A Psychoanalytic Study of Evil C. Fred Alford For all things, from the Void Called forth, deserve to be destroyed . . . . Destruction,—aught with Evil blent,— That is my proper element. —Goethe. Faust, part 1. Quoted by Freud in Civilization and its Discontents Sigmund Freud (1930, 120–122) does not write very much about evil, or at least he does not call it that. In Civilization and its Discontents he does, quoting the above lines by Goethe, and equating evil with the Todestrieb, the drive toward death. Not just because the Todestrieb seeks destruction, but because it seeks the void, nothingness. I too argue that evil is about nothingness—not just the nothingness we seek, but the nothingness we dread. Evil is nothingness because it is no-thing: the dread of boundlessness, and all that goes with it—loss of self, loss of meaning, loss of history, and loss of connection to the world itself. Though I refer to Freud, I draw more heavily upon Thomas Ogden, the analyst who originated the concept of the autistic-contiguous position, an experience of boundlessness at once transcendent and terrifying. One might respond that dread is not the same as evil: the former is a psychological experience, the latter a moral category. There would be some truth to such a response, and I address their complex relationship shortly. For now it must suffice to say that when sixty-eight subjects were asked to talk about evil, most referred to an experience of dread. Each interview lasted about two hours, and was conducted in a conversational, open-ended fashion. Fifty of the respondents were average citizens responding to advertisements placed in a campus newspaper, a local newspaper, and the newspaper of a retirement community (the methodological appendix addresses the problem of self-selection). Eighteen of [End Page 27] the respondents were hardly average, prisoners at a maximum security prison with a small group therapy program. Most had murdered a relative or loved one. I met with the inmates as a group, several hours once a week for over a year. The sheer time spent with the prisoners (over two hundred hours) fostered an intimacy and trust that was rare but not unheard of in a two-hour interview with an individual subject. Free informants are referred to by first name and last initial. Inmates are referred to as Mr. or Ms. This is not to patronize, but reflects the practice of the prison, the way the inmates were known to me. All names are pseudonyms. Presenting the results in numbers (32 hold this, 21 hold that) or percentages does not seem appropriate or useful, granting an aura of precision that is unwarranted and unnecessary. As Aristotle puts it, “it is the mark of a trained mind to expect no more precision than the subject matter allows” (N.Ethics 1094b30). Instead, I have employed the terms “almost all,” “most,” “many,” “some,” “few,” and “very few” in as precise a manner as seems warranted by the terms themselves, using each to reflect a specific number range of responses. The methodological appendix gives the number range to which each of these terms refers, as well as the questions asked, in addition to providing some demographic information about the informants. About most (but not all) questions, the response totals of free citizens and inmates were similar. The differences were in the reasoning and the tone. These differences in tone and logic are important differences (perhaps the most important) that numbers alone cannot capture. The numbers aim to give a feel for how a fairly large group of people responded. What is as interesting, and at least as important, is the tone of the informant’s response, and this is not always adequately represented by numbers. It is often better represented by quotations from the informants. What is a Psychoanalytic Interview? What is a Psychoanalytic Conclusion? Neither the discussions with prisoners, nor interviews withfree subjects, were psychoanalytic in a strict sense. Indeed, [End Page 28] it is hard to know what a psychoanalytic interview would mean. The interviews, and group work, were, however, psychoanalytically informed. Above all, this means most of the time was spent listening: for the image, the...
Read full abstract