Prostate-specific Antigen Velocity Research Articles

Upgrading on Per Protocol versus For Cause surveillance prostate biopsies: An opportunity to decreasing the burden of active surveillance.

Most prostate cancer (PC) active surveillance (AS) protocols recommend "Per Protocol" surveillance biopsy (PPSBx) every 1-3 years, even if clinical and imaging parameters remained stable. Herein, we compared the incidence of upgrading on biopsies that met criteria for "For Cause" surveillance biopsy (FCSBx) versus PPSBx. We retrospectively reviewed men with GG1 PC on AS in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) registry. Surveillance prostate biopsies obtained 1 year after diagnosis were classified as either PPSBx or FCSBx. Biopsies were retrospectively deemed FCSBx if any of these criteria were met: PSA velocity > 0.75 ng/mL/year; rise in PSA > 3 ng from baseline; surveillance magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (sMRI) with a PIRADS ≥ 4; change in DRE. Biopsies were classified PPSBx if none of these criteria were met. The primary outcome was upgrading to ≥GG2 or ≥GG3 on surveillance biopsy. The secondary objective was to assess for the association of reassuring (PIRADS ≤ 3) confirmatory or surveillance MRI findings and upgrading for patients undergoing PPSBx. Proportions were compared with the chi-squared test. We identified 1773 men with GG1 PC in MUSIC who underwent a surveillance biopsy. Men meeting criteria for FCSBx had more upgrading to ≥GG2 (45%) and ≥GG3 (12%) compared with those meeting criteria for PPSBx (26% and 4.9%, respectively, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Men with a reassuring confirmatory or surveillance MRI undergoing PPSBx had less upgrading to ≥GG2 (17% and 17%, respectively) and ≥GG3 (2.9% and 1.8%, respectively) disease compared with men without an MRI (31% and 7.4%, respectively). Patients undergoing PPSBx had significantly less upgrading compared with men undergoing FCSBx. Confirmatory and surveillance MRI seem to be valuable tools to stratify the intensity of surveillance biopsies for men on AS. These data may help inform the development of a risk-stratified, data driven AS protocol.

A big data-based prediction model for prostate cancer incidence in Japanese men

To define a normal range for PSA values (ng/mL) by age and create a prediction model for prostate cancer incidence. We conducted a retrospective analysis using 263,073 observations of PSA values in Japanese men aged 18–98 years (2007–2017), including healthy men and those diagnosed with prostate cancer. Percentiles for 262,639 PSA observations in healthy men aged 18–70 years were calculated and plotted to elucidate the normal fluctuation range for PSA values by age. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to develop a predictive model for prostate cancer incidence. PSA levels and PSA velocity increased with age in healthy men. However, there was no difference in PSA velocity with age in men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Logistic regression analysis showed an increased risk of prostate cancer for PSA slopes ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 ng/mL/year. This study provides age-specific normal fluctuation ranges for PSA levels in men aged 18–75 years and presents a novel and personalized prediction model for prostate cancer incidence. We found that PSA slope values of > 3.5 ng/mL/year may indicate a rapid increase in PSA levels caused by pathological condition such as inflammation but are unlikely to indicate cancer risk.

MP38-07 UPGRADING ON PER PROTOCOL VS FOR CAUSE SURVEILLANCE PROSTATE BIOPSIES: AN OPPORTUNITY TO DECREASING THE BURDEN OF ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP38-07 UPGRADING ON PER PROTOCOL VS FOR CAUSE SURVEILLANCE PROSTATE BIOPSIES: AN OPPORTUNITY TO DECREASING THE BURDEN OF ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE Michael Wang, Andrew Lange, David Perlman, Ji Qi, Arvin George, Stephanie Ferrante, Alice Semerjian, Richard Sarle, Michael Cher, Kevin Ginsburg, and For the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative Michael WangMichael Wang More articles by this author , Andrew LangeAndrew Lange More articles by this author , David PerlmanDavid Perlman More articles by this author , Ji QiJi Qi More articles by this author , Arvin GeorgeArvin George More articles by this author , Stephanie FerranteStephanie Ferrante More articles by this author , Alice SemerjianAlice Semerjian More articles by this author , Richard SarleRichard Sarle More articles by this author , Michael CherMichael Cher More articles by this author , Kevin GinsburgKevin Ginsburg More articles by this author , and For the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003276.07AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Most prostate cancer (PC) active surveillance (AS) protocols recommend “per protocol” surveillance biopsy (PPSBx) every 1-3 years, even if clinical and imaging parameters remained stable. Herein, we compared the incidence of upgrading on biopsies that met criteria for “for cause” surveillance biopsy (FCSBx) vs PPSBx. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed men with GG1 PC on AS in the Michigan Urological Surgical Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) registry. Prostate biopsies obtained one year after diagnosis were classified as either PPSBx or FCSBx. Biopsies were retrospectively deemed as FCSBx if any of these criteria were met: PSA velocity >0.75ng/ mL/year; rise in PSA >3ng from baseline; surveillance MRI (sMRI) with a PIRADS ≥4; change in DRE. Biopsies were classified as PPSBx if none of these criteria were met. MRI obtained within 1 year of diagnosis was considered a confirmatory MRI (cMRI), not sMRI. The primary outcome was upgrading to ≥GG2 or ≥GG3 on surveillance biopsy. Secondary objective was to assess for the association of cMRI and sMRI with biopsy upgrading in men undergoing PPSBx. Proportions were compared with the chi-squared test. RESULTS: We identified 1,773 men diagnosed with GG1 PC in MUSIC from 2016 to 2020 that underwent a surveillance biopsy, of which 41% and 59% met criteria for FCSBx and PPSBx, respectively. Men meeting criteria for FCSBx had more upgrading to ≥GG2 (45%) and ≥GG3 (12%) compared to those meeting criteria for PPSBx (26% and 4.9%, respectively, p<0.001 and p<0.001). Men who had PIRADS 1-3 on cMRI or sMRI undergoing PPSBx had even less upgrading to ≥GG2 (17% and 17%, respectively) and ≥GG3 (2.9% and 1.8%, respectively). In the unique scenario in which men had both a cMRI and sMRI with PIRADS 1-3 (n=28), only 14% were upgraded to ≥GG2 and no patients were upgraded to ≥GG3 (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing PPSBx had significantly less upgrading compared to those undergoing FCSBx. Due to the low upgrading seen with PPSBx in men with stable clinical parameters, especially men with non-concerning cMRI or sMRIs, patients and their urologists may omit a PPSBx after a detailed shared decision making process. Source of Funding: funding from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e526 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Michael Wang More articles by this author Andrew Lange More articles by this author David Perlman More articles by this author Ji Qi More articles by this author Arvin George More articles by this author Stephanie Ferrante More articles by this author Alice Semerjian More articles by this author Richard Sarle More articles by this author Michael Cher More articles by this author Kevin Ginsburg More articles by this author For the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

PSMA-11 PET/CT for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer in Patients With Negative Choline PET/CT.

Prostate adenocarcinoma (CaP) is the leading cancer in men. After curative treatment, from 27% to 53% of patients will experience biochemical recurrence (BR). With the development of focal therapies, precise early identification of recurrence's sites is of utmost importance in order to deliver individualized treatment on positive lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the detection rate (DR) of 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in selected patients with prostate cancer BR and recent negative 18F-choline PET/CT. We performed a retrospective analysis including all patients with CaP referred for BR with a negative 18F-choline PET/CT, and who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT between October, 2018 and December, 2019. The overall DR of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was calculated, and described according to BR characteristics especially PSA levels and velocity. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Patient management following 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and PSA levels evolution after treatment were also recorded. One hundred fifty-nine patients comprising 164 examinations were analyzed. The overall DR of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for BR was 65.9% (95CI, 58.6-73.1). The DR was 52.5% (95CI, 39.9-65.0), 70.6% (95CI, 55.3-85.9), 70.4% (95CI, 53.1-87.6), and 78.6% (95CI, 66.2-91.0) for PSA levels between 0.2 and 0.49 ng/mL, 0.5 to 0.99 ng/mL, 1 to 1.99 ng/mL and PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL, respectively. The DR was 70.7% (95CI, 59.0-82.4) with a PSA doubling time (PSA-DT) ≤6 months and 65.2% (95CI, 55.5-74.9) with a PSA-DT >6 months. Around 3/4 of patients (75.9%) with a positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT initiated treatment, including surgery (2.4%), stereotactic radiotherapy ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (22%) or external conformational radiotherapy ± ADT (46.3%). Patient management changed in 43 cases (39.8%). Our study confirmed the ability of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT to detect occult biochemical recurrence, even in a selected population of CaP patients with negative 18F-choline PET/CT, even at low PSA levels.

Outcomes and prognostic predictors of Lu-177 PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (Asian Population Study).

Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) is a promising therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but there is limited data of its efficacy and safety in Asian population. We aim to explore the clinical outcomes of Lu-177 PSMA-RLT in this population. We evaluated 84 patients with progressive mCRPC receiving Lu-177 PSMA-RLT between 9 May 2018 and 21 February 2022. Lu-177-PSMA-I&T was administered at 6-8-week intervals. Primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PFS), PSA response rate, clinical response, toxicity assessment, and prognostic indicators. The median OS and PSA PFS were 12.2 and 5.2 months, respectively. PSA decline of ≥50% was observed in 51.8% of patients. Patients achieving PSA response had longer median OS (15.0 vs. 9.5 months, p=.03) and PSA PFS (6.5 vs. 2.9 months, p<.001). Pain score improvement was seen in 19 out of 34 patients. A hematotoxicity of ≥grade 3 was observed in 13 out of 78 patients. Multivariable analyses showed that PSA velocity, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin (Hb), and the number of treatment cycles were independent prognostic indicators for OS. The retrospective design was the main limitation of the study. Our study demonstrated a similar safety and efficacy of Lu-177 PSMA-RLT in Asian mCRPC patients compared to the existing literature. A PSA decline ≥50% was associated with longer OS and PSA PFS. Several prognostic indicators for patient outcomes were also identified.

The risk of prostate cancer on incidental finding of an avid prostate uptake on 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for non-prostate cancer-related pathology: A single centre retrospective study

ObjectiveTo review the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) in men with incidentally reported increased intraprostatic uptake at 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) ordered at Department of Urology, The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia for non-PCa related pathology. MethodsRetrospective analysis of consecutive men between August 2014 and August 2019 presenting to a single institution for 18F-FDG PET/CT for non-prostate related conditions was conducted. Men were classified as benign, indeterminate, or malignant depending of the results of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA velocity, biopsy histopathology, and three-Tesla (3 T) multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, or gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) PET/CT results. ResultsThree percent (273/9122) of men demonstrated 18F-FDG avidity within the prostate. Eighty-five percent (231/273) were further investigated, including with PSA tests (227/231, 98.3%), 3 T mpMRI (68/231, 29.4%), 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT (33/231, 14.3%), and prostate biopsy (57/231, 24.7%). Results were considered benign in 130/231 (56.3%), indeterminate in 31/231 (13.4%), and malignant in 70/231 (30.3%). PCa was identified in 51/57 (89.5%) of the men who proceeded to biopsy, including 26/27 (96.3%) men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores 4–5 mpMRI and six men with a positive 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. The most common Gleason score on biopsy was greater than or equal to 4+5 (14/51, 27.5%). 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was concordant with the 18F-FDG findings in 26/33 (78.8%). All 13 men with a positive concordant 18F-FDG, 3 T mpMRI, and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT had PCa on biopsy. There was no statistically significant difference in the 18F-FDG maximum standardized uptake value between the benign or malignant groups (5.7 vs. 6.1; p=0.580). ConclusionIn this study, after an incidental finding of an avid intraprostatic lesion on 18F-FDG PET/CT, 70 of the 231 cases (30.3%; 0.8% of the entire cohort) had results consistent with PCa, most commonly as Gleason score greater than or equal to 4+5 disease. Unless there is limited life expectancy due to competing medical co-morbidity, men with an incidental finding of intraprostatic uptake on 18F-FDG should be further investigated using principles of PCa detection.

Prostate-specific antigen kinetics contributes to decision making for biopsy referral: the predictive implication for PSA retest in patients with elevated PSA levels.

It is common to repeat prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements for men with PSA elevation before prostate biopsy. In this scenario, they may have considerable psychological distress in fear of the presence of cancer until retests. We assessed possible clinical factors causing transient PSA rise and explored the parameters predictive of subsequent PSA change. As interfering conditions, the history of ejaculation, bicycling, and any types of infections were assessed using the questionnaire. The pattern of PSA change was compared in association with the various clinical factors. Predictive significance of PSA kinetics such as coefficient of variation (CV) and PSA velocity (PSAV) for PSA values at retest was evaluated. The rate of reversion to the normal range was 38.3% at retest. The rate of 12.8% of men showed a large increase by ≥20%, whereas 38.2% of men showed a large decline by ≥20% from the baseline. Men with younger age (≤60 years), small prostate (<20cc), and prior history of ejaculation or infections showed significantly larger PSA decrease than their counterparts. Those with large CV or PSAV before the baseline more frequently showed PSA decrease below the age-specific cutoff or decline by ≥10% from the baseline at retest. These parameters associated with PSA kinetics had independent predictive values for relevant PSA change at retest. Ejaculation and any types of infections should be avoided before PSA tests. Men with large PSA fluctuation before the baseline are likely to show a significant PSA decrease at retest. This predictive information may help both physicians to determine whether to proceed to an immediate biopsy and patients to reduce their psychological burden.

Factors impacting on sexual function among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Active surveillance (AS) aims to reduce overtreatment and minimize the negative side effects of radical therapies (i.e., prostatectomy or radiotherapy) while preserving quality of life. However, a substantial proportion of men can experience a decline in sexual function during AS follow-up. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of declining sexual function among men on AS. Men enrolled from 2008 to 2018 in the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative registry-a prospective clinical registry-were studied. Sexual function outcomes were measured using expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC-26) at baseline and 12-months postdiagnosis. Multivariable regression models adjusted for baseline score and other sociodemographic and clinical factors were applied to identify predictors of sexual function score at 12-months. A total of 554 men were included. Variables that showed significant association with decline in sexual function score at 12-months were: having two or more biopsies after diagnosis (mean change score (MCS): -16.3, p < 0.001) compared with no biopsy, higher number of positive biopsy cores (MCS: -1.6, p = 0.004), being in older age category (above 70 vs. below 60: MCS: -16.7, p < 0.001; 65-70 vs. below 60: MCS: -9.7, p = 0.024), having had depression (MCS: -9.0, p = 0.020), and impaired physical function (MCS: -10.0, p = 0.031). Greater socioeconomic advantage (highest vs. lowest quintile: MCS: 15.7, p = 0.022) and year of diagnosis (MCS: 2.6 for every year, p < 0.001) were positively associated with 12-months sexual function score. Neither biopsy type, biopsy timing nor PSA velocity were associated with declines in sexual function. Our findings suggest that multiple factors affected sexual function during AS. Interventions towardreducing the number of biopsies through less invasive monitory approaches, screening for physical and mental well-being, and targeted emotional support and counseling services may be helpful for men on AS.

A phase II trial modifying metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk for patients with prostate cancer on ADT using a risk factor modification program and continuous Fitbit monitoring (ProTrio).

TPS273 Background: Prostate cancer is a disease of older age, and there is significant overlap with age-related illnesses. Androgens play a critical role in prostate cancer but also have been linked to cardiovascular (CV) disease, metabolic syndrome, bone health, and frailty. ADT is associated with an increased risk of CV events primarily due to increased rates of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and adverse changes in body composition. We assume that prostate cancer and age-related illnesses share biology with therapeutic implications in a subset of men. The ProTrio trial will test the hypothesis that a 16-week digital risk factor modification program will improve 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score as compared to usual care in men with potentially lethal prostate cancer receiving ADT. Methods: This single center, open-label, randomized phase II trial is evaluating a 16-week digital risk factor modification program, which includes an exercise prescription (150 minutes of titrated cardiovascular exercise and resistance exercise 2 times a week) with support via a smart phone application (Moving Analytics) and Fitbit, in patients with prostate cancer who are receiving ADT compared to usual care with Fitbit monitoring. Eligible patients are men receiving ADT +/- an androgen signaling inhibitor for at least 3 months prior to enrollment. The study will enroll to two cohorts: (1) distant metastatic disease and (2) biochemically recurrent or regional lymph node disease. Patients will be stratified according to their baseline ASCVD risk score. The primary endpoint is the difference in ASCVD risk score post-intervention. Secondary endpoints include difference in metabolic severity index z-score, PSA velocity, 6-minute walk, 5X Sit-to-Stand, body composition, physical activity measured by Fitbit, and health-related quality of life. Up to 100 patients will be enrolled in each cohort. A clinically relevant improvement in ASCVD score reduction is 2.5%. With 44 men per arm, after 12% dropout, we can detect an improvement of 2.5% vs. 0% at a 2-sided 5% significance level with 80% power assuming a standard deviation (SD) of 4.125%. A sample size adjustment is planned based on the SD of the first cohort to reach 44 patients. Each cohort will undergo futility analysis once half the men are enrolled. The study is enrolling at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Clinical trial information: NCT05054296 .

PRIMARY2: A phase III, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial investigating the additive diagnostic value of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in men with negative/equivocal MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.

TPS397 Background: Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has an established role for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (sPCa), with superior diagnostic accuracy compared with transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy alone. PRIMARY demonstrated significant improvement in sensitivity (97% vs 83%) and negative predictive value (91% vs 72%) with the addition of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (PSMA PET/CT) vs MRI alone. Furthermore, 38% of patients with PI-RADS 2 or 3 were true negative on PSMA PET/CT, a population which may potentially benefit from avoiding transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB). We hypothesize that the addition of PSMA PET/CT is non-inferior to MRI for the detection of sPCa in men with PI-RADS 2-3 disease, while providing the advantages of reducing unnecessary biopsies and limiting to targeted-only TPPB. Methods: This multi-centre, two-arm, randomized controlled, phase III trial will recruit 660 men with high clinical suspicion of sPC. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio in permuted blocks, stratified by center. In the experimental arm, participants will undergo a pelvic PSMA PET/CT. Local and central reviewers will interpret independently, based on the PRIMARY Score. Participants with a positive result will undergo targeted-TPPB, whereas those with negative PSMA PET/CT will avoid biopsy. In the control arm, all participants undergo template-TPPB. Patients will continue follow-up for subsequent clinical care for up to two years post-randomization. Key eligibility criteria include an MRI result of PI-RADS 2 with at least one red flag [PSA density &gt;0.1, abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE), strong family history, BRCA mutation, PSA &gt;10, PSA doubling time &lt;36 months, PSA velocity &gt;0.75/year], or PI-RADS 3, having never undergone a prostate biopsy, &lt;cT3 on DRE, and PSA ≤20 ng/mL. The co-primary objectives are to estimate the percentage difference in sPCa between the experimental and control arms, and the percentage of participants who avoid TPPB in the experimental arm. The primary endpoints will be analyzed on the intention-to-treat principle. The main secondary objectives are the percentage difference between arms in insignificant prostate cancer, in complications following biopsy, in health-related quality of life, generalized anxiety, cancer worry, as well as the health economics impact. Patient enrolment began in March 2022, with recruitment expected to take 36 months. Clinical trial information: NCT05154162 .

Screening Asymptomatic Men for Prostate Cancer Using Prostate-Specific Antigen as An Early Detection Tool: A Review of Existing Literature

Prostate cancer remains the most common non-skin cancer in men. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is recognized as a biomarker for the diagnosis, monitoring, and risk prediction of prostate cancer. However, its role in prostate cancer screening has been controversial. While some authorities have recommended its use for screening, others have stated otherwise. Some clarity is required about its precise role in clinical practice. There need to be more consistent recommendations surrounding using PSA screening in clinical practice. Serum PSA measurements show variable reliability when screening for Prostate cancer, given the dynamics of PSA physiology and the conflicting results from two large, randomized control trials that sought to determine its role in prostate cancer screening and early detection. Hence surrogate measures like PSA density, PSA velocity, free-to-complexed PSA ratio, and percentage Pro-PSA among others, have been used to improve the predictive utility of this assay for Prostate cancer diagnosis. However, the debate on screening still lingers. The current review aims to highlight the controversies and objectively outline the current recommendations. This literature review examined scholarly papers and recommendations about the use of PSA for prostate cancer screening with the aim to rationalize the pros and cons of such approaches. We concluded that although more recent guidelines from the USPSTF recommend that screening be based on individual preference and professional judgment by the healthcare provider, differences in the specific details on how to best employ a PSA screening program still exist and require further review.

Intermediate-term oncological outcomes after a negative endorectal coil multiparametric MRI of the prostate in patients without biopsy proven prostate cancer

PurposeInvestigate the intermediate-term oncological outcome after negative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate in patients without biopsy proven prostate cancer (PCa). MethodsThe retrospective study included 121 patients with negative mpMRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 category<3) performed at our institution between 2012 and 2017 without known biopsy proven PCa. Clinical and pathological data were collated including post-MRI prostatic tissue diagnoses with highest Grade Group and most recent prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels up to any definitive prostate cancer treatment. Mean PSA velocities between patients with and without a subsequent diagnosis of Grade Group 2 or higher (GG2+) PCa were compared, and an optimal threshold value was calculated. ResultsOutcome data available included PSA values in 117 patients and prostate tissue sampling in 52 patients. Over a median follow up interval of 49.8 months, only 11 of 121 patients (9.1%) were diagnosed with GG2+ PCa, 10 patients (8.3%) with GG1 PCa, and 31 patients (25.6%) had negative prostate tissue samples. Mean PSA velocity was significantly higher in the patients diagnosed with GG2+ PCa (3.87 ng/mL/year) compared to those not diagnosed with GG2+ PCa (−0.71 ng/mL/year, p < 0.001). A threshold PSA velocity of 0.27 ng/mL/year had a 100% sensitivity and 69.8% specificity for GG2+ PCa (AUC: 0.898). Conclusion<10% of patients with negative mpMRI without prior biopsy proven PCa were diagnosed with GG2+ PCa over median follow up of over four years and were associated with PSA velocity of ≥0.27 ng/mL/year. PSA monitoring may be a reasonable management strategy in patients with a negative mpMRI without biopsy proven PCa.

Pathological predictors of 18 F-DCFPyL prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

ObjectivesTo assess the correlation of pathological radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen features and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) characteristics to imaging findings on subsequent 18F‐DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with biochemical failure (BF).Patients and MethodsRetrospective analysis of combined 18F‐DCFPyL PET/CT database of patients from centres in Australia and New Zealand was performed. A total of 205 patients presenting with BF after RP were included in this study. Imaging findings on 18F‐DCFPyL PET/CT were recorded and correlated with the PSA characteristics at BF and pathological features of the original tumour.ResultsOf the 205 patients, 120 (58.5%) had evidence of abnormal prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression compatible with recurrent prostate cancer. Increasing PSA velocity (P = 0.01), International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (P = 0.02), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.05) and nodal positivity (P = 0.02) at the time of RP were more likely to demonstrate PSMA positivity. Multivariable logistic regression revealed a higher PSA level prior to PSMA PET/CT (P < 0.01), adjuvant radiotherapy (P = 0.09), Gleason score ≥8 (P < 0.01) and nodal positivity (P = 0.05) were all predictive of PSMA positivity.Conclusion 18F‐DCFPyL PET/CT positivity, both generally and site specific, correlates with PSA and RP pathological factors. Our results echo cohorts focussing on post‐RP patients, those imaged with 68Ga‐PSMA and those concerning biochemical persistence. Nomograms that include risk factors for ‘PSMA‐positive recurrence’ in the BF population may increase the catchment of patients with disease confined to the prostate bed or pelvis who have a greater probability of prolonged disease‐free survival.

PD22-09 DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN BOUNCE AND BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE FOLLOWING STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022PD22-09 DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN BOUNCE AND BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE FOLLOWING STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER Ashley Monaco, Jessica Sommer, Jordan Mendelson, Jonathan Haas, Anthony Corcoran, and Aaron Katz Ashley MonacoAshley Monaco More articles by this author , Jessica SommerJessica Sommer More articles by this author , Jordan MendelsonJordan Mendelson More articles by this author , Jonathan HaasJonathan Haas More articles by this author , Anthony CorcoranAnthony Corcoran More articles by this author , and Aaron KatzAaron Katz More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002564.09AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: While prostate specific antigen (PSA) bounce following radiation therapy for prostate cancer (PCa) treatment is well established, the parameters to predict this occurrence and differentiate it from biochemical recurrence (BCR) following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are unknown. The purpose of this study is to investigate associations between pre-treatment and post-treatment variables among patients experiencing PSA bounce, BCR, or neither following SBRT. METHODS: An IRB-approved PCa database was reviewed for patients who underwent primary SBRT. Patients with less than 18 months of follow-up or were missing >3 PSA measurements following SBRT were excluded. Patients were divided into outcome groups experiencing PSA bounce, BCR, or neither. PSA bounce was defined as a rise of >0.2 ng/mL over the pre-rise nadir followed by a decline without intervention. BCR was defined by Phoenix criteria. Pre-treatment and post-treatment characteristics were analyzed between groups. Results that were significant when comparing PSA bounce to BCR were then analyzed in a multivariate logistic regression model to determine predictors for PSA bounce. RESULTS: We analyzed 170 men with a median age of 72 (52-87) years with an average follow-up time of 75 + 21 months, of which 28 (16%) experienced PSA bounce and 42 (25%) had BCR (Table 1). Pre-treatment D’Amico and Capra risk, Gleason group, PSA, prostate volume, prostate density and post-treatment PSA velocity were not associated with PSA bounce when compared to BCR or non-BCR/bounce cohorts. Compared to those who did not experience PSA bounce/BCR, those with PSA bounce were younger (p <.05), had lower PSA doubling time (p <.001), and took longer to reach PSA nadir (p <.001). Compared to BCR group, men with PSA bounce had lower PSA nadir and took longer to reach nadir, both of which were significant predictors for PSA bounce (OR: 4.3, p <.05; OR: 0.90, p <.001). PSA bounce occurred significantly earlier than BCR (16 vs. 33 months; p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: While there is overlap among patients who experience PSA bounce or BCR following SBRT, the timing of which the PSA rise occurs, the PSA nadir value, and the time to PSA nadir are useful variables in the management of a rising PSA in patients following SBRT. Source of Funding: Department of Urology, NYU Langone Hospital – Long Island © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e407 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ashley Monaco More articles by this author Jessica Sommer More articles by this author Jordan Mendelson More articles by this author Jonathan Haas More articles by this author Anthony Corcoran More articles by this author Aaron Katz More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with metachronous oligorecurrent prostate cancer: A single-center experience

Introduction and objectiveMetachronous oligorecurrence in prostate cancer (PCa) occurs in patients with localized disease who, after failed radical treatment, develop oligometastases. Metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) aims to delay androgen deprivation therapy. In this study, we report our experience to elucidate the role of SBRT in a selected population of patients with metachronous oligorecurrence. Material and methodsRetrospective analysis of patients treated with SBRT for oligorecurrent PCa between November 2015 and December 2020. We detailed clinicopathological characteristics at disease onset (age, PSA, stage, primary treatment), clinical scenario at diagnosis of oligorecurrence (PSA, PSA velocity, metastases characteristics), progression-free survival, castration resistance-free survival, dose, and toxicity of SBRT. ResultsThirty-eight SBRT treatments were applied to 13 lymph node and 25 bone metastases in a total of 28 patients. After a follow-up of 34.57 months (21.17–57.59), 17 patients had radiological progression of the disease and 11 presented castration resistant PCa. PFS and CRFS were 21.93 and 44.13 months, respectively. Only 2 patients presented grade 1 toxicity. ConclusionsIn patients with metachronous oligorecurrent PCa, SBRT constitutes a safe and effective treatment that allows delaying the onset of androgen deprivation therapy and the time to castration resistance, assuming low levels of toxicity.

Incidental Prostate Cancer from Prostate with Benign Biopsies: A Predictive and Survival Analysis from Cohort Study.

PurposeThis cohort was to evaluate incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) from men with preoperative benign biopsies and demonstrate their outcomes under different managements.Patients and MethodsBetween 2015 and 2017, we analyzed the risk factors having iPCa from surgical specimens from men provided with benign preoperative biopsies of their prostates. Furthermore, we compared the survival outcomes according to the different managements after iPCa was diagnosed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to find the best thresholds. Univariable and multivariable nested logit regression were performed to estimate the effect size of different independent variables. Odds ratio (OR) was expressed with 95% confidence interval, and the alpha level was 5%.ResultsIn 295 men we enrolled, there were 57 (19%) men having iPCa from surgical specimens. In univariable logit regression, we found significant variables of age, PSA, prostatic volume, PSA velocity ≥ 0.75 ng/mL/year for 3 years, taking 5α reductase inhibitors, abnormal digital rectal examination, cores of biopsy and surgical methods. In multivariable model, PSA was the strongest variable predicting iPCa (OR 3.81 [2.04–7.07]; Wald: 17.75; p < 0.001). In ROC curve, the best threshold was 9.025 ng/mL (area under curve: 0.95; sensitivity: 0.947; specificity: 0.866). In Kaplan–Meier curve of 27.89-month follow-up, robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) can provide similar PSA progression-free period as robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) following transurethral surgeries in organ-confined cancer (Log rank test, p = 0.293), and both of them were better than external-beam radiation therapy (RT) following transurethral surgeries (Log rank test, p < 0.001).ConclusionPSA was the strongest variable to predict iPCa out of prostate with preoperative benign biopsies. RASP was parallel to RARP following transurethral surgeries in organ-confined cancer in the short term.

Comparison of Different Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Postirradiation Recurrence in Prostate Carcinoma Patients.

After primary treatment of localized prostate carcinoma (PC), up to a third of patients have disease recurrence. Different predictive models have already been used either for initial stratification of PC patients or to predict disease recurrence. Recently, artificial intelligence has been introduced in the diagnosis and management of PC with a potential to revolutionize this field. The aim of this study was to analyze machine learning (ML) classifiers in order to predict disease progression in the moment of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation during follow-up. The study cohort consisted of 109 PC patients treated with external beam radiotherapy alone or in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. We developed and evaluated the performance of two ML algorithms based on artificial neural networks (ANN) and naïve Bayes (NB). Of all patients, 72.5% was randomly selected for a training set while the remaining patients were used for testing of the models. The presence/absence of disease progression was defined as the output variable. The input variables for models were conducted from the univariate analysis preformed among two groups of patients in the training set. They included two pretreatment variables (UICC stage and Gleason's score risk group) and five posttreatment variables (nadir PSA, time to nadir PSA, PSA doubling time, PSA velocity, and PSA in the moment of disease reevaluation). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and predictive accuracy was calculated to test the models' performance. The results showed that specificity was similar for both models, while NB achieved better sensitivity then ANN (100.0% versus 94.4%). The ANN showed an accuracy of 93.3%, and the matching for NB model was 96.7%. In this study, ML classifiers have shown potential for application in routine clinical practice during follow-up when disease progression was suspected.

Terapia de radiación corporal estereotáctica en pacientes con cáncer de próstata oligorrecurrente metacrónico. Experiencia de un centro

Introduction and objectiveMetachronous oligorecurrence in prostate cancer (PCa) occurs in patients with localized disease who, after failed radical treatment, develop oligometastases. Metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) aims to delay androgen deprivation therapy. In this study, we report our experience to elucidate the role of SBRT in a selected population of patients with metachronous oligorecurrence. Material and methodsRetrospective analysis of patients treated with SBRT for oligorecurrent PCa between November 2015 and December 2020. We detailed clinicopathological characteristics at disease onset (age, PSA, stage, primary treatment), clinical scenario at diagnosis of oligorecurrence (PSA, PSA velocity, metastases characteristics), progression-free survival, castration resistance-free survival, dose, and toxicity of SBRT. ResultsThirty-eight SBRT treatments were applied to 13 lymph node and 25 bone metastases in a total of 28 patients. After a follow-up of 34.57 months (21.17-57.59), 17 patients had radiological progression of the disease and 11 presented castration resistant PCa. PFS and CRFS were 21.93 and 44.13 months, respectively. Only 2patients presented grade 1 toxicity. ConclusionsIn patients with metachronous oligorecurrent PCa, SBRT constitutes a safe and effective treatment that allows delaying the onset of androgen deprivation therapy and the time to castration resistance, assuming low levels of toxicity.

Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity Predicts Surgical Outcome of Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.

Background: We determined the effect of prostate-specific antigen velocity (PSAV) on the surgical outcome of thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Methods: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data of patients with BPH who underwent ThuLEP at any time from 2017 to 2019. Patients who had undergone BPH surgery or had prostate cancer previously were excluded, and patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 4 ng/ml were examined through transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy to rule out prostatic malignancy. Furthermore, patients were excluded if prostatic malignancy was diagnosed during postsurgery follow-up.Results: The PSA level, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and quality of life (QoL) of 27 male patients at 3 and 15 months postsurgery differed significantly from those at presurgery; the maximum flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual (PVR) significantly differed between 3 months postsurgery and presurgery; and 22 and 5 patients had good to excellent and fair to poor outcomes, respectively, at 15 months postsurgery. Patients were divided into two groups (fair and poor vs. good and excellent outcomes at 15 months postsurgery), which significantly differed with respect to PSAV at 3 months postsurgery (P = 0.04), IPSS presurgery (P < 0.02), surgical length (P = 0.01), and hospitalization duration (P = 0.04). In a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimal cutoff value of PSAV of −0.52 ng/ml characterized effectiveness at 15 months after ThuLEP, and the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were 0.82 (P < 0.02), 0.80, and 0.82, respectively. For PSAV < -0.52 and ≥-0.52 ng/ml, the percentages of reduction for IPSS, QoL, Qmax, and PVR were −78.6 and −71.4%, −33.3 and 0.0%, 94.4 and 40.0%, and −85.1 and −38.7%, respectively.Conclusions: Postsurgical PSAV was positively correlated with surgical success, and the PSAV cutoff was −0.52 ng/ml. PSAV can, thus, be used to guide the postsurgical follow-up treatment at 3 months after BPH surgery.

PSA and PSA Kinetics as Predictors for 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Positivity in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Introduction: ¹⁸F-Fluciclovine PET/CT is one of the imaging techniques currently employed to restage prostate cancer (PCa). Due to the conflicting results reported in the literature, it is not yet known at what PSA threshold ¹⁸F-fluciclovine PET/CT could reliably demonstrate the presence of recurring disease. We explored the association between ¹⁸F-fluciclovine PET/CT positivity and prescan PSA, PSA doubling time, and PSA velocity in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of PCa after curative-intent treatment. Methods: Data from 59 patients who underwent ¹⁸F-fluciclovine PET/CT for BCR after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy were retrieved from a single institution database. Patients already undergone salvage treatments at the time of PET/CT, with newly diagnosed PCa or with initial diagnosis of metastatic PCa were excluded. A 2-sided independent samples Bayesian t test and Bayesian Mann-Whitney U test were used to assess the association between PET/CT and prescan PSA, PSA doubling time, and PSA velocity. Results: Evidence for no difference between PET/CT-positive and -negative patients for log-transformed PSA was found (BF₀₁ 3.61, % error: 0.01). Robustness check and sequential analysis showed stability across a wide range of prior distribution specifications. The hypothesis of no difference in terms of PSA-dt and for PSA-vel between groups was found to be more likely compared to the alternative hypothesis (BF₀₁ of 3.44 and 3.48, respectively). Conclusion: PSA and PSA kinetics are unlikely to be associated with ¹⁸F-fluciclovine PET/CT positivity in patients with BCR, and none of these serum biomarkers might be used as single predictors of PET/CT detection. Larger studies might be needed to evaluate the role of different predictors.