In Croatia, the model of obstetrics-midwifery management of childbirth in maternity hospitals is still in effect, and this is how > 99% of Croatian women give birth. However, in my view, midwives are still not sufficiently educated for completely independent work notwithstanding their university education. The Law on Midwifery defined the role of the midwife in home birth without, however, setting out other organisational-communication and professional provisions. Then it began with sporadic midwifery home births of a few per year, which grew quite rapidly, especially with the impact of the Covid-19 virus pandemic, to about 100 out of a total of about 38,000 births that are performed annually in the Republic of Croatia in maternity hospitals. Since the start of planned home births many bad perinatal outcomes have been recorded in hospital maternity wards who have admitted women after such deliveries. These include puerperal sepsis, protracted labour of several days, neglected protracted labour with perinatal asphyxia and aspiration of meconium amniotic fluid and resuscitation of the newborn (who later developed cerebral palsy), severe postpartum haemorrhage with obstetric shock and postpartum hysterectomy, episiotomy infection, and stillbirth at term pregnancy. Therefore, planned home birth in Croatia should now be regarded as an unsafe birth in extraordinary circumstances and the person who takes charge of it must be professionally prepared, educated and have numerous social skills. Most Croatian gynaecologists and obstetricians give support to midwives in their efforts to be professional and independent when at work, including the controlled and legal implementation of the planned home birth. We unreservedly support self-aware midwives to maintain their profession as highly ethical and professional as possible above the wishes of non-professionals who call for autonomy, so that we do not have to discuss such problems of malpractice of Croatian midwifery in the 21st century.
Read full abstract