Proximal Gastrectomy Research Articles

Prognostic Implications of Various Surgical Procedures and Postoperative Margin Status in Gastroesophageal Junction Tumors.

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) carcinomas often require access to two compartments of the body for good margin and lymphadenectomy. Whether it is required to do so in all patients is debatable. We analyzed outcomes of patients who underwent surgeries for EGJ carcinomas in terms of margin status and survival. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients with EGJ adenocarcinomas operated between January 2014 and December 2016. Type of surgery performed and its impact on margin status and survival were assessed. Follow-up was for a minimum of 5 years. Ninety-four patients with EGJ carcinomas were operated on during the study period. Eight (8.51%) had involved proximal margin, and 2 of these had positive distal margin also. None had distal margin alone involved. Seventeen (18.09%) and 5 (5.32%) had a close proximal and distal margin, respectively. Radial margin was close/involved in 6 (6.38%) patients. Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival for the cohort was 38% and 30.8%, respectively. Proximal gastrectomy had a higher proximal margin positivity. Positive proximal or distal margin and a close/involved radial margin were detrimental to disease free survival and overall survival. Proximal gastrectomy is associated with a higher likelihood of proximal margin positivity. Positive margin leads to lower survival. Whether involvement of margins is just a surrogate marker of aggressive tumor or is an error in assessing extent tumor needs to be studied. Large-scale prospective studies in this regard are desirable.

A modified esophagogastric reconstruction method after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: A technical note with video vignette

TechniqueAlthough the double flap technique effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic gastrectomy, its clinical application is restricted because the procedure is technical complex. We devised a modified esophagogastric reconstructive method which we termed the "arch-bridge-type" reconstruction. This reconstruction method was performed for a 71-year-old man, who was admitted to our hospital with the diagnosis of cT2N0 upper gastric cancer. The present study reported the surgical details and accompanied with the video. ResultsThe patient underwent surgery successfully without switching to open surgery. The total operation time was 203 min, the time for making the “arch-bridge” was 16 min, and the time for esophagogastric anastomosis under laparoscopy was 23 min. No surgery-related complications occurred. The postoperative hospital stay was 10 days. The upper GI radiography demonstrated that the anastomosis was not narrow and no extravasation of contrast agent was observed. The gastroscopy found no reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stenosis 1 year after surgery. ConclusionThe "arch-bridge-type" reconstruction method is safe and time saving. It has advantages in simplifying the procedure of conventional double flap technique and reducing postoperative complications after proximal gastrectomy.

The influence of partial gastrectomy for gastric cancer on the spontaneous disappearance of Helicobacter pylori: A single-center prospective study.

Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication is recommended after endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC). Cases of spontaneous HP resolution after partial gastrectomy due to environmental changes have been reported; however, there is no evidence for the efficacy of HP eradication in suppressing carcinogenesis and also no reports on the natural history of HP after partial gastrectomy in gastric cancer (GC). To report the natural history of HP in patients with GC and HP infection after partial gastrectomy. We prospectively studied the rate of spontaneous disappearance of HP after partial gastrectomy in patients with GC. From April 2016 to May 2020, 80 patients underwent partial gastrectomy, including 9 cases of proximal gastrectomy (PG), and 71 cases of distal gastrectomy (DG). The presence of HP was confirmed in the stool antigen test 1 year after operation, HP infection persisted in 46 patients (57.5%) and disappeared in 34 patients (42.5%). In univariate analysis, only proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use was a significant contributing factor for the spontaneous resolution of HP infection, especially in the DG group. However, there was no difference in the rates of HP disappearance between Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y reconstructions in the DG group. The HP spontaneously disappeared in 42.5% of the GC patients within 1 year after partial gastrectomy. Further investigation in a larger cohort is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Prognostic nutritional index is a prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer undergoing proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy by the double-flap technique: A secondary analysis of the rD-FLAP study

PurposeAlthough proximal gastrectomy (PG) is commonly used in patients with upper gastric cancer (GC) and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer, long-term prognostic factors in these patients are poorly understood. The double-flap technique (DFT) is an esophagogastrostomy with anti-reflux mechanism after PG; we previously conducted a multicenter retrospective study (rD-FLAP) to evaluate the short-term outcomes of DFT reconstruction. Here, we evaluated the long-term prognostic factors in patients with upper GC and EGJ cancer. MethodsThe study was conducted as a secondary analysis of the rD-FLAP Study, which enrolled patients who underwent PG with DFT reconstruction, irrespective of disease type, between January 1996 and December 2015. ResultsA total of 509 GC and EGJ cancer patients were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival demonstrated that a preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) < 45 (p < 0.001, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.59, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 1.93–6.67) was an independent poor prognostic factor alongside pathological T factor ([pT] ≥2) (p = 0.010, HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.22–4.30) and pathological N factor ([pN] ≥1) (p = 0.001, HR: 3.27, 95% CI: 1.66–6.46). In patients with preoperative PNI ≥45, PNI change (<90%) at 1-year follow-up (p = 0.019, HR: 2.54, 95%CI: 1.16–5.54) was an independent poor prognostic factor, for which operation time (≥300 min) and blood loss (≥200 mL) were independent risk factors. No independent prognostic factors were identified in patients with preoperative PNI <45. ConclusionsPNI is a prognostic factor in upper GC and EGJ cancer patients. Preoperative nutritional enhancement and postoperative nutritional maintenance are important for prognostic improvement in these patients.

A Novel Surgical Technique for Double Flap Reconstruction Using a Circular Stapler After Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy

A Novel Surgical Technique for Double Flap Reconstruction Using a Circular Stapler After Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy

Trans-pacific multicenter collaborative study of minimally invasive proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers

BackgroundThe current standard operation for proximal gastric and gastroesophageal junction (P/GEJ) cancers with limited esophageal extension is total gastrectomy (TG). TG is associated with impaired appetite and weight loss due to the loss of gastric functions such as production of ghrelin and with anemia due to intrinsic factor loss and vitamin B12 malabsorption. Theoretically, proximal gastrectomy (PG) can mitigate these problems by preserving gastric function. However, PG with direct esophagogastric reconstruction is associated with severe postoperative reflux, delayed gastric emptying, and poor quality of life (QoL). Minimally invasive PG (MIPG) with antireflux techniques has been increasingly performed by experts but is technically demanding owing to its complexity. Moreover, the actual advantages of MIPG over minimally invasive TG (MITG) with regards to postoperative QoL are unknown. Our overall objective of this study is to determine the short-term QoL benefits of MIPG. Our central hypotheses are that MIPG is safe and that patients have improved appetite after MIPG with effective antireflux techniques, which leads to an overall QoL improvement when compared with MITG.MethodsEnrollment of a total of 60 patients in this prospective survey-collection study is expected. Procedures (MITG versus MIPG, antireflux techniques for MIPG [double-tract reconstruction versus the double-flap technique]) will be chosen based on surgeon and/or patient preference. Randomization is not considered feasible because patients often have strong preferences regarding MITG and MIPG. The primary outcome is appetite level (reported on a 0-10 scale) at 3 months after surgery. With an expected 30 patients per cohort (MITG versus MIPG), this study will have 80% power to detect a one-point difference in appetite level. Patient-reported outcomes will be longitudinally collected (including questions about appetite and reflux), and specific QoL items, body weight, body mass index and ghrelin, albumin, and hemoglobin levels will be compared.DiscussionSurgeons from the US, Japan, and South Korea formed this collaboration with the agreement that the surgical approach to P/GEJ cancers is an internationally important but controversial topic that requires immediate action. At the completion of the proposed research, our expected outcome is the establishment of the benefit and safety of MIPG.Trial registrationThis trial was registered with Clinical Trials Reporting Program Registration under the registration number NCI-2022–00267 on January 11, 2022, as well as with ClinicalTrials.gov under the registration number NCT05205343 on January 11, 2022.

A Novel Esophagogastrostomy Technique for Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy: Conical Remnant Gastroesophageal Side-overlap Fundoplication.

There is currently no universally-accepted, ideal method of esophagogastric reconstruction to address reflux esophagitis and anastomotic complications of esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy. In June 2022, two patients with Siewert type II carcinoma of esophagogastric junction underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomies, using a novel esophagogastrostomy technique of Conical remnant GastroEsophageal side-Overlap fundoplication (CGEO). On postoperative day 4, upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy was performed, with patients in downward and left oblique positions, allowing gastrografin to accumulate within fundic reconstructions. No reflux into the esophagus was subsequently observed, and both patients were discharged (postoperative days 9 and 11). Six months after surgery, endoscopic view showed that the reconstructed cardia returned to its normal state, in the absence of any reflux symptoms. As of April 2023, we have operated on four patients using CGEO, and all of them recovered without obvious reflux symptoms. CGEO is a feasible and safe reconstructive esophagogastrostomy procedure following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction carcinoma.

479. TRANSTHORACIC VERSUS TRANSABDOMINAL SURGICAL APPROACH FOR SIEWERT TYPE II ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTIONAL ADENOCARCINOMAS—A PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED ANALYSIS

Abstract Background Esophagogastric junctional(EGJ) adenocarcinoma is a complex type of cancer that varies in etiology and disease pattern depending on the tumor level. There is increasing evidence on the need for different surgical approaches for different Siewert types. The optimal surgical approach for Siewert type II cancer remains controversial. This study aims to compare the oncological and surgical safety of transthoracic and transabdominal approaches for type II cancers. Methods The study included patients who underwent resection for Siewert type II adenocarcinomas from 2003–2020 in a single tertiary center using transthoracic (TT) and transabdominal (TA) approaches with macroscopic tumor clearance. The TT approach referred to Lewis-Tanner esophagogastrectomy, while the TA approach included total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy. Data from a prospectively-managed database were analyzed to compare postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, lymph node harvest, completeness of resection and overall survival between the two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used in further analyses. Results Excluding R2 resections, there were 54 patients in the TT and 45 (proximal gastrectomy:23) in the TA groups. cT stages were comparable. In TT group, median tumor length was 6 cm (vs. 3 cm,p = 0.000), 18.5% with esophageal extension of &amp;gt;4 cm above EGJ;75.9% had nodal metastases (vs. 47.7%, p = 0.004);20.4% underwent neoadjuvant therapy (vs. 6.8%, p = 0.057). Anastomotic leak and cardiopulmonary complication rates, R0 resection rates, nodal yield and positive lymph node ratios were comparable. Proximal margin was involved in 15.9% for TA (vs. 5.6%, p = 0.092). Overall median survival times were similar (TT vs. TA: 42vs.65 months, p = 0.557). PSM yielded 33 patients per group. Only one in TT group had &amp;gt;4 cm esophageal involvement. Cardiac complication rate in TT group was 23.6%(vs. 3.5%, p = 0.024). Conclusion After correcting for selection bias, positive lymph node ratio, resection margin and overall survival did not differ for the TT and TA approaches. Resection by the TT approach is associated with more cardiac complications. For Siewert type II tumors with limited thoracic esophageal extension, the TA approach is safe and should be sufficient.

184. INTRATHORACIC SIDE-OVERLAP ESOPHAGOGASTROSTOMY DURING MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION CANCER

Abstract Backgrounds Surgical algorithm for esophagogastric junction cancer have been proposed according to the results of a recent prospective study. However, reconstruction method has yet to be standardized. Esophagogastrostomy is often performed for esophagogastric junction cancer with esophageal invasion, although, it has been related to frequent and severe complications. Recently, we have introduced IntraThoracic Side-overlap EsophagoGastrostomy (ITS-EG), an eazy and novel intrathoracic anastomotic method with reflux prevention mechanism during minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patient backgrounds and surgical/short term outcomes for the patient who underwent ITS-EG during minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer between February 2018 to April 2023 at our institute. Results The study cohort included ten patients, with a median age of 67 (55–77) years. All tumors were classified as Siewert type II, and the median esophageal invasion length was 32 (11.8–40) cm. After extended proximal gastrectomy, patients underwent either thoracoscopic (five patients) or robot-assisted (five patients) minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by ITS-EG. ITS-EG consist of overlap anastomosis utilizing surgical stapler, and reflux prevention mechanism owing to the creation of pseudo-fornix and a slit-shaped anastomosis. The initial case suffered anastomotic leakage, however, recovered by conservative measures. All the other patients had an uneventful recovery without reflux esophagitis nor anastomotic stricture. Conclusion ITS-EG is an easy and safe esophagogastric anastomosis with reflux prevention mechanism during minimally invasive esophagectomy, and may be considered for esophagogastric junction cancers with esophageal invasion. Further accumulation of cases is needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of ITS-EG. Surgical procedure for ITS-EG would be presented by video.

Proximal gastrectomy and double-tract reconstruction vs total gastrectomy in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients — a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021291500)

BackgroundIn Germany and Western Europe, gastroesophageal junction cancer (AEG) and proximal gastric cancer are currently treated with (transhiatal-extended) total gastrectomy (TG) according to the latest treatment guidelines. TG leads to a severe and long-lasting impairment of postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the treated patients. Recent studies have suggested that HRQoL of these patients could be improved by proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (PG-DTR) without compromising oncologic safety. Our aim is therefore to conduct a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing PG-DTR with TG in AEG II/III and gastric cancer patients with overall survival as primary endpoint and HRQoL as key secondary endpoint.MethodsThis protocol is written with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P 2015) statement. We will conduct searches in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library. We will also check references of relevant studies and perform a cited reference research. Titles and abstracts of the records identified by the searches will be screened, and full texts of all potentially relevant articles will be obtained. We will consider randomized trials and non-randomized studies. The selection of studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias of the included studies will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan 5.4 (Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration).DiscussionThis systematic review will identify the current study pool concerning the comparison of TG and PG-DTR and help to finally refine the research questions and to allow an evidence-based trial design of the planned multicenter randomized-controlled trial.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this systematic review. Study findings will be shared by publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42021291500.

Long-term follow-up of a cohort with post sleeve gastrectomy leaks: results of endoscopic treatment and salvage surgery.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most performed bariatric procedure worldwide. The most challenging postoperative complication is gastric leak. The objectives of this study are to examine the efficacy and morbidity of different therapeutic strategies addressing leakage, and the long-term outcomes of a cohort of LSG leaks. A retrospective review of patients treated for LSG leaks between September 2014 and January 2023 at our high-volume bariatric surgery center was performed. The charts of 37 patients (29 women and 8 men) were reviewed, with a mean age of 43years and a median follow-up of 24months. The mean preoperative body mass index was 45.1kg/m2. Overall, 30/37 (81%) patients were successfully treated with endoscopic management, and 7/37 (19%) ultimately underwent salvage surgery. If the leak was diagnosed earlier than 6weeks, endoscopic treatment had a 97% success rate. The median number of endoscopic procedures was 2 per patient, and included internal pigtails, stents, septoplasty, endoluminal vacuum therapy and over-the-scope clips. Complications included stent-related ulcers (10), esophageal stenosis requiring endoscopic dilatations (4), stent migrations (2) and kinking requiring repositioning (1), and internal pigtail migration (3). Revisional surgery consisted of proximal gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y esophago-jejunal anastomosis, Roux-en-Y fistulo-jejunostomy or classic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass proximal to the gastric stricture. In 62% of the cases, the axis/caliber of the LSG was abnormal. Beyond 4 attempts, endoscopy was unsuccessful. The success rate of endoscopic management dropped to 25% when treatment was initiated more than 45days after the index surgery. Purely endoscopic management was successful in 81% of cases; with 97% success rate if diagnosis earlier than 6weeks. After four failed endoscopic procedures, a surgical approach should be considered. Delayed diagnosis appears to be a significant risk factor for failure of endoscopic treatment.

Anti-reflux effects of a novel esophagogastric asymmetric anastomosis technique after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy.

Reflux esophagitis is a common postoperative complication of proximal gastrectomy. There is an urgent need for a safer method of performing esophageal-gastric anastomosis that reduces the risk of reflux after proximal gastrectomy. We hypothesize that a novel technique termed esophagogastric asymmetric anastomosis (EGAA) can prevent postoperative reflux in a safe and feasible manner. To observe a novel method of EGAA to prevent postoperative reflux. Initially, we employed a thermal stress computer to simulate and analyze gastric peristalsis at the site of an esophagogastric asymmetric anastomosis. This was done in order to better understand the anti-reflux function and mechanism. Next, we performed digestive tract reconstruction using the EGAA technique in 13 patients who had undergone laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. Post-surgery, we monitored the structure and function of the reconstruction through imaging exams and gastroscopy. Finally, the patients were followed up to assess the efficacy of the anti-reflux effects. Our simulation experiments have demonstrated that the clockwise contraction caused by gastric peristalsis and the expansion of the gastric fundus caused by the increase of intragastric pressure could significantly tighten the anastomotic stoma, providing a means to prevent the reverse flow of gastric fluids. Thirteen patients with esophagogastric junction tumors underwent laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy, with a mean operation time of 304.2 ± 44.3 min. After the operation, the upper gastroenterography in supine/low head positions showed that eight patients exhibited no gastroesophageal reflux, three had mild reflux, and two had obvious reflux. The abdominal computed tomography examination showed a valve-like structure at the anastomosis. During follow-up, gastroscopy revealed a closed valve-like form at the anastomosis site without stenosis or signs of reflux esophagitis in 11 patients. Only two patients showed gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and mild reflux esophagitis and were treated with proton pump inhibitor therapy. EGAA is a feasible and safe surgical method, with an excellent anti-reflux effect after proximal gastrectomy.

Preliminary exploration of modified side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita (mSOFY) anastomosis technique in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy

Objective: To discuss the feasibility and safety of modified side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita (mSOFY) in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. Methods: Using the method of descriptive case series study, the clinical data of 9 patients with upper gastric cancer who successfully performed mSOFY anastomosis from March 2022 to October 2022 in the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were retrospectively analyzed.The reconstruction steps of mSOFY anastomosis are as follows: (1) Make a small incision on the right side of the esophageal stump and in front of the anterior wall of the gastric stump; (2) The 45mm linear cutting stapler is placed into the preset anastomosis of the esophagus and the remnant stomach, and the esophagus is rotated 90° counterclockwise along the axis, so that the right wall of the esophagus is anastomosed with the remnant stomach, and the stomach wall is sutured to the left side of the esophagus; (3) The common opening of esophagus and remnant stomach was sutured with inverted suture; (4)Suture the left and lower sides of the esophagus with the remnant stomach to make the esophagus flat against the stomach wall; (5) Open the sutured common opening: due to the pressure of the false dome, the posterior wall of the lower esophageal segment was compressed into a valve-like structure. We mainly observing the postoperative reflux and nutritional improvement of the patients, and recording the intraoperative situation and postoperative complications. Results: Nine patients with upper gastric cancer who completed laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (mSOFY anastomosis) did not have conversion to laparotomy or intraoperative / postoperative complications. The operation time was (169.4±10.4) minutes, the anastomotic reconstruction time was (51.7±7.1) minutes, the intraoperative bleeding volume was (98.9±43.4) ml, and the number of lymph nodes dissected was (27.2±6.7). The patient recovered well after operation, without any complaints related to reflux esophagitis. Postoperative gastrointestinal radiography showed that the anastomosis was smooth, without stenosis and leakage. The serum albumin [(41.6±3.4) L vs. (39.9±2.6) L], prealbumin [(211.3±38.6) mg/L vs. (205.3±36.0) mg/L], and hemoglobin levels [(126.7±13.2) g/L vs. (121.0±9.7) g/L] of patients before and one month after surgery have no statistically significant differences (all P>0.05). Conclusion: mSOFY anastomosis can be used as one of the safe and feasible reconstruction methods in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy.

Total gastrectomy as a risk factor for postoperative loss of skeletal muscle in minimally invasive surgery for patients with gastric cancer.

Loss of skeletal muscle mass after gastrectomy for gastric cancer leads to decreased quality of life and poor postoperative survival. However, few studies have examined the postoperative loss of skeletal muscle mass following minimally invasive gastrectomy. This study investigated the impact of minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MI-TG) on changes in skeletal muscle mass during the early postoperative period. Patients who underwent MI-TG or minimally invasive distal or proximal gastrectomy (MI-nonTG) for cStage I-III gastric cancer were retrospectively analyzed (n = 58 vs. 182). Their body composition was measured before surgery and 2 months after surgery. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to clarify the impact of the surgical procedure on skeletal muscle index changes using clinically relevant covariates. Skeletal muscle mass decreased more in the MI-TG group than in the MI-nonTG group (median [interquartile range]; -5.9% [-10.6, -3.7] vs -4.5% [-7.3, -1.9], P = 0.004). In multivariable linear regression analysis using clinically relevant covariates, MI-TG was an independent risk factor for postoperative loss of skeletal muscle mass (coefficient - 2.6%, 95% CI -4.5 to -0.68, P = 0.008). Total gastrectomy was a risk factor for loss of skeletal muscle mass during the early postoperative period. If oncologically feasible, proximal or distal gastrectomy with a small remnant stomach should be considered.

Clinical observation of laparoscopic seromuscular dissection in the treatment of gastric stromal tumors

Objective To investigate the safety and oncological prognosis of laparoscopic seromuscular dissection (LSD) in the treatment of gastric stromal tumors. Material and methods From June 2016 to July 2022, 67 patients with gastric stromal tumors underwent laparoscopic seromuscular dissection (LSD), and 58 patients underwent non-LSD surgery during the same period (52 patients underwent laparoscopic gastric wedge resection (LWR), two patients underwent proximal gastrectomy, three patients underwent total gastrectomy, one patient underwent distal gastrectomy and partial hepatectomy). Gastric stromal tumor patients were compared to compare the surgical results, tumor relapse rate, and survival rate of the two groups. Results The results of the two groups were compared. For gastric stromal tumors, especially gastric stromal tumors located at ‘difficult sites’, LSD can reduce the amount of bleeding and the number of cutting staplers used during the operation, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, shorten the postoperative hospitalization time, reduce the hospitalization cost and improve the quality of life of patients without increasing the operation time. Conclusion Laparoscopic seromuscular dissection for gastric stromal tumors is safe and technically feasible in the hands of experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Bilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery for esophageal cancer with left inferior pulmonary vein invasion following chemoradiation therapy

BackgroundThe surgical strategy for thoracic esophageal cancer that invades the lungs is controversial. In particular, invasion of the pulmonary vein is often regarded unresectable. We successfully applied bilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with left inferior pulmonary vein invasion following induction chemoradiotherapy (CRT), with a favorable response.Case presentationA 64-year-old woman was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the lower third of the esophagus. Computed tomography (CT) revealed that the tumor was suspected to be invading the main trunk of the left lower pulmonary vein and left lower lung. We initiated induction CRT comprising 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and concurrent radiotherapy at 50.4 Gy/28Fr. CT revealed shrinkage of the tumor, and the main trunk of the left inferior pulmonary vein was released from the tumor invasion. We considered the tumor to be completely resectable. VATS esophagectomy is usually performed using a right-sided approach. However, the right-sided approach is inappropriate for evaluating tumors around the left inferior pulmonary vein. We started with left-sided VATS to determine tumor resectability and dissected between the esophagus and the main trunk of the left inferior pulmonary vein. We only needed to perform partial resection of the left lower lobe. We then performed a right-sided VATS esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy with partial en bloc resection of the left lower lobe. Following this, we performed hand-assisted laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and reconstruction using the gastric remnant. The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 14. Histopathological examination of the surgical specimen revealed a complete pathological response without any remnant tumor or lymph node metastasis. There were no signs of recurrence or metastasis at the 1-year follow-up.ConclusionsCurative resection for thoracic esophageal cancer that invades the pulmonary vein could be possible via the bilateral VATS approach following induction CRT with a favorable response.

Preoperatively diagnosed intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm of the pancreas with prominent invasion: a case report.

Previously considered as one of the less-invasive subtypes of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm (IOPN) has recently been acknowledged as a new entity of pancreatic tumor. We herein present a case of preoperatively diagnosable IOPN invasion in the stomach and colon. A 78-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for evaluation of anorexia and gastroesophageal reflux. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a gastric subepithelial lesion with ulcerated mucosa that required hemostasis. Computed tomography revealed a 96-mm-diameter solid tumor with a well-defined border and centrally positioned necrotic area, extending from the stomach to the transverse colon and pancreatic tail. Because it was suspected to be a pancreatic solid tumor with direct stomach invasion, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) was performed, which led to a preoperative diagnosis of IOPN. Moreover, laparoscopic pancreatosplenectomy, proximal gastrectomy, and transverse colectomy were performed. Analysis of the surgical specimen revealed that the tumor was IOPN and had invaded the stomach and transverse colon. Lymph node metastasis was also confirmed. These findings indicate that IOPN can manifest as an invasive tumor, and EUS-FNB may be equally helpful for assessing the invaded area of a cystic lesion as it is for a solid lesion.

Total pancreatectomy with remnant stomach preservation in a patient with a history of proximal gastrectomy and interposed jejunal reconstruction with right gastroepiploic conduit preservation: a case report

BackgroundPancreatic head resection following proximal gastrectomy jeopardizes the blood flow of the remnant stomach owing to right gastroepiploic conduit sacrifice, thereby necessitating total gastrectomy. However, owing to its high invasiveness, concomitant remnant total gastrectomy with pancreatectomy should be avoided as much as possible. Herein, we describe our experience of total pancreatectomy with right gastroepiploic conduit preservation in a patient with a history of proximal gastrectomy and reconstruction by jejunum interposition.Case presentationA 78-year-old woman with a history of gastric cancer was followed up at our institute for multiple intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, and main pancreatic duct stricture in the pancreatic head was newly detected. The cystic lesion was extended to the pancreatic body. Proximal gastrectomy and reconstruction by jejunal interposition were previously performed, and the mesenteric stalk of the interposed jejunum was approached through the retrocolic route. We planned total pancreatectomy with right gastroepiploic conduit preservation. Following adhesiolysis, the interposed jejunum and its mesentery lying in front of the pancreas were isolated. The arterial arcade from the common hepatic artery to the right gastroepiploic artery was detached from the pancreas. Furthermore, the right gastroepiploic vein was isolated from the pancreas. The pancreatic body and tail were pulled up in front of the remnant stomach, and the splenic artery and vein were resected. The pancreatic body and tail were pulled out to the right side, and the pancreatic head was divided from the pancreatic nerve plexus to the portal vein. The jejunal limb for entero-biliary anastomosis was passed through the hole behind the superior mesenteric artery and vein, and gastrointestinal anastomosis using the antecolic route and Braun anastomosis were performed.ConclusionsTo avoid remnant total gastrectomy, right gastroepiploic conduit preservation is an optional procedure for pancreatic head resection in patients who have undergone proximal gastrectomy with reconstruction by jejunal interposition.

A novel trans hiatal esophago-gastrostomy with anti-reflux triangle-valve for laparoscope assisted lower esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a three-year retrospective cohort study

A novel trans hiatal esophago-gastrostomy with anti-reflux triangle-valve for laparoscope assisted lower esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a three-year retrospective cohort study

The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus tube-like stomach reconstruction in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on propensity score-matching: a multicenter cohort study.

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with tube-like stomach reconstruction (LPG-TLR) are both function-preserving procedures performed for treating AEG. However, there is no clinical consensus on the selection of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and the best way to reconstruct the digestive tract remains controversial. This study aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of LPG-DTR and LPG-TLR to provide some reference to the choice of AEG surgical modalities. This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. we collected clinicopathological and follow-up data of patients with consecutive cases diagnosed with AEG from January 2016 to June 2021 in five medical centers. According to the way of digestive tract reconstruction after tumor resection, patients who underwent LPG-DTR or LPG-TLR were included in the present study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline variables that might affect the study outcomes. The QOL of the patients was evaluated using the Visick grade. A total of 124 eligible consecutive cases were finally included. Patients in both groups were matched using the PSM method, and 55 patients from each group were included in the analysis after PSM. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the operation time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, days of postoperative abdominal drainage tube placement, postoperative hospitalization days, total hospitalization cost, the total number of lymph nodes cleared, and the number of positive lymph nodes (P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of time to first flatus after surgery and postoperative soft food recovery time (P<0.05). For the nutritional status, the weight levels at 1 year after surgery was better in the LPG-DTR group than in the LPG-TLR group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Visick grade between the two groups (P>0.05). The anti-reflux effect and quality of life of LPG-DTR for AEG were comparable to those of LPG-TLR. Compared with LPG-TLR, LPG-DTR provide better nutrition status for patients with AEG. LPG-DTR is a superior reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy.