different suture types would further optimize MMPR fixation and affect clinical care.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal suture material for MMPR fixation. It was hypothesized that ultra high–molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) suture tape would be biomechanically superior to UHMWPE suture and standard suture.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:The MMPR attachment was divided in 24 human cadaveric knees and randomly assigned to 3 repair groups: UHMWPE suture tape, UHMWPE suture, and standard suture. Specimens were dissected down to the medial meniscus, and the posterior root attachments were sectioned off the tibia. Two-tunnel transtibial pull-out repair with 2 sutures, as determined by the testing group, was performed. The repair constructs were cyclically loaded between 10 and 30 N at 0.5 Hz for 1000 cycles to mimic the forces experienced on the medial meniscus during postoperative rehabilitation. Displacement was recorded at 1, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 cycles. Ultimate failure load, displacement at failure, and load at 3 mm of displacement (clinical failure) were also recorded.Results:UHMWPE suture tape had significantly less displacement of the medial meniscus when compared with standard suture at 1 (–0.22 mm [95% CI, –0.41 to –0.02]; P = .025) and 50 (–0.35 mm [95% CI, –0.67 to –0.03]; P = .029) cycles. There were no other significant differences observed in displacement between groups at any number of cycles. UHMWPE suture tape had significantly less displacement at the time of failure than standard suture (–3.71 mm [95% CI, –7.17 to –0.24]; P = .034). UHMWPE suture tape had a significantly higher load to reach the clinical failure displacement of 3 mm than UHMWPE suture (15.64 N [95% CI, 0.02 to 31.26]; P = .05). There were no significant differences in ultimate failure load between groups.Conclusion:The meniscal root repair construct with UHMWPE suture tape may be stronger and less prone to displacement than that with standard suture or UHMWPE suture.Clinical Relevance:UHMWPE suture tape may provide better clinical results compared with UHMWPE suture and standard suture.

The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides

PurposePosterior root repair of the medial meniscus (MM) can prevent rapid progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with a MM posterior root tear (MMPRT). The anatomic reattachment of the MM posterior root is considered to be critical in a transtibial pullout repair. However, tibial tunnel creation at the anatomic attachment is technically difficult. We hypothesized that a newly developed point-contact aiming guide [Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) guide] can create the tibial tunnel at a better position rather than a previously designed MMPRT guide. The aim of this study was to compare the position of the created tibial tunnel between the two meniscal root repair guides.Materials and methodsThirty-eight patients underwent transtibial pullout repairs. Tibial tunnel creation was performed using the UMR guide (19 cases) or MMPRT guide (19 cases). Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using the Tsukada’s measurement method postoperatively. The expected anatomic center of the MM posterior root attachment was defined as the center of three tangential lines referring to three anatomic bony landmarks (anterior border of the posterior cruciate ligament, lateral margin of the medial tibial plateau, and retro-eminence ridge). The expected anatomic center and tibial tunnel center were evaluated using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The distance between the anatomic center and tunnel center was calculated.ResultsThe anatomic center of the MM posterior root footprint was located at a position of 79.2% posterior and 39.5% lateral. The mean of the tunnel center in the UMR guide was similar to that in the MMPRT guide (posterior direction, P = 0.096; lateral direction, P = 0.280). The mean distances between the tunnel center and the anatomic center were 4.06 and 3.99 mm in the UMR and MMPRT guide group, respectively (P = 0.455).ConclusionsThe UMR guide, as well as the MMPRT guide, is a useful device to create favorable tibial tunnels at the MM posterior root attachment for pullout repairs in patients with MMPRTs.Level of evidenceIV

A novel suture technique to reduce the meniscus extrusion in the pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears.

The medial meniscus (MM) posterior root has important functions in preventing an excessive loading stress during knee motion and degeneration of the articular cartilage. Although the transtibial pullout repair has become the gold standard for MM posterior root tears (MMPRTs), MM extrusion remains. In addition, during knee extension to deep flexion, the MM posterior segment in the MMPRT knee has been shown to translate toward the posteromedial direction, causing a notable MM posterior extrusion. Thus, the reduction in the MM posteromedial extrusion is one of the important postoperative outcomes to restore the meniscal function and eventually prevent the progression of knee osteoarthritis. The present technical note describes an arthroscopic technique addition to the pullout repair, in which an all-inside suture is inserted into the posteromedial part of the MM to reduce the MM posteromedial extrusion.

Biomechanical Effects of Peripheral Stabilization for the Extruded Medial Meniscus and its Effect on Tibiofemoral Contact Biomechanics

Objectives: To quantitatively evaluate the biomechanical effects of a novel peripheral stabilization technique for the treatment of posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) avulsions and to identify an optimal diagnostic position to assess for the presence of meniscal extrusion. Methods: Meniscal extrusion and tibiofemoral contact mechanics were measured using 3D digitization and pressure sensors, respectively, in ten nonpaired, human cadaver knees. The PMMR of each knee was tested under 6 states: (1) intact; (2) complete root detachment; (3) anatomic transtibial pull-out root repair; (4) anatomic transtibial pull-out repair with peripheral stabilization; (5) nonanatomic transtibial pull-out repair; and (6) nonanatomic transtibial pull-out repair with peripheral stabilization, with randomization of the order of conditions 3 &amp; 4, and 5 &amp; 6. The testing protocol loaded knees with a 1000 N axial compressive force at four flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°) in each state. Meniscal extrusion was recorded at 0° and 90° in both loaded and unloaded states at three locations along the peripheral rim of the medial tibial plateau. Degree of meniscal extrusion was defined as the radial displacement of the medial meniscus from three corresponding points on the posteromedial edge of the tibial plateau: (1) posterior border of MCL; (2) posteromedial capsule midway between the MCL and posterior root; and (3) the direct posterior capsule. Peak contact pressure, contact area, and total contact pressure were also recorded for all states at all flexion angles. Results: Statistical analysis investigated the independent effects of flexion, state, and loading using three, distinct two-factor models. In unloaded knees in full extension, the highest degree of meniscal extrusion was observed at the posterior border of the MCL across all repair testing states (p &lt; 0.001). At full extension, loaded knees exhibited significantly higher extrusion in comparison to unloaded across all knee states at the MCL position (mean 1.1 mm, 95% CI [0.8, 1.4], p &lt;0.001). Significantly more extrusion was observed at 90° of flexion (mean 0.7 mm, 95% CI [0.36, 1.1], p &lt; 0.001). In loaded knees at 90° of flexion, all repair states had significantly lower extrusion than the root tear state (all p &lt;0.05). Only anatomic repair with peripheral stabilization had significantly lower extrusion than both nonanatomic repairs with or without peripheral stabilization (both p &lt; 0.01). Differences in the contact mechanics between repair techniques were most notable at higher flexion angles, demonstrating significantly higher average and peak contact pressures for non-anatomic repair variations when compared to anatomic repairs with and without peripheral stabilization (all p &lt;0.05). Root tear states were significantly higher than intact states for all comparisons except for peak pressure at 0° of flexion (all p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion: Anatomic and anatomic with peripheral suture repair techniques best restore contact mechanics of the knee. In current clinical scenarios where knees are unloaded and imaged in full extension, extrusion is best measured in the coronal plane at the posterior border of the MCL. However, this is likely a “best-case” scenario, as this study has shown that the degree of extrusion increases as the knee is loaded and flexed to 90°. When only a non-anatomic repair can be performed the addition of this peripheral stabilization technique may be beneficial for patients in reducing pathologic extrusion of the meniscus. [Table: see text]

Steep posterior slope and shallow concave shape of the medial tibial plateau are risk factors for medial meniscus posterior root tears.

Bone morphological factors are important for menisci. Their association with medial meniscus posterior root tears, however, has not yet been studied. This study aimed to compare sagittal medial tibial slope and medial tibial plateau depth between knees with and without medial meniscus posterior root tears. Nine healthy volunteers, 24 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and 36 patients who underwent medial meniscus posterior root pullout repair were included. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed in the 10°-knee-flexed position. The medial tibial slope and medial tibial plateau depth were compared among the groups. In healthy volunteers, the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction group, and the medial meniscus posterior root tear group, the medial tibial slopes were 3.5° ± 1.4°, 4.0° ± 1.9°, and 7.2° ± 1.9°, respectively, and the medial tibial plateau depths were 2.1 ± 0.7mm, 2.2 ± 0.6mm, and 1.2 ± 0.5mm, respectively. Patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears had a significantly steep medial tibial slope and shallow medial tibial plateau concavity compared to those of healthy volunteers (P < 0.01) and the anterior cruciate ligament group (P < 0.01). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, body mass index, medial tibial slope, and medial tibial plateau depth were significantly associated with medial meniscus posterior root tears. A steep posterior slope and a shallow concave shape of the medial tibial plateau are risk factors for medial meniscus posterior root tear. Level III: Case-control study.

Short-term clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic findings of high tibial osteotomy combined with medial meniscus posterior root repair

Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic findings after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) combined with medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) repair. Methods Twenty-five patients who underwent HTO combined with MMPR repair were subjected to second-look arthroscopy and retrospectively analyzed. Biplane HTO combined with MMPR repair was performed on these patients. Arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair was employed to repair the MMPR. The relative degree of the medial meniscus extrusion (MME) were measured. Cartilage regeneration and the healing of MMPR were evaluated at the time of second-look arthroscopy. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores and Lysholm scores. Results The MMPRs were completely healed in 12 cases (48%), partially healed in 9 cases (36%), healed with scarring in 3 cases (12%), and no healed in 1 case (4%). Follow-up duration was 13.04±1.06 months (12-16 months). There were no statistically significant differences in the Kellgren-Lawrence classifications of the cases before and after surgery (χ2=0.786, P=0.675). The relative position of the mechanical axis of the lower extremity through the tibial plateau was 19.88%±6.44% preoperatively and 58.68%±7.71% after operation with significant difference (t=-18.561, P 0.05). The comparison between different degree of cartilage regeneration groups revealed no statistical differences in all variables (P>0.05). Conclusion HTO combined with MMPR repair can effectively improve the lower limb alignment and patients' symptoms with a satisfactory healing rate of MMPR. The effects of post-root repair after a short period is not obvious. The longer-term clinical effects is worthy of further observation. Key words: Tibia; Osteotomy; Arthroscopy; Reconstructive surgical procedures; Menisci, tibial; Genu varum; Osteoarthritis, knee

Utilization of Transtibial Centralization Suture Best Minimizes Extrusion and Restores Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics for Anatomic Medial Meniscal Root Repairs in a Cadaveric Model

Background: Although posterior medial meniscal root (PMMR) repairs are often successful, postoperative meniscal extrusion after a root repair has been identified as a potential clinical problem. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to quantitatively evaluate the tibiofemoral contact mechanics and extent of meniscal extrusion after a PMMR repair. It was hypothesized that the addition of a centralization suture (into the posterior medial tibial plateau) would help restore normal joint load-bearing characteristics and restore the native amount of meniscal extrusion after a root tear. Furthermore, we hypothesized that the amount of meniscal extrusion would be greatest in loaded and flexed knees when measured at the posterior border of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Meniscal extrusion and tibiofemoral contact mechanics were measured using 3-dimensional digitization and pressure sensors in 10 nonpaired, human cadaveric knees. The PMMR of each knee was tested under 6 states: (1) intact; (2) type 2A PMMR tear; (3) anatomic transtibial pull-out root repair; (4) anatomic transtibial pull-out repair with centralization; (5) nonanatomic transtibial pull-out repair; and (6) nonanatomic transtibial pull-out repair with centralization, with randomization of the order of conditions 3 and 4, and 5 and 6. The testing protocol loaded knees with a 1000-N axial compressive force at 4 flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°) in each state. Meniscal extrusion was measured with a 3-dimensional coordinate digitizer at 0° and 90° in both the loaded and unloaded states and calculated from the difference from the articular margin of the tibia to the periphery of the meniscus. Peak contact pressure, contact area, and total contact pressure were also recorded for all states at all flexion angles. Statistical analysis investigated the independent effects of flexion, state, and loading using 3 distinct 2-factor models. Results: Differences in the contact mechanics between repair techniques were most notable at higher flexion angles, demonstrating significantly higher average and peak contact pressures for nonanatomic repair states when compared with anatomic repairs with and without centralization (all P < .05). In unloaded knees at full extension, the magnitude of medial meniscal extrusion was significantly higher at the posterior border of the MCL compared with the posterior medial tibia (P < .001) and adjacent to the root attachment on the tibia locations (P < .001). Both anatomic repair states had no significant difference in the degree of extrusion when compared with the intact state. Conclusion: The anatomic transtibial pull-out root repair and the anatomic transtibial pull-out root repair with centralization techniques best restored contact mechanics of the knee and meniscal extrusion when compared with root tear and nonanatomic repair states at time zero. There were no significant differences in contact pressure or magnitude of extrusion between the anatomic repair state and the anatomic repair with centralization state. We found that extrusion is best measured in the coronal plane at the posterior border of the MCL for unloaded knees. However, the degree of extrusion increased as the knee was loaded and flexed to 90°. Clinical Relevance: When there are concerns about meniscal extrusion with a medial meniscal root repair, the addition of a centralization suture may be beneficial for patients in reducing pathologic meniscal extrusion and restoring joint contact mechanics.

Biomechanical comparison of meniscus-suture constructs for pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears

BackgroundTranstibial pullout repair for posterior meniscus root tear is widely performed to restore meniscal function. However, it is sometimes technically difficult to pass the suture through the posterior medial meniscus root in narrow joint space. To address this limitation, a new suture technique using an all-inside meniscal suture device through the tibial tunnel was proposed. The purpose of the present study was to compare the biomechanical properties of a meniscus-suture construct prepared using an all-inside meniscal suture device and those of the construct prepared using conventional suture techniques.MethodsA total of 18 fresh-frozen porcine medial menisci were used and randomly divided into three groups according to the type of suturing technique applied. Three suturing methods were evaluated: suturing with all-inside meniscal suture device, single simple suture, and double simple sutures. All specimens were subjected to cyclic loading of 300 cycles followed by a load-to-failure test. The displacement after cyclic loading, the ultimate failure load, and the mode of failure were evaluated.ResultsThere was no significant difference among the three suturing techniques regarding both displacement after cyclic loading and ultimate failure load. Suture breakage was the most common failure mode in each group.ConclusionsThe biomechanical properties of meniscus-suture construct with the all-inside meniscal suture device were equivalent to those obtained using conventional suture techniques. Our results suggest that pullout repair using the all-inside meniscal suture device through the tibial tunnel could serve as an alternative suture technique for the repair of posterior meniscus root tears.

Pullout repair using modified Mason-Allen suture induces better meniscal healing and superior clinical outcomes: A comparison between two surgical methods

BackgroundPullout repairs of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) have many surgical options. However, there has been no reliable clinical study conducted to compare the superiority of each pullout repair technique. The current study hypothesized that pullout repairs using a modified Mason-Allen suture with FasT-Fix (F-MMA) would have several advantages in postoperative clinical outcomes and meniscal healing compared with single FasT-Fix. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical usefulness of these two techniques in treating MMPRTs. MethodsThirty-eight patients who had complete MMPRTs were included. All patients underwent transtibial pullout repairs. To compare the clinical usefulness between pullout repairs using single FasT-Fix and F-MMA techniques, patients were divided into two groups. Second-look arthroscopic evaluations of meniscal healing were performed at one year postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed using: Lysholm and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). ResultsSingle FasT-Fix and F-MMA pullout repairs improved clinical outcomes in patients with MMPRTs. At second-look arthroscopy, VAS pain, KOOS pain, and arthroscopic meniscal healing scores following F-MMA pullout repairs were superior to those after single FasT-Fix pullout repairs. ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that F-MMA suture configuration obtained better meniscal healing and superior clinical outcomes compared with single FasT-Fix repairs in patients with MMPRTs. These results suggest that the F-MMA pullout repair may possibly reduce knee pain in arthroscopic treatments of MMPRTs.

La réparation en «pull out» transtibial des lésions de la racine postérieure du ménisque médial restaure la rotation physiologique du ménisque médial sur un genou fléchi

BackgroundMedial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) results in joint overloading and degenerative changes in the knee. Favorable clinical outcomes have been reported after transtibial pullout repair of MMPRT. To date, however, in vivo tibial rotational changes before and after root repair remain poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative changes in tibial rotation following MMPRT pullout repair. HypothesisPathological external rotation in the knee-flexed position is caused by MMPRT and is reduced after transtibial pullout repair. Patients and methodsFifteen patients who underwent MMPRT pullout repair and 7 healthy volunteers were included. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed in the 10° and 90° knee-flexed positions. The angles between the surgical epicondylar axis and a line between the medial border of the patellar tendon and the apex of the medial tibial spine were measured. Baseline was defined as a line lying at a right angle to the other, and a value was positive and negative when the tibia rotated internally and externally, respectively. ResultsIn the volunteer's normal knees, tibial internal rotation was +1.00°±3.27° at 10° flexion and +4.14°±3.46° at 90° flexion. In the MMPRT preoperative knees, tibial internal rotation was +1.07°±3.01° at 10° flexion and +1.27°±2.96° at 90° flexion. In the postoperative knees, tibial internal rotation was +1.60°±2.85° at 10° flexion and +4.33°±2.89° at 90° flexion. DiscussionThis study demonstrates discontinuity of the MM posterior root may induce a pathological external rotation of the tibia during knee flexion and that MMPRT pullout repair reduces the pathological external rotation of the tibia in the knee-flexed position. Level of evidenceIII, comparative retrospective study.

Description of a surgical technique of medial meniscus root repair: a fixation technique with two simple stiches under an expected initial tension

The medial meniscus (MM) posterior root has an important role in the maintenance of knee kinematics and articular cartilage. Although transtibial pullout repair of the MM posterior root tear (MMPRT) has become the gold standard, it is associated with several suturing difficulties. The present technical note describes a simple fixation technique using two simple stiches under an expected initial tension. After the degree of knee flexion (20°) and an expected tension (30N) are checked, tibial fixation is performed using a bioabsorbable interference screw with a spring tensioner. After that, a suture knot is made just below the screw in case the sutures are pulled toward the joint direction. Furthermore, a cancellous screw is inserted at a position 1-cm distal from the tibial tunnel for augmentation and is tightened. MMPRT usually occurs in middle-aged females who often have decreased bone quality. However, there is no risk of tibial fracture with our new technique because the bone does not need to be hit. Adopting the advances of fixation with a spring tensioner and Biosure RG instead of Double Spike Plate, we can determine an expected tension easily and safely. The present fixation technique allows reproducibility for many operators to determine an initial tension and might be a good candidate for arthroscopic repair of the MMPRT. Further follow-up studies including second-look arthroscopy and scoring will be necessary to show the clinical benefits of this technique.

Transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear restores physiological rotation of the tibia in the knee-flexed position

BackgroundMedial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) results in joint overloading and degenerative changes in the knee. Favorable clinical outcomes have been reported after transtibial pullout repair of MMPRT. To date, however, in vivo tibial rotational changes before and after root repair remain poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative changes in tibial rotation following MMPRT pullout repair. HypothesisPathological external rotation of the tibia in the knee-flexed position is caused by MMPRT and is reduced after transtibial pullout repair. Patients and methodsFifteen patients who underwent MMPRT pullout repair and 7 healthy volunteers were included. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed in the 10° and 90° knee-flexed positions. The angles between the surgical epicondylar axis and a line between the medial border of the patellar tendon and the apex of the medial tibial spine were measured. Baseline was defined as a line lying at a right angle to the other, and a value was positive and negative when the tibia rotated internally and externally, respectively. ResultsIn the volunteer's normal knees, tibial internal rotation was +1.00°±3.27° at 10° flexion and +4.14°±3.46° at 90° flexion. In the MMPRT preoperative knees, tibial internal rotation was +1.07°±3.01° at 10° flexion and +1.27°±2.96° at 90° flexion. In the postoperative knees, tibial internal rotation was +1.60°±2.85° at 10° flexion and +4.33°±2.89° at 90° flexion. DiscussionThis study demonstrates discontinuity of the MM posterior root may induce a pathological external rotation of the tibia during knee flexion and that MMPRT pullout repair reduces the pathological external rotation of the tibia in the knee-flexed position. Level of evidenceIII, comparative retrospective study.

Arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair for posterior meniscus root tears

Anatomic repair of the torn meniscal root using transosseous sutures through the proximal tibia. Nontraumatic meniscal root tears without severe degenerative changes (Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≤ 2), good quality meniscal tissue, traumatic root tears with or without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament tears or multiligament injuries. Uncorrected varus or valgus malalignment (>3°), osteoarthritis Kellgren-Lawrence grades III and IV, and diffuse articular cartilage changes International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society (ICRS) grades III and IV of the effected compartment, noncompliance. Root tear confirmed by probing; location for the planned root refixation on the tibial plateau is identified. Atibial socket or full transtibial tunnel created with an aiming drill guide. Using aself-retrieving suture passing device or acurved suture passer, the torn meniscus root sutured with no.0 non-absorbable braided suture. Meniscal sutures passed through the tibial tunnel and the meniscus root reduced into the socket or tunnel by tensioning the free ends of the sutures, followed by fixation on the tibial cortex. Toe touch weight-bearing for 6weeks, restricted range of motion (0-60° of flexion) for 6weeks, no axial loading at flexion angles >90° until 6months postoperatively. For medial root tears, pullout repair significantly improves functional outcome scores and seems to prevent the progression of osteoarthritis in theshort-term. Complete healing observed in only 60% of patients. Negative prognostic factors: varus malalignment > 5°, cartilage degeneration Outerbridge grade III and IV, and older age. Outcomes after lateral root repair are encouraging with apparent prevention of progression of osteoarthritis.

Pullout Repair of the Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Reduces Proton Density-Weighted Imaging Signal Intensity of the Medial Meniscus.

Medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tear (PRT) results in joint overloading and degenerative changes in the knee. MM root repair is recommended to prevent subsequent cartilage degeneration following MMPRT. Favorable clinical outcomes have been reported after transtibial pullout repair of MMPRT. However, it is unclear whether pullout repair can cause compositional change in the MM posterior segment. We examined this question in 14 patients who underwent MMPRT pullout repair. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively at 10° knee flexion. The region-of-interest was marked along the MM posterior segment edge. Intra-meniscal signal intensity (IMSI) was expressed as the signal intensity ratio of the repaired MM to the intact lateral meniscus, which was used as a control. MMPRT pullout repair reduced IMSI from 1 to 0.915±0.096 (range, 0.760-1.074) 3 months postoperatively (p=0.006, power=0.90). Meniscal degeneration causes high proton density-weighted imaging signal intensity of the meniscal body. In our study, MMPRT pullout repair reduced IMSI contrary to other tears. This technique may decrease the MM posterior segment signal intensity by restoring the hoop tension mechanism. Measuring IMSI may be useful to assess the effect of MMPRT pullout repair on meniscal healing.