Herpes simplex virus (HSV) and HIV have certain common features, including persistence, stigma, and treatment that effectively decreases viral replication but cannot achieve cure. There has been continuing interest in these 2 viruses and their interrelationship since disease caused by HIV was first reported in 1981 and acyclovir was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1982. At one time, it was thought that acyclovir might be useful in treatment of HIV infection because of evidence that it slowed disease progression [1], an observation that is now hypothesized to be attributable to suppression of CD4 + cell activation by persistent HSV coinfection. Views of the relationship between HIV and HSV have now taken a different direction, but one that has substantial support in clinical observations and biology, the importance of HSV in facilitating HIV transmission. This comes at a time of renewed attention to prevention of HIV infection, with the publication of new guidelines from the US Public Health Service [2], although the specific issue of HSV coinfection is barely mentioned. Management of HSV is particularly important in HIV-positive persons, who may experience severe and prolonged outbreaks. Recurrences may be more frequent or chronic and may become nearly continuous as immunosuppression progresses. Episodic or suppressive therapy with oral antiviral agents is often beneficial in the management of HSV disease in HIV-infected persons [3]. Acyclovir, famciclovir, and valacyclovir suppressive therapy have all been studied in HIVimmunocompromised persons [4‐6]. The newer antiviral agents offer increased convenience over acyclovir, and valacyclovir may offer superior efficacy, compared with acyclovir [7]. The choice of treatment regimen is subjective and may be driven by cost, frequency and severity of the HSV outbreak, and patient preference for episodic or (daily) suppressive therapy. One of the most important studies relevant to the role of HSV in HIV trans