Provider Prescribing Patterns Research Articles

Effectiveness of Inpatient Insulin Order Sets Using Human Insulins in Noncritically Ill Patients in A Rural Hospital

Recent guidelines recommend a physiologic approach to non-intensive care unit (ICU) inpatient glucose management utilizing basal-bolus with correctional (BBC) insulin over traditional sliding-scale insulin monotherapy. Unfortunately, few studies exist using a BBC approach restricted to human insulins (regular and neutral protamine Hagedorn [NPH]). This study evaluated changes in provider prescribing patterns, effects on blood glucose, and safety with implementation of hospital order sets for BBC using human insulins. Order sets were developed for non-ICU inpatients, consisting of basal, prandial, and correctional insulin using NPH and regular human insulins. Evaluation compared a 4-month period before (admissions, n = 274) with a 4-month period after order set availability (n = 302). Primary outcome was change in insulin prescribing patterns. Secondary outcomes included use of nonpreferred diabetes treatments, hemoglobin A1c testing, mean daily blood glucose, and incidence of hypoglycemia. Use of BBC insulin regimen increased from 10.6 to 27.5% after order set implementation (P<.001). Use of oral antihyperglycemic agents decreased from 24.1 to 14.9% after implementation (P = .006). Hemoglobin A1c testing rose from 50.0 to 62.3% after (P = .003). Mean daily blood glucose improved, with an estimated mean difference of 14.4 mg/dL (95% confidence interval, 2.2 to 26.5 mg/dL) over hospital days 3 through 9 (P = .02). There was no significant change in the incidence of moderate or severe hypoglycemia. Implementation of hospital-wide human insulin order sets led to improvements in prescribing practices and blood glucose control, without increasing the incidence of hypoglycemia. These order sets may be useful for facilities limited by formulary and cost considerations to the use of older human insulins.

Impact of CYP2C19 Genetic Testing on Provider Prescribing Patterns for Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndromes and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Patients treated with clopidogrel who have ≥1 loss of function alleles for CYP2C19 have an increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events. In 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a boxed warning cautioning against the use of clopidogrel in such patients. We sought to assess the impact of CYP2C19 genetic testing on prescribing patterns for antiplatelet therapy among patients with acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients with recent acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention prescribed clopidogrel were offered CYP2C19 testing. Genotype and phenotype results were provided to patients and their physicians, but no specific treatment recommendations were suggested. Patients were categorized based on their genotype (carriers versus noncarriers) and phenotype (extensive, intermediate, and poor metabolizers). The primary outcome was intensification in antiplatelet therapy defined as either dose escalation of clopidogrel or replacement of clopidogrel with prasugrel. Between July 2010 and April 2012, 6032 patients were identified, and 499 (8.3%) underwent CYP2C19 genotyping, of whom 146 (30%) were found to have ≥1 reduced function allele, including 15 (3%) with 2 reduced function alleles. Although reduced function allele carriers were significantly more likely than noncarriers to have an intensification of their antiplatelet therapy, only 20% of poor metabolizers of clopidogrel had their antiplatelet therapy intensified. Providers were significantly more likely to intensify antiplatelet therapy in CYP2C19 allele carriers, but only 20% of poor metabolizers of clopidogrel had an escalation in the dose of clopidogrel or were switched to prasugrel. These prescribing patterns likely reflect the unclear impact and evolving evidence for clopidogrel pharmacogenomics.

Genotyping, Clopidogrel Metabolism, and the Search for the Therapeutic Window of Thienopyridines

It is somewhat remarkable to note that not until recently, nearly 12 years and tens of millions of treated patients after its initial approval, has the metabolism of clopidogrel, an inactive prodrug, begun to be more fully understood. Although this lack of knowledge may not be unique among common cardiovascular drugs, there are 4 characteristics of clopidogrel therapy that make this gap in understanding disconcerting: The potential for life-threatening complications (bleeding or thrombosis) at both ends of its therapeutic spectrum; the fact that 1 dose is supposed to fit all; the lack of a measureable, proven end point (such as blood pressure for antihypertensive drugs) that allows for titration to a target response; and the nearly mandatory need by many patients for clopidogrel, with no acceptable alternative until recently. Article see p 512 Historically, understanding the metabolism of a drug has been critical in identifying those patients most likely to benefit from and, more important, potentially be harmed by that drug. This is especially true for drugs with relatively narrow therapeutic windows, such as phenytoin, warfarin, and others. Although it seems safe to assume, on the basis of our extensive clinical experience, that the therapeutic window of clopidogrel is unlikely to be narrow, this certainly does not represent the depth of knowledge we would hope for after so much clinical experience and research. What we do know is that P2Y12 inhibition with thienopyridines is beneficial in preventing arterial thrombotic events, presumably requiring the achievement of some minimal level of receptor inhibition that may or may not vary on the basis of the patient and clinical scenario. We also know that it is associated with a significant increase in serious bleeding events, with higher levels of inhibition associated with greater bleeding. In the present and future practice environment, with a growing …

Optimizing Healthcare at the Population Level: Results of the Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes in Nova Scotia Partnership

Disease management is increasingly considered a valid strategy in the chronic care of our aging patient populations with multiple diseases. The Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes in Nova Scotia (ICONS) project examined whether a community-oriented health management partnership would lead to enhanced care and improved outcomes across an entire healthcare system. ICONS was a prospective cohort study, with baseline and repeated measurements of care and outcomes fed back to all project partners, along with other interventions aimed at optimizing care; preceding interval cohorts served as controls to post-intervention cohorts. The setting was the province of Nova Scotia, whose population is approximately 950,000. All 34,060 consecutive adult patients hospitalized in Nova Scotia with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), unstable angina (UA) or congestive heart failure (CHF) October 1997-March 2002 were included. Interventions were a combination of serial audits and feedbacks of practices and outcomes, web-based publication of findings, newsletter-based education and reminders, physician small-group workshops, pharmacy monitoring and compliance programs, care maps, algorithms, discharge forms and patient information cards. Rates of use of evidence-based marker therapies were the primary outcome measure. Secondary measures included one-year, all-cause mortality and re-hospitalization. Evidence-based prescription practices, for all target diseases, continuously and markedly improved over time. At the population level, there were no changes in one-year mortality for any disease state, although use of proven therapies predicted survival at the individual level throughout the five-year period for all disease states. Rates of re-hospitalization decreased significantly for all disease states over the course of ICONS; but most traditional positive and negative predictors of this outcome, like advanced age and use of proven therapies, respectively, were not predictive. ICONS demonstrated that provider prescribing patterns and patient re-hospitalization rates were continuously improved in three disease states and across an entire health system, through a community partnership model of disease management that was sustained over a long time. Further studies are needed to better understand the drivers and modifiers of patient outcomes at the population level.

Ethnic Differences in the Treatment and Control of Hypertension in Patients With Diabetes

Among diabetic hypertensive patients, ethnic differences in blood pressure control and outcomes have been attributed in part to greater reluctance of providers to prescribe combination antihypertensive regimens to African Americans than to Caucasians. African Americans purportedly receive fewer angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), which reduce target organ complications. To assess these issues, cross-sectional data were analyzed from 19,864 diabetic hypertensives from 62 primary care clinics. Among diabetic hypertensives, African Americans (N=6230) were less likely than Caucasians (N=8041) to have blood pressure (BP) <130/80 mm Hg at their last clinic visit (23.1% [23.0%-23.2%] vs. 30.7% [30.6%-30.9%]) despite a greater number of prescriptions for antihypertensive medications (2.67 [2.63-2.70] vs. 2.23 [2.20-2.26]). African Americans were more likely than Caucasians to have an ACEI and/or ARB prescribed and to receive prescriptions for at least two antihypertensive medications that included an ACEI or ARB (64.1% [63.8%-64.4%] vs. 53.1% [52.8%-53.4%]). Among diabetic hypertensives, African Americans are less likely than Caucasians to attain BP <130/80 mm Hg, despite receiving more antihypertensive medication prescriptions. African Americans receive more ACEIs and/or ARBs than Caucasians for target organ protection and/or BP control. The data suggest provider prescribing patterns are not a major contributor to ethnic differences in BP control and outcomes in diabetic hypertensives.