Protein-ligand Docking Programs Research Articles

How Good Are Current Docking Programs at Nucleic Acid-Ligand Docking? A Comprehensive Evaluation.

Nucleic acid (NA)-ligand interactions are of paramount importance in a variety of biological processes, including cellular reproduction and protein biosynthesis, and therefore, NAs have been broadly recognized as potential drug targets. Understanding NA-ligand interactions at the atomic scale is essential for investigating the molecular mechanism and further assisting in NA-targeted drug discovery. Molecular docking is one of the predominant computational approaches for predicting the interactions between NAs and small molecules. Despite the availability of versatile docking programs, their performance profiles for NA-ligand complexes have not been thoroughly characterized. In this study, we first compiled the largest structure-based NA-ligand binding data set to date, containing 800 noncovalent NA-ligand complexes with clearly identified ligands. Based on this extensive data set, eight frequently used docking programs, including six protein-ligand docking programs (LeDock, Surflex-Dock, UCSF Dock6, AutoDock, AutoDock Vina, and PLANTS) and two specific NA-ligand docking programs (rDock and RLDOCK), were systematically evaluated in terms of binding pose and binding affinity predictions. The results demonstrated that some protein-ligand docking programs, specifically PLANTS and LeDock, produced more promising or comparable results compared with the specialized NA-ligand docking programs. Among the programs evaluated, PLANTS, rDock, and LeDock showed the highest performance in binding pose prediction, and their top-1 and best root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) success rates were as follows: PLANTS (35.93 and 76.05%), rDock (27.25 and 72.16%), and LeDock (27.40 and 64.37%). Compared with the moderate level of binding pose prediction, few programs were successful in binding affinity prediction, and the best correlation (Rp = -0.461) was observed with PLANTS. Finally, further comparison with the latest NA-ligand docking program (NLDock) on four well-established data sets revealed that PLANTS and LeDock outperformed NLDock in terms of binding pose prediction on all data sets, demonstrating their significant potential for NA-ligand docking. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the most comprehensive evaluation of popular molecular docking programs for NA-ligand systems.

Fine tuning rigid body docking results using the Dreiding force field: A computational study of 36 known nanobody-protein complexes.

This paper aims to understand the binding strategies of a nanobody-protein pair by studying known complexes. Rigid body protein-ligand docking programs produce several complexes, called decoys, which are good candidates with high scores of shape complementarity, electrostatic interactions, desolvation, buried surface area, and Lennard-Jones potentials. However, the decoy that corresponds to the native structure is not known. We studied 36 nanobody-protein complexes from the single domain antibody database, sd-Ab DB, http://www.sdab-db.ca/. For each structure, a large number of decoys are generated using the Fast Fourier Transform algorithm of the software ZDOCK. The decoys were ranked according to their target protein-nanobody interaction energies, calculated by using the Dreiding Force Field, with rank 1 having the lowest interaction energy. Out of 36 protein data bank (PDB) structures, 25 true structures were predicted as rank 1. Eleven of the remaining structures required Ångstrom size rigid body translations of the nanobody relative to the protein to match the given PDB structure. After the translation, the Dreiding interaction (DI) energies of all complexes decreased and became rank 1. In one case, rigid body rotations as well as translations of the nanobody were required for matching the crystal structure. We used a Monte Carlo algorithm that randomly translates and rotates the nanobody of a decoy and calculates the DI energy. Results show that rigid body translations and the DI energy are sufficient for determining the correct binding location and pose of ZDOCK created decoys. A survey of the sd-Ab DB showed that each nanobody makes at least one salt bridge with its partner protein, indicating that salt bridge formation is an essential strategy in nanobody-protein recognition. Based on the analysis of the 36 crystal structures and evidence from existing literature, we propose a set of principles that could be used in the design of nanobodies.

GalaxyDock2-HEME: Protein-ligand docking for heme proteins.

Prediction of protein-ligand binding poses is an essential component for understanding protein-ligand interactions and computer-aided drug design. Various proteins involve prosthetic groups such as heme for their functions, and adequate consideration of the prosthetic groups is vital for protein-ligand docking. Here, we extend the GalaxyDock2 protein-ligand docking algorithm to handle ligand docking to heme proteins. Docking to heme proteins involves increased complexity because the interaction of heme iron and ligand has covalent nature. GalaxyDock2-HEME, a new protein-ligand docking program for heme proteins, has been developed based on GalaxyDock2 by adding an orientation-dependent scoring term to describe heme iron-ligand coordination interaction. This new docking program performs better than other noncommercial docking programs such as EADock with MMBP, AutoDock Vina, PLANTS, LeDock, and GalaxyDock2 on a heme protein-ligand docking benchmark set in which ligands are known to bind iron. In addition, docking results on two other sets of heme protein-ligand complexes in which ligands do not bind iron show that GalaxyDock2-HEME does not have a high bias toward iron binding compared to other docking programs. This implies that the new docking program can distinguish iron binders from noniron binders for heme proteins.

Haste makes waste: A critical review of docking-based virtual screening in drug repurposing for SARS-CoV-2 main protease (M-pro) inhibition.

This review makes a critical evaluation of 61 peer‐reviewed manuscripts that use a docking step in a virtual screening (VS) protocol to predict SARS‐CoV‐2 M‐pro (M‐pro) inhibitors in approved or investigational drugs. Various manuscripts predict different compounds, even when they use a similar initial dataset and methodology, and most of them do not validate their methodology or results. In addition, a set of known 150 SARS‐CoV‐2 M‐pro inhibitors extracted from the literature and a second set of 81 M‐pro inhibitors and 113 inactive compounds obtained from the COVID Moonshot project were used to evaluate the reliability of using docking scores as feasible predictors of the potency of a SARS‐CoV‐2 M‐pro inhibitor. Using two SARS‐CoV‐2 M‐pro structures and five protein‐ligand docking programs, we proved that the correlation between the pIC50 and docking scores is not good. Neither was any correlation found between the pIC50 and the ∆G calculated with an MM‐GBSA method. When a group of experimentally known inactive compounds was added, neither the docking scores or the ∆G were able to distinguish between compounds with or without M‐pro experimental inhibitory activity. Performances improved when covalent and noncovalent inhibitors were treated separately, but were not good enough to fully support using a docking score as a cutoff value for selecting new putative M‐pro inhibitors or predicting the relative bioactivity of a compound by comparison with a reference compound. The two sets of known SARS‐CoV‐2 M‐pro inhibitors presented here could be used for validating future VS protocols which aim to predict M‐pro inhibitors.

GWOVina: A grey wolf optimization approach to rigid and flexible receptor docking.

Protein–ligand docking programs are indispensable tools for predicting the binding pose of a ligand to the receptor protein. In this paper, we introduce an efficient flexible docking method, gwovina, which is a variant of the Vina implementation using the grey wolf optimizer (GWO) and random walk for the global search, and the Dunbrack rotamer library for side‐chain sampling. The new method was validated for rigid and flexible‐receptor docking using four independent datasets. In rigid docking, gwovina showed comparable docking performance to Vina in terms of ligand pose RMSD, success rate, and affinity prediction. In flexible‐receptor docking, gwovina has improved success rate compared to Vina and AutoDockFR. It ran 2 to 7 times faster than Vina and 40 to 100 times faster than AutoDockFR. Therefore, gwovina can play a role in solving the complex flexible‐receptor docking cases and is suitable for virtual screening of compound libraries. gwovina is freely available at https://cbbio.cis.um.edu.mo/software/gwovina for testing.

LigRMSD: a web server for automatic structure matching and RMSD calculations among identical and similar compounds in protein-ligand docking.

Root mean square deviation (RMSD) is one of the most useful and straightforward features for structural comparison between different conformations of the same molecule. Commonly, protein-ligand docking programs have included some utilities that allow the calculation of this value; however, they only work efficiently when exists a complete atom label equivalence between the evaluated conformations. We present LigRMSD, a free web-server for the automatic matching and RMSD calculations among identical or similar chemical compounds. This server allows the user to submit only a pair of identical or similar molecules or dataset of similar compounds to compare their three-dimensional conformations. LigRMSD can be freely accessed at https://ligrmsd.appsbio.utalca.cl. Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Highly Flexible Ligand Docking: Benchmarking of the DockThor Program on the LEADS-PEP Protein-Peptide Data Set.

Protein-peptide interactions play a crucial role in many cellular and biological functions, which justify the increasing interest in the development of peptide-based drugs. However, predicting experimental binding modes and affinities in protein-peptide docking remains a great challenge for most docking programs due to some particularities of this class of ligands, such as the high degree of flexibility. In this paper, we present the performance of the DockThor program on the LEADS-PEP data set, a benchmarking set composed of 53 diverse protein-peptide complexes with peptides ranging from 3 to 12 residues and with up to 51 rotatable bonds. The DockThor performance for pose prediction on redocking studies was compared with some state-of-the-art docking programs that were also evaluated on the LEADS-PEP data set, AutoDock, AutoDock Vina, Surflex, GOLD, Glide, rDock, and DINC, as well as with the task-specific docking protocol HPepDock. Our results indicate that DockThor could dock 40% of the cases with an overall backbone RMSD below 2.5 Å when the top-scored docking pose was considered, exhibiting similar results to Glide and outperforming other protein-ligand docking programs, whereas rDock and HPepDock achieved superior results. Assessing the docking poses closest to the crystal structure (i.e., best-RMSD pose), DockThor achieved a success rate of 60% in pose prediction. Due to the great overall performance of handling peptidic compounds, the DockThor program can be considered as suitable for docking highly flexible and challenging ligands, with up to 40 rotatable bonds. DockThor is freely available as a virtual screening Web server at https://www.dockthor.lncc.br/ .

Comparing AutoDock and Vina in Ligand/Decoy Discrimination for Virtual Screening

AutoDock and Vina are two of the most widely used protein–ligand docking programs. The fact that these programs are free and available under an open source license, also makes them a very popular first choice for many users and a common starting point for many virtual screening campaigns, particularly in academia. Here, we evaluated the performance of AutoDock and Vina against an unbiased dataset containing 102 protein targets, 22,432 active compounds and 1,380,513 decoy molecules. In general, the results showed that the overall performance of Vina and AutoDock was comparable in discriminating between actives and decoys. However, the results varied significantly with the type of target. AutoDock was better in discriminating ligands and decoys in more hydrophobic, poorly polar and poorly charged pockets, while Vina tended to give better results for polar and charged binding pockets. For the type of ligand, the tendency was the same for both Vina and AutoDock. Bigger and more flexible ligands still presented a bigger challenge for these docking programs. A set of guidelines was formulated, based on the strengths and weaknesses of both docking program and their limits of validation.

GalaxyDock3: Protein-ligand docking that considers the full ligand conformational flexibility.

Predicting conformational changes of both the protein and the ligand is a major challenge when a protein-ligand complex structure is predicted from the unbound protein and ligand structures. Herein, we introduce a new protein-ligand docking program called GalaxyDock3 that considers the full ligand conformational flexibility by explicitly sampling the ligand ring conformation and allowing the relaxation of the full ligand degrees of freedom, including bond angles and lengths. This method is based on the previous version (GalaxyDock2) which performs the global optimization of a designed score function. Ligand ring conformation is sampled from a ring conformation library constructed from structure databases. The GalaxyDock3 score function was trained with an additional bonded energy term for the ligand on a large set of complex structures. The performance of GalaxyDock3 was improved compared to GalaxyDock2 when predicted ligand conformation was used as the input for docking, especially when the input ligand conformation differs significantly from the crystal conformation. GalaxyDock3 also compared favorably with other available docking programs on two benchmark tests that contained diverse ligand rings. The program is freely available at http://galaxy.seoklab.org/softwares/galaxydock.html. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

DockRMSD: an open-source tool for atom mapping and RMSD calculation of symmetric molecules through graph isomorphism

Comparison of ligand poses generated by protein–ligand docking programs has often been carried out with the assumption of direct atomic correspondence between ligand structures. However, this correspondence is not necessarily chemically relevant for symmetric molecules and can lead to an artificial inflation of ligand pose distance metrics, particularly those that depend on receptor superposition (rather than ligand superposition), such as docking root mean square deviation (RMSD). Several of the commonly-used RMSD calculation algorithms that correct for molecular symmetry do not take into account the bonding structure of molecules and can therefore result in non-physical atomic mapping. Here, we present DockRMSD, a docking pose distance calculator that converts the symmetry correction to a graph isomorphism searching problem, in which the optimal atomic mapping and RMSD calculation are performed by an exhaustive and fast matching search of all isomorphisms of the ligand structure graph. We show through evaluation of docking poses generated by AutoDock Vina on the CSAR Hi-Q set that DockRMSD is capable of deterministically identifying the minimum symmetry-corrected RMSD and is able to do so without significant loss of computational efficiency compared to other methods. The open-source DockRMSD program can be conveniently integrated with various docking pipelines to assist with accurate atomic mapping and RMSD calculations, which can therefore help improve docking performance, especially for ligand molecules with complicated structural symmetry.

Docking with SwissDock.

Protein-ligand docking simulation is central in drug design and development. Therefore, the development of web servers intended to docking simulations is of pivotal importance. SwissDock is a web server dedicated to carrying out protein-ligand docking simulation intuitively and elegantly. SwissDock is based on the protein-ligand docking program EADock DSS and has a simple and integrated interface. The SwissDock allows the user to upload structure files for a protein and a ligand, and returns the results by e-mail. To facilitate the upload of the protein and ligand files, we can prepare these input files using the program UCSF Chimera. In this chapter, we describe how to use UCSF Chimera and SwissDock to perform protein-ligand docking simulations. To illustrate the process, we describe the molecular docking of the competitive inhibitor roscovitine against the structure of human cyclin-dependent kinase 2.

Prediction of the interaction of metallic moieties with proteins: An update for protein-ligand docking techniques.

In this article, we present a new approach to expand the range of application of protein-ligand docking methods in the prediction of the interaction of coordination complexes (i.e., metallodrugs, natural and artificial cofactors, etc.) with proteins. To do so, we assume that, from a pure computational point of view, hydrogen bond functions could be an adequate model for the coordination bonds as both share directionality and polarity aspects. In this model, docking of metalloligands can be performed without using any geometrical constraints or energy restraints. The hard work consists in generating the convenient atom types and scoring functions. To test this approach, we applied our model to 39 high-quality X-ray structures with transition and main group metal complexes bound via a unique coordination bond to a protein. This concept was implemented in the protein-ligand docking program GOLD. The results are in very good agreement with the experimental structures: the percentage for which the RMSD of the simulated pose is smaller than the X-ray spectra resolution is 92.3% and the mean value of RMSD is < 1.0 Å. Such results also show the viability of the method to predict metal complexes-proteins interactions when the X-ray structure is not available. This work could be the first step for novel applicability of docking techniques in medicinal and bioinorganic chemistry and appears generalizable enough to be implemented in most protein-ligand docking programs nowadays available. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Elucidation of Binding Site and Chiral Specificity of Oxidovanadium Drugs with Lysozyme through Theoretical Calculations.

This study presents an implementation of the protein-ligand docking program GOLD and a generalizable method to predict the binding site and orientation of potential vanadium drugs. Particularly, theoretical methods were applied to the study of the interaction of two VIVO complexes with antidiabetic activity, [VIVO(pic)2(H2O)] and [VIVO(ma)2(H2O)], where pic is picolinate and ma is maltolate, with lysozyme (Lyz) for which electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy suggests the binding of the moieties VO(pic)2 and VO(ma)2 through a carboxylate group of an amino acid residue (Asp or Glu). The work is divided in three parts: (1) the generation of a new series of parameters in GOLD program for vanadium compounds and the validation of the method on five X-ray structures of VIVO and VV species bound to proteins; (2) the prediction of the binding site and enantiomeric preference of [VO(pic)2(H2O)] to lysozyme, for which the X-ray diffraction analysis displays the interaction of a unique isomer (i.e., OC-6-23-Δ) through Asp52 residue, and the subsequent refinement of the results with quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics methods; (3) the application of the same approach to the interaction of [VO(ma)2(H2O)] with lysozyme. The results show that convenient implementation of protein-ligand docking programs allows for satisfactorily reproducing X-ray structures of metal complexes that interact with only one coordination site with proteins and predicting with blind procedures relevant low-energy binding modes. The results also demonstrate that the combination of docking methods with spectroscopic data could represent a new tool to predict (metal complex)-protein interactions and have a general applicability in this field, including for paramagnetic species.

GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.

Protein-ligand docking is a useful tool for providing atomic-level understanding of protein functions in nature and design principles for artificial ligands or proteins with desired properties. The ability to identify the true binding pose of a ligand to a target protein among numerous possible candidate poses is an essential requirement for successful protein-ligand docking. Many previously developed docking scoring functions were trained to reproduce experimental binding affinities and were also used for scoring binding poses. However, in this study, we developed a new docking scoring function, called GalaxyDock BP2 Score, by directly training the scoring power of binding poses. This function is a hybrid of physics-based, empirical, and knowledge-based score terms that are balanced to strengthen the advantages of each component. The performance of the new scoring function exhibits significant improvement over existing scoring functions in decoy pose discrimination tests. In addition, when the score is used with the GalaxyDock2 protein-ligand docking program, it outperformed other state-of-the-art docking programs in docking tests on the Astex diverse set, the Cross2009 benchmark set, and the Astex non-native set. GalaxyDock BP2 Score and GalaxyDock2 with this score are freely available at http://galaxy.seoklab.org/softwares/galaxydock.html .

Evaluation of GalaxyDock Based on the Community Structure-Activity Resource 2013 and 2014 Benchmark Studies.

We analyze the results of the GalaxyDock protein-ligand docking program in the two recent experiments of Community Structure-Activity Resource (CSAR), CSAR 2013 and 2014. GalaxyDock performs global optimization of a modified AutoDock3 energy function by employing the conformational space annealing method. The energy function of GalaxyDock is quite sensitive to atomic clashes. Such energy functions can be effective for sampling physically correct conformations but may not be effective for scoring when conformations are not fully optimized. In phase 1 of CSAR 2013, we successfully selected all four true binders of digoxigenin along with three false positives. However, the energy values were rather high due to insufficient optimization of the conformations docked to homology models. A posteriori relaxation of the model complex structures by GalaxyRefine improved the docking energy values and differentiated the true binders from the false positives better. In the scoring test of CSAR 2013 phase 2, we selected the best poses for each of the two targets. The results of CSAR 2013 phase 3 suggested that an improved method for generating initial conformations for GalaxyDock is necessary for targets involving bulky ligands. Finally, combining existing binding information with GalaxyDock energy-based optimization may be needed for more accurate binding affinity prediction.

On-the-Fly Integration of Data from a Spin-Diffusion-Based NMR Experiment into Protein-Ligand Docking.

INPHARMA (interligand nuclear Overhauser enhancement for pharmacophore mapping) determines the relative orientation of two competitive ligands in the protein binding pocket. It is based on the observation of interligand transferred NOEs mediated by spin diffusion through protons of the protein and is, therefore, sensitive to the specific interactions of each of the two ligands with the protein. We show how this information can be directly included into a protein-ligand docking program to guide the prediction of the complex structures. Agreement between the experimental and back-calculated spectra based on the full relaxation matrix approach is translated into a score contribution that is combined with the scoring function ChemPLP of our docking tool PLANTS. This combined score is then used to predict the poses of five weakly bound cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) ligands. After optimizing the setup, which finally also included trNOE data and optimized protonation states, very good success rates were obtained for all combinations of three ligands. For one additional ligand, no conclusive results could be obtained due to the ambiguous electron density of the ligand in the X-ray structure, which does not disprove alternative ligand poses. The failures of the remaining ligand are caused by suboptimal locations of specific protein side chains. Therefore, side-chain flexibility should be included in an improved INPHARMA-PLANTS version. This will reduce the strong dependence on the used protein input structure leading to improved scores overall, not only for this last ligand.

Diaryl-Substituted (Dihydro)pyrrolo[3,2,1-hi]indoles, a Class of Potent COX-2 Inhibitors with Tricyclic Core Structure.

A new compound class of diaryl-substituted heterocycles with tricyclic dihydropyrrolo[3,2,1-hi]indole and pyrrolo[3,2,1-hi]indole core structures has been designed and was synthesized by a modular sequence of Friedel-Crafts acylation, amide formation, and McMurry cyclization. This synthesis route represents a novel and versatile access toward dihydropyrrolo[3,2,1-hi]indoles and is characterized by good chemical yields and high modularity. From a set of 19 derivatives, 11 candidates were selected for determination of their COX inhibition potency and were found to be selective inhibitors with high affinity to COX-2 (IC50 ranging from 20-2500 nM and negligible inhibition of COX-1). The binding mode of the novel inhibitors in the active side of COX-2 was calculated in silico using the protein-ligand docking program GOLD by application of the molecular structures of two compounds derived from X-ray crystallography. Two novel compounds with high affinity to COX-2 (6k = 70 nM, 8e = 60 nM) have a fluoro substituent, making them promising candidates for the development of (18)F-radiolabeled COX-2 inhibitors for imaging purposes with positron emission tomography (PET).

A geometric clustering algorithm with applications to structural data.

An important feature of structural data, especially those from structural determination and protein-ligand docking programs, is that their distribution could be mostly uniform. Traditional clustering algorithms developed specifically for nonuniformly distributed data may not be adequate for their classification. Here we present a geometric partitional algorithm that could be applied to both uniformly and nonuniformly distributed data. The algorithm is a top-down approach that recursively selects the outliers as the seeds to form new clusters until all the structures within a cluster satisfy a classification criterion. The algorithm has been evaluated on a diverse set of real structural data and six sets of test data. The results show that it is superior to the previous algorithms for the clustering of structural data and is similar to or better than them for the classification of the test data. The algorithm should be especially useful for the identification of the best but minor clusters and for speeding up an iterative process widely used in NMR structure determination.

GalaxyDock2: Protein–ligand docking using beta‐complex and global optimization

In this article, an enhanced version of GalaxyDock protein-ligand docking program is introduced. GalaxyDock performs conformational space annealing (CSA) global optimization to find the optimal binding pose of a ligand both in the rigid-receptor mode and the flexible-receptor mode. Binding pose prediction has been improved compared to the earlier version by the efficient generation of high-quality initial conformations for CSA using a predocking method based on a beta-complex derived from the Voronoi diagram of receptor atoms. Binding affinity prediction has also been enhanced by using the optimal combination of energy components, while taking into consideration the energy of the unbound ligand state. The new version has been tested in terms of binding mode prediction, binding affinity prediction, and virtual screening on several benchmark sets, showing improved performance over the previous version and AutoDock, on which the GalaxyDock energy function is based. GalaxyDock2 also performs better than or comparable to other state-of-the-art docking programs. GalaxyDock2 is freely available at http://galaxy.seoklab.org/softwares/galaxydock.html.

Novel Ligands for a Purine Riboswitch Discovered by RNA-Ligand Docking

SummaryThe increasing number of RNA crystal structures enables a structure-based approach to the discovery of new RNA-binding ligands. To develop the poorly explored area of RNA-ligand docking, we have conducted a virtual screening exercise for a purine riboswitch to probe the strengths and weaknesses of RNA-ligand docking. Using a standard protein-ligand docking program with only minor modifications, four new ligands with binding affinities in the micromolar range were identified, including two compounds based on molecular scaffolds not resembling known ligands. RNA-ligand docking performed comparably to protein-ligand docking indicating that this approach is a promising option to explore the wealth of RNA structures for structure-based ligand design.