You have accessJournal of UrologySexual Function/Dysfunction: Surgical Therapy I (PD20)1 Apr 2020PD20-01 VALIDATION OF A PENILE PROSTHETICS PLACEMENT SIMULATION PLATFORM FOR SURGICAL TRAINING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH CADAVERS Rachel Melnyk, Patrick Saba, Michael Witthaus*, Gareth Warren, Divya Ajay, Timothy Campbell, Alexander Cranwell, Ahmed Ghazi, and Ricardo Munarriz Rachel MelnykRachel Melnyk More articles by this author , Patrick SabaPatrick Saba More articles by this author , Michael Witthaus*Michael Witthaus* More articles by this author , Gareth WarrenGareth Warren More articles by this author , Divya AjayDivya Ajay More articles by this author , Timothy CampbellTimothy Campbell More articles by this author , Alexander CranwellAlexander Cranwell More articles by this author , Ahmed GhaziAhmed Ghazi More articles by this author , and Ricardo MunarrizRicardo Munarriz More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000870.01AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Simulation training is particularly relevant in prosthetic urology because of limited training during residency, low prosthetic surgical experience and decreased availability of cadavers. To overcome these limitations, a high-fidelity, non-biohazardous, procedural simulation was developed and validated for inflatable penile prosthetic (IPP) placement to supplement surgical training. METHODS: Using a combination of 3D printing and hydrogel molding, an anatomical male genital model was created and approved by experts. The model was constructed to replicate the appropriate steps of IPP placement: corporal exposure, dilation, measurement, reservoir and pump placement, and closure (Figure 1). Three expert level surgeons (>250 cases), 3 low volume faculty (<50 cases) and 6 residents performed IPP simulations on a cadaver followed by the hydrogel model via an infrapubic and penoscrotal approach. Questionnaires compared the simulations in regards to their realism and value as a training tool. RESULTS: Overall, 66.7% of the participants found the hydrogel models to be an equivalent training platform to cadavers. In terms of tissue texture, physical appearance and safety, the model was rated as similar or superior by 25%, 58.3%, and 92.7% of participants, respectively. Experts rated corporal dilation as the most beneficial step of the procedure, followed by corporal exposure then reservoir placement. Similar results were found in low volume faculty and residents, combined. All participants believed an operative checklist would be an ideal assessment tool. Experts recommended that trainees should complete an average of 3.3 simulations as a prerequisite to live surgical training. Participants believed the model's biggest advantage was its non-biohazardous nature (83.3%), and could potentially replace cadavers without the need for specialized facilities (66.7%). The most requested modifications included improvement of tissue texture (25%) and the addition of bleeding (25%). CONCLUSIONS: This procedural penile prosthesis simulation offers the opportunity to practice each step of IPP placement, obviating the need for specialized facilities. The non-biohazardous nature of this model provides a safe and accessible supplement for penile prosthesis surgical training. Source of Funding: None © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e447-e447 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Rachel Melnyk More articles by this author Patrick Saba More articles by this author Michael Witthaus* More articles by this author Gareth Warren More articles by this author Divya Ajay More articles by this author Timothy Campbell More articles by this author Alexander Cranwell More articles by this author Ahmed Ghazi More articles by this author Ricardo Munarriz More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...