In ‘Low-intensity cigarette smoking and mortality risks: a pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies in Japan’, the authors pool multiple prospective cohort studies to assess the relationship between low-intensity smoking and mortality risk. This study refutes the common belief that low-intensity smoking is not harmful and found a higher risk of mortality among all causes in low-intensity smokers versus never smokers.1 However, the study could be improved in the following ways. Although the authors do acknowledge that the cohorts included in this study only included a smoking status assessment at baseline (with the exception of the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study Cohorts I and II, which re-assessed smoking status at 5 years of follow-up), the study could be improved with more elaboration regarding the impact of this limitation on the study findings. The authors discuss the large decline in smoking prevalence over the recent decades and make the claim that it is likely that many participants reduced or quit smoking, which would improve the observed effect measures; however, all cohorts included individuals over 40 years of age at the time of enrollment, with no stratification by the authors to account for differences in smoking habits by age groups. Research is still unclear as to whether or not the elderly are just as likely as the general population to quit or reduce their smoking. A study conducted in South Korea found that advancing age was not associated with a decline in prevalence of smokers, regardless of gender.2 Given that the readers cannot ascertain the age distribution of the included cohorts from the article, it is difficult to tell whether or not the majority of included participants fall into the age range of elderly or if most are between 40 and 64 years of age. If many of the participants were elderly at baseline, it cannot be safely assumed that many of them quit or reduced their smoking during the follow-up period.
Read full abstract