In the context of the rapid development of technology, science and digitalization, the expansion of cross-border relations between states, the active entry of artificial intelligence into the daily life of society, human intellectual activity and the protection of the rights of the results of his creative work is the most pressing issue. For a long time, the legal regulation of relations arising from the use of intellectual property was considered exclusively the object of domestic legal relations, and did not go beyond its limits. National structures have tried in different ways to balance the interests of the owner of an intellectual property object and consumers seeking free access to these objects. Since the release of intellectual property beyond the borders of one state, problems have arisen of inconsistency in the legislative framework protecting the interests of the actor of the intellectual property object. In turn, this leads to the loss of new technologies and scientifi c developments by countries, and at the level of individuals to the loss of royalties. Taking into account the fact that intellectual property products permeate all spheres of the economy and national economy, we are forced to block the exchange of scientifi c research and technical developments at the international level in order to prevent theft of an intellectual product. In order to protect the rights of the owner of an object of creative work at the international level, and free, unhindered access to these objects by the entire world community, it is necessary to bring the legislative regulation of intellectual property rights beyond the supranational level, and regulate this law enforcement object by international organizations, applying the norms of international law. This scientifi c research is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of the protection of intellectual property rights abroad. The authors state that the legal regime of the state plays an important role, in the territory of which a number of powers of the owner of the object to protect their own rights are determined.
Read full abstract