Total Knee Arthroplasty Prosthesis Research Articles

Total knee arthroplasty: Quality assurance and improved longevity costs less

BackgroundThere is an accepted variation in the financial cost of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants but it is not known whether this cost is reflected by the evidence in support of their use. A cost analysis study was carried out to determine the total cost of consumables of a TKA, and whether this was related to the supporting evidence and survivorship data. MethodsIntra-operative data for all unilateral, cemented, primary TKA over a 13 month period at a high-volume Orthopaedic Centre was collected. Level of evidence for each model was taken from the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) website, and data from the UK National Joint Registry was used to assign survivorship (failure rates). Correlation was calculated using the Spearman rank correlation (r). ResultsA total of 1301 TKA were performed at the study centre during the data collection period. The mean cost of consumables for a TKA with patella resurfacing (n = 816) was £1969.08 (range of £1061.46 and £5143.89), and without resurfacing (n = 485) was £1846.62 (range of £1118.98 and £4196.81). There was a negative correlation between price of implant and ODEP rating (r = −0.47), with increasing level of evidence being associated with a lower cost. There was a positive correlation between price of implant and rate of implant failure at the1-, 3- and 5-year time-points (r = 0.55, 0.44, 0.28 respectively), with increasing cost being associated with a higher failure rate. ConclusionHigher financial cost of TKA prostheses was associated with a weaker level of supporting evidence and a higher failure rate. The increased financial cost of new implants may be justified as more data and evidence becomes available to support an advantage in its use over currently established implants.

Appraisal of Clinical Improvement With Total Knee Arthroplasty in Valgus Knee Deformities: A Case Series.

Introduction This case series explores the efficacy of unassisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in addressing valgus knee deformity secondary to osteoarthritis. The study aims to evaluate functional outcomes pre- and post-surgery using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and radiological assessments in short-term follow-up. Six patients underwent TKA and were evaluated retrospectively. Statistical analysis revealed significant improvements in the angle of deformity, KSS, and range of motion postoperatively. The study underscores the success of TKA in correcting valgus deformity, improving knee function, and enhancing patient satisfaction. TKAis a highly successful treatment for osteoarthritis, providing functional recovery and improved quality of life. However, valgus knee deformity presents a challenge in TKA, affecting approximately 10% of patients. This study aims to assess the functional outcomes of TKA for valgus deformity using KSSand radiological evaluation in short-term follow-up. Materials and methods A retrospective observational study was conducted from November 2022 to December 2023, involving six patients with valgus knee deformity secondary to osteoarthritis. TKA was performed with no technological assistance, and patients were assessed pre- and post-surgery using KSS and radiological measurements. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests. Case description Six patients with grade two valgus deformity underwent technology-unassisted TKA. The postoperative assessment revealed significant improvements in the tibiofemoral angle, KSS, and range of motion. The medial parapatellar approach for TKA was utilized with a standard unconstrained primary TKA prosthesis, resulting in successful correction of deformity and improved knee alignment. Discussion TKA is a widely performed and reliable surgical intervention, with valgus knee deformity posing specific challenges. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of conventional TKA in correcting valgus deformity, improving knee function, and enhancing patient satisfaction in a very small case series. Comparison with previous studies supports the findings of the pre-existing literature, highlighting the importance of appropriate surgical approach and patient selection. Conclusion TKAutilizing a medial parapatellar approach proved effective in our small case series in correcting valgus deformity, improving knee function, and enhancing patient satisfaction. Short-term follow-up reveals significant improvements in stability, posture, and KSS scores. Further assessments and longer-term follow-up are warranted to confirm the long-term effectiveness of this approach.

What Drives the Material Costs of Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Operating Room?

Approximately one-third of US healthcare spending is related to surgical care. Optimizing operating room (OR) spending is crucial, specifically for high-volume procedures like total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, the primary objective was to identify leading material drivers of cost for TKA procedures within the OR. Patients who underwent a primary, elective TKA from 2018 to 2019 were included (n=8,672). Intraoperative cost details for each TKA patient were captured from the Vizient Clinical Database Resource Manager (CDB/RM) data. Each cost type was categorized into (1) implant, (2) disposables, (3) wound care, and (4) miscellaneous. 7,124 patients undergoing primary TKA were included. Implant-related costs accounted for 87.3% of cost, disposable materials covered 10.7%, and wound care products took 2%. The leading subcategories of implant costs were primary prosthetics (85.1%), revision prosthetics (9.9%), cement (2.8%), and implant instruments (1.7%). Within disposables, surgical products accounted for 81.3% of the cost, patient care products for 8.9%, medical apparel for 7.9%, and electrolytes for 1.8%. For an average individual TKA procedure, 86.4% (±4.4) of total cost went towards the implant, 10.7% (±3.4) towards disposable materials, and 1.6% (±1.4) to wound care products. Within the implant category, 92.5% (± 12.8) of costs were associated with primary implants, 13.3% (± 6.9) with instruments, and 2.5% (± 2.8) with cement. The primary operative material expense category was costs associated with the TKA prosthesis and its fixation followed by disposable materials. A large amount of variation exists in the percent of the total cost for a given TKA procedure that can be attributed to each category.

Long-term results (after a mean 11.3 years, and up to 22 years, of follow-up) of the Legacy Constrained Condylar Knee (LCCK™) in primary total knee arthroplasty

IntroductionThe use of a sliding prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with increased stress is an intermediate solution in primary surgery, between posteriorly stabilized prostheses and hinged prostheses, in cases of ligamentous laxity and/or loss of bone substance. Favorable results have been reported in the medium term but to our knowledge, this type of prosthesis has not been evaluated in Europe beyond 10 years of follow-up. We therefore conducted a retrospective study in order to carry out: 1) the study of the survival of the Legacy Constrained Condylar Knee (LCCK™) prosthesis in primary surgery, 2) the analysis of complications, functional scores and radiographic data, 3) the analysis of the link between the diaphyseal filling rate and prosthetic loosening. HypothesisThe LCCK™ sliding prosthesis with increased constraint has equivalent long-term survival and clinical results to standard posteriorly stabilized TKA and superior to hinged TKA. Material and methodA retrospective series of 141 LCCK™ implanted in 134 patients between 1997 and 2010 was analyzed. Survival was assessed with censoring through an evaluation of partial or total revision of the implants. The functional results were evaluated using the IKS and Oxford 12 scores. Data regarding the Canal Fill Ratio (CFR) and the presence of pathological periprosthetic lines were also collected. ResultsThe average follow-up was 11.3±5.3years with a maximum follow-up of 22.7years. Survival at 20years was 90.8% [95% CI: 83.7–95.7]. The rate of early complications was 13.5% (19/141), predominantly comprised of venous thrombosis (6/141), hematomas (3/141 including two requiring surgical drainage), stiffness (3/141) and early infections (3/141). The rate of late complications was 17% (24/141), led by stiffness (4.4%; 6/141), infections (2.9%; 4/141) and hardware failure (2. 2%; 3/141). Ten of the 141 patients (7.1%) had LCCK failure, including 3 (2.1%) for stiffness, 3 (2.1%) for hardware failure, 2 (1.4%) for infection, 1 (0.7%) for laxity and 1 (0.7%) for a periprosthetic fracture. No aseptic loosening was found. The total IKS score went from 65 [0–116] to 143 [79–200] at follow-up, the IKS knee score went from 30 [0–66] to 85 [44–100], and the IKS function score went from 35 [0–70] to 57 [0–100]. The Oxford score went from 14 [2–25] to 34 [15–48] at follow-up. Only two patients (1.4%) presented with a partial periprosthetic line. The tibial CFR was 0.81 and the femoral CFR was 0.76. The influence of the CFR could not be analyzed due to the absence of loosening. DiscussionThe LCCK™ prosthesis in primary surgery has good medium-term survival, a significant improvement in functional scores and a complication rate comparable to posteriorly stabilized prostheses. The complication rate is lower than that of hinged prostheses. Level of evidenceIV; single-center retrospective study.

Knee

The December 2023 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Obesity is associated with greater improvement in patient-reported outcomes following primary total knee arthroplasty; Does mild flexion of the femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty result in better early postoperative outcomes?; Robotic or manual total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial; Patient-relevant outcomes following first revision total knee arthroplasty, by diagnosis: an analysis of implant survivorship, mortality, serious medical complications, and patient-reported outcome measures using the National Joint Registry data set; Sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: are there any discrepancies between robotic-assisted and manual axis orientation?; Tourniquet use does not impact recovery trajectory in total knee arthroplasty; Impact of proximal tibial varus anatomy on survivorship after medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty; Bone cement directly to the implant in primary total knee arthroplasty?; Maintaining joint line obliquity optimizes outcomes in patients with constitutionally varus knees.

Femoral prosthesis alignment of augmented reality-assisted versus accelerometer-based navigation in total knee arthroplasty: A noninferiority analysis

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to examine the comparative precision of the augmented reality (AR)-assisted navigation system and the accelerometer-based navigation system in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Materials and methodsWe performed noninferiority analysis in a retrospective cohort. The coronal alignment of femoral prosthesis was compared between 109 TKAs performed using the AR-assisted navigation system and 118 TKAs performed using the accelerometer-based navigation system. All femoral prostheses were planned to be positioned perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. The primary outcome was the success rate of coronal alignment of the femoral prosthesis defined as alignment error relative to neutral alignment <3°. We calculated the noninferiority margin as 7%-points using the 95%–95 % method and also confirmed the validity of the noninferiority margin using the fixed margin method. Noninferiority would be shown if the lower boundary of the 95 % confidence interval (CI) for the between-group difference in percentage of the success rate was not less than 0.93 (i.e., 1.00 − 0.07). ResultsTreatment success was achieved in 104 of 109 patients (95.4 %) in the AR-assisted navigation group and 110 of 118 (93.2 %) in the accelerometer-based navigation group. The risk ratio of success between the AR-assisted navigation group versus accelerometer-based navigation group was 1.02 (95 % CI, 0.96 to 1.09): the CIs did not include the noninferiority margin of 0.93. ConclusionThe AR-assisted navigation system was noninferior to the accelerometer-based navigation system in terms of coronal alignment of the femoral prosthesis in TKA.

Does mild flexion of the femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty result in better early postoperative outcomes?

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to measure the femoral prosthesis flexion angle (FPFA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using three-dimensional reconstruction, and to assess the differences in early clinical efficacy between patients with different degrees of flexion.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study. From June 2019 to May 2021, 113 patients admitted for TKA due to osteoarthritis of the knee were selected. The patients’ postoperative knee joints were reconstructed in three dimensions according to postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans. The FPFA was measured, and the patients were divided into 4 groups: anterior extension group (FPFA < 0°), mildly flexed group (0° ≤ FPFA < 3°), moderately flexed group (3° ≤ FPFA < 6°) and excessively flexed group (6° ≤ FPFA). The differences in the Knee Society Score (KSS), knee Range of Motion (ROM), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were measured and compared between the four groups at each postoperative time point.ResultsPostoperative KSS, ROM, and VAS were significantly improved in all groups compared to the preoperative period. At 1 year postoperatively, the ROM was significantly greater in the mildly flexed group (123.46 ± 6.51°) than in the anterior extension group (116.93 ± 8.05°) and the excessively flexed group (118.76 ± 8.20°) (P < 0.05). The KSS was significantly higher in the mildly flexed group (162.68 ± 12.79) than in the other groups at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The higher KSS (174.17 ± 11.84) in the mildly flexed group was maintained until 1 year postoperatively, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). No significant difference in VAS scores was observed between groups at each time point.ConclusionsA femoral prosthesis flexion angle of 0–3° significantly improved postoperative knee mobility, and patients could obtain better Knee Society Scores after surgery, which facilitated the postoperative recovery of knee function.Trial registrationChiCTR2100051502, 2021/09/24.

NO CLINICAL ADVANTAGE WITH CUSTOMIZED INDIVIDUALLY MADE IMPLANTS OVER CONVENTIONAL OFF-THE-SHELF IMPLANTS IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

AbstractCustomised individually made implants(CIM) total knee arthroplasty(TKA) are custom-made to better fit patients native anatomy and aim to improve outcomes which can be variable with conventional off-the-shelf(OTS).A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted searching the MEDLINE and Embase databases. Studies reporting on patient reported outcome measures, clinical or radiological outcomes were included.23 studies satisfied the search criteria (case-control studies14, case series8, cross-sectional studies1). There were 2,856(CIM) and 1,877(OTS) implants. The overall revision-rate was higher in CIM 5.9%vs3.7%OTS [OR 1.46(95% CI 0.82–2.62)]. MUA was higher in the CIM group 2.2%vs.1.1%OTS [OR 2.95(95% CI 0.95–9.13)] and overall complications rate was also higher in the CIM group 5% vs. 4.5%OTS [OR 1.45(95% CI 0.53–3.96)]. LOS was significantly shorter in the CIM group 2.9 days vs. 3.5 days [MD −0.51(95% CI −0.82–0.20)]. Pooled analysis for KSS showed no difference between CIM and OTS groups(Knee=90.5 vs. 90.6 [MD-0.27,(95% CI −4.27–3.73)] and Function=86.1 vs. 90.6[MD 1.51 (95% CI −3.69–6.70)] component of the scores. There was no significant difference in post-operative ROM between CIM and OTS groups 117.3° vs. 115.0° [MD 0.02,(95% CI −1.70–1.74)].CIM TKAs has theoretical benefits over OTS TKAs however in this review they were associated with higher complication, MUA and revision rates with no difference in outcome scores and no improvement in target alignment. The findings of this review does not support the use of CIM over OTS prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty.

Sagittal Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are There Any Discrepancies Between Robotic-Assisted and Manual Axis Orientation?

Sagittal alignment determines the extension and flexion of knee prostheses in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The definition of the sagittal axes may be different between the Mako TKA system (Stryker) and the conventional manual intramedullary approach. Whether there is any discrepancy between the 2 approaches has not been well studied. We retrospectively analyzed 60 full-length computed tomographic (CT) scans of the lower extremities of 54 patients. The femur and tibia were modeled by using Mimics (Materialise). The Mako mechanical axes were determined according to the Mako TKA Surgical Guide. The manual intramedullary axes were determined according to the central axis of the tibial proximal and femoral distal medullary cavities. The femoral, tibial, and combined angular discrepancies were measured in the sagittal plane. On the femoral side, the Mako mechanical axis was more likely to be located in an extended position relative to the manual intramedullary axis (56 of 60 knees). The median angular discrepancy was 2.46° (interquartile range [IQR], 1.56° to 3.43° [range, -1.06° to 5.24°]). On the tibial side, the Mako mechanical axis was likely to be located in a flexed position relative to the manual intramedullary axis (57 of 60 knees). The median angular discrepancy was 2.40° (IQR, 1.87° to 2.84° [range, -0.79° to 4.20°]). The angular discrepancy of the femoral-tibial sagittal angle was 4.63° (IQR, 3.71° to 5.64° [range, 1.20° to 9.02°]). Compared with manual TKA, the Mako system is more likely to result in a decreased posterior tibial slope and extension of the femoral prosthesis. It may also influence the evaluation of lower-extremity extension and flexion. When using the Mako system, special attention should be given to these discrepancies. Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Morphometric Study of the Distal Femoral Resected Surface In Osteoarthritis Knees of the Patients in Southwest China and a Comparison with Femoral Components in Six Total Knee Arthroplasty Systems.

Mismatch between the femoral component and the resected surface is related to the postoperative clinical outcome. This study aimed to measure the morphometric features of the distal femoral resected surfaces in patients with osteoarthritis in southwestern China and to compare the measured morphometric data with six commonly used total knee arthroplasty (TKA) femoral components in China. The computer tomography (CT) images of a total of 406 knees from 203 osteoarthritis patients who underwent TKA from January 2018 to December 2021 were imported into Mimics 21.0 software to reconstruct the three-dimensional (3D) model of the femur. Morphometric data of the distal femoral resected surfaces were measured after the completion of simulated bone resection in the software. The data included the medial-lateral (ML) dimension, anterior-posterior (AP) dimension, and the aspect ratio (AR) (AR=ML/AP), which were compared between genders with independent sample t-tests. In addition, we plotted the scatter diagram of those morphometric data in Origin software, and the linear fits of ML versus AP and AR versus AP were performed and compared for the six femoral components commonly used in enrolled patients in China. The mean ML dimension, the mean AP dimension, and the mean AR value measured for Chinese knees were 66.62 ± 4.57 mm, 58.10 ± 3.74 mm, and 1.15 ± 0.06 respectively. All dimensions were significantly larger in males than in females, including the calculated values for AR (P< 0.05). The fitted lines for males showed that the ML dimensions tended to be wider compared to femoral components of a given AP dimension. Females tended to have wider ML dimensions compared to small femoral components and, on the other hand, narrower ML dimensions compared to large femoral components. The femoral component of the current commonly used TKA prosthesis in China may not be perfectly matched to the distal femoral resected surface of patients in southwestern China. Male patients tended to underhang in all dimensions of the ML dimension. Female patients with shorter AP lengths are more likely to experience underhang, whereas those with longer AP lengths are more likely to develop overhangs. Therefore, we recommend multiple ML width options for a given AP length to more appropriately match the Chinese femoral anatomy.

Anatomical risk factors for aseptic loosening of full hinge knee prosthesis in primary and revision TKAs.

Risk factors (RF) associated with aseptic loosening (AL) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are poorly understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the anatomical shape variations in relation to the inner-diameter of the femur and the tibia as prognostic RF for AL of full hinge prosthesis (FHP) in primary and revision TKA. We retrospectively examined all patients, who underwent revision surgery (2003-2018) due to AL of the FHP in primary (n = 38) and revision TKA (n = 46). Diagnosis-appropriate controls without AL at minimum follow-up of 24months were randomly collected for each group. Besides other risk factors, we also measured the inner diameter of the femur according to the Citak classification and of the tibia on anteroposterior radiographies. RF for AL are younger age in primary and revision as well as > 1 previous surgeries in revision TKA. The femoral index was shown to be a RF for AL in revision TKA (p = 0.001), but not in primary TKA. The novel tibial index was associated with AL in primary with AUC 0.776 (95% CI 0.67, 0.88), 65.8% sensitivity, 86.6% specificity and in revision TKA with AUC 0.817 (95% CI 0.73, 0.91), 82.6% sensitivity and 71.7% specificity. This is the first study to calculate the tibial measurements and the tibial index according to Citak et al. and to identify them as prognostic RF for AL of the full hinge knee prosthesis in TKA and confirm the femoral index as a RF for AL also in revision full hinge knee prosthesis. Therefore, the preoperative radiological evaluation should include the analysis of the anatomical shape variants in order to select the appropriate prosthesis design with a possibly enhanced prognosis.

Design Optimisation of Bi-Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Prosthesis via Taguchi Methods

Total knee replacement has become a viable option for treating severe knee arthritis. The demand for more kinematically functional implants that better replicate natural knee kinematics led to the development of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including bi-cruciate-retaining (BCR) TKA. However, optimised design parameters of BCR TKA knee implants that can help achieve a long-term prosthetic survival rate remain unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of the design parameters of BCR TKA knee implants on the mechanics of knee joints and optimise and individualise the knee implant design parameters using the Taguchi method incorporating finite element analysis. Herein, experimental factors and levels were selected and nine finite element models of BCR TKA knee implants were developed to optimise the design of the following parameters: the curvature ratio on the sagittal plane, curvature ratio on the coronal plane, and tibial slope. In addition, finite element analysis was used to determine the effect of the design parameters on the peak contact stress on ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and its deformation. Consequently, among the three parameters that affect the peak contact stress and its deformation, the curvature ratio on the sagittal plane had the greatest effect (range = 10.96), followed by the curvature ratio on the coronal plane (range = 3.54), and the tibial slope (range = 2.56). The optimal design parameters for the BCR TKA knee implant were a curvature ratio of 1.5 on both the sagittal and coronal planes and a tibial slope of 5°. Under these conditions, the peak contact stress and deformation were 25.80 MPa and 0.0835 mm, respectively. The optimisation method based on finite element analysis and the Taguchi method can produce one of the highest-performing BCR TKA knee implant designs, thereby reducing the peak contact stress and deformation. This method sheds fresh light on the development of the BCR TKA knee implant as well as biomechanical decision-making to implant the TKA prosthesis correctly.

Mid-term clinical outcomes of a posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis for Japanese patients: A minimum follow-up of 5 years

BackgroundA high–flexion posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis has been developed for the Asian population. The component design was based on computed tomography images of Japanese osteoarthritic knees. The femoral component is composed of zirconia ceramics, which exhibit low friction and high durability. The present study aimed to evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes of this implant. MethodsThis study included 334 knees of 210 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with this implant at our hospital between October 2010 and December 2014. The patients comprised 28 men and 172 women with an average age of 73 years. The average follow-up period was 5.9 years, and the follow-up rate was 71.1%. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society scoring system, 2011 Knee Society questionnaire, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis was performed to determine the cumulative prosthesis survival rate. ResultsIn terms of clinical outcomes at the final follow-up, the average ranges of motion were −2.0 in extension and 126.7 in flexion. The Knee Society knee and function scores were 94.2% and 72.6%, respectively. With revision surgery or radiographic failure for any reason as the endpoint, the survival rates at 5 and 9 years were 98.2% and 95.5%, respectively. The most common reason for revision surgery or radiological failure was aseptic loosening. ConclusionsDespite several revision cases mainly due to aseptic loosening, the present study found that this new high-flexion posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty prosthesis design showed comparable results for Asian populations with other PS prosthesis. Levels of evidenceLevel Ⅱ (Prospective cohort study).

Posterior-Stabilized Versus Cruciate-Retaining Prostheses for Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Risk of Bias Considerations.

Numerous systematic reviews have been published comparing the outcomes of patients undergoing posterior stabilized (PS) versus cruciate-retaining (CR) procedures in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but with some overlaps and contradictions. The objectives of this study were (1) to perform an overview of current systematic reviews comparing PS versus CR in TKA, by evaluating their methodological quality and risk of bias, and (2) to provide recommendations through the best evidence. A systematic search of systematic reviews comparing PS and CR in TKA, published until June 2021 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Included systematic reviews were assessed for methodological quality and risk of bias by the AMSTAR2 instrument and ROBIS tool, respectively. The choice of best evidence was conducted according to the Jadad decision algorithm. A total of eight systematic reviews were eligible for inclusion in this study. The Jadad decision algorithm suggested that reviews with the highest AMSTAR2 scores should be selected. According to the ROBIS tool, there were three reviews with a low risk of bias and five with a high risk of bias. Consequently, one systematic review conducted by Verra et al. with the highest AMSTAR2 score and low risk of bias was selected as the best evidence. Although current systematic reviews demonstrated some statistical differences in clinical presentation and functional outcomes between PS and CR, the current outcome indicators cannot be taken to provide recommendations for undergoing PS or CR. The decision for prosthesis selection could be made mostly based on the surgeon's preference, indications and other indicators.

A Cadaveric Study Addressing the Feasibility of Remote Patient Monitoring Prosthesis for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, there has been a marked rise in the use of telemedicine to evaluate patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of our study was to assess a novel stem with an embedded sensor that can remotely and objectively monitor a patient's mobility after TKA. A single anatomically designed knee system was implanted in concert with an interconnected tibial stem extension containing 3D accelerometers, 3D gyroscopes, a power source, and a telemetry transmission capability in 3 cadaveric pelvis to toe specimens. The legs were moved by hand to preset tibial positions at full knee extension, midflexion, flexion, and back to midflexion and extension for a total of 16 trials across 6 knees. Sensor data were successfully transmitted with good quality of signal to an external base station. Good correlation to the range of motion of the tibia was found (mean error 0.1 degrees; root mean square error 3.8 degrees). The signal from the heel drop tests suggests the sensor could detect heel strike during activities of daily living invivo and the potential for additional signal processing to analyze vibratory and motion patterns detected by the sensors. A frequency domain analysis of a properly cemented and poorly cemented implant during the heel drop test suggests a difference in accelerometer signal in these implant states. The results confirm signals generated from an embedded TKA sensor can transmit through bone and cement, providing accurate range of motion data and may be capable of detecting changes in prosthesis fixation remotely.

Morphometric analysis of the Filipino knee and its implication in total knee arthroplasty prosthesis design

BackgroundProsthesis factors account for a quarter of the dissatisfaction rates among post-total knee replacement (TKR) patients. In the Philippines, the available prostheses have pre-determined sizes and dimensions that are based on Caucasian morphometric data. This can pose a problem, since according to previous studies Asian knees have smaller dimensions compared to Caucasians. Since there is a paucity of research looking into the fitness of these prostheses to the Filipino knee, this study was pursued.MethodsThis study measured 675 knees of 675 adult Filipinos from January 2018 to December 2020. The morphometric measurements were performed on T1-weighted magnetic resonance images. The distal femoral morphometry included: the anteroposterior distance, lateral and medial anteroposterior distances, mediolateral distance, anterior and posterior mediolateral distances, and the femoral aspect ratio. The proximal tibial morphometry included: the anteroposterior distance, mediolateral distance, the medial and lateral anteroposterior distances, and the tibial aspect ratio. The patellar height, width, and thickness were also determined. Statistical analyses were done by using SPSS (version 26) and Microsoft Excel (version 2016).ResultsThe mean femoral medial and lateral anteroposterior distances were 57.6 mm and 57.1 mm, respectively. The femoral mediolateral distance was 69.3 mm, and the mean femoral aspect ratio was 1.21. The mean proximal tibial antero-posterior and mediolateral distances were 45.3 mm and 71.9 mm, respectively. The mean tibial aspect ratio was 1.66. Most TKR prostheses can be fitted to the Filipino knee but underhang on the mediolateral aspect is commonly observed in both the femoral and tibial components. The mean patellar height and width of Filipinos were 39.6 mm and 42.6 mm, respectively while the average thickness was 23.1 mm.ConclusionMost prostheses available in the Philippine and Asian markets can be fitted into Filipino knees albeit the underhang observed in the mediolateral aspects of both femoral and tibial components. Potential patellar complications are unlikely given the adequate thickness. To avoid the potential mismatch, the best approach is to design a prosthesis aptly suited for the Filipino knees.

Value of personalized extramedullary positioning technique on tibia side for coronal alignment of tibial prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty

To explore the coronal alignment of tibial prosthesis after osteotomy using personalized extramedullary positioning technique on tibia side in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A clinical data of 170 patients (210 knees) who underwent primary TKA between January 2020 and June 2021 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. Personalized and traditional extramedullary positioning techniques were used in 93 cases (114 knees, personalized positioning group) and 77 cases (96 knees, traditional positioning group), respectively. The personalized extramedullary positioning was based on the anatomical characteristics of the tibia, a personalized positioning point was selected as the proximal extramedullary positioning point on the articular surface of the tibial plateau. There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, body mass index, surgical side, course of osteoarthritis, and Kellgren-Lawrence classification ( P>0.05). The preoperative tibial bowing angle (TBA) formed by the proximal and distal tibial coronal anatomical axes in the personalized positioning group was measured and the tibia axis was classified, and the distribution of personalized positioning point was analyzed. The pre- and post-operative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), the lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA), and the postoperative tibia component angle (TCA), the excellent rate of tibial prosthesis alignment in coronal position were compared between the two groups. In the personalized positioning group, 58 knees (50.88%) were straight tibia, 35 knees (30.70%) were medial bowing tibia, and 21 knees (18.42%) were lateral bowing tibia. The most positioning points located on the highest point of the lateral intercondylar spine (62.07%) in the straight tibia group, while in the medial bowing tibia and lateral bowing tibia groups, most positioning points located in the area between the medial and lateral intercondylar spines (51.43%) and the lateral slope of the lateral intercondylar spine (57.14%), respectively. The difference in HKA between pre- and post-operation in the two groups was significant ( P<0.05); while the difference in LDTA was not significant ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in preoperative LDTA and HKA and the difference between pre- and post-operation between groups ( P>0.05). But there was significant difference in postoperative TCA between groups ( P<0.05). The postoperative tibial plateau prosthesis in the traditional positioning group was more prone to varus than the personalized positioning group. The excellent rates of tibial prosthesis alignment in coronal position were 96.5% (110/114) and 87.5% (84/96) in personalized positioning group and traditional positioning group, respectively, showing a significant difference between groups ( χ 2=7.652, P=0.006). It is feasible to use personalized extramedullary positioning technique for coronal osteotomy on the tibia side in TKA. Compared with the traditional extramedullary positioning technique, the personalized extramedullary positioning technique has a higher excellent rate of tibial prosthesis alignment in coronal position.

The effect of polyethylene thickness on revision rates of contemporary cruciate retaining knee replacements. A registry analysis

BackgroundAn attribute that may influence knee replacement survivorship is tibial polyethylene (PE) insert thickness. Previous studies have suggested thin polyethylene made from ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) leads to higher rates of revision surgery. This study aimed to determine if modern polyethylene thickness is associated with altered survivorship of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. MethodsA retrospective analysis of data from Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) was done on well performing total knee arthroplasty prostheses used in Australia from 1999-2018. Six of the best performing minimally stabilized prostheses were examined and categorized into three PE thickness subgroups: A (≤10 mm), B (11–14 mm) and C (≥15 mm). There were 185,539 TKA procedures, of which 64.3% (n = 119,382) were ≤ 10 mm, 33.5% (n = 62,173) 11–14 mm, and 2.2% (n = 3984) ≥ 15 mm. Differences in revision rates were analysed for all causes, including loosening, wear, and instability. ResultsAt 14 years, respective cumulative point revision (CPR) was A: 4.8, B: 4.2 and C: 6.0. The thickest polyethylene group (≥15 mm) had a higher rate of revision for any reason compared to both 11–14 mm and ≤ 10 mm groups. When non-XLPE was analysed the ≤ 10 mm group had higher rates of revision compared to the 11–14 mm group, but this difference was not seen with XLPE. ConclusionHigher rates of revision were seen overall in the thicker PE group (≥15 mm). This group also had higher rates of revision for loosening, instability, and infection. The use of a thicker insert may be a sign of surgical complexity, but is associated with increased revision.

"Systematic review and meta-analysis of ceramic coated implants in total knee arthroplasty. Comparable mid-term results to uncoated implants."

Nitride-based ceramic coatings, such as titanium nitride (TiN) and titanium niobium nitride (TiNbN), have been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to enhance the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of knee components, harden the metal surface and reduce CoCrMo exposure and metal ion release. However, the theoretical advantages of these ceramic coatings in TKA have yet to be fully elucidated. This systematic review aimed to provide clinical evidence on mid-term outcomes of ceramic-coated knee prostheses in comparison with uncoated standard CoCrMo knee prostheses in primary TKA. The hypothesis was that ceramic-coated implants can be used in primary TKA with no inferior outcomes compared to uncoated CoCrMo implants. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to find all clinical studies regarding primary TKA with ceramic-coated knee prostheses. MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from 1990 to October 2020 to identify relevant studies for the first qualitative analysis. Using PICOS eligibility criteria, a subgroup of the selected studies was used to perform a meta-analysis. Fifteen studies were included in this systematic review, of which six were included in the meta-analysis: 3 randomized controlled trials, 2 retrospective comparative studies and 1 prospective cross-sectional study. Pooled data overall included 321 coated TKAs vs. 359 uncoated TKAs and a mean follow-up of 4.6years (range, 2-10years). No significant difference in the implant survival risk ratio with revision or reoperation due to any reason was found between coated and uncoated TKAs, even considering the RCT study subgroup with a risk ratio of 1.02 (P = 0.34). No significant differences were found for postoperative complications, clinical scores, or metal blood concentrations at 1year. The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support the statement that ceramic-coated TKAs are not inferior to uncoated TKAs, showing comparable survival rates, complication rates and clinical outcomes. There is strong evidence that ceramic-coated TKA does not improve the clinical results or survival rate in comparison with uncoated TKA. II, Therapeutic.

Hyperextension following two different designs of fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Hyperextension after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is related to worse functional outcomes. Among the reported predictive factors, it is unclear whether prosthesis design affects postoperative hyperextension. Hence, our objectives were to (1) compare time-dependent changes of the extension angle following multi-radius (MR) and single-radius (SR) TKA and (2) assess predictive factors for the hyperextension. In this study, consecutive 136 MR TKAs and consecutive 71 SR TKAs performed by a single surgeon were reviewed. The extension angle was evaluated by digitized full-extension lateral radiographs at preoperative, 3months and at 1 and 2years after TKA. A positive value was defined as hyperextension. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine predictive factors for the extension angle and the risk of hyperextension > 5°. The postoperative extension angle of both groups gradually increased during the first 2years and the SR group finally progressed with 4.04° greater extension than the MR group (p < 0.01). The incidence of hyperextension > 5° in the SR group was 18.3% and for the MR group, 7.4% (p = 0.02). However, the Oxford knee scores was nonsignificant different between the groups (p = 0.15). Preoperative extension angle, sagittal femoral component angle (SFA) and SR prosthesis were predictive factors for the extension angle at 2years after TKA and were also associated with hyperextension > 5°. The extension angle of the SR group became significantly more extended than that of the MR group during the first two years after TKA. Hence, ideal extension position immediately after SR TKA may be different from that of the MR TKA prosthesis. The preoperative extension angle, SFA and SR prosthesis were factors that were associated with postoperative hyperextension.