This paper reexamines the classic interpersonal explanation of electoral participation. The analysis is based on loglinear modeling of published tabulations from the November 1984, 1982, and 1980 Current Population Surveys. The results support a contagion model of spousal voting. Turnout is higher among those living with a spouse than among other members of the electorate. The high association between husband's and wife's turnout noted in a 1956 presidential election survey (Q = .94) is found to be robust and stable over time. The relevance of these findings for contemporary models of electoral participation is discussed. The role of personal relationships in turning out voters is absent or negligible in contemporary models of electoral participation (Kinder and Sears, 1985; Aldrich and Simon, 1986; Grofman, 1987).1 In contrast, the classic Columbia voting studies (Lazarsfeld, Berelson, and Gaudet, 1948; Berelson, Lazarsfeld, and McPhee, 1954) delineated systematically the social context of voting behavior. Primary-group associates (friends and family) were theorized as providers of political information and influence. The likely mechanisms by which social environments stimulate turnout include the channeling of political information, persuasive argumentation, social pressure, cooperation, and friendly competition. A voter's family, friends, and coworkers serve as bridges to larger networks of social relations (Berelson, Lazarsfeld, and McPhee, 1954:94) which provide access to the information and resources that stimulate political interest and provide an informed basis for making ballot choices. Interpersonal influence occurs when the reluctant voter adopts or acquiesces to an associate's expectations, when associates BRUCE C. STRAITS is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Santa Barbara. The author thanks Noah E. Friedkin, Eric R. A. N. Smith, and Thomas P. Wilson for comments on an earlier draft. 1. A notable exception is the network approach of Huckfeldt and Sprague, 1987, 1988. Public Opinion Quarterly Volume 54:64-73 ? 1990 by the American Association for Public Opinion Research Published by The University of Chicago Press / 0033-362X/90/0054-01/$2.50 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.91 on Wed, 21 Sep 2016 06:01:32 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The Social Context of Voter Turnout 65 reciprocally support each other's electoral participation, and even when an individual is motivated to vote for the opposing candidate to cancel out an associate's choice. This paper provides evidence that one crucial aspect of social context, the spousal relationship, cannot be neglected in explanations of electoral participation. The results support a contagion model of voting: turnout is higher among those living with a spouse, and spouses tend to be joint voters or nonvoters. The similarity in spousal voting appears quite stable over time and unaffected when controls are applied for the major nonattitudinal determinants of voter turnout (educational attainment and age).
Read full abstract