G A A b st ra ct s swallowing. Methods: 10 healthy subjects (4 males, mean age 28, range 21-47) with simultaneous HRIM (36 sensors spaced I cm for pressure and 18 impedance segments at 2 cm intervals) and videofluoroscopy were studied. HRIM data from each of 4 swallows (5-ml Varibar thin liquid) in each subject were analyzed using a customized MATLAB program. An esophageal impedance and pressure topography (EIPT) plot (Figure) was created on which six landmarks (5 red dashed time lines and midline of the crural diaphragm) were identified: a) swallow, i.e., relaxation of the upper esophageal sphincter, b) onset of proximal contraction, c) mid transition zone, d) the contraction deceleration point (CDP), e) end of bolus transit or 12 s after ‘a'. The nadir impedance (blue curve) is also tracked for the duration of bolus transit. Intrabolus pressure was calculated during each phase as the mean pressures at the nadir impedance location for the duration of the phase. This was referenced to gastric pressure to provide an assessment of the EGPG during bolus transit. EGPG was compared amongst the phases of swallowing and between upright and supine measurements. Results: Mean (range) EGPG values during the 4 phases are summarized in the Table (2 swallows supine; 2 upright). The mean EGPG varied consistently during the 4 phases with negative pressures during accommodation, equalization with gastric pressure during compartmentalization, development of a positive EGPG during the stripping phase, and significantly increased EGPG during ampullary emptying. Pressures during each phase were greater in the supine than in the upright position. Conclusions: IBP during esophageal bolus transit varies based on functional phases of the swallow, each with distinct mechanistic implications. IBP during phase I and II would be modulated by deglutitive inhibition and mechanical properties of the esophageal wall. In contrast, measurements during phase III will be affected by peristaltic integrity and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction whereas phase IV may be altered by anatomical and mechanical properties of the EGJ. Comparison of mean (range) EGPG during each phase of bolus transit (I-bolus accommodation, IIcompartmentalization, III-stripping and IV-ampullary emptying) among 10 subjects calculated using the esophageal pressure at nadir impedance locations.