Predictors of carotid occlusion intoleranceduring proximal protectedcarotid arterystenting.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify predictors of occlusion intolerance (OI) developing during proximal protected carotid artery stenting (CAS). The use of proximal embolic protection devices, such as endovascular occlusion, during CAS has beendemonstrated to be particularly safe and effective. However, endovascular occlusion can expose the ipsilateral hemisphere to hypoperfusion and produce transient neurological symptoms (OI). From March 2010 to March 2012, 605 consecutive patients underwent proximal protected CAS at our institution. To identify independent predictors of OI, a multivariate logistic regression model was developed that included all patients' clinical/angiographic and procedural characteristics. OI developed in a total of 184 patients (30.4%). Compared with patients in whom OI did not develop, those who experienced OI had lower occlusion pressure (OP) (42.3 ± 12.7 mm Hg vs. 61.9 ± 15.4 mmHg, p< 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that OP was the most consistent predictor of OI with a C-statistic of0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82 to 0.88) with best cutoff being≤40 mmHg (sensitivity, 68.5%; specificity,93.3%). By logistic regression analysis, the most powerful independent predictor of OI developing was an OP≤40mmHg (odds ratio: 33.2, 95% CI: 19.1 to 57.7) and the most powerful clinical predictor of such OP was the presence ofcontralateral internal carotid artery occlusion (odds ratio: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.5 to 6.2). OI may occur in as many as one-third of the patients undergoing proximal protected CAS. This event ismore common in those patients with an OP≤40 mmHg. Patients presenting with concomitant occlusion of the contralateral internal carotid artery more frequently have an OP≤40 mmHg.