Biomechanical comparison of three different fixation techniques for a proximal biceps tenodesis. Eighteen human cadaver specimens were used for the testing. A tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon was performed using a double-loaded suture anchor (5.5-mm Corkscrew, Arthrex), a knotless anchor (5.5-mm SwiveLock, Arthrex) or a forked knotless anchor (8-mm SwiveLock, Arthrex). Reconstructions were cyclically loaded for 50 cycles from 10-60 to 10-100N. Cyclic displacement and ultimate failure loads were determined, and mode of failure was evaluated. Cyclic displacement at 60N revealed a mean of 3.3±1.1mm for the Corkscrew, 5.4±1.4mm for the 5.5-mm SwiveLock and 2.9±1.6mm for the 8-mm forked SwiveLock. At 100N, 5.1±2.2mm were seen for the Corkscrew anchor, 8.7±2.5mm for the 5.5-mm SwiveLock and 4.8±3.3mm for the 8-mm forked SwiveLock anchor. Significant lower cyclic displacement was seen for the Corkscrew anchor (p<0.020) as well as the 8-mm SwiveLock anchor (p<0.023) compared to the 5.5-mm SwiveLock anchor at 60N. An ultimate load to failure of 109±27N was found for the Corkscrew anchor, 125±25N were measured for the 5.5-mm SwiveLock anchor, and 175±42N were found for the 8-mm forked SwiveLock anchor. Significant differences were seen between the 8-mm SwiveLock compared to the 5.5-mm SwiveLock (p<0.044) as well as the Corkscrew anchor (p<0.009). No significant differences were seen between the Corkscrew and the 5.5-mm SwiveLock anchor. The new 8-mm forked SwiveLock anchor significantly enhances construct stability compared to a 5.5-mm double-loaded Corkscrew anchor as well as the 5.5-mm SwiveLock suture anchor. However, a restrictive postoperative rehabilitation seems to be important in all tested reconstructions in order to avoid early failure of the construct.