You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Advanced1 Apr 2011643 WHAT ABOUT REPRODUCIBILITY OF DECISION MADE AT MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM MANAGEMENT? Younes Bayoud, Johann Menard, Thomas Ripert, Marie Dominique Azemar, Rabah Messaoudi, and Frederic Staerman Younes BayoudYounes Bayoud Reims, France More articles by this author , Johann MenardJohann Menard Reims, France More articles by this author , Thomas RipertThomas Ripert Reims, France More articles by this author , Marie Dominique AzemarMarie Dominique Azemar Reims, France More articles by this author , Rabah MessaoudiRabah Messaoudi Reims, France More articles by this author , and Frederic StaermanFrederic Staerman Reims, France More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.1545AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES to evaluate the reproducibility of thérapeutic decisions made at multidisciplinary team management (MDTM). We compared therapeutic decision of prostate cancer by presenting the same file of patient under a false identity, after a period of first presentation at MDTM. METHODS Forty-nine file of radical prostatectomy (RP) (28 pT2, 21 pT3) performed for clinical loalised prostate cancer were represented at MDTM. Patient's File was identical but the identitiy was false. Patients were represented at MDTM 6 to 12 months after the first presentation. The MDTM included urologist, oncologist, pathologist and radiologist. Therapeutic decisions were analysed using criteria as: TNM stage, Gleason score, margin status. The reproducibility was assessed statistically by Kappa (k) coefficient. RESULTS Forty-nine patients were presented a second time at MDTM. The distribution of cohort was as follows: 28 pT2c and 21 pT3 (14 pT3a, 7 pT3b). The mean age was similar in both groups. The mean PSA was 8.32 ng/ml (3.56–19.5) in pT2 group and 9.4ng/ml (3.8–22) in pT3 group. The margin status was positive in 25% and 47.6% respectively in pT2 and pT3 group. Decision made for pT2 group were the same in 100% case with k=1. In the group of pT3 (n=7), 33% of decision were different at second presentation at MDTM, especially for pT3b with only 29% reproducible decision with k= 0.1. Concerning a group of pT3a, 86% of decision were reproducible with k= 0.74. CONCLUSIONS This study showed a reliability and reproducibility of decision made at MDTM when guidelines were well defined. The therapeutic attitude were less reproducible in locally advanced prostate cancer but the decision concerning those cases should be made in the set of guidelines at MDTM. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e260 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Younes Bayoud Reims, France More articles by this author Johann Menard Reims, France More articles by this author Thomas Ripert Reims, France More articles by this author Marie Dominique Azemar Reims, France More articles by this author Rabah Messaoudi Reims, France More articles by this author Frederic Staerman Reims, France More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...