The White Paper of I972 Education: A Framework for Expansion ignored adult education, with the excuse that its future was under review by the Russell Committee. The Committee reported the following year, suggesting immediate practical advance towards an integrated provision, by using in a systematic way the elements already there. The aim of the Chairman was produce a limited, pragmatic set of proposals that no Government could ignore. Had it not been for the Barber cuts and the continuing climate of retrenchment in public expenditure, that strategy might have succeeded. As it was, it made a minor impact on the thinking of the Department and on the more enlightened LEAs, but led no fundamental reappraisal. The so-called 'great educational debate' launched by the Prime Minister in 1976/7, was limited the schools. Adult education still seemed outside the constituency of the DES, as the OECD complained in I975. Now in August, I977, after four years' pressure, the DES has at last accepted a major recommendation of Russell, and appointed Richard Hoggart chair an Advisory Council on Adult and Continuing Education to advise generally on matters relevant the provision of education for adults . . . and in particular, promote cooperation ... and review current practice, organisation and priorities, with a view the most effective deployment of the available resources; and promote the development of future policies andpriorities, with full regard the concept of education as a process continuing throughout life. Perhaps the Committee will in due course be successful in persuading the Department give a national lead in establishing adult education as part of the varied and comprehensive educational service in every area called for in the 1944 Act. It will be in the nick of time, before many LEAs price adult classes out of existence in their frenetic pursuit of false economies. The title of the new Committee, and its Chairman's five years' experience at UNESCO, indicate that the approach may now be widened take in for the first time in Britain some at least of the continental thinking of continuing, permanent, recurrent or life-long education which Russell disregarded as a long term concept, but which is steadily gaining ground in educational thought. Before speculating on future possibilities, however, the purpose of this article is review the current situation in the light of the Russell recommendations. The Russell Committee was limited by its terms of reference 'non-vocational adult education', a distinction increasingly realised as being unreal. Its main concern was with the existing agencies, the LEAs and 'responsible bodies', and it gave only subsidiary attention the emerging role of the media in 'education at a distance', and the needs of industry. It found itself concerned with 'barely I% of the national education budget' and some two million part time students, and modestly felt that doubling the provision cater for one in nine of the adult population would not be unreasonable or extravagant.