Protected Carotid Artery Stenting Research Articles

The role of post-dilatation in carotid MicroNet-covered stent implantation, evaluated using 3D cone-beam CT angiography.

This study aims to assess the role and safety of post-dilatation in protected carotid artery stenting (PCAS) using the new MicroNet-covered 2nd-generation stent assessed by cone beam CT scans. From March 2020 to March 2022, patients were enrolled in the study according to CT angiography results based on the following criteria: Evidence of 70% to 99% carotid stenosis in asymptomatic patients and 50% to 99% in symptomatic patients, per the NASCET index. Using a FilterWire EZ™ (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) embolic protection system (EPS), MicroNet-covered stent PCAS was performed by two interventional radiologists with at least 8 years of experience in endovascular intervention. Each patient underwent post-dilatation following stent placement. Finally, a third radiologist (not participating in the interventional procedures) evaluated the cone beam CT scans and calculated residual stenosis. Major and minor complications were recorded in the 30 days following the procedure. A total of 192 patients (121 male, mean age 73±10 years) were included in the study, and all patients received post-dilatation following stent implantation. Technical successes were achieved in all procedures. Adverse events noted in this study were limited to periprocedural transient ischemic attacks that occurred in three out of 192 patients (1.6%) and showed a swift complete recovery. The post-dilatation balloon diameters used in the study were: 5.0 mm (30.3%), 5.5 mm (39.3%) and 6 mm (30.3%). Optimized postdilatation resulted in a significant increase in the final luminal area. Similar improvements were observed in all subtypes of plaque. Post-dilatation in protected CAS is safe and induces a significant improvement in the cross-sectional area regardless of the stenotic plaque.

Protected carotid artery stenting in patients with severe stenosis.

Intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) and ulcers are the major findings of unstable plaques. In addition, initial symptoms are associated with postprocedural complications after carotid artery stenting (CAS). The aim of this study was to determine the safety of CAS using an embolic protection device in symptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and unstable plaques such as IPH and ulcers.This retrospective study included 140 consecutive patients with severe carotid stenosis. These patients underwent preprocedural carotid vessel wall imaging to evaluate the plaque status. We analyzed the incidence of initial clinical symptoms, such as headache, nausea, and vomiting, after CAS. The primary outcomes analyzed were the incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death within 30 days of CAS.Sixty-seven patients (47.9%) had IPH, and 53 (38.9%) had ulcers on carotid wall imaging/angiography. Sixty-three patients (45.0%) had acute neurological symptoms with positive diffusion-weighted image findings. Intraluminal thrombi on initial angiography and flow arrest during CAS were significantly higher in patients with IPH and symptomatic patients. Symptoms were significantly higher in patients with IPH than in those without (63.5% vs 35.1%, P < .001). There were no significant differences in clinical symptoms after stenting or in primary outcomes, regardless of IPH, ulcer, or initial symptoms.IPH and plaque ulceration are risk factors in symptomatic carotid stenosis. However, IPH and plaque ulceration were not a significant risk factors for cerebral embolism during protected carotid artery stent placement in patients with carotid stenosis. Protected CAS might be feasible and safe despite the presence of unstable plaques.

Results From a Prospective Real-World Multicenter Clinical Practice of CAS Using the CGuard Embolic Prevention System: The IRONGUARD 2 Study

To evaluate periprocedural, 30-day, and 12-month outcomes in a prospective series of patients submitted to protected CAS with the CGuard Embolic Prevention System (EPS). From January 2017 to June 2019 a physician-initiated prospective multispecialty, multicenter study was initiated enrolling consecutive patients admitted for protected carotid artery stenting and treated using the CGuard EPS in twelve Italian centers. Primary end points were technical and procedural success, immediate (24 hours) and postprocedural (1-30 days) major and minor stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and death rates. Secondary end points were 12-month neurologic adverse events, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and external carotid artery occlusion rates. Seven hundred thirty-three patients (73.03 ± 7.84 years of age; 516 male) were enrolled. Mean carotid stenosis was 80.13 ± 8.51% (range, 50%-99%). Symptoms were present in 131 patients (17.87%): 96 TIAs, 23 minor strokes, and 12 major strokes. An embolic protection device was used in 731 (99.72%) cases: distal filter in 593 (80.9%) and proximal occlusion in 138 (18.82%). Procedural success was 100%, technical success was achieved in all but one patient (99.86%). At 24 hours, one patient died due to a hemorrhagic conversion after urgent carotid artery stenting procedure performed for unstable symptoms. Two minor strokes, 6 TIAs, and 1 AMI occurred before hospital discharge. External carotid artery occlusion was evident in eight patients (1.09%). At 30 days, the rate of new averse cardiac and cerebrovascular adverse event was 0.81%: three new neurologic events (2 TIAs, and 1 minor stroke); and three nonfatal AMI. Therefore, up to 30 days, the cumulative rates of death and stroke were 0.13% and 0.54%, respectively. Our analysis suggests that use of the CGuard-EPS in routine clinical practice was associated with an extremely low occurrence of adverse neurologic events in a nonselected patients’ population.

Game changers in vascular and endovascular surgery

Game changers in vascular and endovascular surgery

Tissue Protrusion With Attenuation Is Associated With Ischemic Brain Lesions After Carotid Artery Stenting.

Background and Purpose- Tissue protrusion between stent struts is frequently observed on optical frequency domain imaging evaluation after carotid artery stenting, but its clinical relevance is unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between the characteristics of tissue protrusion assessed by optical frequency domain imaging and brain lesions identified by diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid artery stenting. Methods- Sixty-five consecutive patients who underwent optical frequency domain imaging after protected carotid artery stenting were enrolled in the study. Cross-sectional optical frequency domain images within the stented segments were evaluated at 0.125-mm intervals. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 1 to 10 days after treatment. The characteristics of tissue protrusion were compared between patients with and without new ipsilateral brain lesions on posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging. Results- Tissue protrusion was observed in 62 patients (95%). New brain lesions were observed in 24 patients (37%). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of protrusion with attenuation (odds ratio, 2.94 [95% CI, 1.05-8.68] P=0.04) was associated with new brain lesions after carotid artery stenting. Conclusions- The presence of protrusion with attenuation assessed by optical frequency domain imaging was associated with ipsilateral brain lesions after carotid artery stenting. Prevention or treatment of protrusions with attenuation may reduce ischemic brain lesions after carotid artery stenting.

Twelve-month results of the Italian registry on protected CAS with the mesh-covered CGuard stent: the IRON-Guard study.

Twelve-month results of the Italian registry on protected CAS with the mesh-covered CGuard stent: the IRON-Guard study.

Incidence and predictors of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing proximal protected carotid artery stenting.

Many studies have analysed the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but there are limited data relating to AKI risk in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and predictors of AKI in patients undergoing proximal protected CAS. We analysed 456 patients undergoing proximal protected CAS. A binomial multivariate logistic model was developed including patients' clinical and angiographic/procedural characteristics. AKI (defined as an sCr increase ≥0.3 mg/dl or ≥1.5-fold sCr increase from baseline or more than 50% increase from baseline, within 48 hours post procedure) occurred in 155 patients (34%). AKI patients were more frequently affected by hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia and anaemia, and presented lower renal function at baseline. Higher contrast volume to creatinine clearance ratio (2.40±1.44 vs. 2.08±1.15; p=0.01), lower post-procedural mean arterial pressure (MAP) (94.3±17.7 vs. 99.6±18.5 mmHg; p=0.003) and a more frequent post-procedural systolic pressure drop (∆SBP >50 mmHg) (23.9% vs. 14.3%, p=0.01) were observed in the AKI group of patients. At multivariate analysis, independent predictors of AKI were ∆SBP >50 mmHg, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia. AKI can occur quite frequently after proximal protected CAS and is related to clinical and procedural features. These data should be confirmed in larger registries or randomised trials.

Risk Factors of Contralateral Microembolic Infarctions Related to Carotid Artery Stenting.

This study sought to analyze the incidence of contralateral microembolic infarctions (MIs) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) following protected carotid artery stenting (CAS) and compared the difference of risk factors between ipsilateral and contralateral lesions. From April 2010 to March 2017, 147 CASs in 140 patients were performed. All the patients underwent DWI within 1 week before and 24 hrs after the procedures. CAS was successfully completed in 145 (98.6%) of the 147 procedures. Forty-nine (33.8%) patients with new MIs revealed on postprocedural DWI were enrolled. They were divided into ipsilateral and contralateral groups based on the side of the CAS and MIs. The ipsilateral group indicates patients with MIs exclusively on the side of CAS. The contralateral group includes patients with MIs on the opposite side of the CAS or both sides. Patients with MIs at vertebrobasilar territory were excluded. Patient characteristics, morphology of the carotid artery and aortic arch, and procedural data were retrospectively assessed and compared between the two groups. Twenty-two (15.2%) and 14 (9.7%) patients were assigned to the ipsilateral and contralateral groups, respectively. Advanced age, left-sided stenosis, severe aortic arch calcification (AAC) on chest X-ray and contralateral carotid occlusion significantly increased the occurrence of contralateral MIs. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, severe AAC was statistically more frequent in the contralateral group. In the present study, the incidences of contralateral MIs after CAS is relatively not low. Advanced aortic atherosclerosis is statistically predictive for contralateral MIs. AAC on chest X-ray is a useful finding for estimating aortic atherosclerosis in candidates for CAS.

Low Common Carotid Artery Systolic Occlusion Pressure and Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Are Associated with Development of Neurologic Intolerance during Proximal Protected Carotid Artery Stenting.

Background and ObjectivesNeurologic intolerance (NI) is defined as the occurrence of neurological symptoms during carotid artery stenting (CAS). Because NI is inevitable problem, it may be helpful to anticipate its occurrence. So, we studied factors associated with NI during proximal protected CAS.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients underwent proximal protected CAS from August 2012 to January 2017.ResultsWe included total 123 patients (109 males, 72±8 years old). The total procedure time was 43±12 minutes, and mean occlusion time was 4.8±1.2 minutes. We divided CAS patients into 2 groups according to presence of NI; neurologic tolerance (NT; n=74, 60%) and NI (n=49, 40%) groups. After the univariate analysis, symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (p=0.003), absence of anterior communicating artery (p=0.015) and low common carotid artery occlusion pressure (CCAOP, p<0.001) were associated with NI. After the multivariate analysis, NI was significantly associated with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (odds ratio [OR], 5.549; p=0.014) and systolic CCAOP≤42 mmHg (OR, 6.461; p<0.001). In NI group, 43 patients (88%) recovered right after the balloon deflation and 2 patients were normalized within 2 hours. However, 1 had major stroke and 3 had minor strokes in 4 patients with persistent NI ≥24 hours.ConclusionsAbout 40% showed NI during the CAS. Most of them (88%, 43 of 49 patients) recovered after the balloon deflation, but stroke incidence was significantly higher in NI group. Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis and systolic CCAOP ≤42 mmHg were significantly associated with the development of NI during proximal protected CAS.

The Safety of Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Unstable Plaque on Carotid High-Resolution MR Imaging

The Safety of Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Unstable Plaque on Carotid High-Resolution MR Imaging

Carotid stenosis - basing treatment on individual patients' needs. Optimal medical therapy alone or accompanied by stenting or endarterectomy.

Though carotid artery stenosis is a known origin of stroke, risk assessment and treatment modality are not yet satisfactorily established. Guideline updates according to latest evidence are expected shortly. Current clinical weakness concerns in particular the identification of "at-risk" patients. Beside the symptomatic status and the degree of stenosis, further signs of unstable plaque on carotid and cerebral imaging should be considered. Moreover, medical and endovascular therapy are continuously improving. Randomized trials and meta-analyses have shown similar long-term results for protected carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy. However, endovascular revascularization was associated with an increased 30-day rate of minor strokes. Newly developed embolic protection devices could possibly compensate for this disadvantage. Furthermore, high-level optimal medical therapy alone is currently being evaluated comparatively. We assume that a comprehensive evaluation of plaque vulnerability, serious consideration of advanced embolic protection, and more space for optimal medical therapy alone according to latest evidence, will benefit patients with carotid stenosis.

P5180Prediction of neurologic intolerance by prediction score during proximal protected carotid artery stenting

P5180Prediction of neurologic intolerance by prediction score during proximal protected carotid artery stenting

Remote pre-procedural ischemic stroke as the greatest risk in carotid‑stenting‑associated stroke and death: a single center's experience.

The goal of carotid artery stenting (CAS) is to decrease the stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis. This procedure carries an immediate risk of stroke and death and many patients do not benefit from it, especially asymptomatic patients. It is crucial to accurately select the patients who would benefit from carotid procedure, and to rule out those for whom the procedure might be hazardous. Remote ischemic stroke is a known risk factor for stroke recurrence during surgery. The aim of our study was to determine the periprocedural complication risk (within 30 days after CAS) associated with carotid stenting (stroke, death) in patients with and without remote pre-procedural ischemic stroke, to analyze periprocedural risk in other specific patient subgroups treated with CAS, and to determine the impact of observed variables on all-cause mortality during long-term follow-up. We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from all patients treated with protected CAS between June 20, 2008 and December 31, 2015. Patient age, gender, type of carotid stenosis (symptomatic versus asymptomatic), side of stenosis (right or left carotid artery), type of cerebral protection (proximal versus distal), presence of comorbidities (remote ischemic pre-procedural ischemic stroke, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, peripheral artery disease), previous ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy (CEA), contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) and previous contralateral CAS/CEA were analyzed to identify higher CAS risk and to determine the impact of these variables on all-cause mortality during follow-up. Survival data were obtained from the Health Care Surveillance Authority registry. Mean follow-up was 1054 days (interquartile range 547.3; 1454.8). Remote pre-procedural ischemic stroke was defined as any-territory ischemic stroke >6 months prior to CAS. Primary periprocedural endpoint incidence (stroke/death) in 502 patients was 3.8% (N.=19) of all patients, 5.4% (N.=10) of symptomatic patients and 2.8% (N.=9) of asymptomatic patients. The risk of periprocedural stroke/death was 3.4 times higher in patients with (N.=198) compared to patients without remote ischemic stroke (N.=304) (6.6% versus 2.0% of patients without remote ischemic stroke; P=0.008). Periprocedural stroke/death in symptomatic patients (N.=186) was non-significantly higher in patients with remote ischemic stroke (N.=76) compared with patients without remote ischemic stroke (N.=110) (7.9% versus 3.6%; P=0.206). Asymptomatic patients with remote ischemic stroke (N.=122) had a 5.6-time-higher periprocedural risk of stroke/death compared with asymptomatic patients without remote ischemic stroke (N.=194) (5.7% versus 1.0%; P=0.014). Patients ≥75 years (N.=83) had a 3.0-time-higher periprocedural risk of stroke/death compared with younger patients (N.=419) (8.4% versus 2.9%; P=0.015); a non-significant increase of periprocedural stroke/death was found in both symptomatic (N.=35) and asymptomatic (N.=48) elderly patients (11.4% versus 4.0%, P=0.078; and 6.3% versus 2.4%, P=0.124, respectively). Increased periprocedural risk of stroke/death was not documented in other analyzed patient subgroups. During long-term follow-up, a 1.5-time-higher mortality risk was found in patients with remote ischemic stroke compared with patients without remote ischemic stroke in multivariable analysis; other patient subgroups (except older versus younger patients) did not differ in long-term mortality following carotid stenting. In our experience, all patients with remote pre-procedural any-territory ischemic stroke belong to risky subgroup for periprocedural stroke death after CAS. All asymptomatic patients with remote ischemic stroke should not be treated with CAS. Remote ischemic stroke increases all-cause mortality in long-term follow-up after carotid stenting. Patients aged ≥75 years also have increased risk of periprocedural stroke and death after CAS. These factors should help us to be more selective when planning carotid procedures.

Evaluation of cerebrovascular reserve in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting and its usefulness in predicting significant hemodynamic changes during temporary carotid occlusion.

We investigated the usefulness of cerebrovascular reserve (CVR) testing to predict severe hemodynamic changes during proximally protected carotid artery stenting. Of 90 patients referred, 63 eligible underwent complete evaluation of the extent of carotid artery disease and transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) assessment of CVR by means of a breath-holding test and ophthalmic artery flow pattern evaluation. Periprocedural TCD monitoring of the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery flow was performed in 24 patients undergoing proximally protected procedure (requiring induction of flow arrest within internal carotid artery). Abnormal CVR was significantly less common in patients with unilateral compared to bilateral carotid artery disease (26.3 % vs. 76.9 %, p=0.02), while ophthalmic artery flow reversal was rare in patients with unilateral carotid artery disease (2.5 % vs. 42.9 %, p<0.01). During the induction of carotid flow arrest, the average mean flow velocity drop following external carotid artery occlusion was low (3.5 %, p=0.67) compared to the induction of complete flow arrest (32.8 %, p<0.01). Six patients had a total mean flow velocity drop >50 %, including 2 patients with normal pre-procedural CVR. Our results suggest that TCD evaluation of CVR is not a reliable predictor of hemodynamic changes induced during proximally protected carotid artery stenting in patients with unilateral carotid artery disease.

Associations between Cerebral Embolism and Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage during Protected Carotid Artery Stenting.

Carotid artery stent placement in patients with intraplaque hemorrhage remains controversial because of the incidence of cerebral embolism after the procedure. The purpose of this study is to determine if intraplaque hemorrhage is a significant risk factor for cerebral embolism during carotid artery stent placement. This prospective study assessed 94 consecutive patients with severe carotid stenosis. These patients underwent preprocedural carotid MR imaging and postprocedural DWI after carotid artery stent placement. Intraplaque hemorrhage was defined as the presence of high signal intensity within the carotid plaque that was >200% of the signal from the adjacent muscle on MPRAGE. We then analyzed the incidence of postprocedural ipsilateral ischemic events on DWI and primary outcomes within 30 days of carotid artery stent placement. Forty-three patients (45.7%) had intraplaque hemorrhage on an MPRAGE image. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postprocedural ipsilateral ischemic events and primary outcomes between the intraplaque hemorrhage and non-intraplaque hemorrhage group. However, postprocedural ipsilateral ischemic events were more frequently observed in the symptomatic group (17/41 [41.5%]) than in the asymptomatic group (8/53 [15.1%]; P = .005). Intraplaque hemorrhage was not a significant risk factor for cerebral embolism during carotid artery stent placement in patients with severe carotid stenosis. Symptomatic patients should receive more careful treatment during carotid artery stent placement because of the higher risk of postprocedural ipsilateral ischemic events.

Proximal occlusion versus distal filter for cerebral protection during carotid stenting: updated meta-analysis of randomised and observational MRI studies.

Proximal occlusion (PO) and distal filter (DF) serve for cerebral embolic protection during carotid artery stenting (CAS). New cerebral lesions at diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) represent a surrogate endpoint for embolisation, though their clinical impact is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of randomised and observational DW-MRI studies comparing PO and DF during CAS. We searched electronic scientific databases. The primary endpoint was the incidence of new cerebral lesions at DW-MRI; secondary endpoints were the incidence of new ipsilateral and new contralateral cerebral lesions at DW-MRI and death/cerebrovascular events (CVE). A total of 392 patients (seven studies) received CAS. At DW-MRI after 48 hours 178 patients (48.3%) presented new cerebral lesions. The use of PO versus DF reduced neither the risk of new cerebral lesions (OR [95% confidence interval] 0.65 [0.28-1.52], p=0.32) nor the risk of death/CVE (0.59 [0.22-1.60], p=0.30). Diabetes, baseline stenosis and symptoms significantly modified the risk estimates for new cerebral lesions. In this meta-analysis, one half of patients receiving protected CAS developed new embolic cerebral lesions at DW-MRI, although the overwhelming majority were asymptomatic. Cerebral protection with PO versus DF neither reduced cerebral embolisation nor impacted on clinical outcomes.

Experience and outcomes with carotid artery stenting: an analysis of the CHOICE study (Carotid Stenting for High Surgical-Risk Patients; Evaluating Outcomes Through the Collection of Clinical Evidence).

This study sought to examine operator experience measured by time-related variables on outcomes withprotected carotid artery stenting (CAS). Studies on experience have focused on operator and institutional CAS volumes alone in the absence ofa better metric. Using the CHOICE (Carotid Stenting for High Surgical-Risk Patients; Evaluating Outcomes Through the Collection of Clinical Evidence) multicenter prospective data from October 1, 2006 to June 1, 2012, 5,841 evaluable subjects were identified. Operator experience within this study was assessed using 5 variables for each operator: 1) baseline CAS volume; 2)time from first CAS to each subsequent CAS; 3) time between each CAS; 4) CAS volume in the institution; and 5) medical specialty (cardiology, surgery, or radiology/neurology). Institutional experience was determined by CAS volume within the study. Embolic protection device dwell time was used to assess technical performance, and 30-day death, stroke, or myocardial infarction composed the clinical outcome. Hierarchical logistic regression and linear mixed models were used. Cardiologists (p< 0.001) along with operators with longer time interval from first CAS (p< 0.001) had reduced embolic protection device dwell times (technical performance). Increased time interval between CAS was the only independent predictor of 30-day death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (adjusted odds ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 1.09, p= 0.005). Prolonged embolic protection device dwell time was associated with30-day death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (adjusted odds ratio: 1.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 1.17; p= 0.03). The time interval between CAS procedures, specialty assignment, and time from first CAS are important measures of operator experience that may significantly affect technical performance and clinical outcome.

Predictors of carotid occlusion intoleranceduring proximal protectedcarotid arterystenting.

The aim of this study was to identify predictors of occlusion intolerance (OI) developing during proximal protected carotid artery stenting (CAS). The use of proximal embolic protection devices, such as endovascular occlusion, during CAS has beendemonstrated to be particularly safe and effective. However, endovascular occlusion can expose the ipsilateral hemisphere to hypoperfusion and produce transient neurological symptoms (OI). From March 2010 to March 2012, 605 consecutive patients underwent proximal protected CAS at our institution. To identify independent predictors of OI, a multivariate logistic regression model was developed that included all patients' clinical/angiographic and procedural characteristics. OI developed in a total of 184 patients (30.4%). Compared with patients in whom OI did not develop, those who experienced OI had lower occlusion pressure (OP) (42.3 ± 12.7 mm Hg vs. 61.9 ± 15.4 mmHg, p< 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that OP was the most consistent predictor of OI with a C-statistic of0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82 to 0.88) with best cutoff being≤40 mmHg (sensitivity, 68.5%; specificity,93.3%). By logistic regression analysis, the most powerful independent predictor of OI developing was an OP≤40mmHg (odds ratio: 33.2, 95% CI: 19.1 to 57.7) and the most powerful clinical predictor of such OP was the presence ofcontralateral internal carotid artery occlusion (odds ratio: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.5 to 6.2). OI may occur in as many as one-third of the patients undergoing proximal protected CAS. This event ismore common in those patients with an OP≤40 mmHg. Patients presenting with concomitant occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery more frequently have an OP≤40 mmHg.

Impact of coexisting coronary artery disease on the occurrence of cerebral ischemic lesions after carotid stenting.

BackgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) may coexist with extracranial carotid artery stenosis (ECAS), but the influence of CAD on procedure-related complications after carotid artery stenting (CAS) has not been well investigated. The study aimed to determine the impact of CAD on the occurrence of peri-CAS cerebral ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) scanning.MethodsCoronary angiography was performed within six months before CAS. DWI scanning was repetitively done within 1 week before and after CAS. Clinical outcome measures were stroke, angina, myocardial infarction and death within 30 days.ResultsAmong 126 patients (69.5±9.0 years) recruited for unilateral protected CAS, 33 (26%) patients had peri-CAS DWI-positive lesions. CAD was noted in 79% (26 in 33) and 48% (45 in 93) of patients with and without peri-CAS DWI-positive lesions (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.6–10.0; P = .0018), and the number of concomitant CAD on coronary angiography was positively correlated with the risk for peri-CAS DWI-positive lesions (P = .0032). In patients with no CAD (n = 55), asymptomatic CAD (n = 41) and symptomatic CAD (n = 30), the occurrence rates of peri-CAS DWI-positive lesions were 13%, 41% and 30% (P = .0048), and the peri-CAS stroke rates were 2%, 7% and 0% (P = .2120).ConclusionsThe severity of morphological CAD and the presence of either symptomatic or asymptomatic CAD are associated with the occurrence of peri-CAS cerebral ischemic lesions.

Risk factors for ipsi- and contralateral cerebral ischemic lesions after carotid artery stenting with embolic protection

Objective: We aimed to identify factors predictive for new ipsi- and contralateral cerebral ischemic lesions during embolic protected carotid artery stenting (CAS). Background: Carotid endarterectomy and CAS appear to have similar overall perioperative stroke rates, which, however, may differ in specific patient subgroups. Knowledge of the risk factors for cerebral embolic events during CAS may impact treatment decisions for the individual patient, but have not been extensively studied. Aim of the study: To evaluate the risk factors for cerebral embolization after carotid artery stenting with embolic protection. Methods: Out of 837 consecutive patients undergoing CAS with cerebral embolic protection pre- and post-procedural diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was performed for evaluation of new cerebral ischemic lesions in 728 patients (86.9%). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive for embolic events. Results: New ischemic lesions were found in 32.8% of the patients. Age, hypertension, lesion length, lesion excentricity, and aortic arch type III were significantly associated with new ischemic lesions, calcified lesions were negatively associated. In 25% of patients with embolic events lesions were also found in the contralateral hemisphere. Predictive factors for contralateral lesions were age, > 50% stenosis of the contralateral internal carotid artery, and an aortic arch type II, with a trend for aortic arch type III. Conclusions: Age, hypertension, lesion morphology, and aortic arch type were predictive for procedural related cerebral embolic events during embolic protected CAS. Age, significant contralateral carotid stenosis and complex aortic arch type were predictive for contralateral ischemic events. These findings may help to find the optimal treatment decision for the individual patient with carotid artery stenosis.