Reviewed by: Experiencing Empire: Power, People, and Revolution in Early America ed. by Patrick Griffin Zach Bates Experiencing Empire: Power, People, and Revolution in Early America. Edited by Patrick Griffin. (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2017. 280 pp. Illustrations, maps, notes, index. $24.95.) Inspired by a 2013 conference at Northwestern University in honor of T. H. Breen, this volume argues that in order to understand the American Revolution, scholars should use an imperial-revolutionary framework, combining the study of empires with that of the American Revolution. In his introduction, Patrick Griffin suggests that this approach should follow Breen's work by focusing on common people and their ideas and behavior during the revolutionary period. According to Griffin, "the issue of identity defines the thirteen years between 1763 and 1776" (2), and the volume is particularly concerned with "people reckoning with the meanings of British empire before revolution and American empire after" (11). This collection, therefore, engages with three concerns at the top of many historical agendas: empire, recovering the voice(s) of common people (taken to mean "non-elites"), and identity—all interpreted through on-the-ground agents rather than metropolitan or provincial elites. Griffin opens the volume with an introduction to the historiographical trends over the last fifty years in the study of the American Revolution. Three sections follow the introduction. The first two, "Empire and Provincials" and "War, Revolution, and Empires," discuss the period before the 1780s, with wide-ranging essays—both chronologically and geographically—that cover topics as diverse as wine-growing in America to imperial schemes in 1720s France. The final section engages with the impact of the American Revolution in the newly formed United States (or, as this collection has it, the "American Empire"). Two essays in particular are of interest to readers of this journal. In the first, Timothy J. Shannon argues that American "baubles" imported into Britain had a cultural footprint through Peter Williamson, a Scot who spent six years as a servant in Pennsylvania and seems to have brought ideas of Pennsylvanian agricultural technology back to Scotland, thus reversing Breen's earlier arguments about the impact of British goods in America. In the second, Seth Cotlar focuses on the career of the Philadelphia antiquarian John Fanning Watson and the importance of nostalgia in the United States during the early nineteenth century. Of the two, Shannon's contribution engages most directly with Breen's work. The collection ends with a conclusion by Breen, which is an essential summary of his interpretative approach to the revolution, and an afterword by Joyce Chaplin, whose overview and synthesis of Breen's scholarly output is magisterial. Both are must-reads for advanced undergraduates and early graduate students. The majority of the contributors to this volume received their PhDs from [End Page 219] Northwestern, and several are former students of Breen; many of the contributions, therefore, are grounded in Breen's approach to the American Revolution or on the study of common persons in imperial settings. The recent work of both Brendan McConville (The King's Three Faces, which is mentioned in a few citations but never directly discussed) and especially Eric Nelson (The Royalist Revolution) are overlooked, but both have argued for the importance of the crown in colonial culture and in interpreting the American Revolution, making important contributions in its social and ideological history. At times, the contributions seem to depart from the focuses in the introduction, making the collection somewhat disjointed; Breen, in his conclusion, directly engages with only a few of the essays. The volume suffers from something of an identity crisis: Is it about the American Revolution; the common person engaging with (any?) empire; or a tribute to Breen and his approach? If the answer is all three, it is too ambitious for an edited collection to accomplish. Nonetheless, this volume will benefit those who admire Breen's work or wish to find recent scholarship that has adopted the imperial-revolutionary approach. Zach Bates University of Calgary Copyright © 2019 The Historical Society of Pennsylvania
Read full abstract