BackgroundSexual dysfunction (SD) is a common symptom for many with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, SD research in general appears to often overlook young adults within their samples, which can be a major issue for better understanding and treatment for the MS population. Few studies have compared age-related differences in distress in response to physical disability. Research has also found that many people diagnosed with MS do not discuss any SD struggles with their providers. The present study hopes to see whether age-related differences exist in the reporting of the levels of primary, secondary, and tertiary SD, as defined by subscale scores of the Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire-19 (MSISQ-19), and amount of distress, as defined by the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)’s Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). Additionally, we hope to determine if there are any age-related or sex-related differences in help-seeking behaviors for SD. MethodsStudy participants were recruited from the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry. Participants completed the MSISQ-19, SF-12, and Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), provided demographic information, and responded if they received medical or psychological treatment for SD. Study participants were 5815 respondents (Mage = 51 years, SD = 9.63, 75 % female, 30 % having attained a high school diploma, 35 % scoring “advanced disability” on the PDDS). Young adult (19–39 years), middle adult (40–64 years), and mature adult (65-older) were compared on SD. ResultsLinear mixed effects modeling revealed that the MSISQ-19 subscale scores were significantly predicted by secondary SD (t = 2.48, p < .13). Young adult participants had the lowest primary SD (M = 13.87, 95 % CI [13.13, 14.61]) when compared to mature adult (M = 14.12, 95 % CI [13.27, 14.97]) and middle adult participants (M = 14.44, 95 % CI [14.21, 14.66]), though none were statistically significant. Mature adults had the lowest secondary SD (M = 16.50, 95 % CI [15.65, 17.35]), a statistically significant difference from the middle adults (M = 18.20, 95 % CI [17.97, 18.42]) and young adults (M = 18.91, 95 % CI [18.17, 19.65]). Mature adults had the lowest tertiary symptoms (M = 10.12, 95 % CI [9.27, 10.96]), followed by young adults (M = 12.23, 95 % CI [11.48, 12.97]), and middle adults (M = 11.65, 95 % CI [11.43, 11.88]), though none were statistically significant. Hierarchical multiple regressions found that age had the most significant impact on SD. When SF-12 MCS-12 was added, linear mixed effects did not reveal any statistically significant results between the age groups and SD levels. In contrast, hierarchical multiple regressions found that SF-12 MCS-12 scores had the most significant impact on SD. There were significant age-related and sex-related differences in help-seeking behaviors in those who sought psychological counseling as opposed to medical treatment for SD. ConclusionOur study has highlighted the importance of clinicians assessing for SD and psychological distress within their patients and to consider potential differences in symptom presentations of age groups to better address their unique needs.
Read full abstract