Proximal Aortic Surgery Research Articles

Early clinical outcomes in men and women undergoing proximal thoracic aortic surgery – A Swedish population-based cohort study

ObjectiveTo investigate the association between female sex and 30-day mortality and postoperative complications in patients undergoing scheduled proximal thoracic aortic surgery in Sweden. MethodsIn a nationwide population-based cohort study, all patients who underwent scheduled proximal thoracic aortic surgery in Sweden between 2016 and 2020 were included. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measure included a combined endpoint including 30-day all-cause mortality, postoperative new onset dialysis, perioperative stroke or a prolonged need of postoperative ventilation (>48 hours). Logistic regression models and propensity score matching were used to estimate the association between female sex and primary and secondary outcomes adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics. Results2000 patients (29% women) were analyzed. The crude 30-day all-cause mortality rate was higher in women compared to men (3.1 vs. 1.4%, p<0.001). Women were older at time of surgery (65.6 vs. 60.2 years, p<0.001), had more comorbidities and a larger maximum indexed aortic diameter (cm/m body height) at time of surgery (3.4 ± 0.56 vs. 3.0 ± 0.48, p<0.001). The adjusted risk for 30-day mortality for women compared to men was not significant (OR 1.41 CI 95% (0.70-2.83)), neither was the secondary composite endpoint (OR 0.89 CI 95% (0.62-1.27)). The propensity score matched analysis showed similar results. ConclusionsWomen who underwent proximal thoracic aortic surgery had a two-fold higher unadjusted 30-day mortality risk, but the mortality risk was not significantly higher when age and comorbidities was taken into consideration.

Cerebral Protection in Complex Re-Operative Proximal Aortic Surgery

Cerebral Protection in Complex Re-Operative Proximal Aortic Surgery

Sex-related differences in outcome of thoracic aortic surgery.

Sex-related dissimilarities' influence on outcomes following thoracic aortic surgery is poorly understood. Our aim is to examine sex-related disparities in patients undergoing thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). A total of 455 cases undergoing thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) surgery were consecutively enrolled between December 2009 and December 2015 in a Chinese hospital. Primary outcomes, including overall mortality and related risk factors, were evaluated. Cox regression is utilized to recognize the independent risk factor of these consequences. Females, compared to males, had greater indexed aortic diameters and higher aortic transvalvular pressure differences. For the location of aortic aneurysms, females had a higher rate of aortic arch involvement, while males had a higher rate of root involvement. Females underwent less frequent complex proximal aortic operations compared with males (29.5% versus 46.9%; p < 0.001). Women and men both had a lower rate of aortic transvalvular pressure difference and LV volume index 7 days after thoracic aortic surgery. The overall mortality for the women's groups (11%) was suggestively greater compared to 4.9% for the men's groups (p = 0.026). Renal failure and aortic arch involvement were the main risk factors associated with males' survival, while maximum indexed aortic diameter and cross-clamp time were the risk factors associated with females' survival. The outcome after TAA surgery was less favorable in women with significantly increased overall mortality. It highlights the need to focus on implementing personalized surgery strategies and gender-specific guidelines in treating female patients following TAA surgery.

Aortic events and relative survival in patients with moderately dilated proximal thoracic aorta

Objectives. This study describes growth, local and remote aortic events, and survival in patients with proximal (root, ascending) aortic diameters just below threshold for operation. Methods. Patients with proximal aortic diameter of 4.5 to 5.4 cm at baseline, were followed with serial computed tomography studies and data collected retrospectively. Aortic growth rate was estimated using mixed effects modelling. Clinical and radiological features associated with outcomes (all-cause death, aortic death, local or remote aortic events (dissection, rupture, intramural hematoma, or intervention)) were assessed with Cox analysis. Survival and freedom from events were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results. 80 patients underwent 274 CT scans during 265 patient-years. Median proximal aortic growth was 0.2 cm in 3 years. 32 events occurred in 28 patients (35%). Eleven events were local, all elective proximal aortic surgery. Nine events were remote: 5 type B aortic dissections, 3 descending aneurysms undergoing elective repair, and one infrarenal aortic rupture. Twelve patients died, half of type B aortic dissection. Relative survival compared to a matched normal population was 82% (95% confidence limits 55–98%) at 10 years. In Cox analysis, increased descending aortic diameter was an independent predictor of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39) and aortic death (HR 1.96). Conclusions. Descending, but not proximal, aortic growth was predictive of lethal events. The decreased relative survival, the substantial number of remote aortic events and aortic deaths strongly suggest continuous serial CT surveillance of the entire aorta. Other indicators than proximal aortic diameter appear needed to improve management of this patient group.

Unplanned readmissions, community socioeconomic factors, and their effects on long-term survival after complex thoracic aortic surgery

ObjectiveWe evaluated community socioeconomic factors in patients who had unplanned readmission after undergoing proximal aortic surgery (ascending aorta, aortic root, or arch). MethodsUnplanned readmissions for any reason within 60 days of the index procedure were reviewed by race, acuity at presentation, and gender. We also evaluated 3 community socioeconomic factors: poverty, household income, and education. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess long-term survival differences by group (race, acuity, and gender). ResultsAmong 2339 patients who underwent proximal aortic surgery during the 20-year study period and were discharged alive, our team identified 146 (6.2%) unplanned readmissions. Compared with White patients, Black patients lived in areas characterized by more widespread poverty (20.8% vs 11.1%; P = .0003), lower income ($42,776 vs $65,193; P = .0007), and fewer residents with a high school diploma (73.7% vs 90.1%; P < .0001). Compared with patients whose index operation was elective, patients who had urgent or emergency index procedures lived in areas with lower income ($54,425 vs $64,846; P = .01) and fewer residents with a high school diploma (81.1% vs 89.2%; P = .005). Community socioeconomic factors did not differ by gender. Four- and 6-year survival estimates were 63.1% and 63.1% for Black patients versus 89.1% and 83.0% for White patients (P = .0009). No significant differences by acuity or gender were found. ConclusionsAmong readmitted patients, Black patients and patients who had emergency surgery had less favorable community socioeconomic factors and poorer long-term survival. Earlier and more frequent follow-up in these patients should be considered. Developing off-campus clinics and specific postdischarge measures targeting these patients is important.

The Impact of Frailty on Outcomes of Proximal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery: A Nationwide Analysis.

(1) Background: This study examines frailty's impact on proximal aortic surgery outcomes. (2) Methods: All patients with a thoracic aortic aneurysm who underwent aortic root, ascending aorta, or arch surgery from the 2016-2017 National Inpatient Sample were included. Frailty was defined by the Adjusted Clinical Groups Frailty Indicator. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality and a composite of death, stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), and major bleeding (MACE). (3) Results: Among 5745 patients, 405 (7.0%) met frailty criteria. Frail patients were older, with higher rates of chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. There was no difference in in-hospital death (4.9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.169); however, the frail group exhibited higher rates of stroke and AKI. Frail patients had a longer length of stay (17 vs. 8 days), and higher rates of non-home discharge (74.1% vs. 54.3%) than non-frail patients (both p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis confirmed increased morbidity and mortality in frail individuals. After adjusting for patient comorbidities and hospital characteristics, frailty independently predicted MACE (OR 4.29 [1.88-9.78], p = 0.001), while age alone did not (OR 1.00 [0.99-1.02], p = 0.568). Urban teaching center status predicted a lower risk of MACE (OR 0.27 [0.08-0.94], p = 0.039). (4) Conclusions: Frailty is associated with increased morbidity in proximal aortic surgery and is a more significant predictor of mortality than age. Coordinated treatment in urban institutions may enhance outcomes for this high-risk group.

Aortic arch redo surgery: early and mid-term outcomes in 120 patients.

The aim of this study was to analyse the indications, surgical extent and results of treatment, as well as determine the risk factors for adverse outcomes after redo arch surgery. Between January 1996 and December 2022, 120 patients underwent aortic arch reoperations after primary proximal aortic surgery. We retrospectively analysed perioperative data, as well as early and mid-term outcomes in these patients. Indications for arch reintervention included new aortic aneurysm in 34 patients (28.3%), expanding post-dissection aneurysm in 36 (30.0%), aortic graft infection in 39 (32.5%) and new aortic dissection in 9 cases. Two patients underwent reoperation due to iatrogenic complications. Thirty-one patients (25.8%) had concomitant endocarditis. In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 11.7% and 15.0%, respectively. Stroke was observed in 11 (9.2%) and paraplegia in 1 patient. Prior surgery due to aneurysm [odds ratio 4.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-17.3] and critical preoperative state (odds ratio 5.9; 95% CI 1.5-23.7) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Overall 1- and 5-year survival was 65.8 ± 8.8% and 51.2 ± 10.6%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio 2.4; 95% CI 1.0-5.1) and peripheral arterial disease (hazard ratio 4.7; 95% CI 1.1-14.3) were independent predictors of late death. The cumulative incidence of reoperations was 12.6% (95% CI 6.7-20.4%) at 5 years. Accounting for mortality as a competing event, connective tissue disorders (subdistribution hazard ratio 4.5; 95% CI 1.6-15.7) and interval between primary and redo surgery (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-1.06) were independent predictors of reoperations after redo arch surgery. Despite being technically demanding, aortic arch reoperations are feasible and can be performed with acceptable results.

Discussion to: Lower extremity malperfusion syndrome in patients undergoing proximal aortic surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

Discussion to: Lower extremity malperfusion syndrome in patients undergoing proximal aortic surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

Lower-extremity malperfusion syndrome in patients undergoing proximal aortic surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

ObjectiveData regarding management of lower-extremity malperfusion in the setting of type A aortic dissection are limited. This study aimed to compare acute type A aortic dissection with lower-extremity malperfusion outcomes in patients undergoing lower-extremity revascularization with no revascularization. MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing acute type A aortic dissection surgery were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative variables were compared between patients with and without lower-extremity malperfusion. Factors associated with lower-extremity malperfusion, revascularization, and mortality were determined using univariable Cox regression and Firth's penalized likelihood modeling. ResultsFrom January 2007 to December 2021, 601 patients underwent proximal aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection at a quaternary care center. Of these, 85 of 601 patients (14%) presented with lower-extremity malperfusion and were more often male (P = .02), had concomitant moderate or greater aortic insufficiency (P = .05), had lower ejection fraction (P = .004), had preoperative dialysis dependence (P = .01), and had additional cerebral, visceral, and renal malperfusion syndromes (P < .001). Kaplan–Meier estimated survival fared worse with lower-extremity malperfusion compared with no lower-extremity malperfusion at 1, 5, and 10 years (84% vs 77%, 74% vs 71%, 65% vs 52%, respectively, P = .03). In the lower-extremity malperfusion group, 15 of 85 patients (18%) underwent lower-extremity revascularization without significant differences in postoperative morbidity and mortality compared with patients not undergoing revascularization. Need for peripheral revascularization was associated with peripheral vascular disease (hazard ratio, 3.7 [1.0-14.0], P = .05) and pulse deficit (hazard ratio, 5.6 [1.3-24.0], P = .02) at presentation. ConclusionsPatients presenting with type A aortic dissection and lower-extremity malperfusion have worse overall survival compared with those without lower-extremity malperfusion. However, not all patients with type A aortic dissection and lower-extremity malperfusion require revascularization.

Race and Socioeconomic Disparities in Proximal Aortic Surgery

BackgroundSubstantial socioeconomics-based disparities exist in cardiac surgery. Although there are robust data for revascularization and valve procedures, the effect of race and socioeconomic status on proximal aortic surgery is not well studied. This study analyzed the impact of race and socioeconomic status on in-hospital outcomes after proximal aortic surgery. MethodsAll adult patients who underwent proximal aortic surgery for aortic dissection or thoracic aneurysm from the 2016 to 2018 National Inpatient Sample were included. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and in-hospital composite morbidity (stroke, pulmonary embolus, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, or permanent pacemaker insertion). Adjusted outcomes were assessed with multivariable analysis. ResultsA weighted total of 32,895 patients were included; 25,461 (77.4%) classified as White, 3224 (9.8%) Black, 2039 (6.2%) Hispanic, and 2171 (6.6%) other. Black and Hispanic patients had significantly lower median household income, higher proportion of self-pay insurance status, younger age, higher comorbidity burden, and a higher proportion of urgent or emergency procedures compared with White patients. There was no significant difference in observed in-hospital mortality by patient race, but non-White patients had significantly higher composite morbidity. On adjusted analysis, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality, but non-White race was an independent predictor of in-hospital morbidity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4-1.8; P < .001). ConclusionsPatients of non-White race who undergo proximal aortic surgery have less insurance coverage, more urgent procedures, and a higher comorbidity burden than White patients, disparities that translate to significantly higher morbidity in non-White. A greater focus on nonfatal outcome differentials and improving access to care likely will improve aortic surgery disparities.

Predictors of Lethality, Remodeling, and Aorta-Related Events in Different Types of Proximal Aortic Dissection Surgery.

A retrospective observational comparison of the results of surgical treatment of 213 patients with the diagnosis of "DeBakey type I aortic dissection" has been carried out. The participants were divided into three groups: group 1 underwent classic aortic arch reconstruction using hemiarch technique or total reconstruction of the aortic arch with a multiple-branch prosthesis (n=121); group 2 was subjected to the hemiarch technique and implantation of bare-metal (uncoated) stents (n=55); in group 3, the "frozen elephant trunk" correction technique was used (n=37). The diagnosis of all patients included into the study was preoperatively confirmed by ultrasound and tomographic examination. Predictors of negative events have been identified by building the models of logistic regressions. The multivariate model of logistic regression has revealed multiplicative significant predictors of lethality: postoperative neurological complications increased the probability of lethality by 3.39 (1.24-9.18) times and presence of a patent false lumen by 4.17 (1.49-13.68) times.Among the predictors of aorta-related events, the most important were connective tissue diseases (the probability increased by 6.68 (2.98-15.62) times), presence of partial thrombosis of the false lumen (the probability of event development increased by 2.39 (1.07-5.44) times), and aortic valve repair (the probability aorta-event occurrence increased by 2.84 (1.13-7.17) times).Hybrid prosthesis implantation appeared to be the most significant predictor of false lumen thrombosis increasing its probability by 4.19 (1.90-9.44) times among aortic repair methods, while a bare-metal stent implantation in contrast reduced the likelihood of false lumen thrombosis by 0.17 (0.03-0.62) times. Eventually, the type of repair had not any significant impact on the aorta-related events and lethality in the long-term period.

Innominate Artery Cannulation for Proximal Aortic Surgery.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of innominate artery cannulation strategy with side-graft technique in proximal aortic pathologies. A total of 70 patients underwent innominate artery cannulation with a side graft for surgery on the proximal aorta from 2012 to 2020. There were 46 men and 24 women with an average age of 56±13 years. The indications for surgery were type A aortic dissection in 17 patients (24.3%), aortic aneurysm in 52 patients (74.3%), and ascending aorta pseudoaneurysm in one patient (1.4%). The innominate artery was free of disease in all patients. Hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion was utilized in 60 patients (85.7%). Three patients had previous sternotomy (4.2%). The most common surgical procedure was ascending aorta with hemiarch replacement in 34 patients (48.5%). The mean cardiac ischemia and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 116+46 minutes and 164+56 minutes, respectively. Mean antegrade cerebral perfusion time was 27+14 minutes. The patients were cooled between 22°C and 30°C during surgery. Thirty-day mortality rate was 7.1% (five patients). One patient (1.4%) had stroke, one patient (1.4%) had temporary neurologic deficit, and eight patients (11.4%) had confusion and agitation that resolved completely in all cases. There was no local complication or arterial injury. Cannulation of the innominate artery with side graft is safe and effective for both cardiopulmonary bypass and antegrade cerebral perfusion. This technique provides satisfactory neurologic outcomes for proximal aortic surgery.

Rapid cooling is a safe technique in patients undergoing circulatory arrest for aortic repair.

To evaluate our institutional experience with rapid cooling for hypothermic circulatory arrest in proximal aortic repair. We retrospectively reviewed data from 2171 patients who underwent proximal aortic surgery requiring hypothermic circulatory arrest between 1991 and 2020. Cooling times were divided into quartiles and clinical outcome event rates were compared across quartiles using contingency table methods. Incremental effect of cooling time was assessed in the context of other perfusion time variables using multiple logistic regression analysis. Median age was 61years (interquartile range, 49-70years) and 34.1% of patients were women. The procedure was emergent in 33.5% of patients, 22.9% had a previous sternotomy. The median circulatory arrest time was 22minutes, with retrograde cerebral perfusion used in 94% of cases. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 149minutes, with an aortic crossclamp time of 90minutes. Patients were cooled to deep hypothermia. The first quartile had cooling times ranging from 5 to 13minutes, second 14 to 18minutes, third 19-23minutes, and fourth 24-81minutes. Overall, 30-day mortality was 9.4%, and was not significantly different across quartiles. There was a statistically significant trend toward lower rates of postoperative encephalopathy, gastrointestinal complications, and respiratory failure with shorter cooling times (P<.001, .006, and<.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in rates of postoperative stroke or dialysis. Rapid cooling can be performed safely in patients undergoing aortic surgery requiring circulatory arrest without increasing mortality or stroke. There were significantly lower rates of coagulopathy, respiratory failure, and postoperative encephalopathy with shorter cooling times.

Racial disparities in thoracic aortic surgery: Myth or reality?

ObjectiveWe examined the relationship between Black or White race and adverse outcomes in patients who underwent surgery of the ascending aorta, aortic root, or aortic arch at our center. MethodsWe analyzed 2335 consecutive patients who identified as Black (n = 217, 9.3%) or White (n = 2118, 90.7%) and underwent proximal aortic surgery. Patient zip codes were used to determine community socioeconomic (CSE) characteristics. The composite adverse outcome comprised mortality, persistent neurologic injury, and renal failure necessitating dialysis at discharge. We performed multivariable analysis, Kaplan–Meier analysis, and propensity score matching adjusted for CSE factors. ResultsMedian follow-up time was 3.7 years. Compared with White patients, Black patients lived in areas characterized by a higher percentage living below poverty level, lower income, and lower education level (P < .0001). Black patients had higher rates of emergency presentation (P < .0001) and lower 5- and 10-year survival rates (P = .0002). Short-term outcomes were similar between groups, except for respiratory failure and length of stay (P < .0001), which were higher in the Black population. After propensity score matching adjusted for CSE factors, Black and White patients (n = 204 each) had similar short-term outcomes and 5- and 10-year survival rates (P = .30). Multivariable analysis stratified by race showed that CSE factors independently predicted adverse outcomes in Black but not White patients. ConclusionsThis is among few studies that have analyzed the relationship between race and proximal aortic surgery. Although outcomes were similar between Black and White patients in our cohort after adjusting for CSE factors, unfavorable CSE factors predicted adverse outcomes in Black but not White patients. More patient-specific studies are needed.

Comparison of minimally invasive versus conventional thoracic aortic operations: Early and midterm results in a series of 624 patients.

Despite minimally invasive techniques having gained wider application in cardiac surgery, current evidence on minithoracic aortic surgery is still limited. The aim of this study was to compare early and midterm outcomes of patients undergoing operations of the proximal thoracic aorta through ministernotomy (MS) versus full sternotomy (FS). Data from 624 consecutive patients who underwent proximal aortic repair through MS (n = 214, 34.3%) and FS (n = 410, 65.7%) at two aortic centerswere analyzed. Treatment selection bias was addressed using propensity score matching (MS vs.FS). After matching, two well-balanced groups of 202 patients each were created. Median cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 88 and 68 min, respectively, with no difference between groups. Overall, 30-day mortality was 1% (n = 2) in MS and 0.5% (n = 1) in FS (p = .6). No difference was found in the rates of stroke (MS n = 5, 2.5%; FS n = 5, 2.5%), dialysis (MS n = 1, 0.5%; FS n = 4, 2%), bleeding (MS n = 7, 3.5%; FS n = 7, 3.5%), and blood transfusions (MS n = 67, 33.3%; FS n = 57, 28.4%). Patients receiving MS showed a lower incidence of respiratory insufficiency compared with FS (0% vs. 2.5%, p = .04). Intensive care unit and hospital stays were similar between groups. Two-year survival rate was 97.2% in MS and 96.5% in FS (p = .9). Mini proximal aortic operations can be performed successfully without compromising the proven efficacy and safety of conventional access. In selected patients, MS was associated with very low mortality and morbidity rates. Additionally, MS demonstrated superior clinical outcomes as regards respiratory adverse events, when compared with FS.

Abstract 9865: Acute Infarcts on Brain MRI Following Aortic Arch Repair With Circulatory Arrest: Insights From the ACE Cardiolink-3 Randomized Trial

Introduction: Our objective was to investigate the frequency and distribution of new ischemic brain lesions detected by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on brain MRI after aortic arch surgery. Methods: This was an imaging sub-analysis of the ACE CardioLink-3 randomized controlled trial which compared the safety and efficacy of innominate vs axillary artery cannulation during elective proximal aortic arch surgery. All participants in the trial underwent pre- and post-operative MRI. New ischemic lesions were defined as lesions on post-operative DWI that were not visible on the pre-operative DWI. Results: Of 102 patients who underwent surgery, 71 (70%) had new ischemic lesions on DWI and the total lesion number across all participants was 391. The average lesion number in patients with at least one ischemic lesion was 5.5±4.9, and were similar in the right (3.3±2.7) or left (3.6±2.8) hemispheres (p=0.49). The most common lesion patterns were single or multiple cortical infarcts. Half of the lesions (n=183, 47%) were in the middle cerebral artery territory, while 24% were in the infratentorium. 42% of patients had lesions distributed in both anterior and posterior circulation, 21% in anterior circulation only, and 7% in posterior circulation only. Besides, 20% had lesions in watershed areas. There were no differences in distribution between patients in the innominate vs axillary artery cannulation groups. In multivariable regression models, more severe white matter hyperintensity on pre-operative MRI (odds ratio per 1-score increase of Fazekas scale 1.80; p=0.02) and lower nadir temperature during operation (odds ratio per 1°C decrease, 1.14; p=0.05) were associated with having any new ischemic lesion, while older age (risk ratio per 1-year increase 1.02; p=0.03) and lower nadir temperature (risk ratio per 1°C decrease, 1.06; p=0.06) were associated with higher lesion numbers. Conclusion: In patients who underwent elective proximal aortic arch surgery, new ischemic brain lesions were common, and mostly identified as scattered cortical infarcts in the middle cerebral artery territory. Advanced age, underlying small vessel disease, and lower nadir temperature during operation were risk factors of presence and burden of new ischemic lesions after surgery.

Acute Infarcts on Brain MRI Following Aortic Arch Repair With Circulatory Arrest: Insights From the ACE CardioLink-3 Randomized Trial.

to investigate the frequency and distribution of new ischemic brain lesions detected by diffusion-weighted imaging on brain magnetic resonance imaging after aortic arch surgery. This preplanned secondary analysis of the randomized, controlled ACE (Aortic Surgery Cerebral Protection Evaluation) CardioLink-3 trial compared the safety and efficacy of innominate versus axillary artery cannulation during elective proximal aortic arch surgery. Participants underwent pre and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. New ischemic lesions were defined as lesions visible on postoperative, but not preoperative diffusion weighted imaging. Of the 111 trial participants, 102 had complete magnetic resonance imaging data. A total of 391 new ischemic lesions were observed on diffusion-weighted imaging in 71 (70%) patients. The average number of lesions in patients with ischemic lesion were 5.5±4.9 with comparable numbers in the right (2.9±2.0) and left (3.0±2.3) hemispheres (P=0.49). Half the new lesions were in the middle cerebral artery territory; 63% of the cohort had ischemic lesions in the anterior circulation, 49% in the posterior circulation, 42% in both, and 20% in watershed areas. A probability mask of all diffusion-weighted imaging lesions revealed that the cerebellum was commonly involved. More severe white matter hyperintensity on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (odds ratio, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.10-2.95]; P=0.02) and lower nadir nasopharyngeal temperature during surgery (odds ratio per 1°C decrease, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.00-1.32]; P=0.05) were associated with the presentation of new ischemic lesion; older age (risk ratio per 1-year increase, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.04]; P=0.03) and lower nadir temperature (risk ratio per 1°C decrease, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.00-1.14]; P=0.06) were associated with greater number of lesions. In patients who underwent elective proximal aortic arch surgery, new ischemic brain lesions were common, and predominantly involved the middle cerebral artery territory or cerebellum. Underlying small vessel disease, lower temperature nadir during surgery, and advanced age were risk factors for perioperative ischemic lesions. URL: https://www. gov; Unique identifier: NCT02554032.

The intersection of community socioeconomic factors with gender on outcomes after thoracic aortic surgery

ObjectiveWe evaluated the relationship among community socioeconomic factors (poverty, income, and education), gender, and outcomes in patients who underwent ascending aortic, root, and arch surgery. MethodsFor 2634 consecutive patients, we associated patients' ZIP codes with community socioeconomic factors. The composite adverse outcome comprised death, persistent neurological injury, and renal failure necessitating dialysis at discharge. Multivariable analysis and Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used. Men and women from the full cohort and from the elective patients were propensity matched. ResultsMedian follow-up was 3.6 years (interquartile range, 1.2-9.3). Men lived in areas characterized by less poverty (P = .03), higher household income (P = .01), and more education (P = .02) than women; likewise, in the elective cohort, all community socioeconomic factors favored men (P ≤ .009). Female gender predicted composite adverse outcome (P = .006). In the propensity-matched women and men (820 pairs), the composite adverse outcome rates were 14.2% and 11%, respectively (P = .06). In 583 propensity-matched pairs of elective patients, men had less composite adverse outcome (P = .02), operative mortality (P = .04), and renal (P = .02) and respiratory failure (P = .0006). The 5- and 10-year survivals for these men and women were 74.2% versus 71.4% and 50.2% versus 48.2%, respectively (P = .06). All community socioeconomic factors in both propensity-matched groups nonsignificantly favored men. ConclusionsThis study is among the first to examine the association among community socioeconomic factors, gender, and outcomes in patients who undergo proximal aortic surgery. Female gender predicted a composite adverse outcome. In the elective patients, most adverse outcomes were significantly less in men. In the propensity-matched patients, all community socioeconomic factors favored men, although not significantly. Larger studies with patient-level socioeconomic information are needed.

Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest With Retrograde Cerebral Perfusion: How Long Is Safe?

BackgroundCerebral protection strategies during proximal aortic repair remains controversial due to lack of evidence and large patient cohort studies. We herein evaluated our 3-decade experience using hypothermic circulatory arrest with retrograde cerebral perfusion (DHCA/RCP) to evaluate for its safety and safe duration during proximal aortic repair. MethodsAll proximal aortic repairs using DHCA/RCP from January 1991 to December 2020 performed at our institution were included in the analyses. Perioperative variables were evaluated for mortality and cerebrovascular accident (CVA; combined stroke and transient ischemic attack). ResultsIn all, 1429 repairs were performed using DHCA/RCP. Of these, 464 (32%) were acute aortic dissection and 297 (21%) were resternotomy. The median age was 61 years (interquartile range 50-70 years). Operative mortality was 8.9% and CVA occurred in 8.4% (stroke 7.8%, transient ischemic attack 0.6%). There was a linear relationship between the RCP time and the incidence of immediate postoperative CVA. Incidence of CVA was less than 5% when RCP time was less than 20 minutes, 6.3% at 30 minutes, and 11.5% at 60 minutes. Multivariable analysis demonstrated acute type A aortic dissection (odds ratio 2.58, 95% CI1.49-4.48, P = .001) was the only predictor for postoperative CVA but RCP time was not (odds ratio 0.991, 95% CI 0.962-1.02, P = .527). ConclusionsDHCA/RCA provided satisfactory outcomes after proximal aortic operations. The safe duration of RCP with DHCA was up to 30 minutes in our experience. When the circulatory arrest time is expected to exceed 60 minutes, other adjuncts for cerebral protection should be recommended.

UpToDate®

UpToDate| September 2022 UpToDate® ASA Monitor September 2022, Vol. 86, 41. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASM.0000874300.60733.69 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Cite Icon Cite Get Permissions Search Site Citation UpToDate®. ASA Monitor 2022; 86:41 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASM.0000874300.60733.69 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll PublicationsASA Monitor Search Advanced Search Topics: aortic surgery, heart valves, transesophageal echocardiography UpToDate® and ASA Monitor are collaborating to present select content abstracts on “What's New in Anesthesiology.” UpToDate is an evidence-based, clinical support resource used worldwide by health care practitioners to make decisions at the point of care. For complete, current “What's New” content, or to become a subscriber for full content access, go to www.uptodate.com. “What's New” abstract information is free for all medical professionals. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is commonly used during cardiac valve surgery to assess valve function prior to and following repair/replacement and to manage complications. In a matched cohort study including more than 850,000 patients in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, use of intraoperative TEE was associated with lower 30-day mortality after open cardiac valve or proximal aortic surgery compared with not using TEE [1]. Composite outcomes were also lower (i.e., stroke or 30-day mortality; reoperation or 30-day mortality). As these... You do not currently have access to this content.