Effects of morphine (and opium) on intestinal motility were tested on dogs, with Thi ry-Vell a fistulae of the small intestine. Two dogs had two fistulae, one with intact nerves, another wholly deprived from innervation. One dog had three fistulae with intact nerves. The splanchnic nerves of this dog were afterwards interfered with bilater-ally. The propulsive rate or the passage time was measured for the loop, a cylinder-shaped sponge being inserted into the proximal opening. Morphine hydrochloride, several times purified, was mostly sub-cutaneously injected in varying doses of 4mg. to 0.005mg. per kilo, intravenously in doses of 2mg. to 0.002mg. per kilo. Opium was orally given in doses of 5mg. to 2mg. per kilo. It is needless to say that the animals were not fastened on the table, nor otherwise anaesthetized except by morphine. (1) The propulsive rate of intestines is modified largely and ex-tensively by morphine administration. The rate becomes very rapid, from the usual rate, about 1cm per 1 minute, to peristaltic rush, as rapid as about twenty to thirty times ad maximum. This rapid pas-sage period would last for a long time, for example, 6 hours on 2mg. morphine per kilo, but in fact the rapid propulsion period is interrupt-ed by development of the stagnation period, which is conditioned by an enormous and persistent increase of tone; say 5 hours, in the above example. The general outline of intestinal forward movement on poisoning with morphine is the first rapid passage period, the stagna-tion period, and the second rapid passage period, which turns then to the ordinary rate. The development of the stagnation period never implies any reduc-tion in the intestinal activities, as some previous investigators con-sider, but the reverse is true; the tone increases remarkably and persis-tently. That some authors failed to deduce properly the results they obtained from the Thiry-Vella fistula by means of a balloon and those yielded in the hands of some investigators by means of a bolus, might be due probably to the possibility that they did not extend the experimentation sufficiently long, and in consequence took the stag-nation period as a reduction of the intestinal activities. The resistance of the loop canal against inserting bolus, the colour of the loop openings, and the secretion therefrom vary correspondingly. When the passage period recovers the normal, the behaviour of the animal, the pulse rate and the properties of loop recover too. The average passage time, that is, that through the whole course of morphine poisoning, the rapid passage periods and the stagnation period together, was commonly more or less shortened, except in cases of heavy dosages, such as 4mg. and 2mg. per kilo morphine, the shortest being recorded as one third, one fourth of the normal rate. It is there-fore irrational to take the stagnation period alone into consideration, and assume it to be the chief factor for the constipation by opium al-kaloids, as some writers do. (2) The larger the dose, the longer the duration of modified pas-sage period, especially the stagnation period, and the sooner the latter sets in. With a dose as small as 0.005mg. per kilo subcutaneously, no stagnation period was observed; and it is the minimal effective dose. (3) The alteration due to morphine in the forward movement' of the intestinal loop is facilitated a little by its intravenous application and reduced slightly by the total denervation of the loop. (4) The stagnation period makes manifest just a little-sooner in the proximal portion of intestines that in the distal. (5) Double splanchnicotolny reduces in a marked way the mass of alteration of the passage rate, causable by morphine.