Proximal Tear Research Articles

Outcomes of sciatic neurolysis in chronic hamstring tears: a retrospective case series.

Proximal hamstring tears may present with neurological dysfunction due to compression or stretching of the sciatic nerve. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of hamstring repair with concurrent sciatic nerve neurolysis for clinical outcomes and patient symptoms. A retrospective chart review of patients who were diagnosed with hamstring injury at a large tertiary care institution was conducted. Patients with chronic tears (> 6weeks from injury to surgery) who underwent hamstring repair were reviewed for demographics, clinical variables including symptoms of sciatic neuritis, sciatic nerve abnormalities on MRI, and postoperative outcomes. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables, t test for continuous variables. Pairwise t tests were used to compare average pre- and postoperative strength for patients with and without symptoms of sciatic neuritis. Thirty-two patients with chronic hamstring tears were included in the analysis. Patients were 59.4% female with an average age of 51.4years (SD 13.1). Preoperatively, 27 patients (84.4%) were noted to have symptoms of sciatic neuritis. These patients did not differ in age (p = .677) or sex (p = .374) from patients without preoperative symptoms. Sciatic nerve abnormalities were noted on MRI report in 7 patients who had sciatic nerve symptoms and 0 patients who did not have sciatic nerve symptoms. Symptomatic improvement was seen in 21/26 (81%) of patients who had preoperative neurological symptoms, and in 6/7 (86%) of patients with MRI findings. All patients had equivalent or improved strength postoperatively. A sciatic nerve neurolysis is a safe and effective procedure to perform on patients with preoperative sciatic nerve symptoms and chronic hamstring tears that leads to improvement in neurological symptoms and strength. In neurologically asymptomatic patients with chronic hamstring injuries and MRI findings indicating possible nerve damage, a discussion should be held about the risks and benefits of performing a sciatic nerve neurolysis.

Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Overhead Athletes: Diagnosis, Management, and Clinical Outcomes.

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries are a common source of pain and disability in overhead and throwing athletes. The prolonged nature of healing often results in notable time lost from competitive sports regardless of the definitive management strategy. A thorough history and physical examination are critical in the diagnosis of UCL injury and understanding patient goals and expectations. In carefully selected patients, nonsurgical management, including rest and slow progression back to activities, can result in successful return to sport. Recent literature has suggested that administration of platelet-rich plasma may be effective in aiding in the healing process, particularly in proximal and partial-thickness tears; however, additional study is warranted. UCL reconstruction has been the benchmark for tears not amendable to nonsurgical treatment, with flexor-pronator complex preservation being important. UCL repair has historically been most commonly used in partial avulsions, but indications have yet to be completely well defined. Knowledge regarding appropriate UCL treatment continues to evolve with patient-specific treatment being essential.

Two-Year Functional Outcomes of Nonsurgical Treatment in Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries: A Case-Control Study.

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common knee injury in high-intensity sports, which can cause early career loss in young athletes. Concomitant damage to other knee stabilizers may occur, such as the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Recent studies have shown that knee stability can increase without surgical intervention in patients with ACL and MCL injuries. Regarding the importance of functional tests in return to exercise prediction, this study aims to measure nonsurgical approach's long-term outcome for concomitant ACL and MCL injuries with a focus on functional tests. This is a case-control study with a 2-year follow-up. The case group consisted of patients who had provided written consent and completed their 2-year follow-up, and the control group was made up of healthy people who did not have any knee medical conditions and were matched by age, gender, and activity level. Physical examinations, Tegner and International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaires, and knee magnetic resonance imaging were conducted, and functional performance tests were performed after a 10-minute warm-up. Lody's index (the ratio of injured-to-uninjured knee results) was calculated. The data were analyzed using independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, chi-squared test, and Fisher's exact test. The study involved 11 patients in each concomitant ACL and MCL injury cases and healthy control groups with a mean age of 32.4 and 28 years, respectively. None of the patients reported knee instability symptoms in the 2-year follow-up. More than half of the patients continued their sports field without reinjury, with no significant difference in activity levels between case and control groups. The 6-meter hop test and single-leg hop test showed no significant difference between case and control groups (p-value: 0.326, 0.859), and no significant difference was observed in the three Carioca, cocontraction, and Shuttle tests in the 2-year follow-up. Functional tests in ACL and MCL injuries revealed normal outcomes, implying a nonsurgical approach for patients with proximal ACL tears, better knee stability, and no significant differences between the injured and control groups.

Anterior cruciate ligament primary repair revision rates are increased in skeletally mature patients under the age of 21 compared to reconstruction, while adults (>21 years) show no significant difference: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To evaluate the impact of age as a risk factor on the revision rates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) primary repair (ACLPR), dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) and bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) compared to ACL reconstruction (ACLR). A systematic literature search was performed for comparative studies comparing outcomes for ACLPR, DIS or BEAR to ACLR. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to assess nondifferentiated and age-differentiated (skeletally mature patients ≤21 and >21 years) ACL revision and reoperation risk, as well as results for subjective outcomes. Methodological study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool 2.0c and Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies tools. A total of 12 studies (n = 1277) were included. ACLR demonstrated a lower nonage-stratified revision risk at 2 years versus ACLPR, DIS and BEAR, but a similar revision risk at 5 years when compared to DIS. However, an age-stratified analysis demonstrated a significantly increased ACLPR revision risk as compared to ACLR in skeletally mature patients ≤21 years of age (risk ratios [RR], 6.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-33.87, p = 0.03), while adults (>21 years) showed no significant difference between groups (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.25-8.91, n.s.). Furthermore, DIS reoperation rates were significantly higher than respective ACLR rates (RR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.35-3.65, p = 0.002), whereas BEAR (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.41-2.75, n.s.) and ACLPR (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.21-3.09, n.s.) showed no differences. IKDC scores were equivalent for all techniques. However, ACLPR exhibited significantly better FJS (mean difference, 11.93; 95% CI, 6.36-17.51, p < 0.0001) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Symptoms (mean difference, 3.01; 95% CI, 0.42-5.60, p = 0.02), along with a lower Tegner activity reduction. ACLPR in skeletally mature patients ≤21 years of age is associated with up to a six-fold risk increase for ACL revision surgery compared to ACLR; however, adults (>21 years) present no significant difference. Based on the current data, age emerges as a crucial risk factorand should be considered when deciding on the appropriate treatment option in proximal ACL tears. Level III.

Intravascular Ultrasound Enhances the PETTICOAT Technique in Endovascular Therapy for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection with Malperfusion Syndrome

ObjectiveTo present the value of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in diagnosis and treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection (TBD) with malperfusion (MP). Especially the value of IVUS regarding the treatment strategy, reoperation rate, acute kidney injury (AKI) and false lumen thrombosis (FLT) was investigated. MethodsRetrospective analysis of 25 TBD cases with MP treated with endovascular therapy from April 2019 to August 2022. In 17 cases angiography & IVUS were applied during the operation (IVUS group) and in 8 cases angiography was used without IVUS (control group) for final intraoperative control. IVUS was used to assess the true lumen collapse and to decide if additional bare stenting was necessary or not. Details from patients’ charts and documentation from surgeries were analyzed. The endovascular technique included thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with primary entry sealing and -if needed- bare stenting of the true lumen distal of the entry tears using the PETTICOAT (Provisional Extension To Induce Complete Attachment) technique. ResultsAll patients presented with pain localized mostly (48%) in thorax and abdomen. In all patients the proximal entry tear of the dissection was covered using TEVAR. The PETTICOAT technique was applied in 13 cases (52%), whereas most combined procedures were applied in the IVUS group (12 compared to 1; p=0,02). A total of 3 patients (1 in the control group; 12,5% and 2 in the IVUS group; 11,8%) underwent a bowel resection. Totally 8 patients (32%) underwent a reoperation in aorta (3 during the hospital stay). There were no statistical differences between IVUS and control group regarding the preoperative findings, the reoperation rates and the postoperative complications. 5 patients died (4 during the hospital stay), 1 in control and 4 in IVUS group; p=0,53. The follow up included a clinical and a computed tomography angiography (CTA) examination. No statistically significant difference regarding occurrence and extension of FLT was observed between the two groups. ConclusionsThe IVUS and control groups showed no difference in survival rates. The use of IVUS extended the indication for PETTICOAT technique with statistically significant difference. A milder form of AKI presented in the IVUS group compared to the control group. In addition, a stronger correlation between IVUS and the avoidance of an aorta reoperation was observed, though it did not reach statistical significance.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Stump Elongation Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Restoration

There is renewed interest in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) preservation techniques. Prior studies have shown good outcomes and low failure rates with ACL preservation in patients with good tissue quality and more proximal tears. We describe a technique intended to assist surgeons in obtaining maximal length of the ACL stump during ACL preservation surgery. We find this to be effective in reapproximating the ACL remnant to its origin on the femoral wall in many cases, even those with a relatively short-appearing stump on preoperative imaging. This technique may allow for surgeons to feel more comfortable offering ACL repair or restoration to patients with a smaller distal ACL remnant.

Paper 26: Role of Age on Survival of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair at minimum 5-year follow-up

Objectives: Short-term follow-up of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) primary repair (ACLPR) presented increased failure risk (37%) in patients ≤21 years of age (y/o), however low rates in patients &gt;21 y/o (3.5%). Mid- and long-term clinical evidence for contemporary anterior cruciate ligament primary repair (ACLPR) is lacking, whereas outcomes of historical ACL repair were shown to deteriorate at midterm follow-up after initial good short-term outcomes. This study evaluates age-differentiated survival rates of ACLPR at 5-year FU to assess whether the previously presented rates at 2-year FU can be maintained at 5-year FU. Methods: The first 113 consecutive patients with proximal ACL tears undergoing ACLPR by a single surgeon, from 04/2008 to 09/2017, were prospectively followed up. Indication for ACLPR was determined if a proximal type I or II tear and good to excellent tissue quality was present. Failure and re-operation rates, patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) (IKDC score, Lysholm score, Forgotten Joint score, ACL-RSI score, and Tegner Activity Scale Difference) and instrumented anterior-tibial translation side-to-side difference (ATT-SSD) were recorded at minimum 5-year FU. Results: A total of 96 patients (85%) with a mean final FU of 7.2 ±2.3 (5.0 – 12.8) years were evaluated. Ipsilateral reinjury rates for patients ≤21 y/o, from 2- to 5-year FU, remained stable (40.0%) with no additional failure recorded. Six additional re-injuries were detected in patients &gt;21 y/o, leading to a failure rate of 9.8% at 5-year FU. Mean time to failure following surgery was 17 ±11 months in patients ≤21 y/o versus 26 ±16 months in patients &gt;21 y/o. Re-operation rates for patients ≤21- and &gt;21 y/o were 0.0% and 4.0% respectively. PROMs showed no significant differences as compared to outcomes at 2-year FU (p &lt;.001) and 5-year ATT-SSD was 0.75 ±1.2 mm. Conclusions: ACLPR is correlated with a high risk of early failure (40.0% at 17 ±11 months) in patients &lt; 21 y/o, however no additional subsequent re-injuries were reported at minimum final 5-year FU. In contrast, patients &gt;21 y/o demonstrate low failure rates at 2- (3.5%) and 5-year FU (9.8%).

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation of Proximal Tears and Early Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation Result in Comparable Clinical Outcomes With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2-Year Follow-Up

To compare the postoperative side-to-side laxity and short-term clinical outcomes of patients who received primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with suture tape augmentation, acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with suture tape augmentation performed within 8 weeks of injury (ACLRacute), or ACLR beyond 8 weeks of injury. After institutional review board approval was obtained, 100 patients were enrolled in this prospective trial: 34 primary ACL repair with suture tape augmentation, 33 ACLRs performed within 8 weeks of injury (ACLRacute), and 33 ACLRs. Patients were allocated to ACL repair if a proximal avulsion was present with good tissue quality (Sherman type 1), confirmed by intraoperative diagnostic arthroscopy. Preoperative side-to-side anteroposterior knee laxity was assessed with KT-1000 arthrometer, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including the visual analog scale, Marx activity scale, Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12 physical & mental), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score survey subscales, and range of motion were collected. These objective and subjective measures were repeated at regular intervals postoperatively through 2 years. Minimal clinically important difference calculations were performed assessing postoperative PRO changes at 2 years compared with preoperative. The average time from injury to surgery was 5.03 ± 1.2 weeks for the ACL repair group, 5.09 ± 0.74 weeks for the ACLRacute, and 43.22 ± 33.5 weeks for the ACLR group. Postoperatively, the KT-1000 side-to-side laxity difference for 30 lbs was determined to be 0.1 ± 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.7 to 0.8) for ACL repair versus ACLR (P < .0001), -0.8 ± 0.35 (95% CI -1.5 to -0.1) for ACLRacute versus ACLR (P < .0001), and 0.8 ± 0.40 (95% CI 0.0-1.6) for ACL repair versus ACLRacute (P < .0001). The data reveal ACL repair and ACLRacute are noninferior to ACLR at 2-year follow-up. The postoperative difference from baseline for all PROs demonstrated improvement for all PROs. Magnetic resonance imaging at 1 year revealed tissue healing for the 3 ACL injury treatment groups. Patients who underwent ACL repair of proximal tears with suture tape augmentation or ACL reconstruction within 8 weeks from injury resulted in noninferior side-to-side knee laxity, comparable PROs, and similar range of motion at 2-year follow-up compared with ACLR. Level II, prospective comparative study.

Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: Insights From a Single-Center Retrospective Experience Over 12 Years.

The treatment of acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) is currently a challenge for vascular surgeons, because of the early morbidity and mortality rates and the high risk of late aortic events up to 50% at 5 years. This study presents the initial outcomes of ATBAD treatment using optimal medical therapy alone or combined with proximal entry tear stent-graft coverage. Additionally, it provides an analysis of the evolution of the aortic diameter and its clinical consequences during the chronic phase in each group. Conducted as a retrospective, single-center study, we enrolled all consecutive ATBAD patients (n=130) treated between 2008 and 2020. The primary analysis studies the entire patient cohort based on their initial management approach, namely, medical treatment alone for uncomplicated ATBAD (n=67) or combined with stent-graft entry tear coverage (n=63). We also conducted a subgroup analysis to investigate factors associated with disease progression in the medical management group. Median follow-up was 29.5 months. During this time aneurysmal evolution was observed in: 42.4% of cases in the medical group compared with 21.8% in the stent-graft group, primarily affecting the thoracic aorta. The stent-graft group exhibited significant aortic remodeling, with a decrease in false lumen (FL) and thoracic aortic diameters. Initial aortic diameter ≥40 mm and FL ≥22 mm were independent risk factors for aneurysmal degeneration. Five-year survival was consistent at 76.1% in both groups. This study confirms the safety and efficacy of stent-graft entry tear coverage for ATBAD. Initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) appears to reduce late aortic events by promoting aortic remodeling. Considering TEVAR's safety and potential to prevent late aortic complications, it may be considered for uncomplicated ATBAD patients with an initial aortic diameter ≥40 mm or an FL ≥22 mm. This study validates the efficacy and safety of using endovascular stent grafts to seal the proximal entry tear in cases of acute type B aortic dissections, compared to optimal medical therapy. Aortic remodelling significantly benefits from endovascular stent graft coverage of the proximal entry tear. Given the heightened risk of late aortic events observed in the medical therapy cohort, there appears to be a necessity for including endovascular interventions in the management of uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections, particularly when aortic diameter is ≥40 mm and false lumen diameter is ≥22 mm.

Comparative analysis of five-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament tears repaired with different techniques

Introduction Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) torn from the femur and the synovial membrane being intact can be an indication for two competing methods including dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) as the saving method and resection of the stump and primary autoplasty as a more traumatic option.The purpose was to evaluate the five-year results of DIS in comparison with early ACL reconstruction of the knee joint.Material and methods A review and statistical analysis of outcomes of 72 patients with ACL injuries (47 males and 25 females) were performed. The patients aged between 18 and 45 years (30.9 ± 8.5), with the length of time from injury ranging from 3 to 21 days (10.6 ± 5.0) and the Tegner activity score of 5 (1–9; 5.8 ± 0.9) prior to injury. DIS was performed for the first group of patients (n = 39) who arthroscopically were diagnosed with ACL torn off the femur with the synovial membrane preserved. Early ACL repair was performed for the controls (second group, n = 33).Results VAS scored 1.4 ± 0.8 in group I and 1.9 ± 0.8 in group II at 6 months, p = 0.004. Patient satisfaction scored 8.0 ± 0.8 in group I and 7.4 ± 0.8 in group II at 12 months, p = 0.003. Tegner activity level scored 6.5 ± 0.9 in group I and 6.3 ± 0.8 in group II at 12 months, p = 0.014. The Lysholm knee score measured 91.1 ± 2.2 in group I and 88.6 ± 3.5 in group II at 12 months, p = 0.001. Five-year dynamic observation showed relapses of anterior-medial instability of the knee joint in 10 patients (13.9 %), with 4 patients in group I (10.3 %) and 6 patients in group II (18.2 %).Discussion Outcomes of proximal ACL tears with intact synovium can be as good as with ACL repair. Removal of the torn cruciate ligament with the synovium being intact and grafting may be an unnecessary and aggressive approach.Conclusion Dynamic intraligamentous stabilization as compared to early ACL repair shows a faster recovery of physical activity at a short term and less relapses of knee joint instability at a long term.

Technique of Distal Tendon Excision for the Treatment of Chronic Pain Caused by Isolated Proximal Gracilis Tears

Proximal gracilis tear is a rare sports-related injury that can easily lead to misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis. Clinical manifestations are dominated by localized pain, tenderness, and dysfunction. Here, we report a therapy of proximal segmental tear of the gracilis and demonstrate its treatment process and clinical outcome. This Technical Note describes in detail the minimally invasive distal gracilis resection technique for the treatment of chronic proximal gracilis ruptures, focusing on the most important technical aspects and thus attempting to introduce this procedure and make it more widely used in the treatment of similar muscle injuries.

Clinical Results of Primary Repair Versus Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Contemporary Trials.

Primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair has gained renewed interest in select centers for patients with proximal or midsubstance ACL tears. Therefore, it is important to reassess contemporary clinical outcomes of ACL repair to determine whether a clinical benefit exists over the gold standard of ACL reconstruction (ACLR). To (1) perform a meta-analysis of comparative trials to determine whether differences in clinical outcomes and adverse events exist between ACL repair versus ACLR and (2) synthesize the midterm outcomes of available trials. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. The PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in August 2023 for prospective and retrospective clinical trials comparing ACL repair and ACLR. Data pertaining to tear location, surgical technique, adverse events, and clinical outcome measures were recorded. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models were constructed to quantitatively evaluate the association between ACL repair/ACLR, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. A subanalysis of minimum 5-year outcomes was performed. Twelve studies (893 patients; 464 ACLR and 429 ACL repair) were included. Random-effects models demonstrated a higher relative risk (RR) of recurrent instability/clinical failure (RR = 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.57; P = .032), revision ACLR (RR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.03-2.59; P = .039), and hardware removal (RR = 4.94; 95% CI, 2.10-11.61; P = .0003) in patients who underwent primary ACL repair versus ACLR. The RR of reoperations and complications (knee-related) were not significantly different between groups. No significant differences were observed when comparing patient-reported outcome scores. In studies with minimum 5-year outcomes, no significant differences in adverse events or Lysholm scores were observed. In contemporary comparative trials of ACL repair versus ACLR, the RR of clinical failure, revision surgery due to ACL rerupture, and hardware removal was greater for primary ACL repair compared with ACLR. There were no observed differences in patient-reported outcome scores, reoperations, or knee-related complications between approaches. In the limited literature reporting on minimum 5-year outcomes, significant differences in adverse events or the International Knee Documentation Committee score were not observed.

Avulsion and Soft Tissue Injuries of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament in Children and Adolescents

Background: Although pediatric medial epicondylar fractures and apophysitis are well studied, patterns of subapophyseal avulsion and ligamentous injuries of the medial elbow in this population merit investigation to inform optimal treatment strategies. Purpose: To describe the occurrence and demographic correlates of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) avulsion and soft tissue injuries of the pediatric and adolescent elbow. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: An institutional review board–approved review was conducted to identify consecutive patients with medial elbow injuries treated in a tertiary pediatric sports medicine practice between 2016 and 2021. Radiographs were obtained during injury evaluation, and patients with nondisplaced medial epicondylar apophysitis and complete epicondylar fracture were excluded, resulting in 150 patients with soft tissue injuries occurring distal to the medial epicondyle apophysis (subapophyseal) for study. Radiographs were evaluated for bony avulsion of the UCL from either the medial epicondyle proximally or the ulnar sublime tubercle distally. Injuries without radiographic evidence of bony avulsion, but with clinical examination findings consistent with ligamentous injury, were classified as radiographically negative UCL injuries, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to further evaluate these injuries if moderate to severe medial swelling of the elbow or significant concern for medial structural injury was present on examination. These MRI scans were evaluated to classify the UCL injury and assess for periosteal or cartilaginous avulsions. Results: A total of 150 patients (mean age, 12.5 ± 3.4 years; 70 female), 55% (150/274) of the entire medial elbow injury population, had a subapophyseal injury. Of these patients, 62 had a bony avulsion detected on radiograph, and 88 had a radiographically negative injury. In addition to the 62 radiographic avulsions, the 61 MRI scans obtained on those radiographically negative injuries revealed 33 complete UCL disruptions, resulting in 63.3% (95/150) of patients sustaining a complete ligamentous disruption. With the MRI scans, 37 (61%) cases of cartilaginous or periosteal avulsion of the UCL were diagnosed. Overall, 66% of all 150 subapophyseal injuries had a bony, cartilaginous, or periosteal UCL avulsion. Patients with cartilaginous (mean age, 10.3 years) and bony (mean age, 10.6 years) avulsions were younger than those with central ligament injury (mean age, 14.2 years) or periosteal (mean age, 14.2 years) avulsions (P = .005). There was a significant association between the mechanism of injury and the location of UCL tear identified on MRI scans: traumatic falls were associated with distal tears, and throwing injuries were associated with proximal tears (P < .001). Conclusion: UCL central ligament and avulsion lesions may be frequently diagnosed after injury to the pediatric medial elbow, the majority of which are complete injuries, and may require MRI for diagnosis. The mechanism of injury may predict the location of ligamentous injury, and osteocartilaginous avulsions are more likely to present at younger ages than injuries to the soft tissue of the UCL or periosteum. The prevalence of these injuries merits further investigation into best protocols of nonoperative treatment or surgical repair techniques and outcomes.

Bone bruise distribution predicts anterior cruciate ligament tear location in non-contact injuries.

It is unclear whether different injury mechanisms lead to divergent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear locations. This study aims to analyse the relationship between bone bruise (BB) distribution or depth and ACL tear location. A retrospective analysis of 446 consecutive patients with acute non-contact ACL injury was performed. Only patients with complete ACL tears verified during subsequent arthroscopy were included. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to classify BB location, BB depth, ACL tear location and concomitant injuries (medial/lateral meniscus and medial/lateral collateral ligament). Demographic characteristics included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), type of sport and time between injury and MRI. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of ACL tear location. One hundred and fifty-eight skeletally mature patients met the inclusion criteria. The presence of BB in the lateral tibial plateau was associated with a more distal ACL tear location (β = -0.27, p < 0.001). Less BB depth in the lateral femoral condyle showed a tendency towards more proximal ACL tears (β = -0.14; p = 0.054). Older age predicted a more proximal ACL tear location (β = 0.31, p < 0.001). No significant relationship was found between ACL tear location and gender, BMI, type of sport, concomitant injuries and time between injury and MRI. ACL tear location after an acute non-contact injury is associated with distinct patterns of BB distribution, particularly involving the lateral compartment, indicating that different injury mechanisms may lead to different ACL tear locations. Level III.

Spinal cord ischemia and reinterventions following thoracic endovascular repair for acute type B aortic dissections

ObjectiveThe technical aspects of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), specifically the location of proximal seal zone (PSZ) (need to cover the left subclavian artery [LSA]), distal seal zone (DSZ) (length of aortic coverage), benefit of LSA revascularization, and prophylactic lumbar drainage are still debated. Each of these issues has potential benefits but also has known risks. This study aims to identify factors associated with reintervention and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) following TEVAR for acute TBAD with a zone 3 entry tear. MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for TEVARs performed for acute TBAD with zone 3 entry tear, zone 3 proximal zone of disease, treated with TEVAR extending between zone 2 and zone 5. The primary outcomes were SCI and related reintervention. Secondary outcomes were stroke, arm ischemia, and retrograde type A dissection (RTAD). The exposure variables were PSZ 2 vs 3, DSZ 4 vs 5, prophylactic lumbar drain, and LSA revascularization. Univariate analyses were conducted with χ2 analysis, and multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate association with outcomes. ResultsOf 583 patients who met inclusion criteria, 266 had PSZ 2 and 317 had PSZ 3. On univariate analysis, PSZ 2 was associated with a higher rate of reintervention, but PSZ2 was not significant on multivariable analysis after accounting for age, sex, race, smoking, PSZ, DSZ, prophylactic lumbar drain, and LSA patency. PSZ 2 was not associated with SCI, arm ischemia, or RTAD. PSZ 2 was associated with a trend towards a higher rate of stroke. DSZ 4 and DSZ 5 were performed in 161 and 422 TEVARs, respectively, and DSZ 5 was associated with a higher rate of SCI on univariate (3 [1.9%] vs 39 [9.2%]; P = .01) and multivariable (odds ratio, 7.384; 95% confidence interval, 2.193-24.867; P = .001) analyses. Prophylactic lumbar drain placement was not statistically significantly associated with SCI, but lack of postoperative LSA patency was associated with SCI (odds ratio, 2.966; 95% confidence interval, 1.016-8.656; P = .05). ConclusionsThis study found that PSZ 2 was not associated with lower reinterventions or higher rates of SCI but trended towards a higher rate of stroke than PSZ 3. Additionally, DSZ 5 was strongly associated with SCI when compared with DSZ 4, highlighting the importance of limiting aortic coverage to coverage of the proximal entry tear when possible.

Outcomes of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Repair for Proximal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The purpose of this study is to compare failure rates among different techniques of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair for the treatment of proximal ACL ruptures. Meta-analysis and systematic review were completed, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses(PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Studies from Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed published between June 2011 and June 2022 reporting outcomes of primary ACL repair on proximal tears with a minimum two-year follow-up were included. Primary ACL repair was divided into dynamic, static, and non-augmented repair. The primary outcome was failure rates, and the secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and anterior tibial stability (ATT). Eighteen studies on primary ACL repair were included, with a total of 614 patients (ages rangingfrom 6 to 65, 60% male). Only two studies were level 1 randomized controlled clinical trials. The static repair had a failure rate of 33 out of 261 (12.6%), non-augmented was 17 out of 179 (9.4%), and dynamic repair was 31 out of 174 (17.8%); no statistically significant difference was found comparing the failure rates (p = 0.090). PROs using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores had weighted averages of 91.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): 89.6-93.8) and 94.7 (95% CI: 92.7-96.7), respectively. ATT had a weighted average of 1.668 mm (95% CI: 1.002-2.334). The primary findings of this paper include a 12.6% combined failure rate for primary proximal ACL repair with no significant difference in failure rate or PROs when accounting for the methodology of repair at a minimum two-year follow-up. It is important to note the lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials, the heterogeneity of included studies, and the lack of long-term data. Despite these limitations, the findings of the current analysis suggest that primary repair may be a useful treatment option for indicated candidates with proximal ACL ruptures. Further long-term and higher-quality comparative studies on ACL reconstruction are warranted.

Arthroscopic repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears in children and adolescents: A systematic review.

Anterior cruciate ligament repair techniques are of growing interest because they allow for minimally invasive surgery that avoids harvesting of the transplant, without risking growth deficiencies in young patients. The aim of this study is to summarize the published evidence about arthroscopic repair of anterior cruciate ligament proximal tears in skeletally immature patients. In total, four studies were included and processed for data extraction after screening for eligibility for this systematic review: one retrospective cohort study and three retrospective case series. Altogether, the four studies included in this review included 61 skeletally immature patients with a mean age of 12.1 years diagnosed with proximal anterior cruciate ligament tear who underwent arthroscopic repair with preservation of the native ligament. The mean follow-up period was 2.8 years. The most relevant and objective outcome that we considered was re-rupture rate. One study reports a cumulative incidence of graft failure in the first 3 years after surgery of 48.8% while the others report a 0%, 0% and 21.5% re-rupture rate. No growth disturbances were reported in the included studies. Despite growing interest surrounding anterior cruciate ligament repair techniques, the presence of limited quality studies in the literature means repair cannot be strongly supported at present. Some encouraging data regarding the absence of growth disturbance and functional outcomes does exist, but studies with larger samples are required. level IV.

Conservative management of proximal hamstring avulsion: A clinical study

IntroductionThe management of proximal hamstring tear (PHT) is debated and consensus regarding recommended measures and individual treatment regimens is lacking. The present investigation evaluated the efficacy of a conservative management of partial and complete PHT. MethodsThe present observational study was conducted following the STROBE statement. In June 2018 the medical databases of the BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Germany were accessed. All the patients with PHT were retrieved. The outcomes of interest were to evaluate the clinical examination, PROMs, imaging, and isokinetic muscle strength at the baseline and last follow-up. Results31 patients were enrolled in the present study. Nine patients (29 % (9 of 31) described local pain at the ischial tuberosity in sitting situations and also in manual palpation. A persistent gap in the tendon string beneath the tuberosity in manual palpation was reported in 25.8 % (8 of 31). The mean VAS at the last follow-up was 2.3 ± 2.3. The mean LEFS score was 50.9 ± 18.8.Control MRI at follow-up showed scarring restitution in the proximal tendon in all patients in the partial tear group. In the complete tear group, a persisting defect state of the proximal tendon course was found in 45 % (9 of 20). The injured side achieved 81.5 ± 22.2 % of the force of the uninjured side, measured in the flexion movement at 60°/s. At an angular velocity of 240°/s, 83.2 ± 26.3 % of the force of the uninjured side was achieved. ConclusionAccording to the main findings of the present study, conservative therapy of PTH tears is associated with good clinical outcomes. High-quality investigations are required to establish the proper therapeutic algorithm and advantages of conservative management compared to a surgical approach. Level of evidenceLevel III.

An in-depth study on the magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of tendon rupture in sports injuries and its correlation with patients' clinical symptoms.

Muscle injuries, such as Achilles and quadriceps tendon ruptures, pose a significant challenge in elite sports, accounting for more than 30% of all sports-related injuries. Our primary goal is to investigate the MR imaging characteristics of tendon rupture in sports injuries and their relationship with patients' clinical symptoms. In our retrospective study at Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine's Second Affiliated Hospital (Zhejiang Xinhua Hospital), we compared the clinical presentation and MRI results of 106 patients with isolated AT and QT ruptures. In the AT, the enthesis was identified as a common site of bony avulsions (30.2%). In contrast, insertional ruptures were more common in the gastrocnemius heads (69.8% and 66.0%). The low frequency of mid-substance tears (13.2% to 20.8%) demonstrated the central tendon region's inherent tensile strength. The ruptured musculotendinous junctions affected the soleus (20.8%). In QT, bony avulsions play a minor role (5.1% to 11.3%). The patella was the primary site of tears (42.2% - 45.3%), with the Vastus intermedius favoring proximal tears (58.5%). Our examination of AT and QT ruptures across sub-components sheds light on their distinct patterns and the implications for clinical practice in terms of precise diagnosis, personalized treatment, and, ultimately, better patient outcomes for these debilitating injuries.

Dissection flap fenestration can reduce re-apposition force of the false lumen in type-B aortic dissection: a computational and bench study.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been widely adopted as a standard for treating complicated acute and high-risk uncomplicated Stanford Type-B aortic dissections. The treatment redirects the blood flow towards the true lumen by covering the proximal dissection tear which promotes sealing of the false lumen. Despite advances in TEVAR, over 30% of Type-B dissection patients require additional interventions. This is primarily due to the presence of a persistent patent false lumen post-TEVAR that could potentially enlarge over time. We propose a novel technique, called slit fenestration pattern creation, which reduces the forces for re-apposition of the dissection flap (i.e., increase the compliance of the flap). We compute the optimal slit fenestration design using a virtual design of experiment (DOE) and demonstrate its effectiveness in reducing the re-apposition forces through computational simulations and benchtop experiments using porcine aortas. The findings suggest this potential therapy can drastically reduce the radial loading required to re-appose a dissected flap against the aortic wall to ensure reconstitution of the aortic wall (remodeling).