Robert Johnson: Mythmaking and Contemporary American Culture. By Patricia R. Schroeder. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2004. Pp. x, 192. Acknowledgments, illustrations, appendix, notes, worked cited, index. $25.00.) Devil's Son-in-Law: Story of & His Songs, Revised and Expanded Edition. By Paul Garon. (Chicago: Charles H. Kerr, 2003. Pp. xii, 138. Foreword to 1971 edition, foreword to 2003 edition, illustrations, notes, bibliography, discography, index, companion CD. $21.00, cloth; $15.00, paperback.) Here we have two books taking on unenviable challenges-discussing lives and legacies of two influential Arkansas-connected bluesmen about whom very little is known. Only one photograph is known to exist of Wheatstraw; only in recent years did two known photographs of Johnson surface. In terms of public recognition then and now, careers of Robert Johnson and William Peetie Wheatstraw Bunch could scarcely be more different. Johnson, dead since 1938 and not especially popular during his time, is today subject of documentaries, referenced in movies and TV, and lauded as muse to rock 'n' roll royalty like Eric Clapton and Rolling Stones. He earned a posthumous Grammy and appeared on a U.S. postage stamp in 1990s. Wheatstraw, by contrast, was among most prolific and popular of 1930s blues pianists (he also played guitar). In fact, Wheatstraw's popularity was such that Johnson adopted Wheatstraw's catchphrase vocal tic, ooh, well, well. But today, is nearly forgotten. For this reason alone, Garon's would-be biography, an update of his 1971 tome, is to be commended. accompanying CD is a fantastic bonus to better understand Wheatstraw's influence. author pulls many of scraps that are known about together and offers new ideas about man's psyche by delving into his song lyrics. In doing so, however, he seems to stray by confusing artist and his art. Garon writes, we consider [the lyrics] fantasy, very probably lived this fantasy as well as sang about it. Huh? Further: The separation of fantasy from reality is not always necessary for our purposes. We can see this is so if we investigate Peetie's attitude towards women, for example, using lyrics as our guide. We can say that however actually treated women, his songs tell us how he felt about them. But isn't it reverse when telling the story of a person, that way he actually treated women tells us how he felt about them? Sometimes, when a song tackles a topical issue or mentions a place name, Garon uncovers a nugget, but too often author relies on device of analyzing songs in search of himself. With information so scarce, Garon's dilemma is understandable, but speculative nature of practice sheds precious little light in end. Surrealist art-much of it, thankfully, based around lone photograph-is found throughout book, as are surrealist references in text. …