Hearing Aid Provision Research Articles

What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol

IntroductionHearing aids are the gold standard treatment to help manage hearing loss. However, not everyone who needs them has them, and of those who do, a significant proportion of people...

Using a decision tree approach to determine hearing aid ownership in older adults

Purpose The main clinical intervention for older adults with hearing loss is the provision of hearing aids. However, uptake and usage in this population have historically been reported as low. The aim of this study was to understand the hearing loss characteristics, from measured audiometric hearing loss and self-perceived hearing handicap, that contribute to the decision of hearing aid ownership. Materials and methods A total of 2833 adults aged 50+ years, of which 329 reported hearing aid ownership, were involved with a population-based survey with audiometric hearing assessments. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to classify hearing aid ownership from audiometric measurements and hearing disability outcomes. Results An overall accuracy of 92.5% was found for the performance of the CART analysis in predicting hearing aid ownership from hearing loss characteristics. By including hearing disability, sensitivity for predicting hearing aid ownership increased by up to 40% compared with just audiometric hearing loss measurements alone. Conclusions A decision tree approach that considers both objectively measured hearing loss and self-perceived hearing disability, could facilitate a more tailored and personalised approach for determining hearing aid needs in the older population. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Without intervention, older adults with hearing loss are at higher risk of cognitive decline and higher rates of depression, anxiety, social isolation. The provision of hearing aids can compensate hearing function, however, uptake and usage have been reported as low. Using a more precise cut-off from audiometric measures and self-perceived hearing disability scores could facilitate a tailored and personalised approach to screen and identify older adults for hearing aid needs.

Approach and solutions to congenital hearing impairment in Cameroon: perspective of hearing professionals

ObjectivesTo bring out the diagnostic attitude of hearing professionals in Cameroon towards congenital hearing impairment (CHI), assess availability of tests, neonatal screening, and create a national map of availability of treatment opportunities.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online-based survey from June to December 2021, concerning ear–nose–throat (ENT) specialists, hearing care professionals, speech therapists and ENT nurses. A Google Forms online questionnaire was used to collect data, filled by eligible professionals involved in hearing care in Cameroon.ResultsA total of 93 professionals working in 31 different health facilities participated. A cumulative percentage of 79.9% of ENTs were found in just two out of 10 regions. Specialists sought by ENTs for assessment of patients with CHI included neurologists/neuro-pediatricians (96.8%), pediatricians (47.6%), other ENTs (34.9%), and psychologists (3.2%). Investigations requested included auditory-evoked brainstem response (ABR; 87.3%), otoacoustic emissions recording (OAE; 71.4%), and tympanometry (66.7%). There were eight OAE and nine ABR machines in the country. Twenty-five (88.6%) out of 31 facilities with otolaryngologists did not carry out systematic neonatal screening. Reasons included unavailability of equipment (21; 84%), and administrative delays (14; 56%). Sixteen (51.6%) facilities had ENTs with additional training in otologic surgery and 11 (35.5%) were equipped to perform ear surgery. Three centers (9.7%) specialized in hearing aid provision and maintenance services. Three hospitals (9.7%) had performed cochlear implantation.ConclusionOur results show scarcity and overt unevenness in distribution of specialists, equipment and solutions to CHI in Cameroon. A serious negative health care consequence of this shortage is the unavailability of universal newborn hearing screening and implementation programs.

APSO Standards: Implementing Hearing Aid Needs Assessments and Measuring Related Outcomes.

The proportion of individuals who pose to benefit from the use of hearing aids is much smaller than those who adopt them. Likewise, many adults who try hearing devices abandon using them after a short period of time. Most factors related to hearing aid use are unrelated to a patient's hearing loss severity. Hearing loss treatment requires more than the provision of hearing aids as a sole intervention. Adoption rates could be improved through the implementation of evidence-based clinical protocols which maximize patients' success. Recently, the Audiology Practice Standards Organization (APSO) released evidence-based, formal standards of practice addressing hearing aid selection, fitting, and rehabilitation for adult and geriatric patients. Notably, the standards acknowledge the importance of an amplification needs assessment, including hearing aid outcomes measurement. In this brief narrative, we describe Standards 3 and 14 ( Needs Assessment and Hearing Aid Outcomes Measurement ) and offer an example of the clinical implementation of a comprehensive needs assessment and hearing aid outcomes measurement currently being used in a multisite, longitudinal clinical trial.

Results and Quality of Life after Implantation of Active Middle Ear Implants.

The provision of implantable hearing aids represents an area with high development and innovation potential. On the one hand, this review article provides an overview of current indication criteria for the treatment with active middle ear implants. On the other hand, outcome parameters as well as functional results after implantation of active middle ear implants are demonstrated and discussed. The focus is mainly placed on audiological results as well as the subjective health status. "Patient Reported Outcome Measures" (PROMs) have become an integral part of the evaluation of hearing implant treatment. Due to low evidence level criteria, the study situation regarding audiological as well as subjective outcome parameters is not satisfactory. The lack of an international consensus on accepted outcome parameters makes a meta-analytical analysis of results immensely difficult. In the studies published to date, patients with sensorineural hearing loss and patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss offered better speech recognition after implantation of an active middle ear implant compared to conventional hearing aids. Current analyses show a significant improvement in general as well as hearing-specific quality of life after implantation of an active middle ear implant. To date, no validated, hearing-specific quality-of-life measurement instruments exist for assessing the success of fitting in children. Especially in children with complex malformations of the outer ear and the middle ear, excellent audiological results were shown. However, these results need to be substantiated by quality-of-life measurements in future.

Wirksamkeit der Hörgeräteversorgung bei hochgradigem Hörverlust

HintergrundIn der Praxis liegt das unilaterale Einsilberverstehen mit Hörgerät bei 65 dB SPL (EV65(HG)) häufig unter dem maximalen Einsilberverstehen aus dem Sprachaudiogramm (mEV), insbesondere bei Hörgeräteträgern mit hochgradigem Hörverlust. Diese Arbeit zielte darauf ab, den Wirkungsgrad Q der Hörgeräteversorgung, den Quotienten aus EV65(HG) und mEV, bei Hörgeräteträgern mit hochgradigem bis an Taubheit grenzendem Hörverlust zu untersuchen.Material und MethodenEs wurden Daten aus In-situ-Messungen, dem Reinton- und Sprachaudiogramm und dem Sprachverstehen mit und ohne Hörgerät von 93 Ohren von 64 Patienten ausgewertet. Die Patienten stellten sich im Jahr 2019 für eine Hörgerätekontrolle in unserem Hörzentrum vor. Es wurden die Abweichung der in-situ gemessenen frequenzabhängigen Ausgangspegelwerte von den Zielvorgaben der präskriptiven Anpassformeln NAL-NL2 und DSL v5.0 analysiert. Für die Parameter EV65(HG) und Q wurden jeweils die Spearman-Korrelationskoeffizienten für den Sprachverständlichkeitsindex (SII) berechnet.ErgebnisseBei mehr als 67 % der Hörgeräteeinstellungen stimmten die Ausgangspegelwerte mit den Zielkurven für NAL-NL2 oder DSL v5.0 im Bereich von ±5 dB für Frequenzen von 0,5 bis 4 kHz für 65 dB SPL überein. Trotzdem wurde das mEV mit Hörgerät bei 65 dB SPL nicht erreicht (mittlere Abweichungen: 34,4 %). EV65(HG) und Q waren jedoch am besten, wenn Zielwerte für DSL v5.0 bei 65 dB SPL erreicht wurden, was mit einem höheren SII einhergeht.SchlussfolgerungFür Hörgeräteträger mit hochgradigem bis an Taubheit grenzendem Hörverlust führen die Anpassformeln NAL-NL2 und DSL v5.0 nicht zu einer solchen Verstärkung, dass bei Alltagssprache von 65 dB SPL das mEV erreicht wird. Es bleibt zu untersuchen, ob alternative Präskriptionen mit besserer Hörbarkeit für Eingangspegel von 50 und 65 dB SPL den Wirkungsgrad der Hörgeräteversorgung verbessern könnten.

The dynamic relationship between hearing loss, quality of life, socioeconomic position and depression and the impact of hearing aids: answers from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA)

PurposeThe adverse impact of hearing loss (HL) extends beyond auditory impairment and may affect the individuals' psychosocial wellbeing. We aimed to examine whether there exists a causal psychosocial pathway between HL and depression in later life, via socioeconomic factors and quality of life, and whether hearing aids usage alleviates depressive symptoms over time.MethodsWe examined the longitudinal relationship between HL and depressive symptoms (CES-D) applying dynamic cross-lagged mediation path models. We used the full dataset of participants aged 50–89 years (74,908 person-years), from all eight Waves of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Their quality of life (CASP-19) and their wealth were examined as the mediator and moderator of this relationship, respectively. Subgroup analyses investigated differences among those with hearing aids within different models of subjectively and objectively identified HL. All models were adjusted for age, sex, retirement status and social engagement.ResultsSocioeconomic position (SEP) influenced the strength of the relationship between HL and depression, which was stronger in the lowest versus the highest wealth quintiles. The use of hearing aids was beneficial for alleviating depressive symptoms. Those in the lowest wealth quintiles experienced a lower risk for depression after the use of hearing aids compared to those in the highest wealth quintiles.ConclusionHL poses a substantial risk for depressive symptoms in older adults, especially those who experience socioeconomic inequalities. The early detection of HL and provision of hearing aids may not only promote better-hearing health but could also enhance the psychosocial wellbeing of older adults, particularly those in a lower SEP.

A Scoping Review of Studies Comparing Outcomes for Children With Severe Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids to Children With Cochlear Implants

Objectives: Clinical practice regarding children’s candidature for cochlear implantation varies internationally, albeit with a recent global trend toward implanting children with more residual hearing than in the past. The provision of either hearing aids or cochlear implants can influence a wide range of children’s outcomes. However, guidance on eligibility and suitability for implantation is often based on a small number of studies and a limited range of speech perception measures. No recent reviews have catalogued what is known about comparative outcomes for children with severe hearing-loss using hearing aids to children using cochlear implants. This article describes the findings of a scoping review that addressed the question “What research has been conducted comparing cochlear implant outcomes to outcomes in children using hearing aids with severe hearing-loss in the better-hearing ear?” The first objective was to catalogue the characteristics of studies pertinent to these children’s candidature for cochlear implantation, to inform families, clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers. The second objective was to identify gaps in the evidence base, to inform future research projects and identify opportunities for evidence synthesis. Design: We included studies comparing separate groups of children using hearing aids to those using cochlear implants and also repeated measures studies comparing outcomes of children with severe hearing loss before and after cochlear implantation. We included any outcomes that might feasibly be influenced by the provision of hearing aids or cochlear implants. We searched the electronic databases Medline, PubMed, and CINAHL, for peer-reviewed journal articles with full-texts written in English, published from July 2007 to October 2019. The scoping methodology followed the approach recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute regarding study selection, data extraction, and data presentation. Results: Twenty-one eligible studies were identified, conducted across 11 countries. The majority of children studied had either congenital or prelingual hearing loss, with typical cognitive function, experience of spoken language, and most implanted children used one implant. Speech and language development and speech perception were the most frequently assessed outcomes. However, some aspects of these outcomes were sparsely represented including voice, communication and pragmatic skills, and speech perception in complex background noise. Two studies compared literacy, two sound localization, one quality of life, and one psychosocial outcomes. None compared educational attainment, listening fatigue, balance, tinnitus, or music perception. Conclusions: This scoping review provides a summary of the literature regarding comparative outcomes of children with severe hearing-loss using acoustic hearing aids and children using cochlear implants. Notable gaps in knowledge that could be addressed in future research includes children’s quality of life, educational attainment, and complex listening and language outcomes, such as word and sentence understanding in background noise, spatial listening, communication and pragmatic skills. Clinician awareness of this sparse evidence base is important when making management decisions for children with more residual hearing than traditional implant candidates. This review also provides direction for researchers wishing to strengthen the evidence base upon which clinical decisions can be made.

Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an active communication education programme plus hearing aid provision versus hearing aid provision alone (ACE To HEAR)

ObjectiveTo establish the acceptability and feasibility of delivering the Active Communication Education (ACE) programme to increase quality of life through improving communication and hearing aid use in the UK National...

Effective interventions for potentially modifiable dementia risk factors: Their costs and cost‐effectiveness

AbstractBackgroundThe potential economic value of interventions to prevent dementia is unknown. We modelled this for potentially modifiable dementia risk factors.MethodWe searched PubMed and Web of Science from inception to July 2018 and included interventions that (a) successfully targeted any of nine pre‐specified potentially modifiable risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hearing loss, obesity, physical inactivity, social isolation, depression, cigarette smoking and less childhood education), (b) had robust evidence that the intervention improved risk or risk behaviour and (c) are feasible in an adult population. We established when in the life‐course each intervention would be delivered. We calculated dementia incidence reduction from: annual incidence of dementia in people with each risk factor; population attributable fraction for each risk, corrected for risk factor clustering, and how effectively the intervention controls the risk factor. We calculated the discounted value of lifetime health gain (including reduced dementia mortality) and impact on cost (including NHS, social care and carer costs) per person eligible for treatment. We estimated annual total expenditure on the fully operational intervention programme in England.ResultWe found effective treatments for hypertension, stopping smoking, diabetes prevention and hearing loss. Treatments for stopping smoking and provision of hearing aids reduced cost. Treatment of hypertension was cost‐effective by reference to standard UK thresholds. The three interventions when fully implemented would save £1·863 billion annually in England, reduce dementia prevalence by 8·5% and produce QALY gains. The intervention for diabetes was unlikely to be cost‐effective in terms of impact on dementia alone.ConclusionThere is a strong case for implementing the three effective interventions on grounds of cost‐effectiveness and quality of life gains, as well as for improvements in general health. While some people will decline or discontinue interventions, there is considerable room for the interventions to remain cost‐saving or cost‐effective even if adherence is lower.

Long-term Impact of Hearing Aid Provision or Cochlear Implantation on Hearing Handicap.

Previous research has shown hearing handicap to be reduced following hearing aid use or cochlear implantation in short-to-medium follow-up periods, yet the impact of interventions for hearing loss on hearing handicap in the long term remains understudied. This article reports hearing handicap at 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years after either hearing aid provision or cochlear implantation. Observational study. A study of 115 participants from the Studying Multiple Outcomes after Aural Rehabilitative Treatment (SMART) study cohort assessed self-reported hearing handicap using the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening version (HHIE-S) at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to estimate the population mean HHIE-S score over time, accounting for the correlated nature of repeated measures data, and multiple imputation with chained equations was performed to impute missing data. Compared to baseline, mean HHIE-S scores after hearing aid provision were significantly reduced at 6 months (mean = -7.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -10.40, -5.53), 12 months (mean = -6.58, 95% CI: -9.26, -3.90), and 5 years (mean = -4.58, 95% CI: -7.87, -1.30). After cochlear implantation, mean hearing handicap scores were also significantly lower compared to baseline at 6 months (mean = -8.18, 95% CI: -11.07, -5.30), 12 months (mean = -10.04, 95% CI: -12.92, -7.16), and 5 years (mean = -8.97, 95% CI: -12.92, -7.16). This study found short-term benefits from hearing aids and cochlear implantation on hearing handicap were maintained over 5 years. Laryngoscope, 131:1122-1126, 2021.

Effective interventions for potentially modifiable risk factors for late-onset dementia: a costs and cost-effectiveness modelling study

The potential economic value of interventions to prevent late-onset dementia is unknown. We modelled this for potentially modifiable risk factors for dementia. For this modelling study, we searched PubMed and Web of Science from inception to March 12, 2020, and included interventions that: successfully targeted any of nine prespecified potentially modifiable risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hearing loss, obesity, physical inactivity, social isolation, depression, cigarette smoking, and less childhood education); had robust evidence that the intervention improved risk or risk behaviour; and are feasible to enact in an adult population. We established when in the life course each intervention would be delivered. We calculated dementia incidence reduction from annual incidence of dementia in people with each risk factor, and population attributable fraction for each risk, corrected for risk factor clustering, and how effectively the intervention controls the risk factor. We calculated the discounted value of lifetime health gain and effect on cost (including NHS, social care and carer costs) per person eligible for treatment. We estimated annual total expenditure on the fully operational intervention programme in England. We found effective interventions for hypertension, smoking cessation, diabetes prevention, and hearing loss. Treatments for stopping smoking and provision of hearing aids reduced cost. Treatment of hypertension was cost-effective by reference to standard UK thresholds. The three interventions when fully implemented would save £1·863 billion annually in England, reduce dementia prevalence by 8·5%, and produce quality-adjusted life-year gains. The intervention for diabetes was unlikely to be cost-effective in terms of effect on dementia alone. There is a strong case for implementing the three effective interventions on grounds of cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life gains, as well as for improvements in general health. The interventions have the potential to remain cost-saving or cost-effective even with variations in dementia incidence and costs and effectiveness of interventions. Economic and Social Research Council.

Effect of social and self stigma on hearing aid rejection

Hearing loss creates emotional and behavior imbalance thus leads toward stigma. The stigma, whether social or self, leaves a great impact on uptake of hearing aids. For a proper provision of hearing aids to the patients, it is necessary to deal with stigma.

Longitudinal study of use of the pressure free, adhesive bone conducting hearing system in children at a tertiary centre

ObjectivesTo assess the long-term compliance and usability of the non-implantable, adhesive bone conduction hearing aid system in children. Review of patient demographics, compliance and continued use. Identification of factors that impact on future patient selection. MethodsRetrospective case series review of all children aged 5 and above fitted with the adhesive bone conduction hearing aid at a paediatric tertiary centre in the UK between 2015 and 2019. Data collected from medical and audiological records. Patient demographics, skin complications, patient feedback and changes in hearing aid provision were recorded. Results82 children (40 female, 42 male) were provided with 89 adhesive hearing devices. To date 72 (87.8%) of the fitted patients, continue to use the device daily with minimal reported skin complications. Of the 10 patients that no longer use the adhesive aid, 5 no longer use any hearing device at all and the remaining 5 patients use an alternative hearing system. These include spectacle aids (n = 2) and bone anchored hearing implant (n = 3). ConclusionAdhesive aid products are reported to provide comparable audiological results to the commercial softband hearing aids. They provide an excellent alternative in the treatment of conductive hearing loss without the costs and possible complications of a surgical intervention. A compliance rate of 87.8% of all patients fitted with the adhesive system demonstrates a high level of patient satisfaction. The device may also provide an appropriate stepping stone to implanted device once a child reaches the age in which an autonomous decision can be made. Limitations of the device have been the variability in the longevity of the adhesive adaptor and interference with headscarves, hats and glasses with a low frequency of transient minor skin reactions reported.

Teachers' report on Status of Communication with Hearing Impaired Children in Special Schools of Punjab: An Evaluation of Current Linguistic Competence of HIC

Development of communication skills in children with hearing impairment (HIC) is one of the major goals of rehabilitation for these children. Information about current trends and communication status of HIC is a prerequisite for communication skill-building plan development. For the exploration of the current communication status of HIC studying in public special education institutes of Punjab, a survey was conducted. Two-stage cluster sampling was used to get data from teachers working in 30 randomly selected institutes. A self-developed questionnaire (Cronbach alpha, 0.8) was mailed to get data. SPSS was used for quantitative analysis of data obtained from 107 questionnaires containing information about 886 HIC studying in the special schools. Sign language was found as a common mode of communication. Those using an oral mode of communication were at the word level. The aural approach of teaching was getting acceptance from the teachers. Provision of hearing aid and improvement in speech therapy services were recommended.

Making Audiology Work During COVID-19 and Beyond

Making Audiology Work During COVID-19 and Beyond

Integrating hearing health services for geriatric day care patients: a feasibility study

ABSTRACT Background: The proportion of the global community aged 60 years and older is rapidly increasing and hearing loss is very prevalent in this group. However, there is limited awareness of the benefits of hearing health care amongst elderly persons. Aim: This study examined the feasibility of integrating hearing health care within an outpatient urban geriatric day clinic service. The proportion of elderly persons with hearing loss attending such a clinic, the proportion previously assessed for hearing disorder, and attitudes towards hearing loss and hearing aids, were determined. Method: Patients were recruited from the Geriatric Day Clinic, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong. A hearing health focused questionnaire was administered, followed by otoscopic examination and standard pure tone audiometric screening. Results: Data from 78 patients were analyzed, and 70 of these older adults (90%) had hearing impairment. Fifty-one patients had hearing loss of moderate or greater degree in the better hearing ear. Only 9% of the participants had been previously assessed for hearing loss and prescribed hearing aids. Fifty-four percent of the patient group had self-perceived hearing impairment and 72% of all participants were prepared to accept hearing aid provision if recommended. Most patients did not know how to access hearing health care services. Conclusion: Given the high prevalence of hearing loss found in this group, and availability of hearing health care services in this context, an integrated hearing screening service is both feasible and desirable. With this service in place, appropriate assessment and intervention could be more readily accessed by elderly patients.

Impact of Hearing Aids on Poverty, Quality of Life and Mental Health in Guatemala: Results of a before and after Study

There are 466 million people globally with disabling hearing loss, many of whom can benefit from hearing aids. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of providing hearing aids on poverty, mental health, quality of life, and activities, among adults in Guatemala. A nonrandomised before and after study was conducted, with a comparison group to assess for secular trends. Adult cases with bilateral hearing impairment were identified within 150 km of Guatemala City, as well as age- and sex-matched comparison subjects without disabling hearing loss. All participants were interviewed with a semistructured questionnaire, and cases were offered hearing aids. Participants were reinterviewed 6–9 months later. We interviewed 135 cases and 89 comparison subjects at baseline and follow-up. At baseline, cases were poorer than comparison subjects with respect to individual income (p = 0.01), household income (p = 0.02), and per capita expenditure (PCE) (p = 0.003). After provision of hearing aids, median household income improved among cases (p = 0.03). In the comparison group, median individual income (p = 0.01) and PCE (p = 0.03) fell between baseline at follow-up. At follow-up, there were also improvements in productive time use, quality of life, and depressive symptoms among cases, but these were less apparent in the comparison group. In conclusion, this study has demonstrated a positive effect of hearing aids in improving quality of life, economic circumstances and mental health among Guatemalan adults.

Protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled stand-alone feasibility trial to assess potential effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of digital hearing aids in patients with tinnitus and hearing loss (the HUSH trial)

BackgroundThe most common management strategy for tinnitus provided in the UK audiology clinics is education and advice. This may also be combined with some form of sound therapy (e.g. digital hearing aids). While education and advice is generally provided by all clinics, there is a marked variability in provision of hearing aids that depends very much on clinical decisions. A recent Cochrane review concluded a lack of evidence to support or refute hearing aid use as a routine intervention for people with tinnitus and hearing loss. This lack of evidence is reflected in the inconsistency of tinnitus management in the UK. The aim of the HUSH trial is to determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hearing aids for adults with tinnitus and hearing loss.MethodsThis is a multicentre randomised controlled feasibility trial. Up to 100 adults, aged 18 and over, presenting to 5 UK audiology clinics with a complaint of tinnitus and measurable hearing loss are being randomised to receive either (i) education and advice (treatment as usual) or (ii) education and advice with digital hearing aids. Feasibility outcomes are being collected around recruitment, retention, patient and healthcare professional acceptability and clinical outcome assessment. Outcomes are being collected via postal questionnaire at 12 weeks post baseline. A nested interview study will supplement clinical and other outcome data, providing a detailed understanding of participants’ and audiologists’ experience of both tinnitus management and the research processes.DiscussionThis feasibility trial will help us to (i) determine if it is feasible to conduct a multicentre RCT comparing treatment as usual and treatment as usual plus digital hearing aids; (ii) optimise the design of a future definitive, multicentre RCT; and (iii) inform which outcome(s) is/are relevant for patients. This work presents an important first step in determining the effectiveness of hearing aids as a tinnitus management strategy.Trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN14218416. Registered on 30 July 2018.

Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms

BackgroundImprovement of speech perception in quiet is an important goal of hearing aid provision. In practice, results are highly variable. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between type and extent of hearing loss (audiogram type), maximum word recognition score, and aided speech perception.Materials and methodsPure tone and speech audiometric data of 740 ears in 370 patients were reviewed. All subjects visited our hearing center for hearing aid evaluation between 2012 and 2017. The maximum word recognition score (WRSmax) and the monosyllabic speech recognition score with hearing aids, WRS65(HA) were analyzed for 10 different standard audiogram types.ResultsThe WRS65(HA) with hearing aids for different degrees of hearing loss is, within error boundaries, comparable to previous investigations and shows a difference of 10–20 percentage points to the WRSmax. This difference tends to be larger for flat and moderately sloping audiograms compared to steep-sloping audiograms. The ratio WRS65(HA)/WRSmax can be interpreted as an efficiency factor for hearing aid provision, since it relates speech recognition with hearing aids to the maximally achievable information carrying capacity of the hearing impaired.ConclusionThe expectation regarding hearing aid provision has to be adjusted according to maximum word recognition score, the derived quality measures, degree of hearing loss, and audiogram type.