Psoriatic Arthritis Screening And Evaluation Research Articles

A cross-sectional questionnaire survey involving physicians for the clarification of the diagnosis and current status of therapeutic intervention of psoriatic arthritis in Japan.

Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) often experience comorbid, irreversible joint destruction, therefore early diagnosis and treatment of PsA are important. The diagnosis requires a comprehensive assessment, which includes an interview, a physical examination, a visual examination of the skin and nails, a blood test, and an imaging test. To clarify how patients with PsA are actually diagnosed and how physicians collaborate among clinical departments, we conducted a web-based questionnaire survey of 500 physicians (dermatologists, rheumatologists, and orthopedists) frequently involved in PsA treatment in Japan. The survey showed that those patients are rarely confirmed to have axial arthritis, peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, or dactylitis by general dermatology practitioners (GP dermatologists). Overall, <60% of patients suspected of having PsA underwent PsA examination by GP dermatologists more than once every 6 months; this percentage is lower than that of patients who underwent PsA examination by rheumatologists and orthopedists. The Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) questionnaire is the most commonly used for PsA screening. However, users of PASE were only 11.0%, 25.3%, 14.8%, and 24.1% of GP dermatologists, attending dermatologists in hospitals (HP dermatologists), rheumatologists, and orthopedists, respectively. While >80% of HP dermatologists, rheumatologists, and orthopedists used imaging tests (ultrasound, X-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging) for PsA screening, only 40% of GP dermatologists performed imaging tests. Regarding the demands on the healthcare environment of PsA treatment, early diagnosis and treatment for PsA are crucial in every clinical department. The present study showed that GP dermatologists rarely perform imaging tests or confirm a PsA diagnosis, thus patients may miss out on appropriate treatment through collaboration among clinical departments and step-up therapy. Because patients with PsA present diverse comorbid clinical symptoms, early diagnosis, including routine imaging tests, and appropriate treatment in collaboration with other experts are necessary.

Assessment of four screening tools and retrieval of key questions to detect undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis in Chinese patients with psoriasis: A multicenter study.

Several screening tools have been developed to facilitate early diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA); however, their performance varied greatly across different studies. In this study, we validated and compared the performance of four screening tools in detecting undiagnosed PsA Chinese patients with psoriasis, and determined the key questions and their weights. The four screening tools were the Early Arthritis for Psoriatic Patients (EARP) questionnaire, Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) questionnaire, Psoriasis and Arthritis Screening Questionnaire (PASQ), and Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST). The receiver-operator curve (ROC) with area under curve (AUC) was used to determine sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and logistic regression were utilized to retrieve key questions, and a nomogram was utilized to visualize their weights. Of 482 psoriasis patients from dermatology clinics, 77 were newly diagnosed with PsA. Another 68 patients with newly diagnosed PsA from rheumatology clinics were incorporated in the analysis. ROC analysis indicated that the optimal cut-off values for EARP, PASE, PASQ, and PEST were 3, 40, 7, and 3, with corresponding sensitivities of 91.4%, 88.6%, 86.2%, and 88.5%, and specificities of 88.6%, 75.2%, 80.2%, and 83.6%, respectively. The AUC of EARP (0.925) was higher than those of PASE (0.885), PASQ (0.905), and PEST (0.827). However, none of them were sufficiently sensitive to identify pure axial PsA (sensitivities of EARP, PASQ, and PASE were 25.0%, 36.8%, and 42.1%, respectively). Twelve key questions were retrieved from these four tools to establish a nomogram with a high discrimination (C-index=0.993) and a good calibration (mean absolute error=0.014). In conclusion, to screen undiagnosed PsA, EARP has slightly better balanced sensitivity and specificity, and higher accuracy. The retrieval of key questions and nomogram signify the necessity of attributing different scores to differently weighted questions when developing a new screening tool to make it function more efficiently.

Relationship between iodine-enhanced dual energy-computed tomographic findings and ultrasonographic findings for psoriatic arthritis.

Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are useful for diagnosing psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, ultrasonography depends on the skill of the operator and MRI is often disturbed by artifacts when distal interphalangeal joints are examined. Although iodine-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has the potential to diagnose PsA without these disadvantages, its usefulness over ultrasonography has not yet been examined in detail; therefore, the present study was conducted to address this issue. The acral joint of 13 PsA patients, which was the most severely affected, was scanned with imaging devices. Ultrasonography was performed with a high-frequency linear 18-MHz probe. Iodine-enhanced DECT was conducted in the DE mode with iohexol as a contrast material. Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) scores were recorded. Synovitis and periarticular inflammation delineated with iodine-enhanced DECT correlated with the loss of the fibrillar pattern delineated with ultrasonography (p=0.033 and 0.002, respectively). Peritendinitis delineated with iodine-enhanced DECT also correlated with tendon thickening delineated with ultrasonography (p=0.011). Iodine uptake did not correlate with Doppler signal or PASE scores. In conclusion, the present results demonstrated that the qualitative findings of iodine-enhanced DECT correlated with those of ultrasonography in PsA patients, whereas quantitative findings did not. Iodine-enhanced DECT may be an alternative imaging modality for the diagnosis of PsA.

Assessment of enthesitis in patients with psoriasis: Relationships with clinical features, screening questionnaries results, and quality of life: An ultrasound study

Background/Aim. Often asymptomatic, enthesitis can be an integral feature of the wide clinical spectrum in psoriasis as well as an early sign of development of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). It may be difficult to clinically recognize enthesitis in patients with psoriasis or distinguish it from other causes of extraarticular pain. Ultrasound (US) expanding use with the development of accurate assessments through standardized US algorithms as the Glasgow Ultrasound Enthesis Scoring System (GUESS) and the Madrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index Scoring System (MASEI) scores made the US the dominant imaging technique in diagnosing enthesitis. The aims of this study were to establish the prevalence of US signs of en-thesitis, compare it with screening questionnaires results, and estimate possible connections of US verified enthesitis with quality of life (QOL) of patients with psoriasis without PsA diagnosis. Methods. A cross-sectional study was performed on 67 patients with psoriasis who were without systemic therapy. The clinical presence of enthesitis was examined by an experienced rheumatologist, and systemic inflammation was estimated through serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP). The Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Body Surface Area- Psoriasis (BSA-PsO) were calculated by a dermatologist. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, screening questionnaires ? the Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screening (ToPAS), Psoriasis Ep-idemiology Screening Tool (PEST), Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE), Early Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Questionnaire (EARP), and Psoriasis and Arthrosis Screening Questionnaire (PASQ) ? were filled by patients. GUESS and MASEI scores were determined by US. The QOL was estimated by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Results. The presence of clinical enthesitis was recorded in 8.7% of patients. According to US signs of enthesitis using GUESS and MASEI scores, only 7% and 2% of patients, respectively, had no sign of enthesitis. Duration of psoriasis and age of subjects were in a significant correlation with GUESS and MASEI scores, while systemic inflammation, V AS v alue, PASI, and BSA-PsO scores were not. GUESS and MASEI scores significantly correlated with scores of all screening questionnaires as well as with DLQI. Conclusion. US can detect subclinical enthesitis better than clinical examination and widely used screening questionnaires, even though the correlations between MASEI and/or GUESS scores and results of screening questionnaires were positive. US examination is important in the multidisciplinary approach in diagnosing and managing psoriasis.

Real-World Postmarketing Study of the Impact of Adalimumab Treatment on Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.

IntroductionThis study investigated the effectiveness of adalimumab treatment in improving Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in real-world settings in Japan.MethodsThis 24-week, single-arm, postmarketing surveillance study (2014–2017), conducted at 75 centers in Japan, enrolled adalimumab-naïve patients (paid workers, including part-time) meeting ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR). The primary endpoint was improvement in overall work impairment (OWI) scores from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints included changes in WPAI-PsA (OWI, absenteeism, presenteeism, and activity impairment), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), psoriatic arthritis screening and evaluation (PASE) scores, Disease Activity Scores in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) scores, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores, and PASI75/90 and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 rates.ResultsIn the effectiveness population (n = 106; 72.6% men; mean ± standard deviation [SD] age, 49.3 ± 10.7 years), OWI scores significantly improved (mean ± SD change, − 25.2 ± 35.3; p < 0.0001) from baseline to week 24. Other WPAI domain scores also improved significantly. Changes in OWI were significantly correlated (p < 0.0001) with PASE (r = 0.6284), DAS28(CRP) (r = 0.6059), BASDAI (r = 0.7281), and HAQ-DI (r = 0.6161) scores and were significantly influenced by previous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (p = 0.0142), and baseline PASE (p = 0.0098), DAS28(CRP) (p = 0.0026), HAQ-DI (p = 0.0004), and BASDAI (p < 0.0001) scores. At the last evaluation, rate (95% confidence interval) of PASI 75 and 90 (n = 100) was 58.0% (47.7–67.8) and 39.0% (29.4–49.3), respectively, and that of ACR 20, 50, and 70 (n = 58) was 86.2% (74.6–93.9), 70.7% (57.3–81.9), and 53.4% (39.9–66.7), respectively. No new safety signals were observed in the safety population (n = 148).ConclusionAdalimumab treatment improved WPAI in patients with PsA. Improvements in OWI and joint symptoms were significantly associated.Trial Registration NumberClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02414633.FundingAbbVie GK and Eisai Co., Ltd.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0866-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Usefulness of the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation Questionnaire to Monitor Disease Activity in Management of Patients with Psoriasis: Findings from the EPI-PSODE Study.

BackgroundPsoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are included in the group of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) caused by systemic inflammation; however, indicators for monitoring inflammatory activity in patients with psoriasis, such as the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), are limited.ObjectiveTo determine whether the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) questionnaire can be used to monitor disease activity in patients with psoriasis.MethodsThis was a multicenter, noninterventional, cross-sectional study. Demographic factors and PASI and PASE scores were collected to investigate associations between each.ResultsPASE data were available for 1,255 patients, of whom 498 (39.7%) had a score of ≥37. Compared with the group with PASE score <37, the group with score ≥37 had a higher proportion of women (34.9% vs. 48.8%, p<0.0001), older mean age at diagnosis (36.4 vs. 41.7 years, p<0.0001), more severe disease activity using PASI and body surface area measures (p=0.0021 and p=0.0008, respectively), and higher mean body mass index (23.7 vs. 24.1, p=0.0411). In a multiple linear regression model, PASE score was positively associated with cutaneous disease activity (p<0.0001).ConclusionAfter risk-adjustment, PASE was positively associated with PASI, which suggests that PASE can be sensitive to disease activity. Since psoriasis is regarded as one of the IMIDs, PASE may be utilized as a tool not only to screen PsA but also to monitor disease activity.

Semantic and psychometric validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version (PASE-P) of the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation questionnaire.

PASE (Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation) was developed in the English language to screen for inflammatory arthritis among patients with psoriasis. It is 15 item self administered questionnaire with a score from 15 to 75. A higher score indicates a greater risk for inflammatory joint disease. The purpose of this study was to translate, adapt and validate this questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese (PASE-P). METHODS: 465 patients diagnosed with psoriasis (158 with psoriatic arthritis confirmed by a rheumatologist according to the CASPAR criteria and 307 without) were evaluated in dermatology clinics. We performed the analysis of semantic equivalence in eight steps. For psychometric equivalence, we evaluated the data quality, reliability, construct validity, well-known groups and discriminant characteristics of the items, as well as a ROC curve to determine optimal PASE-P cutoff points in case identification and their sensitivity / specificity. The final version presented excellent reproducibility (CCI = 0.97) and reliability (Cronbach’s alpha> 0.9). A cut-off point of 25 distinguished between patients with and without psoriatic arthritis, with sensitivity of 69.5 and specificity of 86.8. PASE-P proved to be culturally valid and reliable to screen for psoriatic arthritis in Brazilian patients with psoriasis.

The relationship between clinical characteristics including presence of exposed lesions and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with psoriasis: analysis from the nationwide epidemiologic study for psoriasis in Korea (EPI-PSODE study).

Psychological aspect and quality of life should be considered in treating patients with psoriasis. We sought to ascertain which clinical characteristics including presence of exposed lesions are associated with impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with psoriasis. The EPI-PSODE study was a nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional study conducted in Korea that included 1260 adult patients with psoriasis. In addition to clinical characteristics including presence of exposed lesions, data were collected using the Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Screening and Evaluation (PASE), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire Psoriasis (WPAI: PSO) and Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). Patients with a DLQI score>5 (n=990) were younger, had an earlier onset of psoriasis, scored higher on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), had higher body surface area (BSA) and had higher PASE scores than patients with DLQI≤5 (n=266). The group of patients with exposed lesions (n=871) were younger and male predominance, earlier onset of psoriasis, longer disease duration, higher PASI/BSA score and a higher proportion with drinking and smoking history each than the group of patients without exposed lesions (n=389). Presence of exposed lesions negatively influenced DLQI, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (mental component), presenteeism, total work productivity impairment and total activity impairment in the WPAI: PSO. In multiple regression model, PASI score was the only variable which was significantly associated with all HRQoL measures. Presence of exposed lesions was a significant factor affecting DLQI and SF-36 (mental). The presence of exposed lesions has a negative impact on quality of life, mental health and work productivity. Therefore, effective treatments are particularly needed for psoriasis patients with exposed lesions.

PP36 Early Diagnosis And Treatment Of Psoriatic Arthritis

Introduction:Screening for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is expected to identify patients at earlier stages of the disease. Early treatment is expected to slow disease progression and delay the need for biologic therapy. This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of screening tools for PsA in Canada.Methods:A Markov model was built to estimate the associated costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of screening tools for PsA in patients using topical treatment for psoriasis. The screening tools included: the Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screening (ToPAS) questionnaire; the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST); the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) questionnaire; and the Early ARthritis for Psoriatic patients (EARP) questionnaire. Health states were defined by disability levels, as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and state transition was modeled according to annual disease progression. Screening was assumed to be effective during a 2-year sojourn period. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated based on health-state specific costs and utilities. A probabilistic analysis was undertaken to account for parameter uncertainty. All results were compared with the commonly cited cost-effectiveness threshold of CAD 50,000 (USD 37, 600) per additional QALY.Results:Screening with the ToPAS questionnaire resulted in cost savings compared with no screening or the EARP questionnaire, with a total cost of CAD 30,706 (USD 23,090) and 17.29 QALYs. The PEST dominated the PASE questionnaire and was more costly and more effective than the ToPAS questionnaire, with an ICER of CAD 312,398 (USD 234,909). The results were most sensitive to test sensitivity and specificity, HAQ progression, and average HAQ score at diagnosis and the start of biologic therapy. A scenario analysis tested screening efficacy for a 1-year period before diagnosis, with the ToPAS questionnaire remaining the most cost-effective option.Conclusions:Screening was cost-effective compared with no screening at the commonly used cost-effectiveness threshold of CAD 50,000 (USD 37, 600). Value of information analyses will be useful for determining the need to collect further information around test accuracy parameters.

Determining the Validity and Reliability of Persian Version of the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation Questionnaire

Background: The psoriatic arthritis screening and evaluation (PASE) questionnaire was designed in English language with no particular action for the Persian language population. The current study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of this questionnaire for screening the patients with psoriatic arthritis (PSA). Patients and methods: The PASE questionnaire was administered to 100 patients with psoriasis. After determining the validity of questionnaire, the receiver operation characteristic (Roc) curve was used to optimize the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire to diagnose the patients. The reliability of the PASE questionnaire was determined by a group of patients with PSA; data were analysed using SPSS. Results: Out of 100 participants, 36 had PSA. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) score of the questionnaire in the groups with PSA and without PSA were 50.19 ± 12.97 and 38.75 ± 12.53, respectively and the difference between the groups was significant (P<0.0001); the total score of the questionnaire ranged 15-75. In this questionnaire, scores higher than 42 are considered as patients with PSA, with 73.81% Sensitivity and 74.13% specificity. Correlation between the tests was significant using test-retest reliability (P<0.05; r ≥ 0.8). Conclusion: The results showed that the questionnaire has a relatively high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing PSA patients. Furthermore the questionnaire had acceptable reliability; however, Persian version is not an adequate method for diagnosis patients with psoriatic arthritis in the absence of clinical diagnosis rheumatologist. In other words the Persian version of the PASE questionnaire is only an initial screening test for PSA diagnosis and cannot substitute for clinical examinations by a rheumatologist.

Frequency of undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis among psoriasis patients in Australian dermatology practice.

Psoriatic arthritis commonly develops in psoriasis patients and, if undiagnosed, can lead to potentially avoidable joint damage and an increased risk of comorbidity and mortality. Increased awareness of PsA symptoms among dermatologists provides an opportunity for earlier diagnosis, more timely therapy and prevention of disability. To provide Australian epidemiological data on the frequency of undiagnosed PsA among psoriasis patients in dermatology practice, and to investigate the impact of psoriasis on quality of life and work productivity. Nine tertiary centre dermatology practices enrolled patients presenting with plaque psoriasis and no prior rheumatologist-confirmed PsA diagnosis. Patients were screened using the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) questionnaire and were referred to a rheumatologist for assessment of PsA status using CASPAR criteria if they had a PASE score ≥44. Based on the composite and sequential application of PASE and CASPAR criteria, undiagnosed PsA among psoriasis patients in this study is 9% [95% CI: 6, 12]. The PPV of PASE in this setting is 26% [95% CI: 19, 34]. Nail involvement and chronic large plaque psoriasis were identified as independent positive predictors of PsA, whereas scalp psoriasis was an independent negative predictor of PsA. Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PASI ≥15) had lower quality of life scores than patients with less severe psoriasis. In this study, the frequency of undiagnosed PsA in Australian dermatology practice was 9% among plaque psoriasis patients with no prior PsA diagnosis. Compared with psoriasis alone, the impact of undiagnosed PsA on health-related quality of life of psoriasis patients is substantial.

Alcohol Intake and Risk of Incident Psoriatic Arthritis in Women

Alcohol intake has been associated with an increased risk of psoriasis. However, the association between alcohol intake and risk of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has been unclear. We evaluated the association between alcohol intake and risk of incident PsA in a large cohort of US women. Our present study included a total of 82,672 US women who provided repeated data on alcohol intake over the followup period (1991-2005). Self-reported PsA was validated using the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) questionnaire. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the age-adjusted and multivariate-adjusted HR and 95% CI for the PsA in association with alcohol intake. We documented 141 incident PsA cases during 14 years (1,137,763 person-yrs) of followup. Compared to non-drinkers, the multivariate HR for PsA were 0.70 (95% CI 0.48-1.01) for 0.1-14.9 g/day, 1.43 (95% CI 0.67-3.08) for 15.0-29.9 g/day, and 4.45 (95% CI 2.07-9.59) for ≥ 30.0 g/day of cumulative average alcohol intake. Risk estimates were generally consistent when using updated alcohol intake and baseline alcohol intake in 1991 as the exposures, and when the analysis was restricted to those who developed psoriasis during the followup. Excessive alcohol intake was associated with an increased risk of incident PsA in a cohort of US women.

Screening for Psoriatic Arthritis in Korean Psoriasis Patients Using the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Evaluation Questionnaire.

BackgroundPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) is chronic seronegative inflammatory arthritis that causes irreversible joint damage. Early recognition of PsA in patients with psoriasis is important for preventing physical disability and deformity. However, diagnosing PsA in a busy dermatology outpatient clinic can be difficult.ObjectiveThis study aimed to validate the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) questionnaire for the detection of PsA in Korean patients with psoriasis.MethodsThe PASE questionnaire was prospectively given to 148 patients diagnosed with psoriasis but without a previous diagnosis of PsA. All patients underwent radiologic and laboratory examinations, and a subsequent clinical evaluation by a rheumatologist.ResultsEighteen psoriasis patients (12.2%) were diagnosed with PsA according to the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis. The PASE questionnaire scores of differed significantly between PsA and non-PsA patients. Receiver operator characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.72, 0.92) for PASE score. A PASE score cut-off of 37 points had a sensitivity of 77.8% and specificity of 82.3% for the diagnosis of PsA.ConclusionThe PASE questionnaire is a simple and convenient screening tool for detecting PsA in Korean dermatology clinics. A PASE questionnaire score of 37 points appears to be an appropriate cut-off for screening Korean psoriasis patients.

Remission criteria and activity indices in psoriatic arthritis.

Remission criteria and activity indices used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are often applied in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Some new indices have been specifically developed for PsA. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of different remission criteria and activity indices in PsA. This is a cross-sectional study that includes consecutive patients with PsA. Information necessary to complete the following indices was captured: Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (CPDAI), Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE), Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Boolean RA remission criteria. Patients were classified according to activity categories (remission, low, medium, or high disease activity). Correlation between indices was established. Fifty-five patients were included. Mean age was 53 years (SD = 12), and 35 (63.6 %) were males. Mean PsA disease duration was 5.9 years (SD = 8.5), and mean psoriasis duration was 15.9 (SD = 12.6). We found important differences in the percentage of patients classified as in remission by applying different remission criteria: DAS28 = 33 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 20-45) vs ACR/EULAR = 4 % (95 % CI 1-17). Particularly, DAS28 and minimal disease activity seemed to be less stringent in PsA than the other indices. Of the specific PsA indices evaluated, CPDAI showed the poorest correlation with all the other activity measurements, although differences were not statistically significant in most cases. Disease activity in PsA is measured by many different indices. In spite they all showed good correlations between them, they classified different patients in different disease status.

Psoriatic arthritis screening tools: study design and methodological challenges

Funding sources: No external funding. Conflicts of interest: A.A.Q. has licensed the PASE questionnaire to Merck and Pfizer, has received a grant from Amgen, and is a consultant for Jansen, Novartis and Abbott. J.F.M. is a consultant for Biogen IDEC, an investigator for Amgen and has served on an advisory board for Amgen. M.E.H. has licensed the PASE questionnaire as above, and has also acted as a consultant for UCB, Amgen, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb and Abbott. Dear Editor, In their study ‘Comparison of three screening tools to detect psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis (CONTEST study)’, Coates et al.1 compared three published, validated screening tools for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening project (PEST), the Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screen (ToPAS) and the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) tools.1 2 3 4 5 We would like to address how PASE was not adequately or appropriately compared in this setting.

Validation and Field Performance of the Italian Version of the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) Questionnaire.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a potentially severe inflammatory condition (entheso-arthro-osteopathy), and early diagnosis is important to guide treatment choices in patients with psoriasis. The objective of this study is to further validate the PsA Screening and Evaluation (PASE) questionnaire, and to assess its field performance. Data were collected in 10 Italian centres, and the PASE was administered at baseline, after 3 days and after 3 months. The Skindex-29 was also administered. To determine the best cut-off value to identify patients with PsA we produced receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using the rheumatologist's diagnosis as outcome. Of the 298 patients that were enrolled, 28% were classified as having PsA according to the CASPAR criteria, while 19% had received a diagnosis of PsA from a rheumatologist. PASE score were always significantly different in patients with or without PsA, while Skindex-29 scores never were. The internal consistency of the PASE was very good (Cronbach's α of 0.90-0.95), the test-retest reliability was also very high (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.91-0.93), and the PASE scores showed good responsiveness to clinical change over time. The optimal cut-off identified through the ROC curves was ≥ 48 on the total PASE score, which was able to distinguish PsA from non-PsA patients with a 73.2% sensitivity and a 76.1% specificity. Our results confirm the good psychometric properties of the PASE, and indicate that it may be a useful tool for the dermatologists, both to screen for PsA and to obtain a standardized patient-reported measure to monitor and evaluate the health status of the patients with PsA.

Turkish PASE: Turkish Version of the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation Questionnaire

BackgroundPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis and causes irreversible joint damage, unless detected early and treated with systemic drugs.ObjectiveThere is no reliable tool for screening PsA among Turkish psoriasis patients. Therefore, we aimed to validate the psoriatic arthritis screening and evaluation (PASE) questionnaire in the Turkish.MethodsA 15-item Turkish PASE questionnaire was administered to 122 consecutive psoriasis patients who visited our dermatology clinic for routine evaluations. Then, the patients were evaluated for PsA by a rheumatologist who was blinded to the results of the questionnaire.ResultsAmong the 113 patients who participated in the study, 11.5% (13 of 113) had a diagnosis of PsA. The Turkish PASE total scores ranged from 15 to 67 (possible range, 15~75). The median total score was 49 (25th and 75th percentile, 36 and 50) for the PsA group and 35 (25th and 75th percentile, 27 and 42) for the non-PsA group. The median total score of the PsA group was significantly higher than that of the non-PsA group (p=0.33). The Turkish PASE total score of 44 distinguished PsA from non-PsA participants, with 62% sensitivity and 76% specificity. For further analysis of each question, we counted the responses according to symptoms (positive for "agree" and "strongly agree" and negative for "disagree" and "strongly disagree"), and the sensitivity ranged from 23% (third question of the functions subscale) to 77% (second question of the symptoms subscale, first and fifth questions of the functions subscale) and the specificity ranged from 51% (second question of the symptoms subscale) to 87% (fourth question of the functions subscale). No relation was found between the PASI scores and the presence (p=0.899) or absence (p=0.941) of PsA, as well as between the PASI and PASE scores of each patient (p=0.961).ConclusionThirteen of the 15 items demonstrated significant test-retest reliability as assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient (p<0.05). These results show that the Turkish version of the PASE questionnaire may be useful for identifying PsA patients for inclusion in trials; however, it is not a reliable tool for screening PSA patients in a dermatology clinic.

Screening Instruments for Psoriatic Arthritis

To the Editor: In a recent study, Walsh, et al 1 sought to compare 3 published, validated screening tools for psoriatic arthritis (PsA): the Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening project (PEST), the Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screen (ToPAS), and the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE)2,3,4,5. We would like to address how PASE may not have been appropriately compared in this setting. The PASE questionnaire, developed by our group, is the only one of these 3 tools where scores have demonstrated sensitivity to change with disease activity6. PASE has similarly been shown to correlate with response to therapy7. PASE was … Address correspondence to Dr. A.A. Qureshi, Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; E-mail: aqureshi{at}bics.bwh.harvard.edu

Utility of the PASE questionnaire, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) prevalence and PsA improvement with anti-TNF therapy: results from the PRISTINE trial

Objective: The authors tested the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (PASE) to assess usefulness for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) screening before and after anti-TNF treatment in a clinical trial setting. Methods: Participants of the PRISTINE trial (NCT0066305) were randomized to etanercept 50 mg once weekly or twice weekly. PASE was administered at baseline and 12 weeks of treatment. Scores were compared by a paired sample t-test. Logistic regression and receiver operating curves were used to compare disease assessments against the PASE scores. Results: Participants (N = 273, once weekly, N = 137; twice weekly, N = 136) had a mean age of 44 years; 70% were male; mean PASI was 21. At baseline, 31% had a self-reported history of physician-diagnosed PsA (mean duration, 8 years); ∼25% had a PASE total score ≥47, indicating active PsA. At week 12, 14% had scores ≥47 (p =. 0143). PASE scores correlated with subject global assessment of joint pain. Conclusions: The PASE was used in a randomized controlled clinical trial in a moderate to severe psoriasis population with a high prevalence of PsA. The findings also support the use of PASE as a tool to measure treatment response for PsA.

SAT0287 High prevalence of articular involvement in patients with severe psoriasis with poor performance of screening questionnaires

BackgroundDelay in diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) remains a significant contributor to poor patient outcome. Clinical predictors of the development of arthritis among patients with psoriasis (Ps) have been proposed...