Public Practice Research Articles

A Systematic Review of Public Relations Research in the Context of Artificial Intelligence

In the context of the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, this article provides a systematic review of public relations research in the context of artificial intelligence to provide valuable references for future public relations research and practice. Collect literature data from CNKI, use systematic review methods to select literature that meets the standards, and sort and summarize it from four dimensions: application background, application scenarios, challenges faced, and response measures. Research has found that currently, applying artificial intelligence technology to public relations practice has become a basic consensus in academia; The paradigm of public relations research in the era of artificial intelligence has changed; In the short term, artificial intelligence technology will not completely replace public relations personnel; The measures for responding to public relations in the era of artificial intelligence can be summarized and divided into two levels: theoretical and practical. In the future, it is necessary to further explore and improve public relations theories related to artificial intelligence, construct new analytical frameworks and research methods to adapt to the changes brought about by technology.

Are research articles becoming more syntactically complex? Corpus-based evidence from research articles in applied linguistics and biology (1965–2015)

Research on the diachronic changes of syntactic complexity in research articles (RAs) in recent decades has been scant. As one of the first studies addressing this gap, the present study investigated the diachronic changes of eight indices of syntactic complexity in the RAs of applied linguistics and biology from 1965 to 2015 based on a corpus of 720 RAs (totalling 4.14 million tokens) from prestigious journals. The study revealed several common patterns of diachronic changes in syntactic complexity in two disciplines. First, RA writers in both disciplines tended to produce longer production units and employed more coordinate phrases and complex nominals over time, reflecting increased levels of syntactic complexity in two disciplines in recent five decades. In addition, both disciplines displayed an overall decline in the reliance on clausal elaboration (e.g. clausal coordination and clausal subordination), but an increase in phrasal complexity (e.g. phrasal coordination and complex nominals), which demonstrated an increased level of information compression in RA writing over time. The study also discussed changes in publication norms and practices in the two academic fields in recent decades that may be related to the diachronic changes of syntactic complexity features.

CEO activism: a strategic framework for topic selection, considering issue maturity and congruence

PurposeThis study proposes that strategic planning and execution can make CEO activism an effective public relations practice. It introduces a model for selecting activism topics, emphasizing issue maturity and congruence as critical factors. The study investigates how topic selection influences public trust in CEO activism and perceptions of CEO leadership, ultimately impacting public support for the advocated issue and company loyalty.Design/methodology/approachA randomized 2 × 2 experiment was conducted: issue maturity (mature vs controversial) and issue-company congruence (high vs low).FindingsGenerally, CEO activism on mature issues fostered greater public trust and favorable evaluations of transformational leadership compared to controversial issues. However, issue-company congruency significantly moderated these effects. Mature, high-congruence issues led to increased trust, positive leadership evaluations and greater advocacy and company loyalty. In contrast, mature issues with low congruency did not yield the same positive outcomes. Controversial issues with high congruency resulted in the lowest levels of trust, potentially leading to backlash and diminished the positive impact of CEO activism.Originality/valueThe results underscore the importance of strategic issue selection for CEO activism. Carefully chosen topics, considering both issue maturity and company-issue congruence, can effectively garner public support for the sociopolitical issue the CEO is advocating for while simultaneously enhancing perceptions of the CEO’s leadership and fostering company loyalty.

Playing the Publish or Perish Game: Guidance for Doctoral Students and Early Career Faculty

“Publish or perish,” or the idea that one must consistently publish to succeed in an academic career is a well-known adage within higher education (Schaberg, 2016). Specifically, Bond (2023) shares that publications are promoted as a path to career success. The scholarly output of professors simultaneously affects the reputations of the professors and their institutions. Similarly, doctoral programs often require students to publish before they graduate. When applying for academic positions, having publications beyond the dissertation is seen as a strength by prospective employers. Although publications are viewed as a strength, Huang (2021) discusses some challenges doctoral students have with publishing, including a lack of understanding of the publication process. Many students who are in master’s degree programs may complete a thesis. However, the thesis process diverges from journal articles because the publication procedures differ. Huang (2021) further notes that the pressure to publish in high-quality, well-known journals is another challenge. These journals are identified as the best because of the rigor involved in their peer review process, and they typically accept fewer papers per year. Finally, journal publications are a competitive process, and the inability to complete a publication on time can cause anxiety among students. Researchers have called for an evaluation of publishing practices in academia. For example, Saxena, Godfrey, and Yannessa (2023) explain that publishing expectations can lead to the production of low-quality publications and an increase in unethical behaviors such as plagiarism. Moreover, inexperienced writers may seek to validate their research by relying on the willing acceptance of predatory journals (Mertkan, Aliusta, & Bayrakli, 2022). These journals flood the internet with low-quality papers that do not adhere to rigorous peer-review standards. Consequently, inferior research that has not been vetted is often repetitively cited. Since navigating the publication process is a skill that must be gained, Dyke (2019) suggests that it is necessary to teach early-career academics how to manage the rigors of publication expectations. Dyke asserts that learning to manage stress and time is essential for successfully publishing. Also, new scholars must be taught how to explain their research’s benefits and potential impact. Dyke further argues that publishers can play a crucial role in teaching publication skills. Instead of relying solely on universities, publishers can develop courses to clarify the process of writing publications. These courses can include content about basic writing and editing skills and submitting revisions. The panel recognizes that publishing is indeed not a game. However, it is a necessary component of career progression at many universities. Therefore, in response to library and information science doctoral and early career professionals’ scholarly publishing professional development needs, this panel seeks to advise about strengthening writing skills and clarifying the peer review publishing process. This panel will include expert editors and editorial board members with over a century of combined scholarly publishing experience. Attendees will participate in a discussion of the peer review process and receive suggestions for efficiently writing and submitting journal articles. The panelists are Drs. John Budd and Denice Adkins (co-editors of JELIS), Yunfei Du (editorial board member of JELIS), Maria Cahill (co-editor of School Library Research), and Vanessa Reyes (co-editor of The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion). The moderator will be Dr. Daniella Smith (editorial board member of Public Library Quarterly). Program Format This interactive program will include polls to increase audience engagement and an online whiteboard to collect questions for the discussion after the presentation. The program format will be as follows: Session introduction: The moderator will introduce the session by sharing the presentation objectives and research about publishing in academia.. Panel introduction: Each panelist will introduce themselves and their experience with scholarly publications. Topic Discussion: The panelists will answer questions related to the following topics. Understanding the peer review process: The presenters will share the peer-reviewed process used by the journals and the pros and cons of the peer-review process. Implementing strategies for publishing quicker: Panelists will provide suggestions for streamlining the publication process. Submitting revisions and options for addressing comments: Our experts will discuss their expectations for article revisions and the do’s and don’ts of getting an article published after revisions have been requested. Preparing content for peer-reviewed journals: There is a difference between casual and scholarly writing. The panelists will discuss the differences and provide examples of their expectations regarding the content of peer-reviewed publications. Identifying appropriate journals: The panel will suggest how to determine the best journals for their research areas and how to avoid predatory journals. Identifying publication tools and resources: Authors curate tools and acquire skills that help them navigate the publication process. The presenters will share their favorite tools and resources. Making writing enjoyable: The panelists will discuss embracing writing and making publishing fun. Final words of advice and questions: The session will conclude with audience questions and final panelist thoughts.

Impact of arterial stiffness on health-related quality of life in older Thai adults with treated HIV infection: a multicenter cohort study.

Despite advancements in antiretroviral therapy (ART) that extend life expectancy, older adults with HIV (OAHIV) face elevated cardiovascular disease risks. This study examines the impact of arterial stiffness on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among OAHIV in rural Northern Thailand. We conducted a 5-year prospective cohort study from 2015, including 338 OAHIV aged ≥ 50 without prior cardiovascular disease who received ART in 12 community hospitals in Chiang Mai. Arterial stiffness was assessed using Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI), with values ≥ 8 indicating significant stiffness. HRQoL was measured using the MOS-HIV Health Survey at baseline, one year, and five years. Analysis adjusted for HIV/AIDS severity, cardiovascular comorbidities, and socioeconomic factors. Elevated CAVI (≥ 8) was associated with lower HRQoL scores. The elevated CAVI group showed lower physical health summary scores (average difference:-2.2 points, 95%CI: -3.5 to -0.9) and mental health summary scores (average difference: -1.2 points, 95%CI: -2.2 to -0.3) compared to the normal CAVI group (CAVI < 8). Findings highlight the importance of routine screening for arterial stiffness and support the implementation of comprehensive care strategies that incorporate cardiovascular risk management. Such approaches could guide public health interventions and clinical practices to enhance the overall health and well-being of OAHIV, potentially through targeted cardiovascular risk reduction programs and personalized care plans. However, the study's regional focus in rural Northern Thailand and participant attrition over the five-year period limit the generalizability of the findings. Future research in diverse settings with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these results.

The "Green Doctor" Initiative: Ethical Healthcare in the Age of Medical Commercialization

The "Green Doctor" initiative represents a groundbreaking shift in global healthcare systems, aiming to prioritize ethical, compassionate, and patient-centered care in an era of increasing commercialization. Proposed by Professor Reza Ghalamghash, the "Green Doctor" concept focuses on the moral obligations of healthcare professionals to provide care that transcends financial considerations and commercial pressures. This innovative model emphasizes the humanistic aspects of medicine, where physicians are encouraged to focus on patients' holistic well-being, mental and emotional health, and equitable access to care. In the face of rising healthcare costs, systemic inequities, and ethical dilemmas posed by profit-driven models, the "Green Doctor" approach is particularly timely. This article explores the philosophical foundation of the "Green Doctor" concept, its implications for healthcare systems around the globe, and its potential to drive meaningful change in public health policy and medical practices. Through a detailed exploration of real-world case studies, the article delves into how this model is being adopted in different healthcare settings, examining its efficacy in enhancing patient outcomes, promoting healthcare equity, and reshaping the relationship between doctors and their patients. Additionally, the article discusses the structural challenges faced by healthcare providers in implementing this approach, including financial constraints, regulatory hurdles, and the need for institutional support. It also highlights the role of technology in facilitating the "Green Doctor" model, particularly through the use of telemedicine, digital health platforms, and AI-driven diagnostics, which allow doctors to extend care to underserved populations while maintaining a patient-centered focus. Finally, the article assesses the future of the "Green Doctor" initiative in the context of evolving global healthcare challenges, offering insights into how it could serve as a sustainable model for ethical healthcare in the 21st century.

General public knowledge, attitudes, and practices about rabies and associated factors in Gomma district of Jimma zone, southwestern Ethiopia.

Rabies is a disease of warm-blooded animals that affects the central nervous system and is almost invariably fatal once clinical signs develop. It is one of the most neglected tropical diseases in several areas of the world, including Ethiopia. Additionally, the burden of the disease is estimated to be high in Ethiopia, and public awareness contributes to prevention. A community-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from June-August 2023 in the Gomma district, Jimma zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia, to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of communities towards rabies and associated risk factors using a structured questionnaire survey. A multi-stage sampling technique was used for the selection of the sampling units and a total of 140 participants were interviewed. The questionnaire parts included socio-demographics information, knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the community's respect for rabies management and control. The data was analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Version 20. Descriptive analyses were employed and multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate the association between independent and dependent variables (Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice scores). About 134 (95.7%) respondents had heard about rabies. Likewise, 75 (53.6%), 55 (39.3%), and 95 (67.9%) of the respondents had good knowledge, favorable attitudes, and good practices, respectively. Christians were more likely to have higher knowledge scores than Muslims (AOR = 6.876, CI = 1.750-27.016, p = 0.006). Respondents who knew someone's exposure had a higher knowledge score than those who did not (AOR = 6.208, CI = 2.750-14.012, p = 0.000). Moreover, Muslims were found to have a more favorable attitudes than Christians (AOR = 5.518, CI = 1.199-25.391, p = 0.028). Those who knew someone's exposure to rabies were found to have a more favorable attitudes than those who did not (AOR = 2.367, CI = 1.157-4.839, p = 0.018). Respondents who had favorable attitudes towards rabies were found to have more good practices than unfavorable attitudes (AOR = 3.267, CI = 1.391, 7.730, p = 0.005). The study revealed a gap in knowledge among communities in the study area. Thus, rabies control activity and community awareness should be implemented with stakeholders.

Forschen ist Silber, Publizieren ist Gold. Publikationsverhalten im Wissenschaftsbetrieb

Abstract As the current higher education system also ranks the performance of individual researchers through quantitative methods, i.e. according to scientific productivity and the citation of publications in relevant journals, the article critically examines the effects of common evaluation procedures of scientific practice, which have led to a change in publication practice. Since publications abroad and in English-language journals are considered proof of internationally competitive science and academic education, the accumulation of credit points from such types of publication is gaining in importance to fulfill the formal requirements for a career at universities. In this context, not only the publication behavior of young scientists after their doctorate is considered, but also the publication practice of experienced researchers.

Public engagement with consumer sleep technology for obstructive sleep apnea screening: implications for equity, access, and practice.

To characterize public practices and perspectives on the use of consumer sleep technology (CST) and evaluate perspectives on using CST as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We designed a survey instrument incorporating content from validated instruments (STOP-BANG and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale) and hypothesis-generated questions. Survey development involved multidisciplinary collaboration among three board-certified sleep medicine experts, researchers, and consumers. The survey was disseminated across a national sample of adults living in the United States via an online platform. Among 897 respondents, the mean (SD) age was 47.5 (16.9) years; 73.1% were female, 81.8% were White, and 505 respondents (56.3%) reported having tracked sleep using CS. Factors associated with decreased odds of CST use included household income <$30,000 (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.79; p=0.004), Medicaid insurance (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.69; p=0.001), Medicare insurance (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.84; p=0.004), and lack of a primary care physician (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.91; p=0.021). Most respondents (91.1%) agreed or strongly agreed that screening for OSA would be a useful feature of CST, but respondents reporting an education of high school diploma or less (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.79; p=0.004) were less likely to agree with this statement. Attitudes toward and use of CST differed based on demographic and socioeconomic factors. Further study is needed to understand and address barriers to CST adoption and to characterize implications for equitable access to care for sleep disorders.

Socioeconomic factors and COVID-19 mortality in immune-mediated rheumatic diseases patients: regional analysis from Argentina, Mexico and Brazil

BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 infection has become a major international issue, not only from a medical point of view, but also social, economic and political. Most of the available information comes from the United States, Europe, and China, where the population and the socioeconomic status are very different from Latin American countries. This study evaluates the effect of regional socioeconomic characteristics on mortality due SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) from Argentina, Mexico and Brazil.MethodsData from three national registries, SAR-COVID (Argentina), CMR-COVID (Mexico) and ReumaCoV-Brasil (Brazil), were combined. Adult IMRD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited. National data for each province/state, including population density, number of physicians per inhabitant, income, unemployment, GINI index, Municipal Human Development Index (MHDI), stringency index, vaccination rate and most frequent viral strains per period were assessed as risk factors for mortality due to COVID-19.ResultsA total of 4744 patients were included, 2534 (53.4%) from SAR-COVID, 1166 (24.6%) from CMRCOVID and 1044 (22.0%) from ReumaCoV-Brasil. Mortality due to COVID-19 was 5.4%. In the multivariable analysis, higher number of physicians per 1000 inhabitants and being infected during the vaccination period of each country were associated with lower mortality. After adjustment for socioeconomic factors, there was no association with country of residence and mortality.ConclusionThese findings corroborate the complex interplay between socioeconomic factors, rheumatic disease activity, and regional disparities as determinants of death due to COVID-19 in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Thus, this research provides valuable insights for guiding public health policies and clinical practice in the ongoing fight against the COVID-19 pandemic.

Publics' Expectation Toward Ethical Leadership and Ethical Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Evidence From the U.S. and South Korea

ABSTRACTDespite continuous academic attempts to investigate the relationship between public expectations of ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts, little research has demonstrated the subliminal process of the relationship. This study focuses on the publics' power distance perceptions as a key driver to lead individuals to prioritize CSR, mediated by the expectations of corporate ethical leadership. To further understand the mechanism and the way power distance perception influences public attitudes toward CSR operations, this study suggests a theoretical model illustrating the relationships among power distance perception, expectancy of ethical leadership, expectancy of ethical CSR, and willingness to support socially responsible companies. A cross‐national survey was conducted to provide empirical evidence from the United States (U.S.) and South Korea. Given that strategic approaches of CSR prioritize meeting public expectations toward corporate social roles, this study provides meaningful implications on public relations practice and CSR scholarship by demonstrating how public expectations of corporate ethical operations are shaped and how these expectations influence the public evaluation of corporate behaviors.

WASTEFUL GOVERNMENT SPENDING AND MARKET DISTORTION: AN EMPIRICAL ACCOUNT OF MODERN INTERVENTIONISM’S UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT

Wasteful government spending can be seen in the Misesian tradition as a type of interventionism with unintended consequences, such as market distortion and the creation of privilege. An underlying problem that helps the distortion become a tradition is that of ‘wasteful spending cultures’. The latter reflects a hardly identifiable problem in practice, i.e. the creation of welfare losses through public administration practices that are influenced by bureaucratic inertia. The growing acceptance of the compatibility of the Austrian tradition and public policy studies allows for a better understanding of imperfect policies, their consequences, and ways to improve both the process and its result. Using data from government-driven procurement of armored cars in Colombia, this paper illustrates how the distortion of the market mechanism is affected by narrative-driven practices and how special interest groups derive rents at the expense of citizens. Using a cost-effectiveness analysis, the study identifies how a tradition is built around procuring high-end vehicles, portraying a failed central planner in the modern public administration context of a developing country.

Legal and organizational problems of development and production of innovative medicines in Russia

The article outlines the range of problems facing the Russian pharmaceutical industry as a segment of the real sector of the economy that ensures the health of the population. The necessity of an integrated approach to the formation of a model for the organization of scientific research, innovation and production activities in the designated area is substantiated; an organizational model is proposed that ensures the development and production of innovative medicines; individual legal measures aimed at increasing the effectiveness of state support for the development and production of innovative medicines (normative consolidation of the concept of an innovative drug and a scientific and technological consortium, the inclusion of scientific and educational organizations of higher education among the subjects of industrial clusters). The results of the research can be used in law-making activities and public administration practice.

Provider costs of treating opioid dependence with extended-release buprenorphine in Australia.

The costs of providing medication-assisted treatment for opioid dependence can determine its scale of provision. To provide estimates of the costs of extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR), we performed a bottom-up costing analysis of provider operational treatment costs. Data were collected in a single-arm open label trial of BUP-XR injections conducted in specialist public drug treatment services and primary care private practices in three Australian states (the CoLAB study). The unit costs of resources used for each activity were combined with quantities used at each participating facility to arrive at the average annual cost per client. One hundred participants across the six health facility sites received monthly subcutaneous BUP-XR injections administered by a health-care practitioner. The average cost of providing 1 year of treatment per participant was $6656 ($6026-$8326). Screening cost (initial assessment and medical history) was $282 while monthly follow-up appointments cost $531 per client. The main cost driver was the monthly treatment costs accounting for 79% of the average annual client cost, with medication costs comprising 95% of this cost. With medication costs making up the largest proportion of treatment costs, treatment using BUP-XR has the potential to free up other health system resources, for example, staff time. The costs reported in this study can be used in an economic evaluation to estimate the net benefit or cost-effectiveness of BUP-XR especially when compared to other opioid agonist treatments.

Searching for effective strategies to reach boys and young men; a mixed-methods study protocol for youth clinics in Sweden

BackgroundEfforts to engage boys and young men in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Sweden remain limited, with only a small proportion accessing youth clinics, the primary providers of such services. Existing initiatives are often ad-hoc and lack institutionalization within public policy and practice. This study aims to identify feasible and effective interventions to improve boys’ and young men’s access to youth clinics in Sweden.MethodsEmploying a mixed-methods approach, this study investigates interventions, strategies, and factors influencing access to SRH services for boys and young men in Sweden. Firstly, a systematic literature review will be conducted to identify evaluated interventions globally. Secondly, strategies to attracts boys and young men in youth clinics in Sweden will be mapped. Thirdly, case studies in two regions in Sweden – chosen for their demographic and geographic diversity – will be conducted interviewing healthcare providers, managers, policymakers, and boys and young men. Lastly, Q-methodology will be used to rank all identified strategies. Healthcare providers and managers will rank these strategies based on their perceived effectiveness and feasibility while boys and young men will rank the interventions based on perceived effectiveness.DiscussionThe added value of this project is generating robust evidence regarding boys and young men’s involvement in SRH services, especially their access to youth clinics. This is crucial for (1) developing gender-sensitive services and service delivery models that effectively promote young men’s SRH; (2) informing future young men’s health policies ensuring that their unique SRH concerns are addressed; and (3) improving young men’s participation in SRH provision. This will ultimately foster a culture of shared responsibilities and advance gender equality.

Unhealthy Eating Habits and Determinants of Diet Quality in Primary Healthcare Professionals in Poland: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background/Objectives: The aim of this work was to understand the factors influencing the prevalence of dietary behaviors, as well as determinants of unhealthy eating and diet quality among primary care physicians and nurses in Poland. Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 161 doctors and 331 nurses was conducted in the years 2020–2022 in primary healthcare settings. Results: Unhealthy eating habits affected GPs aged 40–54 years (42.9%), females (64.3%), those of normal body weight (67.9%), representing private medical practice (67.9%), who had over 20 years of work experience (42.8%). Similarly, among the group of nurses, unhealthy eating habits were reported in subjects aged 40–54 (46.5%), individuals with normal body weights (49.5%), those with one chronic disease (38.4%), representing public medical practice (63.6%), with over 20 years of work experience (40.4%), seeing ≤100 patients during the work week (84.8%). The univariable logistic regression analyses for unhealthy dietary habits showed that overweight GPs had lower odds of unhealthy eating habits (OR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.11–1.08; p &lt; 0.05). Among the nurses, the odds of unhealthy eating habits increased with the number of years of work. Nurses with 10–20 years of work experience had 1.23 times greater odds of unhealthy eating habits, while people working for more than 20 years had 1.81 times greater odds of unhealthy eating habits than individuals working for a period shorter than ten years (OR = 1.23; 95% CI: 0.68–2.23; p &gt; 0.05 vs. OR = 1.81; 95% CI: p &lt; 0.05). The multivariable logistic regression analysis did not show statistically significant results. Conclusions: These issues should be addressed when planning educational activities aimed at supporting healthcare professionals in implementing lifestyle changes.

“Giving them the best information I could with whatever I had at hand”. Physicians' online health communication practices in a post-normal science context

This study describes US-based physicians' online public communication practices, particularly on the social media platform Twitter/X, during the COVID-19 pandemic. We draw on 28 semi-structured interviews to examine how they responded to the unique COVID-19 context with respect to each of the four features of post-normal science (PNS): facts uncertain, values in dispute, stakes high, and decisions urgent. Our analysis reveals that the pandemic shifted what, why, and how physicians used the platform, and with whom they aimed to communicate. We discuss the implications of these changes in their online communication habits, discourses, and representations around social media as a reaction to the context of PNS brought about by the pandemic.

Poor registration and publication practices in clinical trials of targeted therapeutics for endocrine and metabolic diseases: an observational study

ObjectiveTo assess the completeness and concordance of reporting in registries and corresponding publications of interventional trials on targeted therapeutics for endocrine and metabolic disorders. Study Design and SettingWe searched clinical trial registries in September 2022 for completed interventional trials of target therapeutics for endocrine and metabolic disorders registered from 2005 onwards. We used ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registration Platform (WHO ICTRP) registration requirements to extract data and assess the completeness of initial entry and final updates to trial registration and concordance with their published journal articles. ResultsAmong 149 clinical trials included, 121 (81%) had corresponding publications. Missing mandatory registration data items were identified in 88 (67%) trials at the initial registration, 17 (13%) at the last registration, and in 85 (77%) corresponding publications. All trials showed changes between initial registration and final registration update, and 98% showed changes from the initial registration to publication. Changes between initial registration and final update were most common in the categories ‘Completion date’ (92%), ‘Key secondary outcomes’ (82%), and ‘Date of first enrolment’ (70%). Changes between initial registration and publication were most common in categories ‘Sample size’ (91%), ‘Key inclusion and exclusion criteria’ (81%), ‘Key secondary outcomes’ (84%), and ‘Completion date’ (83%). ConclusionDespite the legal and journal registration requirements, the completeness and consistency of reporting mandatory data items in registries and corresponding publications regarding targeted therapeutics for endocrine and metabolic disorders are inadequate. Our findings raise questions about the integrity and reliability of clinical trials focusing on targeted therapeutics.

RETRACTION: Oncologic, Fertility, and Obstetric Outcomes With MPA Therapy in Women with Endometrial Cancer and Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia.

A. Takeda , Y. Yamamoto , K. Tamura , H. Aoki , H. Noguchi , S. Minato , S. Kamada , R. Arakaki , T. Kaji , and T. Iwasa , "Oncologic, Fertility, and Obstetric Outcomes With MPA Therapy in Women with Endometrial Cancer and Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia," The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 50, no. 4 (2024): 633-638, https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15872. The above article, published online on 28 December 2023 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors; the journal Editor-in-Chief, Hiroaki Kajiyama; and John Wiley & Sons, Australia, Ltd. The retraction has been agreed upon following an investigation into concerns raised by a third party, which revealed major conceptual overlap and significant primary data redundancy with a previously published article by an overlapping group of authors. Such publishing practice is against the journal's policy and Wiley's Best Practice Guidelines on Research Integrity and Publishing Ethics.

Collaboration for Lead Poisoning Prevention in Puerto Rico.

In 2010, Puerto Rico experienced a cluster of childhood lead poisoning cases stemming from parental occupational exposure to lead. Following the immediate response to this crisis, a dedicated coalition of pediatricians and public health practitioners sustained a collaborative effort to advance pediatric environmental health initiatives across Puerto Rico. Their commitment laid the groundwork for the establishment and evolution of Puerto Rico's comprehensive Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention and Blood Lead Level Surveillance Program. This compelling case study showcases the potential for concerted, multidisciplinary action to leverage an acute event to influence public policy and clinical practice to promote children's health. By drawing on the lessons learned and strategies used in Puerto Rico, other jurisdictions can overcome challenges in pursuit of enhanced secondary lead poisoning prevention measures, with the goal of achieving primary prevention in the near future.