You have accessJournal of UrologyTrauma/Reconstruction/Diversion: External Genitalia Reconstruction and Urotrauma (including transgender surgery) II (PD31)1 Sep 2021PD31-12 PENILE PROSTHESIS PLACEMENT USING AN OPTIMIZED METHOD BY A DEDICATED TRANSGENDER SURGERY UNIT: A SLOW DECREASE IN HIGH COMPLICATION RATES Ravyn Middleton, Brenna Briles, Kenan Celtik, Curtis Crane, Michael Safir, and Richard Santucci Ravyn MiddletonRavyn Middleton More articles by this author , Brenna BrilesBrenna Briles More articles by this author , Kenan CeltikKenan Celtik More articles by this author , Curtis CraneCurtis Crane More articles by this author , Michael SafirMichael Safir More articles by this author , and Richard SantucciRichard Santucci More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002032.12AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Female to male transgender individuals may seek penile prostheses as part of genital gender affirmation surgery for the purpose of achieving penile rigidity, as this is not achieved with phalloplasty alone. This study aims to observe the types and rates of complications of penile prostheses after phalloplasty, over time and across surgical conditions, and to seek improvements in the complication rate by diligent adherence to proven principles. METHODS: Data was gathered via retrospective chart review of 81 patients at our high-volume center. The natural history of each prosthesis was followed through time. RESULTS: There was an overall complication rate of 36% and infection rate of 20%, with 15% experiencing infection requiring removal. Differences in infection rates were not significant across categories of previous surgery or with simultaneous surgery, but we did notice a markedly lower rate for semirigid prostheses compared to inflatable [infection rate 22% (15/67) for inflatable prostheses and 7% (1/14) for semirigid (p=0.19)]. Infection rates decrease with time and surgical experience: the rate of prosthesis infection improved over time, and the slope of the cumulative curves are much lower for infections (r=0.013) than expected for the number of cases performed over time (r=0.082) (p=0.979). The first 40 patients had an overall infection rate of 28% (11/40), a slope of 0.071 for cases vs time, and 0.013 for infections vs time (p=0.975). The most recent set of 41 patients had a lower overall infection rate of 12% (5/41), a slope of 0.079 for cases, and 0.006 for infections (p=0.969). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements were achieved by strict adherence to proven techniques: no touch techniques (Level 3 evidence), appropriate pre-operative intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis (Level 2), control of blood sugar in diabetics (Level 2), antibiotic soaked implants (Level 2), hair clipping instead of razor shaving (Level 1), and use of chlorhexidine-based surgical scrub (Level 1). Overall, 28% of patients required surgery for complications. This compares favorably to the meta-analysis of penile prosthesis placements in phalloplasty patients, where the overall rate of complications requiring surgery was 45% for inflatable prostheses, and 42% for non-inflatable prostheses. Using careful surgical technique advised by specific knowledge of phalloplasty anatomy, and following proven infection control methods developed in the cisgender population, we hypothesized and then achieved lower rates of complication in this risky procedure. Source of Funding: None © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e543-e543 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ravyn Middleton More articles by this author Brenna Briles More articles by this author Kenan Celtik More articles by this author Curtis Crane More articles by this author Michael Safir More articles by this author Richard Santucci More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...