Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Research Articles

Fluorine-18 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–1007 PET/CT vs Multiparametric MRI for Locoregional Staging of Prostate Cancer

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) demonstrates overexpression in prostate cancer and correlates with tumor aggressiveness. PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) is superior to conventional imaging for the metastatic staging of prostate cancer per current research but studies of second-generation PSMA PET radioligands for locoregional staging are limited. To determine the accuracy of fluorine-18 PSMA-1007 PET/computed tomography (18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT) compared to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the primary locoregional staging of intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancers. The Next Generation Trial was a phase 2 prospective validating paired cohort study assessing the accuracy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI for locoregional staging of prostate cancer, with results of histopathologic examination as the reference standard comparator. Radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and pathologists were blinded to preoperative clinical, pathology, and imaging data. Patients underwent all imaging studies and radical prostatectomies at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Alberta, Canada. Eligible participants included men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer who consented to radical prostatectomy. Participants who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in the final analysis. Patients were recruited between March 2022 and June 2023, and data analysis occurred between July 2023 and December 2023. All participants underwent both 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI within 2 weeks of one another and before radical prostatectomy. The primary outcome was the correct identification of the prostate cancer tumor stage by each imaging test. The secondary outcomes were correct identification of the dominant nodule, laterality, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesical invasion. Of 150 eligible men with prostate cancer, 134 patients ultimately underwent radical prostatectomy (mean [SD] age at prostatectomy, 62.0 [5.7] years). PSMA PET was superior to MRI for the accurate identification of the final pathological tumor stage (61 [45%] vs 38 [28%]; P = .003). PSMA PET was also superior to MRI for the correct identification of the dominant nodule (126 [94%] vs 112 [83%]; P = .01), laterality (86 [64%] vs 60 [44%]; P = .001), and extracapsular extension (100 [75%] vs 84 [63%]; P = .01), but not for seminal vesicle invasion (122 [91%] vs 115 [85%]; P = .07). In this phase 2 prospective validating paired cohort study, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT was superior to MRI for the locoregional staging of prostate cancer. These findings support PSMA PET in the preoperative workflow of intermediate-risk and high-risk tumors.

Should new organ involvement be included in Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA Imaging?

The current study is intended to investigate the effect of new organ involvement on overall survival (OS) and modify the Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA Imaging (RECIP) by including new organ involvement to RECIP 1.0. This retrospective study includes 114 patients diagnosed with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) between September 2017 and June 2022 who had received docetaxel treatment and had baseline and post-treatment prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images. The inclusion criteria were patients with pre- and post-treatment [18F]FDG PET/CT images and whose [18F]FDG PET images were negative. Those whose data were unavailable, who had additional malignancy, or who received abiraterone, enzalutamide, or Lutetium (Lu)-177 treatment were excluded. Age, Gleason score (GS), TPSA (total prostate-specific antigen) levels, surgical history, and OS information were recorded for each patient. The 114 patients herein had a median age of 72.5 (51-91) years and a median GS of 8 (7-10). New lesions were observed in 59 patients (51.7%) and new organ PSMA uptake was observed in 14 patients (12.2%). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, volume-based treatment response (vTR)-total lesion PSMA (TLP), RECIP PSMA-VOL, modified RECIP (mRECIP) PSMA-VOL, and mRECIP TLP were independent prognostic factors for mortality (p < 0.001, p = 0.006, p = 0.003, and p = 0.003, respectively). The median OS of patients with new organ involvement and new lesion with PSMA uptake was 9.3months (95% CI 2.1-16.5months) and 11.8months (95% CI 7.4-16.2months), respectively. The study concluded that new organ involvement had a shorter OS than new lesion involvement. In the mRECIP that we developed, unlike RECIP, we demonstrated that both PSMA-VOL and TLP value were independent prognostic factors for mortality.

Real-world PET PSMA imaging patterns in a Chicago safety-net hospital.

e17009 Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) imaging is an FDA-approved imaging modality with increased sensitivity for prostate cancer (PCa) detection. It thus can more accurately stage patients to determine optimal initial treatment. However, patients with indications for these scans can still experience significant delays in obtaining them, mainly due to insurance denials. Such delays often disproportionately affect those with healthcare disparities, representing a substantial population at University of Illinois Chicago (UIC), a safety-net hospital. We sought to identify patterns, barriers, &amp; areas for improvement in obtaining this guideline-directed imaging modality. Methods: PCa patients with a PSMA PET scan ordered between January 2021 and June 2023 were included for analysis. Key medical and demographic data such as age, race/ethnicity, and insurance status were obtained. We also determined the time between ordering and obtaining the PSMA PET, and whether the scan led to classifying the patient’s disease as clinically localized, regional, or metastatic. We also determined whether subsequent treatment was curative or palliative intent. The dates and types of other imaging modalities, if obtained, were also recorded. Results: We identified 76 patients with PSMA PET scans ordered during the study timeframe. The mean age was 68.6 years, with a standard deviation of 7.3 years. 60.0% identified as Black or African American, 24.0% as White, 4.0% as Asian, and 1.3% as American Indian or Alaska Native. 40.8% had Illinois Medicare as their primary insurance, 27.6% had Medicaid, and 31.6% had another medical insurance. Most individuals (77.6%) had a delay in obtaining their PSMA PET scan, with a median time to scan of 23.0 days (range 6-136). All insurance types, including Illinois Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance, had delays (74.2%, 81.0% and 79.2% of all PSMA PETs, respectively). Many delayed individuals also received conventional imaging (46.0%) within 3 months of the PSMA PET scan order as part of their workup, with 40.0% of PSMA PETs revealing new findings compared to the other scans. Ultimately, most of the imaged patients (54.0%) were determined to have regional or metastatic PCa. Delays in obtaining and receiving the results of scans affected individuals who underwent both curative (40.8%) as well as palliative intent (46.1%) treatment. Conclusions: Between January 2021 and June 2023, PCa patients had a median delay of approximately three weeks in obtaining a PSMA PET scan that was ordered urgently for the determination of their PCa treatment. Such delays can significantly impact health outcomes and often result in redundant conventional imaging. This retrospective study represents the first step in a quality improvement project to reduce delays to PSMA PETs and enable the development of a timely treatment plan to improve patient outcomes in our diverse patient population.

Quality metrics analysis in patients who received Lutetium-177 PSMA-617 (177Lu–PSMA) therapy in a real-world practice setting.

e17049 Background: 177Lu–PSMA is a radiolabeled small molecule that delivers β radiation to cells expressing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). It has been approved for use in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCPRC) in 3/2022, based on VISION study. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label for 177Lu–PSMA requires prior therapy with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) and taxane-based chemotherapy as well as presence of at least one PSMA-positive tumor with uptake greater than normal liver and no PSMA-negative lesions on a PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) scan. In the VISION study, PSMA PET was performed within 4 weeks of therapy start. Further, patient received either 177Lu–PSMA plus protocol permitted standard of care (SOC), including ARPI, or SOC alone. Given the relatively recent approval of this therapy, real-world familiarity with administration of this agent may not be optimal. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 25 patients with mCRPC who received 177Lu–PSMA therapy since 3/2022 at the University of California Irvine (24/25) and Hoag Hospital (1/25) was performed. Multiple variables were analyzed and compared to the FDA label for this agent as well as design of the VISION study. Results: All patients in this study had received an ARPI and at least one taxane chemotherapy prior to 177Lu–PSMA. A PSMA-PET scan was obtained prior to 177Lu–PSMA therapy in all patients. The timing of the scan was within 4 weeks of starting 177Lu–PSMA therapy in only 5/25 (20.0%) patients. The average time from PSMA PET scan to 177Lu–PSMA therapy start was 66 days [range: 18 - 326 days]. None of the PSMA PET scan reports included a baseline liver standardized uptake value (SUV) or mentioned whether any lesions were non PSMA-avid. All reports provided SUV values for some, but not all, PSMA-avid lesions. The average maximum SUV of the most PSMA-avid lesion noted on the reports was 34.7. All PSMA PET scans were retrospectively reviewed by a nuclear medicine specialist and the average maximum SUV of the most PSMA-avid lesion on re-review was 42.0 (p &lt;0.05). During 177Lu–PSMA therapy, co-administration of ARPI occurred in 10/24 (23.8%) of patients. Conclusions: This study highlights the differences in quality metrics between patients who received 177Lu–PSMA therapy in a real-world practice setting compared to the FDA label for this agent and VISION study design. Differences included lack of uniform PSMA PET scan reporting, timing of obtaining pre-treatment PSMA PET imaging, and co-administration of ARPI. Development of institutional algorithms around administration of 177Lu–PSMA therapy may be needed.

Protocol for CHAMPION study: a prospective study of maximal-cytoreductive therapies for patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer who achieve oligopersistent metastases during systemic treatment with apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy

BackgroundThe proposed trial is to examine the feasibility of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-guided cytoreduction plus apalutamide and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) at oligometastatic state.MethodsCHAMPION (NCT05717582) is an open-label, single-arm, phase II trial, planning to enroll newly diagnosed mHSPC cases with oligometastases (≤ 10 distant metastatic sites in conventional imaging). Patients will receive 6 cycles of apalutamide plus ADT. Patients with oligometastatic disease at PSMA PET/CT after 3 treatment cycles will receive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy. PSMA PET/CT-guided metastasis-directed external radiation therapy will be determined by the investigators. Apalutamide plus ADT will be continued for 2 weeks postoperatively. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA), no disease progression, and no symptom deterioration after 6 cycles of apalutamide plus ADT. Secondary endpoints include the percentage of patients with PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL and oligometastases by the end of 3 treatment cycles, PSA response rate, and safety. Fleming’s two-stage group sequential design will be adopted in the study, where the null hypothesis is that the rate of patients with an undetectable PSA is ≤ 40% after 6 cycles of treatment, while the alternate hypothesis is an undetectable PSA of > 60%; with one-sided α = 0.05, power = 0.80, and an assumed dropout rate of 10%, the required number of patients for an effective analysis is 47. Enrolment in the study commenced in May 2023.DiscussionThe multi-modal therapy based on treatment response may improve the prognosis of newly diagnosed mHSPC patients with oligometastases.Trial registrationThe study is registered with Clinical Trials.Gov (NCT05717582). Registered on 8th February 2023.

Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography for Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer and Surgical Guidance: A Prospective Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Survivors of surgically managed prostate cancer may experience urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Our aim was to determine if 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography CT (PSMA-PET) in addition to multiparametric (mp) MRI scans improved surgical decision-making for nonnerve-sparing or nerve-sparing approach. We prospectively enrolled 50 patients at risk for extraprostatic extension (EPE) who were scheduled for prostatectomy. After mpMRI and PSMA-PET images were read for EPE prediction, surgeons prospectively answered questionnaires based on mpMRI and PSMA-PET scans on the decision for nerve-sparing or nonnerve-sparing approach. Final whole-mount pathology was the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated and McNemar's test was used to compare imaging modalities. The median age and PSA were 61.5 years and 7.0 ng/dL. The sensitivity for EPE along the posterior neurovascular bundle was higher for PSMA-PET than mpMRI (86% vs 57%, P = .03). For MRI, the specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curves were 77%, 40%, 87%, and 0.67, and for PSMA-PET were 73%, 46%, 95%, and 0.80. PSMA-PET and mpMRI reads differed on 27 nerve bundles, with PSMA-PET being correct in 20 cases and MRI being correct in 7 cases. Surgeons predicted correct nerve-sparing approach 74% of the time with PSMA-PET scan in addition to mpMRI compared to 65% with mpMRI alone (P = .01). PSMA-PET scan was more sensitive than mpMRI for EPE along the neurovascular bundles and improved surgical decisions for nerve-sparing approach. Further study of PSMA-PET for surgical guidance is warranted in the unfavorable intermediate-risk or worse populations. NCT04936334.

Role of Ga68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer Imaging

Role of Ga68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer Imaging

Beyond Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography PRIMARY Score in a Composite (P) Score for More Accurate Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score is standard of care for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnosis. The PRIMARY score (prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]-positron emission tomography [PET]/CT) also has high diagnostic accuracy for csPCa. This study aimed to develop an easily calculated combined (P) score for csPCa detection (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] ≥2) incorporating separately read PI-RADS and PRIMARY scores, with external validation. Two datasets of men with suspected PCa, no prior biopsy, recent MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT, and subsequent transperineal biopsy were evaluated. The development sample (n = 291, 56% csPCa) a prospective trial and the validation sample (n = 227, 67% csPCa) a multicenter retrospective database. Primary outcome was detection of csPCa (ISUP ≥2), with ISUP ≥ 3 cancer detection a secondary outcome. Score performance was evaluated by area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and decision curve analysis. The 5-point combined (P) score was developed in a prospective dataset. In the validation dataset, csPCa was identified in 0%, 20%, 52%, 96%, and 100% for P score 1 to 5. The area under the curve was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96), higher than PI-RADS 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93, P = .039) and PRIMARY score alone 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.89, P < .001). Splitting scores at 1/2 (negative) vs 3/4/5 (positive), P score sensitivity was 94% (95% CI: 89-97) compared to PI-RADS 89% (95% CI: 83-93) and PRIMARY score 86% (95% CI: 79-91). For ISUP ≥ 3, P score sensitivity was 99% (95% CI: 95-100) vs 94% (95% CI: 88-98) and 92% (95% CI: 85-97) for PI-RADS and PRIMARY scores respectively. A maximum standardized uptake value > 12 (P score 5) was ISUP ≥ 2 in all cases with 93% ISUP ≥ 3. The P score is easily calculated and improves accuracy for csPCa over both PI-RADS and PRIMARY scores. It should be considered when PSMA-PET is undertaken for diagnosis.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Oncological Applications beyond Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Other Radiopharmaceuticals.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed on the surface of tumor cells in most of the patients affected by prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa). However, PSMA expression has also been demonstrated in the endothelial cells of newly formed vessels of various solid tumors, suggesting a role for PSMA in neoangiogenesis. In this scenario, gallium-68 (68Ga) or fluoro-18 (18F)-labeled PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) may play a role in tumors other than PCa, generally evaluated employing other radiopharmaceuticals targeting different pathways. This review aims to investigate the detection rate of PSMA-PET compared to other radiopharmaceuticals (especially [18F]FDG) in non-prostate tumors to identify patients who may benefit from the use of such a theragnostic agent. We performed a bibliographic search on three different databases until February 2024 using the following terms: "positron emission tomography", "PET", "PET/CT", "Prostate-specific membrane antigen", "PSMA", "non-prostate", "not prostate cancer", "solid tumor", "FDG", "Fluorodeoxyglucose", "FAPi", "FET", "MET", "DOPA", "choline", "FCH", "FES", "DOTATOC", "DOTANOC", and "DOTATATE". Only original articles edited in English with at least 10 patients were included. Out of a total of 120 articles, only 25 original articles comparing PSMA with other radiotracers were included in this study. The main evidence was demonstrated in renal cell carcinoma, where PSMA showed a higher detection rate compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT, with implications for patient management. PSMA PET may also improve the assessment of other entities, such as gliomas, in defining regions of early neoangiogenesis. Further data are needed to evaluate the potential role of PSMA-PET in triple-negative breast cancer as a novel therapeutic vascular target. Finally, unclear applications of PSMA-PET include thyroid and gastrointestinal tumors. The present review shows the potential use of PSMA-labeled PET/CT in solid tumors beyond PCa, underlining its value over other radiopharmaceuticals (mainly [18F]FDG). Prospective clinical trials with larger sample sizes are crucial to further investigate these possible clinical applications.

The additional value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT SUVmax in predicting ISUP GG ≥ 2 and ISUP GG ≥ 3 prostate cancer in biopsy.

Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increases the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) maximum standardized uptake value(SUVmax) of the prostate may offer additional value in predicting the likelihood of csPCa in biopsy. A single-center cohort study involving patients with biopsy-proven PCa who underwent both MRI and PSMA PET/CT between 2020 and 2021. Logistic regression models were developed for International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2 and GG ≥ 3 using noninvasive prebiopsy parameters: age, (log-)prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, PI-RADS 5 lesion presence, extraprostatic extension (EPE) on MRI, and SUVmax of the prostate. Models with and without SUVmax were compared using Likelihood ratio tests and area under the curve (AUC). DeLong's test was used to compare the AUCs. The study included 386 patients, with 262 (68%) having ISUP GG ≥ 2 and 180 (47%) having ISUP GG ≥ 3. Including SUVmax significantly improved both models' goodness of fit (p < 0.001). The GG ≥ 2 model had a higher AUC with SUVmax 89.16% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.06%-92.26%) than without 87.34% (95% CI: 83.93%-90.76%) (p = 0.026). Similarly, the GG ≥ 3 model had a higher AUC with SUVmax 82.51% (95% CI: 78.41%-86.6%) than without 79.33% (95% CI: 74.84%-83.83%) (p = 0.003). The SUVmax inclusion improved the GG ≥ 3 model's calibration at higher probabilities. SUVmax of the prostate on PSMA PET/CT potentially improves diagnostic accuracy in predicting the likelihood of csPCa in prostate biopsy.

Biochemical Response of

BackgroundIn a subset of patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa), salvage surgery with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioguided surgery (PSMA-RGS) seems to be of value. ObjectiveTo evaluate whether a lower level of postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA; <0.1 ng/ml) is predictive of therapy-free survival (TFS) following salvage PSMA-RGS. Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study evaluated patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and oligorecurrent PCa on PSMA positron emission tomography treated with PSMA-RGS in three tertiary care centers (2014–2022). InterventionPSMA-RGS. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisPostsalvage surgery PSA response was categorized as <0.1, 0.1–<0.2, or >0.2 ng/ml. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression models evaluated TFS according to PSA response. Results and limitationsAmong 553 patients assessed, 522 (94%) had metastatic soft tissue lesions removed during PSMA-RGS. At 2–16 wk after PSMA-RGS, 192, 62, and 190 patients achieved PSA levels of <0.1, 0.1–<0.2, and >0.2 ng/ml, respectively. At 2 yr of follow-up, TFS rate was 81.1% versus 56.1% versus 43.1% (p < 0.001) for patients with PSA <0.1 versus 0.1–<0.2 versus >0.2 ng/ml. In multivariable analyses, PSA levels of 0.1–0.2 ng/ml (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.9, confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–3.1) and ≥0.2 ng/ml (HR: 3.2, CI: 2.2–4.6, p < 0.001) independently predicted the need for additional therapy after PSMA-RGS. The main limitation is the lack of a control group. ConclusionsFor patients after salvage PSMA-RGS, a lower biochemical response (PSA <0.1 ng/ml) seems to predict longer TFS. This insight may help in counseling patients postoperatively as well as guiding the timely selection of additional therapy. Patient summaryWe studied what happened to prostate cancer patients in three European centers who had salvage surgery using a special method called prostate-specific membrane antigen–targeted radioguidance. We found that patients who had low prostate-specific antigen levels soon after surgery were less likely to need further treatment for a longer time.

A Comparison of Globally Applied Prognostic Risk Groups and the Prevalence of Metastatic Disease on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer

BackgroundVarious risk classification systems (RCSs) are used globally to stratify newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) into prognostic groups. ObjectiveTo compare the predictive value of different prognostic subgroups (low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease) within the RCSs for detecting metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for primary staging, and to assess whether further subdivision of subgroups would be beneficial. Design, setting, and participantsPatients with newly diagnosed PCa, in whom PSMA-PET/CT was performed between 2017 and 2022, were studied retrospectively. Patients were stratified into risk groups based on four RCSs: European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG), and Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe prevalence of metastatic disease on PSMA-PET/CT was compared among the subgroups within the four RCSs. Results and limitationsIn total, 2630 men with newly diagnosed PCa were studied. Any metastatic disease was observed in 35% (931/2630) of patients. Among patients classified as having intermediate- and high-risk disease, the prevalence of metastases ranged from approximately 12% to 46%. Two RCSs further subdivided these groups. According to the NCCN, metastatic disease was observed in 5.8%, 13%, 22%, and 62% for favorable intermediate-, unfavorable intermediate-, high-, and very-high-risk PCa, respectively. Regarding the CPG, these values were 6.9%, 13%, 21%, and 60% for the corresponding risk groups. ConclusionsThis study underlines the importance of nuanced risk stratification, recommending the further subdivision of intermediate- and high-risk disease given the notable variation in the prevalence of metastatic disease. PSMA-PET/CT for primary staging should be reserved for patients with unfavorable intermediate- or higher-risk disease. Patient summaryThe use of various risk classification systems in patients with prostate cancer helps identify those at a higher risk of having metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary staging.

Added Value of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT and PET/MRI in Patients With Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Impact on Detection Rates and Clinical Management.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) can change management in a large fraction of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR). To investigate the added value of PET to MRI and CT for this patient group, and to explore whether the choice of the PET paired modality (PET/MRI vs. PET/CT) impacts detection rates and clinical management. Retrospective. 41 patients with BCR (median age [range]: 68 [55-78]). 3T, including T1-weighted gradient echo (GRE), T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) and dynamic contrast-enhanced GRE sequences, diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging, and a T1-weighted TSE spine sequence. In addition to MRI, [18F]PSMA-1007 PET and low-dose CT were acquired on the same day. Images were reported using a five-point Likert scale by two teams each consisting of a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician. The radiologist performed a reading using CT and MRI data and a joint reading between radiologist and nuclear medicine physician was performed using MRI, CT, and PET from either PET/MRI or PET/CT. Findings were presented to an oncologist to create intended treatment plans. Intrareader and interreader agreement analysis was performed. McNemar test, Cohen's κ, and intraclass correlation coefficients. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant. 7 patients had positive findings on MRI and CT, 22 patients on joint reading with PET/CT, and 18 patients joint reading with PET/MRI. For overall positivity, interreader agreement was poor for MR and CT (κ = 0.36) and almost perfect with addition of PET (PET/CT κ = 0.85, PET/MRI κ = 0.85). The addition of PET from PET/CT and PET/MRI changed intended treatment in 20 and 18 patients, respectively. Between joint readings, intended treatment was different for eight patients. The addition of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/MRI or PET/CT to MRI and CT may increase detection rates, could reduce interreader variability, and may change intended treatment in half of patients with BCR. 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Salvage Radiotherapy PSMA PET/CT-guided in Men With PSA Recurrence.

To evaluate the clinical outcome in men with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) treated by salvage radiotherapy (sRT) prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT)-guided. From January 2021 to January 2023, 33 patients who previously underwent definitive/systemic therapy were submitted to sRT PSMA PET/CT-guided for PCa recurrence: 16 (48.5%) on the prostate bed (PB), 12 (36.4%) on the lymph node (LN) and five (15.1%) on the bone. The median PSA value was 3.3 ng/ml (range=0.3-15.5 ng/ml): 0.2-0.5 ng/ml (18.2% cases), 0.51-1 ng/ml (39.4% cases) and >1 ng/ml (42.4% cases). Median 18F PSMA PET/CT standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was evaluated on PB, vs. LN vs. bones PCa recurrences and was equal to 12.5 vs. 19.0 vs. 30.1, respectively. Overall, at a median follow up of 12 months, 23/33 patients (69.7%) had local control without distant progression (PSA and SUVmax evaluation): 14/16 (87.5%) vs. 7/12 (58.3%) vs. 2/5 (40%) underwent sRT on the PB vs. LN vs. bone metastases, respectively. PSMA PET/CT allows to perform sRT early in men with PCa recurrence and low PSA values obtaining a complete clinical response in approximately 70% of the cases one year from treatment.

Heterogeneous PSMA ligand uptake inside parotid glands

The purpose of this investigation is to quantify the spatial heterogeneity of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) uptake within parotid glands. We aim to quantify patterns in well-defined regions to facilitate further investigations. Furthermore, we investigate whether uptake is correlated with computed tomography (CT) texture features. Methods: Parotid glands from [18F]DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT images of 30 prostate cancer patients were analyzed. Uptake patterns were assessed with various segmentation schemes. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated between PSMA PET uptake and feature values of a Grey Level Run Length Matrix using a long and short run length emphasis (GLRLML and GLRLMS) in subregions of the parotid gland. Results: PSMA PET uptake was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in lateral/posterior regions of the glands than anterior/medial regions. Maximum uptake was found in the lateral half of parotid glands in 50 out of 60 glands. The difference in SUVmean between parotid halves is greatest when parotids are divided by a plane separating the anterior/medial and posterior/lateral halves symmetrically (out of 120 bisections tested). PSMA PET uptake was significantly correlated with CT GLRLML (p < 0.001), and anti-correlated with CT GLRLMS (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Uptake of PSMA PET is heterogeneous within parotid glands, with uptake biased towards lateral/posterior regions. Uptake within parotid glands was strongly correlated with CT texture feature maps.

Prognostic impact of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) staging for clinically node-positive prostate cancer.

In the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, patients with pelvic nodal metastases are considered stage IV prostate cancer. This study aims to investigate whether men with prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET)-detected pelvic node-positive prostate cancer at diagnosis have a better outcome compared to men with node-positive disease identified on conventional imaging. This is a retrospective cohort study comparing the outcomes of men with node-positive prostate cancer and disease confined to the pelvis, staged with conventional versus PSMA PET imaging. Men had to be treated definitively with a combination of androgen deprivation therapy and radiation treatment to the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis was used to compare biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) and overall survival (OS). Seventy-six men with nodal metastases confined to the pelvis were identified. Fifty-one were detected with PSMA PET while 25 were staged with conventional imaging. PSMA PET staged patients had a lower proportion of Gleason 8-10 disease (78% vs. 96%) as well as a lower median prostate-specific antigen (11 ng/mL vs. 26 ng/mL). BFFS at 4 years was 72% with PSMA PET-detected node-positive disease vs. 38% with conventionally detected node-positive disease. Four-year OS was 93% with PSMA PET staged patients vs. 76% with conventionally staged patients. On multivariate analysis, the PSMA PET staged group was associated with improved BFFS (Adjusted HR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.43, 6.29, P = 0.004) and OS (Adjusted HR = 5.81, 95% CI 1.43, 23.7, P = 0.007). Men with PSMA PET-detected node-positive prostate cancer confined to the pelvis have significantly better biochemical control and survival compared to those with node-positive pelvic disease identified through conventional staging.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Response Associates with Metastasis-Free Survival After Stereotactic Ablative Radiation in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer

PurposeEmerging data suggest metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) improves outcomes in patients with oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) can detect occult metastatic disease and has been proposed as a biomarker for treatment response. Herein we identify and validate a PSMA-PET biomarker for metastasis-free survival (MFS) following MDT in omCSPC. Methods and materialsWe performed an international multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with omCSPC, defined as ≤3 lesions, treated with metastasis-directed stereotactic ablative radiation therapy who underwent PSMA-PET/CT prior to and after (median 6.2 months, range 2.4-10.9 months) treatment. Pre- and post-MDT PSMA-PET/CT SUVmax was measured for all lesions and PSMA response was defined as percent change in SUVmax of the least responsive lesion. PSMA response was evaluated as both a continuous variable and dichotomized as PSMA responders with a complete/partial response (at least 30% reduction in SUVmax) and PSMA non-responders with stable/progressive disease (less than a 30% reduction in SUVmax). PSMA response was correlated conventional imaging defined metastasis-free survival (MFS) with Kaplan-Meier and cox regression. ResultsA total of 131 patients with 261 treated metastases were included in the analysis, with median follow-up of 29 months (IQR 18.5-41.3). Following SABR, 70.2% of patients were classified as PSMA responders. Multivariable analysis demonstrated PSMA response as a continuous variable was associated with significantly worse MFS (HR=1.003, 95%CI 1.001-1.006; p=0.016). Patients classified as PSMA responders were found to have significantly improved median MFS of 39.9 vs 12 months (p=0.001) compared to PSMA non-responders. Our study is limited as it is a retrospective review of a heterogenous population. ConclusionsFollowing SABR, PSMA-PET response appears to be a radiographic biomarker that correlates with MFS in omCSPC. This approach holds promise for guiding clinical management of omCSPC and should be validated in a prospective setting.

Multidisciplinary Team Approach in Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Theranostics for Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review

In managing prostate cancer, the integration of multidisciplinary team (MDT) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) theranostics marks a significant advancement, addressing the disease's spectrum from indolent forms to aggressive metastatic stages. MDTs, comprising urology, oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine experts, are pivotal in delivering tailored, evidence-based care, essential for the varied clinical presentations of prostate cancer. The introduction of PSMA-targeted theranostics and PSMA positron emission tomography imaging has impacted the approach to diagnosis and treatment, offering enhanced precision in disease localization and enabling more nuanced management strategies for conditions such as oligometastatic prostate cancer, metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The collaborative approach of MDTs in utilizing PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy emphasizes meticulous patient selection, predictive assessment of therapy response, and careful management of therapy-related toxicities. Additionally, recent strategies, including combination therapies from ENZA-P and Lu-PARP trials, show potential for improving treatment efficacy. This unified approach showcases the critical role of MDTs in optimizing treatment outcomes, underscoring the importance of collaboration in advancing the treatment of prostate cancer with PSMAtargeted therapies, thereby setting a new paradigm in personalized prostate cancer management.

Key learnings from concordant systematic biopsies in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography-guided prostate biopsies: Enhancing targeting accuracy.

Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and staging have evolved with the advent of 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT). This study investigates the role of complementary systematic biopsies (SB) during PSMA-PET/CT-guided targeted prostate biopsies (PET-TB) for PCa detection, grading, and distribution. We address the uncertainty surrounding the necessity of SB in conjunction with PET-TB. We analyzed PCa grading and distribution in 30 men who underwent PET-TB and SB because of contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging or high clinical suspicion of PCa. Tumor distribution was assessed in relation to the PET-highlighted lesions. Standardized reporting schemes, encompassing SUVmax, PRIMARY score, and miTNM classification, were evaluated. 80% of patients were diagnosed with PCa, with 70% classified as clinically significant (csPCa). SB detected more csPCa cases than PET-TB, but the differences were not statistically significant. Discordant results were observed in 25% of cases, where SB outperformed PET-TB. Spatial analysis revealed that tumor-bearing cores from SB were often located in close proximity to the PET-highlighted region. Reporting schemes showed potential for csPCa detection with significantly increased SUVmax in csPCA patients. Subsequent follow-up data underscored the importance of SB in precise PCa grading and staging. While PET-TB can simplify prostate biopsy and reduce invasiveness by core number, SB cannot be omitted yet due to potential PET-TB targeting errors. Factors such as limited spatial resolution and fusion inaccuracies contribute to the need for SB. Standardization in reporting schemes currently cannot compensate for targeting errors highlighting the need for refinement.

Head-to-head comparison of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) in comparison to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods We conducted a comprehensive search for articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, spanning the inception of the database until October 26, 2022, which included head-to-head comparisons of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for assessing the biochemical recurrence of PCa. Results A total of 5 studies including 228 patients were analyzed. The overall positivity rates of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa after final treatment were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–0.89) and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.36–0.88), respectively. The positivity rates of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and bone metastases were 0.37 (95% CI, 0.30–0.47) and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.22–0.67), 0.44 (95% CI, 0.35–0.56) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.17–0.35), and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.11–0.31) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05–0.25), respectively. Compared with mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT exhibited a higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastases, and no significant difference in the positivity rate of local recurrence was observed between these 2 imaging modalities. Conclusions Compared with mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT appears to have a higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa. Although both imaging methods showed similar positivity rates of detecting local recurrence, PSMA PET/CT outperformed PSMA PET/CT in detecting lymph node involvement and overall recurrence.