This paper is wri t ten about one session of a difficult psychotherapy group, seen on videotape at the fall conference of the Eastern Group Psychotherapy Society in 1985 and discussed by a panel. The panel comprised the two therapists and the supervisor of the group--Ms. Thera, Dr. Junior and Dr. Senior--and three professionals in the field with three different frames of reference: Dr. Ormont, Dr. Tut tman and Dr. Agazarian. My own approach was that of ~the group-as-a-whole. When I first listened to the tape I was searching for live examples of the Theory of the Invisible Group, my own formulation of group-as-a-whole thinking. I also wanted to discover if listening to the voice of this videotaped group would yield insights into the dynamics of this group that would not have been apparent if I had confined my listening to the voices of the individual members. This, for me, is the test of theory. If theory can help us see things or do things or understand things that we could not without theory, then it is useful and important. As it seems very important for us not to ~fight in the field about whether there is such a thing as the group-as-a-whole which is different from the sum of the individual interpersonal interactions, I suggest two hypotheses as a framework for evaluating the following ideas. First, that from the individual perspective, all behavior that occurs in a group can be explained as a function of innerpersonal and interpersonal dynamics. Second, with equal validity, one can observe the exact same events in the group from the group-as-a-whole perspective and explain all behavior as a function of group roles and group-asa-whole dynamics. One of the most unusual and helpful foundations for this paper was the generosity with which Dr. Senior, Dr. Junior and Ms. Thera shared their inner experience in relation to this group and the supervisory issues around it. Supervision has a major impact on the way therapists frame their experience in group and on their leadership behavior. So one group system, the group of supervisor and therapists, existed both inside and outside the boundary of the therapy group, and influenced the way the therapists behaved in the group, as we shall see later. This outpatient group of psychosomatic patients must have indeed been very difficult for Dr. Junior and Ms. Thera, two relatively novice group therapists. When Ms. Thera read the history of the group, she quoted some of the things that the group had said in relation to Frank, one of their members who had died of cancer. I am going to present these quotes, first suggesting that probably
Read full abstract