Prosthetic Impingement Research Articles

Change in spinopelvic mobility 3 months after THA using a direct anterior approach.

Spinopelvic kinematics, reflected by the change in spinopelvic tilt (ΔSPT) from a standing position to a flexed seated position, has been associated with the risk of prosthetic impingement and hip dislocation. Some studies have suggested changes in spinopelvic mobility after total hip arthroplasty (THA), but none have explored changes in mobility in the first three months following THA using a direct anterior approach. Our hypothesis was that changes in spinopelvic mobility occur in the first 3 months postoperatively, leading to increased hip mobility and increased spinopelvic kinematic abnormalities. This retrospective analysis of a consecutive series included 109 patients treated with primary anterior THA by a single senior surgeon. Lateral radiographs taken in standing and flexed seated positions before and three months after surgery were examined to analyze ΔSPT, pelvic femoral angle (PFA), lumbar lordosis (LL), and abnormal spinopelvic mobility (ΔSPT ≥20 °). Secondary objectives included examining the relationship between changes in lumbar flexion and hip flexion, and then analyzing preoperative spinopelvic parameters involved in postoperative pelvic mobility changes. Between the two periods of analysis, the ΔSPT increased on average by 9.53 ° (-34.4/50.3 °), the ΔPFA increased by 7.68 ° (-74/49 °), and lumbar flexion (ΔLL) decreased by 4.26 ° (-20.8/26 °). The rate of ΔSPT ≥20 ° was 22.9% before the operation and 47.7% after the operation (OR = 8.98; CI [2.82; 28.56]; p < 0.001). A strong positive correlation was found between changes in ΔSPT and ΔPFA (ρ = 0.76; r2 = 0.574; p < 0.001) and no correlation between changes in ΔSPT and ΔLL (ρ=-0.019; r2 = 0.005; p = 0.842). The multivariate analysis demonstrated independent predictors of change in ΔSPT were body mass index (BMI, β = -0.59, [-1.15; -0.03], p = 0.0386), ΔPFA (β = -0.46, [-0.59; -0.34], p < 0.001), and ΔLL (β = -0.36, [-0.53; -0.19], p < 0.001). No dislocation was observed. Spinopelvic mobility changes occur early on, within 3 months, after anterior THA. Patients with preoperative lumbar stiffness, associated with a stiff hip and lower BMI, should prompt surgeons to the risk of worsening spinopelvic kinematic abnormalities postoperatively. IV; retrospective study.

Adjustment of stem anteversion using tapered cone stem in total hip arthroplasty.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the tapered cone stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with excessive femoral anteversion and after femoral osteotomy. We included patients who underwent THA using Wagner Cone due to proximal femur anatomical abnormalities between August 2014 and January 2019 at a single institution. We investigated implant survival time using the endpoint of dislocation and revision, and compared the prevalence of prosthetic impingements between the Wagner Cone, a tapered cone stem, and the Taperloc, a tapered wedge stem, through simulation. We also collected Oxford Hip Score (OHS), visual analogue scale (VAS) satisfaction, and VAS pain by postal survey in August 2023 and explored variables associated with those scores. Of the 58 patients (62 hips), two (two hips) presented with dislocation or reoperation, and Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a five-year survival rate of 96.7% (95% CI 92.4 to 100). Mean stem anteversion was 35.2° (SD 18.2°) for the Taperloc stem and 29.8° (SD 7.9°) for the Wagner Cone stem; mean reduction from Taperloc to Wagner Cone was 5.4° (SD 18.8°). Overall, 55 hips (52 patients) were simulated, and the prevalence of prosthetic impingement was lower for the Wagner Cone (5.5%, 3/55) compared with the Taperloc (20.0%, 11/55) stem, with an odds ratio of 0.20 (p = 0.038). Among the 33 respondents to the postal survey (36 hips), the mean scores were VAS pain 10.9, VAS satisfaction 86.9, and OHS 44.7. A multivariable analysis revealed that reduction of stem anteversion from Taperloc to Wagner Cone was more favourable for VAS pain (p = 0.029) and VAS satisfaction (p = 0.002). The mid-term survival rate for THA using the Wagner Cone stem was high, which may be supported by a reduction in prosthetic impingement. The reduction in excessive stem anteversion by using a tapered cone stem was associated with reduced pain and increased patient satisfaction.

Archetype analysis of the spine-hip relationship identifies distinct spinopelvic profiles

IntroductionThe position of the pelvis in the sagittal plane can vary considerably between different functional positions. Adapting the position of the acetabular cup in relation to the alignment between the spine and the hip of each individual, prior to prosthesis placement, can prevent the risk of prosthetic impingement. Taken individually, risk factors for unfavorable spinopelvic kinematics can be difficult to interpret when trying to precisely predict which patients are at risk. Furthermore, the use of classifications or algorithms can be complex, most often associated with limited values and often difficult to apply in current practices of risk assessment. HypothesisWe hypothesized that the deconstruction of the data matrix including age and spinopelvic parameters (SPT, LL, PI, LF and PI-LL) correlated with the analysis of spinopelvic kinematics could be used to define an individualized hip-spine relationship. Material and methodWe applied archetypal analysis, which is a probabilistic, data-driven and unsupervised approach, to a complete phenotype cohort of 330 patients before total hip arthroplasty to define the spinopelvic profile of each individual using the spinopelvic parameters without threshold value. For each archetype, we analyzed the spinopelvic kinematics, not implemented in the creation of the archetypes. ResultsAn unsupervised learning method revealed seven archetypes with distinct spinopelvic kinematic profiles ranging from −8.9 ° to 13.15 ° (p = 0.0001) from standing to sitting and −5. 35 ° to −10.81 ° (p = 0.0001) from supine to standing. Archetype 1 represents the “ideal” patient (A1); young patients without spinopelvic anomaly and the least at risk of mobility anomaly. Followed by 3 archetypes without sagittal imbalance according to their lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence, from the highest to the lowest (archetypes 2–4), archetype 4 exposing a greater risk of spinopelvic kinematic anomaly compared to others. Then 2 archetypes with sagittal imbalance: archetype 5, with an immobile pelvis in the horizontal plane from standing to sitting position in anterior tilt and archetype A6, with significant posterior pelvic tilt standing, likely compensating for the imbalance and associated with the greatest anomaly of spinopelvic kinematics. Finally, archetype 7 with the stiffest lumbar spine without sagittal imbalance and significant unfavorable kinematics from standing to sitting. ConclusionAn archetypal approach to patients before hip replacement can refine diagnostic and prognostic features associated with the hip-spine relationship and reduced heterogeneity, thereby improving spinopelvic characterization. This risk stratification of spinopelvic kinematic abnormalities could make it possible to target patients who require adapted positioning or types of implants before prosthetic surgery. Level of evidenceIV retrospective study.

In silico analysis of the patient-specific acetabular cup anteversion safe zone

IntroductionVarious computer-assisted surgical systems claim to improve the accuracy of cup placement in total hip arthroplasties after assessing spinopelvic mobility to prevent prosthetic impingement. However, no study has yet analyzed the extent of the patient-specific cup anteversion safe zones. HypothesisWe hypothesized that most patients have a safe zone >10 °, except those with abnormal spinopelvic mobility, who have a much narrower safe zone. Materials and methodsWe simulated the risks of prosthetic impingement using the planned cup anteversion. The consecutive cohort included 341 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty. Our primary endpoint was the patient-specific impingement-free zone for cup anteversion, which was then divided into four subgroups: 0 °, 1 ° to 5 °, 6 ° to 10 °, and >10 °. This data was then secondarily analyzed for abnormal spinopelvic mobility (the difference in the spinopelvic tilt [ΔSPT] from a standing to a flexed seated position >20 °). ResultsThe mean anteversion safe zone was 22.8 ° with 82.4% (281/341) of patients with a zone strictly >10 °. The mean safe zone was 8.9 ° (+/− 9 °) in patients with an ΔSPT ≥20 ° (18.2%), with 37.1% of these patients having a zone of 0 °, 16.13% a zone between 1 ° and 5 °, 8.06% a zone between 6 ° and 10 ° and 38.71% a zone >10 °. The mean safe zone was 25.9 ° (+/− 9 °) in patients with an ΔSPT <20 ° (81.8%), and the proportion of cases in each zone was 2.51%, 1.08%, 4.3%, and 92.11%, respectively (p < 0.001). ConclusionThe safe zone for anteversion appears to be fairly wide in most patients. However, identifying patients at risk of abnormal spinopelvic mobility seems necessary to identify the two-thirds of patients with a narrow safe zone. Level of evidenceIV; retrospective study

Using preoperative planning software to assess the effect of head length on prosthetic range of motion in a high-risk population: a three-dimensional modeling study.

Concurrent use of minus heads with tapered stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA) decreases the prosthetic range of motion (pROM). Three-dimensional preoperative templating can simulate the location of the impingement by taking the hip through a virtual pROM. This enables surgeons to simulate how modifying the type of implant, orientation, and position influences impingement. We hypothesized that CT-based modeling would result in a decrease in the pROM, thereby increasing the risk of impingement when minus heads are used. Forty-three patients who underwent robotic-assisted primary THAs were included. Prosthetic head diameter (32/36-mm) and head length (minus/zero/plus) were the predictors. Maximum external rotation at full hip extension and internal rotation at 90° and 100° of flexion prior to prosthetic impingement were the outcome variables. A CT-based preoperative planning software was used for pROM estimation and impingement detection. Significant decreases in pROM were found for both head diameters as the head length decreased and was more pronounced in external rotation during full hip extension (changes of 2.8-3.4° for the 32-mm head and 1.6-2.8° for the 36-mm head (p = 0.00011)). The magnitude of loss in pROM when using a minus head was larger than the gain provided by a plus head in tapered stems (p < 0.0001). Head length affects the offset and pROM. When the use of minus heads or smaller heads is indicated, 3D preoperative templating for assessing postoperative pROM and impingement provides surgeons with options to consider alternate surgical plans offering additional assurance and protection from dislocation.

WHAT RANGE OF MOTION (ROM) DOES A HIP ARTHROPLASTY ACTUALLY NEED? A CT-BASED METHOD TO PREDICT AN INDIVIDUAL'S HIP ROM PREOPERATIVELY

Ideally the hip arthroplasty should not be subject to bony or prosthetic impingement, in order to minimise complications and optimise outcomes. Modern 3d planning permits pre-operative simulation of the movements of the planned hip arthroplasty to check for such impingement. For this to be meaningful, however, it is necessary to know the range of movement (ROM) that should be simulated. Arbitrary “normal” values for hip ROM are of limited value in such simulations: it is well known that hip ROM is individualised for each patient. We have therefore developed a method to determine this individualised ROM using CT scans.CT scans were performed on 14 cadaveric hips, and the images were segmented to create 3d virtual models. Using Matlab software, each virtual hip was moved in all potential directions to the point of bony impingement, thus defining an individualised impingement-free 3d ROM envelope. This was then compared with the actual ROM as directly measured from each cadaver using a high-resolution motion capture system.For each hip, the ROM envelope free of bony impingement could be described from the CT and represented as a 3d shape. As expected, the directly measured ROM from the cadaver study for each hip was smaller than the CT-based prediction, owing to the presence of constraining soft tissues. However, for movements associated with hip dislocation (such as flexion with internal rotation), the cadaver measurements matched the CT prediction, to within 10°.It is possible to determine an individual's range of clinically important hip movements from a CT scan. This method could therefore be used to create truly personalised movement simulation as part of pre-operative 3d surgical planning.

Outcomes and complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty in patients with a pre-existing pathologic spine-hip relation. A systematic review of the literature.

There has been a growing interest in pathologic spine-hip relations (PSHR) in current literature, with the aim of reducing the risk of prosthetic impingement, dislocation, and edge loading in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary objective of this review is to determine the effect of different PSHR on primary THA outcomes and complication profile. The secondary objective is to stratify the risk of different subgroups of PSHR patients. A systematic review of the literature was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Randomised controlled trials, comparative cohort studies and case-control studies comparing outcomes and complication rates of primary THA in patients with and without a PSHR (spinal fusion; degenerative spinal conditions determining stiff spine and/or spinal misalignment) were included. The quality of the included studies and the risk of bias were assessed. The revision rate, complications, and clinical and radiological data were analysed. Complications included: aseptic loosening (AL), periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), hip dislocations and periprosthetic fractures (PF). Fifteen articles were included with 3.306.342 THAs. The mean follow-up (FU) was 31.4 ± 21.7months. The population was divided into three subgroups: spinal fusion patients (48.315 THAs); non-fused patients with spinal stiffness (106.110 THAs); non-fused patients with normal spines (3.151.917 THAs). A statistically significant risk stratification was observed about dislocation rate (5.98 ± 6.9% SF, 3.0 ± 1.9% non-SF Stiff and 2.26 ± 1.4% non-SF; p = 0.028). Similarly, about THA revision rate, a statistically significant risk stratification was also observed (7.3 ± 6.8% SF, 6.4 ± 3.1% non-SF Stiff and 2.7 ± 1.7% non-SF; p = 0.020). No statistically significant difference was observed when analysing AL, PJI and PF. A statistically significant risk stratification of dislocation and revision rate was observed in the different PHSR, as theorised by the Bordeaux classification. Fused patients present a higher risk, degenerated and/or stiff spine an intermediate risk and mobile spines a lower risk profile. A standardised approach to THA candidate patients must consider the possible PSHR to improve clinical outcomes and reduce adverse events of THA.

THRESHOLD FOR ANTERIOR CUP OVERHANG CORRELATED WITH SYMPTOMATIC ILIOPSOAS IMPINGEMENT AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: A 268-PATIENT CASE CONTROL STUDY USING CT SCAN

Mechanical irritation or impingement of the iliopsoas tendon accounts for 2–6% of persistent postoperative pain cases after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The most common trigger is anterior cup overhang. CT-scan can be used to identify and measure this overhang; however, no threshold exists for symptomatic anterior iliopsoas impingement. We conducted a case–control study in which CT-scan was used to define a threshold that differentiates patients with iliopsoas impingement from asymptomatic patients after THA.We analyzed the CT-scans of 622 patients (758 CT-scans) between 2011 and 2020. Out of this population we identified 136 patients with symptoms suggestive of iliopsoas impingement. Among them, 6 were subsequently excluded: three because the diagnosis was reestablished intra-operatively (one metallosis, two anterior instability related to posterior prosthetic impingement) and three because they had another obvious cause of impingement (one protruding screw, one protruding cement plug, one stem collar), leaving 130 patients in the study (impingement) group. They were matched to a control group of 138 patients who were asymptomatic after THA. The anterior cup overhang (anterior margin of cup not covered by anterior wall) was measured by an observer (without knowledge of the clinical status) on an axial CT slice based on anatomical landmarks (orthogonal to pelvic axis).The impingement group had a median overhang of 8 mm [IQR: 5 to 11] versus 0 mm [IQR: 0 to 4] for the control group (p&lt;.001). Using ROC curves, an overhang threshold of 4 mm was best correlated with a diagnosis of impingement (sensitivity 79%, specificity 85%, PPV = 75%, NPV = 85%).Pain after THA related to iliopsoas impingement can be reasonably linked to acetabular overhang if it exceeds 4 mm on a CT scan. Below this threshold, it seems logical to look for another cause of iliopsoas irritation or another reason for the pain after THA before concluding impingement is present.

Simulating movements of daily living in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty with 3D modelling.

Computer-assisted 3D preoperative planning software has the potential to improve postoperative stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Commonly, preoperative protocols simulate two functional positions (standing and relaxed sitting) but do not consider other common positions that may increase postoperative impingement and possible dislocation. This study investigates the feasibility of simulating commonly encountered positions, and positions with an increased risk of impingement, to lower postoperative impingement risk in a CT-based 3D model. A robotic arm-assisted arthroplasty planning platform was used to investigate 11 patient positions. Data from 43 primary THAs were used for simulation. Sacral slope was retrieved from patient preoperative imaging, while angles of hip flexion/extension, hip external/internal rotation, and hip abduction/adduction for tested positions were derived from literature or estimated with a biomechanical model. The hip was placed in the described positions, and if impingement was detected by the software, inspection of the impingement type was performed. In flexion, an overall impingement rate of 2.3% was detected for flexed-seated, squatting, forward-bending, and criss-cross-sitting positions, and 4.7% for the ankle-over-knee position. In extension, most hips (60.5%) were found to impinge at or prior to 50° of external rotation (pivoting). Many of these impingement events were due to a prominent ischium. The mean maximum external rotation prior to impingement was 45.9° (15° to 80°) and 57.9° (20° to 90°) prior to prosthetic impingement. No impingement was found in standing, sitting, crossing ankles, seiza, and downward dog. This study demonstrated that positions of daily living tested in a CT-based 3D model show high rates of impingement. Simulating additional positions through 3D modelling is a low-cost method of potentially improving outcomes without compromising patient safety. By incorporating CT-based 3D modelling of positions of daily living into routine preoperative protocols for THA, there is the potential to lower the risk of postoperative impingement events.

Accuracy of Blueprint in Predicting Range of Motion One Year After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

/hypothesis: Blueprint 3D CT software has a functionality that predicts impingement-free range of motion with the limits of range of motion determined at which bone and/or prosthetic impingement occurs. To the best of knowledge, there is only one previously published study that assessed the ability for the Blueprint software to predict actual postoperative range of motion after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The hypothesis of this study was that 1) mean Blueprint predicted impingement-free range of motion will be statistically similar to the mean actual range of motion one year after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and 2) there will be a correlation between Blueprint predicted impingement-free range of motion and the actual range of motion one year after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. A retrospective review of patients that had Blueprint planning prior to undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from March 2017 through May 2021 was reviewed. At one-year follow-up. flexion, external rotation at the side, abduction, abduction / external rotation, abduction / internal rotation, and internal rotation behind the back were measured. The preoperatively predicted flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation were recorded from the Blueprint software. Group 1 analysis examined the predicted vs actual range of motion for all 127 patients regardless if intraoperative component modifications were made. Group 2 examined the predicted vs actual range of motion of only the patients that did not have intraoperative changes that would affect the preoperative range of motion prediction (n=97). Group 3 examined the predicted vs actual range of motion of Group 2 combined with the 30 patients that had post-hoc Blueprint planning modifications to account for the changes made intraoperatively (combined sample size = 127). One-hundred-twenty-seven patients of the 141 patients (90%) were available for one year follow-up. When examining the mean of all three groups, the actual range of motion and predicted range of motion was statistically significantly different (p<0.0001) for flexion, external rotation, abduction, abduction/ external rotation, and abduction / internal rotation. In Group 1, a very weak or poor correlation was found between predicted internal rotation and actual abducted/internal rotation (r=0.19; p=0.04). For all other range of motion metrics in Groups 1, 2, and 3, there were no correlations between predicted and actual range of motion (p >.07). In its current state, preoperative Blueprint 3D CT planning software is unable to accurately predict range of motion one year after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Does Individualization of Cup Position Affect Prosthetic or Bone Impingement Following Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BackgroundSpinopelvic (SP) mobility patterns during postural changes affect three-dimensional acetabular component position, the incidence of prosthetic impingement, and total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability. Surgeons have commonly placed the acetabular component in a similar “safe zone” for most patients. Our purpose was to determine the incidence of bone and prosthetic impingement with various cup orientations and determine if a preoperative SP analysis with individualized cup orientation lessens impingement. MethodsA preoperative SP evaluation of 78 THA subjects was performed. Data were analyzed using a software program to determine the prevalence of prosthetic and bone impingement with a patient individualized cup orientation versus 6 commonly selected cup orientations. Impingement was correlated with known SP risk factors for dislocation. ResultsProsthetic impingement was least with the individualized choice of cup position (9%) versus preselected cup positions (18%-61%). The presence of bone impingement (33%) was similar in all groups and not affected by cup position. Factors associated with impingement in flexion were age, lumbar flexion, pelvic tilt (stand to flexed seated), and functional femoral stem anteversion. Risk factors in extension included standing pelvic tilt, standing SP tilt, lumbar flexion, pelvic rotation (supine to stand and stand to flexed seated), and functional femoral stem anteversion. ConclusionProsthetic impingement is reduced with individualized cup positioning based on SP mobility patterns. Bone impingement occurred in one-third of patients and is a noteworthy consideration in preoperative THA planning. Known SP risk factors for THA instability correlated with the presence of prosthetic impingement in both flexion and extension.

OVER 50% OF PATIENTS AT RISK OF IMPINGEMENT AFTER THA SURGERY ARE NOT CAPTURED WITH NEUTRAL BONY ALIGNMENT

Dislocation is one of the most common complications in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and is primarily driven by bony or prosthetic impingement. The aim of this study was two-fold. First, to develop a simulation that incorporates the functional position of the femur and pelvis and instantaneously determines range of motion (ROM) limits. Second, to assess the number of patients for whom their functional bony alignment escalates impingement risk.468 patients underwent a preoperative THA planning protocol that included functional x-rays and a lower limb CT scan. The CT scan was segmented and landmarked, and the x-rays were measured for pelvic tilt, femoral rotation, and preoperative leg length discrepancy (LLD). All patients received 3D templating with the same implant combination (Depuy; Corail/Pinnacle). Implants were positioned according to standardised criteria.Each patient was simulated in a novel ROM simulation that instantaneously calculates bony and prosthetic impingement limits in functional movements. Simulated motions included flexion and standing-external rotation (ER). Each patient's ROM was simulated with their bones oriented in both functional and neutral positions.13% patients suffered a ROM impingement for functional but not neutral extension-ER. As a result, 48% patients who failed the functional-ER simulation would not be detected without consideration of the functional bony alignment. 16% patients suffered a ROM impingement for functional but not neutral flexion. As a result, 65% patients who failed the flexion simulation would not be detected without consideration of the functional bony alignment.We have developed a ROM simulation for use with preoperative planning for THA surgery that can solve bony and prosthetic impingement limits instantaneously. The advantage of our ROM simulation over previous simulations is instantaneous impingement detection, not requiring implant geometries to be analysed prior to use, and addressing the functional position of both the femur and pelvis.

Elucidation of target implant orientations with the safety range of hip rotation with adduction or abduction during squatting: Simulation based on in vivo replaced hip kinematics.

Objectives: The study aimed to elucidate target cup orientation and stem anteversions to avoid impingement between the liner and stem neck even at hip rotation with adduction during the deeply flexed posture. Methods: A computer simulation analysis was performed on 32 total hip arthroplasty patients applying patient-specific orientation of the components and in vivo hip kinematics obtained from three-dimensional analysis of the squatting motion. The anterior/posterior liner-to-neck distance and impingement were evaluated based on a virtual change in internal/external rotation (0°-60°) and adduction/abduction (0°-20°) at actual maximum flexion/extension during squatting. Cutoff values of cup orientations, stem anteversion, and combined anteversion to avoid liner-to-neck impingements were determined. Results: The anterior liner-to-neck distance decreased as internal rotation or adduction increased, and the posterior liner-to-neck distance decreased as external rotation or adduction increased. Negative correlations were found between anterior/posterior liner-to-neck distances at maximum flexion/extension and internal/external rotation. Anterior/posterior liner-to-neck impingements were observed in 6/18 hips (18/56%) at 45° internal/external rotation with 20° adduction. The range of target cup anteversion, stem anteversion, and combined anteversion to avoid both anterior and posterior liner-to-neck impingements during squatting were 15°-18°, 19°-34°, and 41°-56°, respectively. Conclusion: Simulated hip rotations caused prosthetic impingement during squatting. Surgeons could gain valuable insights into target cup orientations and stem anteversion based on postoperative simulations during the deeply flexed posture.

Combined kinematic cup alignment reduces the rate of impingement and edge loading compared to mechanical and anatomical alignment. An in-vitro case-control study

IntroductionIn recent years, different alignments have been described for acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty (THA), to reduce the risk of impingement and edge loading. Currently there are 3 main options: mechanical (40° inclination/15° anteversion relative to the anterior pelvic plane), anatomic (40° inclination/anteversion parallel to the transverse ligament) and combined kinematic (according to spinal-pelvic parameters). There are no studies comparing all three in terms of impingement and edge loading. We therefore performed a retrospective case-control in-vitro study comparing risk of impingement and edge loading between the three alignments. HypothesisThe study hypothesis was that combined kinematic alignment incurs significantly less risk of impingement and edge loading than do the other two types of alignment. MethodsUsing a THA planning system, we simulated the 3 alignments for 90 patients undergoing THA with a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing between November 2019 and January 2022; for each simulation, we recorded any prosthetic impingement or edge loading. The study endpoint was the rate of prosthetic impingement or edge loading between the 3 alignments. ResultsWith the mechanical alignment, 31% of patients (28/90) showed risk of impingement and 22% (20/90) risk of edge loading. With the anatomic alignment, 31% of patients (28/90) showed risk of impingement and 23.3% (21/90) risk of edge loading. With the combined kinematic alignment, 12.2% of patients (11/90) showed risk of impingement and 8.9% (8/90) risk of edge loading. Pairwise comparison showed that the combined kinematic alignment was associated with significantly less impingement and edge loading than the mechanical alignment (respectively, p=0.03 and p=0.022) or the anatomic alignment (respectively, p=0.03 and p=0.014), while the mechanical and anatomic alignments did not differ. ConclusionA combined kinematic cup alignment in THA significantly reduced the risk of impingement and edge loading compared to mechanical and anatomic alignments. Level of evidenceIII, retrospective case-control study.

Optimal combined anteversion range for obtaining a wider range of motion without prosthetic impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a three-dimensional analysis study

BackgroundObtaining a larger theoretical range of motion (ROM) is crucial to avoid prosthetic impingement after total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, no reports have examined the permissible range values of combined anteversion (CA) satisfying targeted ROM without prosthetic impingement. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the possible postoperative CA extent that would allow meeting target ROM criteria according to Yoshimine’s theory using computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional motion analysis after THA.MethodsThis study included 114 patients (133 hips) who underwent cementless primary THA using a CT-based navigation system and implants (oscillation angle ≥ 135°). Implant positions were determined using Yoshimine's CA formula. Postoperative evaluation was conducted using a three-dimensional templating software for CT data. The postoperative Yoshimine’s and Widmer’s CA was calculated, and the difference between the target and postoperative values was defined as the error of Yoshimine’s CA and Widmer’s CA. Prosthetic ROM was assessed by Yoshimine’s stringent criteria for activities of daily living. Based on fulfilling these criteria, all patients were divided into the ROM (+) and ROM (−) groups. Evaluation items were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were 111 and 22 hips in the ROM (+) and ROM (−) groups, respectively. A significant difference was noted in the absolute error of Yoshimine’s and Widmer’s CA between the two groups. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, threshold values of 6.0 (higher values indicate greater disability; sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 72.1%) for the absolute Yoshimine’s CA difference (area under the curve [AUC] 0.87, P < 0.01) and 6.9 (higher values indicate greater disability; sensitivity 68.2%, specificity 88.3%) for the absolute Widmer’s CA difference (AUC 0.83, P < 0.01) were predictors in the ROM (−) group.ConclusionsThe target range of Yoshimine’s CA (90.8° ± 6.0°) and Widmer’s CA values (37.3° ± 6.9°) was crucial in implant orientation for obtaining theoretical ROM without prosthetic impingement after THA.

Computer simulation of optimal lipped polyethylene liner orientation against prosthetic impingement

BackgroundLipped or elevated acetabular liners are to improve posterior stability and are widely used in hip arthroplasty. However, concerns of increasing impingement exist when using such liners and optimal orientation of the elevated rim remains unknown. We aimed to identify the impact of lipped liner on the range of motion (ROM) before impingement and propose its optimal orientation.MethodsAn isochoric three-dimensional model of a general hip-replacement prosthesis was generated, and flex-extension, add-abduction and axial rotation were simulated on a computer. The maximum ROM of the hip was measured before the neck impinged on the liner. Different combinations of acetabular anteversion angles ranging from 5 to 30 degrees, and lipped liner orientations from posterior to anterior were tested.ResultsWhen acetabular anteversion was 10 or 15 degrees, placing the lip of the liner in the posterosuperior of the acetabulum allowed satisfactory ROM in all directions. When acetabular anteversion was 20 degrees, extension and external rotation were restricted. Adjusting the lip to the superior restored satisfactory ROM. When acetabular anteversion was 25 degrees, only placing the lip into the anterosuperior could increase extension and external rotation to maintain satisfactory ROM.ConclusionsThis study showed that optimal lipped liner orientation should depend on acetabular anteversion. When acetabular anteversion was smaller than 20 degrees, placing lip in the posterior allowed an optimally ROM. When acetabular anteversion was greater than 20 degrees, adjusting lip to the anterior allowed a comprehensive larger ROM to avoid early impingement.

Does accelerometer-based portable navigation provide more accurate and precise cup orientation without prosthetic impingement than conventional total hip arthroplasty? A randomized controlled study

This prospective randomized controlled study examined whether accelerometer-based navigation resulted in more accurate or precise cup orientation than a conventional mechanical guide. We used a simulation to evaluate how cup orientation affected potential hip range of motion (RoM) and freedom from prosthetic impingement. Sixty hips were randomly allocated 1:1 to accelerometer-based portable navigation or conventional guidance. Procedures were performed through a standard posterolateral approach and combined anteversion technique. Cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem anteversion were measured using computed tomography (CT). Using CT-based simulation, we evaluated impingement-free potential RoM and the proportion of hips with potential RoM required for daily activities. Absolute cup inclination and anteversion error averaged 4.3° ± 3.2° and 4.4° ± 2.9° for the navigation cohort and 5.6° ± 3.7° and 5.7° ± 4.2° for the conventional cohort, with no significant differences. Navigation resulted in significantly less variation in anteversion error than the conventional guide (p = .0049). Flexion, internal rotation (IR) at 90° of flexion, extension, and external rotation (ER) averaged 123° ± 12°, 46° ± 13°, 50° ± 10°, and 73° ± 23°, respectively, in the navigation cohort and 127° ± 10°, 52° ± 14°, 45° ± 10°, and 63° ± 12°, respectively, in the conventional cohort (p = .15, .15, .03, and .03, respectively). Flexion > 110°, IR > 30° at 90° of flexion, extension > 30°, and ER > 30° were achieved by 93%, 90%, 100%, and 100% of hips, respectively, in the navigation cohort and 97%, 93%, 97%, and 100% of hips, respectively, in the conventional cohort, with no significant differences. Cup anteversion with the navigation system was more precise, but not more accurate, than with the conventional guide. The navigation cohort exhibited greater potential extension and ER than the conventional cohort, but no significant difference in impingement within the potential RoM required for daily activities. 29036. Date of registration: November 14, 2017.

The Impact of Lumbar Spine Disease on Hip-Spine Relationship in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Mini-Review

Background: Patients with severe lumbar spine diseases run a high risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Therefore, it is essential to determine the pathological effect of common lumbar diseases on pelvic motions before the surgery. Aim: This study reviewed the literature on the hip-spine relationship during total hip arthroplasty and explored the degenerative presentations and management of four common lumbar disorders. The review showed that patients with the spinal deformity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were characterized by thoracolumbar kyphosis with corresponding hip extension and pelvic retroversion, prone to anterior hip dislocation; patients with lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) were more susceptible to prosthetic impingement and ultimate dislocation, especially in the limited posterior tilt of the pelvis while sitting; those with degenerative disc disease (DDD) had a greater compensatory pelvic posterior angle while standing and greater hip joint flexion while sitting to compensate for the reduced lumbar flexion; those with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DSPL) demonstrated a pelvic flexibility with a much wider range and relative acetabular anteversion, especially when standing. Recommendation: According to the literature, spinal osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty are the most common surgical interventions in AS cases. DSPL is classified into the Flexible &amp; Unbalanced type and should be placed more posteriorly, but the literature suggests that patients with lumbar instability should first be placed in a more predictable position. In contrast, LSF and DDD are categorized as the Rigid &amp; Balanced type. For these two types of disorders, the literature suggests that acetabular prostheses require more anterior tilt at the time of implantation. Conclusion: These findings indicate that for degenerative lumbar disorders, a balance between stable component implantation and minimal wear should be based on the different changes in spinopelvic mobility.

Small Random Angular Variations in Pelvic Tilt and Lower Extremity Can Cause Error in Static Image-based Preoperative Hip Arthroplasty Planning: A Computer Modeling Study.

Many THA simulation models rely on a limited set of preoperative static radiographs to replicate sagittal pelvic tilt during functional positions and to recommend an implant orientation that minimizes the risk of prosthetic impingement. However, possible random changes in pelvic or lower extremity angular motions and the effect of coronal and axial pelvic tilt are not included in these preoperative models. (1) Can prosthetic impingement occur if the pelvic tilt or lower extremity alignment randomly varies up to ± 5° from what is measured on a single preoperative static radiographic image? (2) Do changes in coronal and axial pelvic tilt or lower extremity alignment angles have a similar effect on the risk of prosthetic impingement? A de-identified pelvis and lower-body CT image of a male patient without previous THA or lower extremity surgery was used to import the pelvis, femur, and tibia into a verified MATLAB computer model. The motions of standing, pivoting, sitting, sit-to-stand, squatting, and bending forward were simulated. THA implant components included a full hemispherical acetabular cup without an elevated rim, polyethylene liner without an elevated rim, femoral head (diameter: 28 mm, 32 mm, 36 mm, or 40 mm), and a triple-taper cementless stem with three different neck shaft angles (127°, 132°, or 135°) with a trapezoidal neck were used in this model. A static model (cup anatomical abduction 40°, cup anatomical anteversion 20°, stem anatomical anteversion 10°) with a predefined range of sagittal pelvic tilt and hip alignment (0° coronal or axial tilt, without random ± 5° change) was used to simulate each motion. We then randomly varied pelvic tilt in three different pelvic planes and hip alignments (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, rotation) up to ± 5° and assessed the same motions without changing the implant's anatomical orientation. Prosthetic impingement as the endpoint was defined as mechanical abutment between the prosthetic neck and polyethylene liner. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the effect of variation in pelvic tilt and hip alignment (predictors) on prosthetic impingement (primary outcome). The static-based model without the random variation did not result in any prosthetic impingement under any conditions. However, with up to ± 5° of random variation in the pelvic tilt and hip alignment angles, prosthetic impingement occurred in pivoting (18 possible combinations), sit-to-stand (106 possible combinations), and squatting (one possible combination) when a 28-mm or a 32-mm head was used. Variation in sagittal tilt (odds ratio 4.09 [95% CI 3.11 to 5.37]; p < 0.001), axial tilt (OR 3.87 [95% CI 2.96 to 5.07]; p < 0.001), and coronal tilt (OR 2.39 [95% CI 2.03 to 2.83]; p < 0.001) affected the risk of prosthetic impingement. Variation in hip flexion had a strong impact on the risk of prosthetic impingement (OR 4.11 [95% CI 3.38 to 4.99]; p < 0.001). The combined effect of 2° to 3° of change in multiple pelvic tilt or hip alignment angles relative to what is measured on a single static radiographic image can result in prosthetic impingement. Relying on a few preoperative static radiographic images to minimize the risk of prosthetic impingement, without including femoral implant orientation, axial and coronal pelvic tilt, and random angular variation in pelvis and lower extremity alignment, may not be adequate and may fail to predict prosthetic impingement-free ROM. Determining a safe zone for THA implant positioning with respect to impingement may require a dynamic computer simulation model to fully capture the range of possible impingement conditions. Future work should concentrate on devising simple and easily available methods for dynamic motion analysis instead of using a few static radiographs for preoperative planning.

Femoral stem neck geometry determines hip range of motion shape : a computer simulation study.

AimsIn computer simulations, the shape of the range of motion (ROM) of a stem with a cylindrical neck design will be a perfect cone. However, many modern stems have rectangular/oval-shaped necks. We hypothesized that the rectangular/oval stem neck will affect the shape of the ROM and the prosthetic impingement.MethodsTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) motion while standing and sitting was simulated using a MATLAB model (one stem with a cylindrical neck and one stem with a rectangular neck). The primary predictor was the geometry of the neck (cylindrical vs rectangular) and the main outcome was the shape of ROM based on the prosthetic impingement between the neck and the liner. The secondary outcome was the difference in the ROM provided by each neck geometry and the effect of the pelvic tilt on this ROM. Multiple regression was used to analyze the data.ResultsThe stem with a rectangular neck has increased internal and external rotation with a quatrefoil cross-section compared to a cone in a cylindrical neck. Modification of the cup orientation and pelvic tilt affected the direction of projection of the cone or quatrefoil shape. The mean increase in internal rotation with a rectangular neck was 3.4° (0° to 7.9°; p < 0.001); for external rotation, it was 2.8° (0.5° to 7.8°; p < 0.001).ConclusionOur study shows the importance of attention to femoral implant design for the assessment of prosthetic impingement. Any universal mathematical model or computer simulation that ignores each stem’s unique neck geometry will provide inaccurate predictions of prosthetic impingement.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(12):780–789.