Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Research Articles

Survival Patterns Based on First-site–specific Visceral Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Are Outcomes of Visceral Metastases the Same?

Background and objectiveVisceral metastatic disease in prostate cancer patients conveys a poor prognosis. Using advanced imaging techniques, studies have demonstrated increasing detection rates of visceral metastasis. Visceral metastases are now seen in up to 30–60% of prostate cancer patients. Survival patterns of site-specific visceral metastasis are described poorly in the literature. Here, we sought to investigate survival patterns in prostate cancer patients according to their first detected site of visceral metastasis. MethodsRetrospectively, we identified 203 prostate cancer patients with visceral metastases from the Mayo Clinic Advanced Prostate Cancer Registry. Patients were divided into three groups according to the first site of visceral metastases detected: lung, brain, or liver. Visceral metastases were detected primarily on either metabolic imaging (C-11 choline) or prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography (CT) scan. Confirmation of visceral metastasis diagnosis was established with either biopsy when feasible or focused conventional imaging, including focused CT or magnetic resonance imaging. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression model was conducted to assess different variables that affect overall and cancer-specific survival. Key findings and limitationsOver a median (interquartile range) follow-up duration of 16.2 (3.9–49.8) mo, the overall and cancer-specific survival of the entire cohort suggests better survival patterns in patients with first-site lung metastases than in patients with first-site brain or liver metastases (p < 0.0001). In univariate and multivariate analyses of factors impacting patients’ overall and cancer-specific survival, a high prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis of visceral metastasis, concomitant bone and lymph node disease, and more than four visceral metastases were associated with poor overall and cancer-specific survival (p < 0.05). On the contrary, first-site lung metastasis was associated with improved overall and cancer-specific survival, compared with first-site liver and brain metastases (p < 0.001). Conclusions and clinical implicationsThese data suggest that prostate cancer patients with visceral metastatic disease have varying survival patterns according to first-site detected visceral metastasis. In our cohort, patients with first-site lung metastasis demonstrated better survival outcomes than patients with first-site brain or liver metastasis. Patient summaryOur study explored the survival outcomes among patients with visceral metastatic prostate cancer employing cutting-edge imaging methods. Prostate cancer patients with metastases to different organs have different survival rates. Patients with cancer spreading to the lungs first showed better survival than those with cancer spreading to the brain or liver first.

PSMA PET/MR is a New Imaging Option for Identifying Glioma Recurrence and Predicting Prognosis.

Glioma is characterized by a high recurrence rate, while the results of the traditional imaging methods (including magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) to distinguish recurrence from treatment-related changes (TRCs) are poor. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (US10815200B2, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, German Cancer Research Center) is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in glioma vascular endothelium, and it is a promising target for imaging and therapy. The study aimed to assess the performance of PSMA positron emission tomography/ magnetic resonance (PET/MR) for diagnosing recurrence and predicting prognosis in glioma patients. Patients suspected of glioma recurrence who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MR were prospectively enrolled. Eight metabolic parameters and fifteen texture features of the lesion were extracted from PSMA PET/MR. The ability of PSMA PET/MR to diagnose glioma recurrence was investigated and compared with conventional MRI. The diagnostic agreement was assessed using Cohen κ scores and the predictive parameters of PSMA PET/MR were obtained. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were used to analyze recurrence- free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Finally, the expression of PSMA was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Nineteen patients with a mean age of 48.11±15.72 were assessed. The maximum tumorto- parotid ratio (TPRmax) and texture features extracted from PET and T1-weighted contrast enhancement (T1-CE) MR showed differences between recurrence and TRCs (all p <0.05). PSMA PET/MR and conventional MRI exhibited comparable power in diagnosing recurrence with specificity and PPV of 100%. The interobserver concordance was fair between the two modalities (κ = 0.542, p = 0.072). The optimal cutoffs of metabolic parameters, including standardized uptake value (SUV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak) and TPRmax for predicting recurrence were 3.35, 1.73, 1.99, and 0.17 respectively, with the area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.767 to 0.817 (all p <0.05). In grade 4 glioblastoma (GBM) patients, SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, TBRmax, TBRmean, and TPRmax showed improved performance of AUC (0.833-0.867, p <0.05). Patients with SUVmax, SUVmean, or SUVpeak more than the cutoff value had significantly shorter RFS (all p <0.05). In addition, patients with SUVmean, SUVpeak, or TPRmax more than the cutoff value had significantly shorter OS (all p <0.05). PSMA expression of glioma vascular endothelium was observed in ten (10/11, 90.9%) patients with moderate-to-high levels in all GBM cases (n = 6/6, 100%). This primitive study shows multiparameter PSMA PET/MR to be useful in identifying glioma (especially GBM) recurrence by providing excellent tumor background comparison, tumor heterogeneity, recurrence prediction and prognosis information, although it did not improve the diagnostic performance compared to conventional MRI. Further and larger studies are required to define its potential clinical application in this setting.

Tubarial salivary glands show a low relative contribution to functional salivary gland tissue mass.

In 2021, the tubarial salivary glands (TSGs) were newly identified on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) as macroscopic glands in the nasopharyngeal wall. However, the relative contribution of the TSGs to the total salivary gland function, and consequently on the development of xerostomia after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy (RNT) is not known. Therefore, we aimed to determine the presence of the TSGs and to quantify uptake in the TSGs on PSMA PET. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans of 100 patients with prostate cancer. The mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmean and SUVmax) in the TSGs were measured and compared to the parotid, submandibular and sublingual salivary glands (PSGs, SMSGs and SLSGs, respectively). Furthermore, proportional function of the TSGs was compared to the PSGs, SMSGs and SLSGs based on the total organ PSMA (TO-PSMA). The TSGs were visible on 95% of the 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans. The normalized median SUVmean and SUVmax was significantly higher for the PSGs (p < 0.001) and SMSGs (p < 0.001) compared to the TSGs, but not for the SLSGs (p = 0.242 and p = 0.300, respectively). The normalized median TO-PSMA was significantly higher for the PSGs (p < 0.001) and SMSGs (p < 0.001), and significant lower for the SLSGs (p < 0.001) compared the TSGs. The SUVmean, SUVmax and TO-PSMA of the TSGs were most comparable to the SLSGs. However, the measured PSMA uptake may be disproportional towards the saliva production. Therefore, future studies should focus on the relation between PSMA uptake and salivary function before and after PSMA therapy.

Portal Venous Tumor Thrombosis and Visceral Organ Metastasis without Skeletal Involvement in mCRPC: Adverse Prognostic Indicators on Dual Tracer PET/CT and Clinical Outcome after 177Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT and Cabazitaxel Therapy

AbstractProstate cancer involving visceral organs are occurrences in the later disease course, usually following regional nodal and skeletal involvement, and are refractory to conventional treatment. A 61-year-old male patient presented with locally advanced disease at presentation, which progressed on androgen deprivation therapy and systemic therapy with involvement of the visceral organs (lungs and liver). Portal venous tumor thrombosis involving the right and main branch was also observed on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which showed intense uptake on 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT). Post-177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (PRLT) showed mixed response on tumor marker and imaging analysis with survival of 6 months after 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy. The high Gleason score, visceral organ metastasis, and increased metabolic activity on FDG were the adverse prognostic factors in the described patient.

A systematic review on artificial intelligence evaluating PSMA PET scan for intraprostatic cancer.

To assess artificial intelligence (AI) ability to evaluate intraprostatic prostate cancer (PCa) on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) scans prior to active treatment (radiotherapy or prostatectomy). This systematic review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42023438706). A search was performed on Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Engineering Village with the following terms: 'artificial intelligence', 'prostate cancer', and 'PSMA PET'. All articles published up to February 2024 were considered. Studies were included if patients underwent PSMA PET scan to evaluate intraprostatic lesions prior to active treatment. The two authors independently evaluated titles, abstracts, and full text. The Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was used. Our search yield 948 articles, of which 14 were eligible for inclusion. Eight studies met the primary endpoint of differentiating high-grade PCa. Differentiating between International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) ≥3 PCa had an accuracy between 0.671 to 0.992, sensitivity of 0.91, specificity of 0.35. Differentiating ISUP GG ≥4 PCa had an accuracy between 0.83 and 0.88, sensitivity was 0.89, specificity was 0.87. AI could identify non-PSMA-avid lesions with an accuracy of 0.87, specificity of 0.85, and specificity of 0.89. Three studies demonstrated ability of AI to detect extraprostatic extensions with an area under curve between 0.70 and 0.77. Lastly, AI can automate segmentation of intraprostatic lesion and measurement of gross tumour volume. Although the current state of AI differentiating high-grade PCa is promising, it remains experimental and not ready for routine clinical application. Benefits of using AI to assess intraprostatic lesions on PSMA PET scans include: local staging, identifying otherwise radiologically occult lesions, standardisation and expedite reporting of PSMA PET scans. Larger, prospective, multicentre studies are needed.

Determination of the optimal imaging protocol for [18F]PSMA-PET-CT for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is a widely used diagnostic tool in patients with prostate cancer (PC).However, due to the limited availability of PET scanners and relevant acquisition costs, it is important to consider the indications and acquisition time.The aim of this investigation was to determine whether a PET scan from the skull base to the proximal thigh is sufficient to detect the presence of bone metastases. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1050 consecutive [18F]PSMA-1007-PET-CT scans from the head to the proximal lower leg.The PET scans were categorised according to the presence and amount of bone metastases: (1) 1-5, (2) 6-19 and (3) ≥20. Additionally, the PET scans were evaluated for the presence of bone metastases below the proximal thigh as well as bone metastases above the skull base.Imaging results were compared to patients PSA values. Of the 391 patients with bone metastases, 146 (37.3%) exhibited metastases located below the proximal thigh and 104 (26.6%) above the skull base.The majority of bone metastases located below the proximal thigh (145, 99.3%) and above the skull base (94, 90.4%) were identified in patients with more than five bone metastases. No solitary distal metastasis was detected.The PSA value correlated significantly with number of bone metastases (e. g., 1-5 vs. ≥20 bone metastases, P < 0.001) and was significantly higher in patients with distal bone metastases (P < 0.001).ROC analysis showed that a PSA value of 11.15 ng/mL is the optimal cut-off for detecting bone metastases located below the proximal thigh, with an AUC of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.892-0.945, sensitivity 87%, specificity 86%).Similarly, the PSA value of 12.86 ng/mL is the optimal cut-off for detecting bone metastases above the skull base with an AUC of 0.904 (95% CI: 0.874-0.935, sensitivity 87%, specificity 83%). CONCLUSION: PSMA-PET acquisition protocols from the skull base to the proximal femur may be sufficient to accurately detect bone metastatic disease in PC. PSA values can provide decision support for individual PET acquisition protocols.

Transcriptomic Profiling of Primary Prostate Cancers and Nonlocalized Disease on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

To characterize the relationship between Decipher genomic classifier scores and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-based metastatic spread. We identified patients from four institutions who underwent PSMA PET/CT scans pretreatment for primary staging or postradical prostatectomy (RP) for suspected recurrence and had Decipher transcriptomic data available from biopsy or RP specimens. PSMA PET/CT-based patterns of spread were classified as localized (miT + N0M0) or nonlocalized (miN1M0 or miM1a-c). We calculated the association between Decipher scores and the risk of nonlocalized disease on PSMA PET/CT using multivariable logistic regression for pretreatment patients and multivariable Cox regression for post-RP patients. We also compared select transcriptomic signatures between patients with localized and nonlocalized diseases. Five hundred eighty-six patients were included (pretreatment: n = 329; post-RP: n = 257). Higher Decipher scores were associated with nonlocalized disease on PSMA PET/CT both pretreatment (odds ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.36] per 0.1 increase in Decipher score, P = .02) and post-RP (hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.27] per 0.1 increase in Decipher score, P = .003). In the pretreatment setting, nonlocalized disease was associated with higher rates of TP53 mutations and lower rates of PAM50 luminal A subtype compared with localized disease. In the post-RP setting, overexpression of signatures related to metabolism, DNA repair, and androgen receptor signaling were associated with higher rates of nonlocalized disease. Higher Decipher scores were associated with nonlocalized disease identified on PSMA PET/CT both pretreatment and post-RP. There were several transcriptomic differences between localized and nonlocalized diseases in both settings.

Fluorine-18 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–1007 PET/CT vs Multiparametric MRI for Locoregional Staging of Prostate Cancer

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) demonstrates overexpression in prostate cancer and correlates with tumor aggressiveness. PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) is superior to conventional imaging for the metastatic staging of prostate cancer per current research but studies of second-generation PSMA PET radioligands for locoregional staging are limited. To determine the accuracy of fluorine-18 PSMA-1007 PET/computed tomography (18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT) compared to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the primary locoregional staging of intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancers. The Next Generation Trial was a phase 2 prospective validating paired cohort study assessing the accuracy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI for locoregional staging of prostate cancer, with results of histopathologic examination as the reference standard comparator. Radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and pathologists were blinded to preoperative clinical, pathology, and imaging data. Patients underwent all imaging studies and radical prostatectomies at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Alberta, Canada. Eligible participants included men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer who consented to radical prostatectomy. Participants who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in the final analysis. Patients were recruited between March 2022 and June 2023, and data analysis occurred between July 2023 and December 2023. All participants underwent both 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI within 2 weeks of one another and before radical prostatectomy. The primary outcome was the correct identification of the prostate cancer tumor stage by each imaging test. The secondary outcomes were correct identification of the dominant nodule, laterality, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesical invasion. Of 150 eligible men with prostate cancer, 134 patients ultimately underwent radical prostatectomy (mean [SD] age at prostatectomy, 62.0 [5.7] years). PSMA PET was superior to MRI for the accurate identification of the final pathological tumor stage (61 [45%] vs 38 [28%]; P = .003). PSMA PET was also superior to MRI for the correct identification of the dominant nodule (126 [94%] vs 112 [83%]; P = .01), laterality (86 [64%] vs 60 [44%]; P = .001), and extracapsular extension (100 [75%] vs 84 [63%]; P = .01), but not for seminal vesicle invasion (122 [91%] vs 115 [85%]; P = .07). In this phase 2 prospective validating paired cohort study, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT was superior to MRI for the locoregional staging of prostate cancer. These findings support PSMA PET in the preoperative workflow of intermediate-risk and high-risk tumors.

Whole pelvis vs. hemi pelvis elective nodal radiotherapy in patients with PSMA-positive nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy - a retrospective multi-institutional propensity score analysis.

Despite growing evidence for bilateral pelvic radiotherapy (whole pelvis RT, WPRT) there is almost no data on unilateral RT (hemi pelvis RT, HPRT) in patients with nodal recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy. Nevertheless, in clinical practice HPRT is sometimes used with the intention to reduce side effects compared to WPRT. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) is currently the best imaging modality in this clinical situation. This analysis compares PSMA-PET/CT based WPRT and HPRT. A propensity score matching was performed in a multi-institutional retrospective dataset of 273 patients treated with pelvic RT due to nodal recurrence (214 WPRT, 59 HPRT). In total, 102 patients (51 in each group) were included in the final analysis. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) < post-RT nadir + 0.2ng/ml, metastasis-free survival (MFS) and nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Median follow-up was 29 months. After propensity matching, both groups were mostly well balanced. However, in the WPRT group there were still significantly more patients with additional local recurrences and biochemical persistence after prostatectomy. There were no significant differences between both groups in BRFS (p = .97), MFS (p = .43) and NRFS (p = .43). After two years, BRFS, MFS and NRFS were 61%, 86% and 88% in the WPRT group and 57%, 90% and 82% in the HPRT group, respectively. Application of a boost to lymph node metastases, a higher RT dose to the lymphatic pathways (> 50Gy EQD2α/β=1.5Gy) and concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were significantly associated with longer BRFS in uni- and multivariate analysis. Overall, this analysis presents the outcome of HPRT in nodal recurrent prostate cancer patients and shows that it can result in a similar oncologic outcome compared to WPRT. Nevertheless, patients in the WPRT may have been at a higher risk for progression due to some persistent imbalances between the groups. Therefore, further research should prospectively evaluate which subgroups of patients are suitable for HPRT and if HPRT leads to a clinically significant reduction in toxicity.

Should new organ involvement be included in Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA Imaging?

The current study is intended to investigate the effect of new organ involvement on overall survival (OS) and modify the Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA Imaging (RECIP) by including new organ involvement to RECIP 1.0. This retrospective study includes 114 patients diagnosed with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) between September 2017 and June 2022 who had received docetaxel treatment and had baseline and post-treatment prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images. The inclusion criteria were patients with pre- and post-treatment [18F]FDG PET/CT images and whose [18F]FDG PET images were negative. Those whose data were unavailable, who had additional malignancy, or who received abiraterone, enzalutamide, or Lutetium (Lu)-177 treatment were excluded. Age, Gleason score (GS), TPSA (total prostate-specific antigen) levels, surgical history, and OS information were recorded for each patient. The 114 patients herein had a median age of 72.5 (51-91) years and a median GS of 8 (7-10). New lesions were observed in 59 patients (51.7%) and new organ PSMA uptake was observed in 14 patients (12.2%). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, volume-based treatment response (vTR)-total lesion PSMA (TLP), RECIP PSMA-VOL, modified RECIP (mRECIP) PSMA-VOL, and mRECIP TLP were independent prognostic factors for mortality (p < 0.001, p = 0.006, p = 0.003, and p = 0.003, respectively). The median OS of patients with new organ involvement and new lesion with PSMA uptake was 9.3months (95% CI 2.1-16.5months) and 11.8months (95% CI 7.4-16.2months), respectively. The study concluded that new organ involvement had a shorter OS than new lesion involvement. In the mRECIP that we developed, unlike RECIP, we demonstrated that both PSMA-VOL and TLP value were independent prognostic factors for mortality.

Real-world PET PSMA imaging patterns in a Chicago safety-net hospital.

e17009 Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) imaging is an FDA-approved imaging modality with increased sensitivity for prostate cancer (PCa) detection. It thus can more accurately stage patients to determine optimal initial treatment. However, patients with indications for these scans can still experience significant delays in obtaining them, mainly due to insurance denials. Such delays often disproportionately affect those with healthcare disparities, representing a substantial population at University of Illinois Chicago (UIC), a safety-net hospital. We sought to identify patterns, barriers, &amp; areas for improvement in obtaining this guideline-directed imaging modality. Methods: PCa patients with a PSMA PET scan ordered between January 2021 and June 2023 were included for analysis. Key medical and demographic data such as age, race/ethnicity, and insurance status were obtained. We also determined the time between ordering and obtaining the PSMA PET, and whether the scan led to classifying the patient’s disease as clinically localized, regional, or metastatic. We also determined whether subsequent treatment was curative or palliative intent. The dates and types of other imaging modalities, if obtained, were also recorded. Results: We identified 76 patients with PSMA PET scans ordered during the study timeframe. The mean age was 68.6 years, with a standard deviation of 7.3 years. 60.0% identified as Black or African American, 24.0% as White, 4.0% as Asian, and 1.3% as American Indian or Alaska Native. 40.8% had Illinois Medicare as their primary insurance, 27.6% had Medicaid, and 31.6% had another medical insurance. Most individuals (77.6%) had a delay in obtaining their PSMA PET scan, with a median time to scan of 23.0 days (range 6-136). All insurance types, including Illinois Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance, had delays (74.2%, 81.0% and 79.2% of all PSMA PETs, respectively). Many delayed individuals also received conventional imaging (46.0%) within 3 months of the PSMA PET scan order as part of their workup, with 40.0% of PSMA PETs revealing new findings compared to the other scans. Ultimately, most of the imaged patients (54.0%) were determined to have regional or metastatic PCa. Delays in obtaining and receiving the results of scans affected individuals who underwent both curative (40.8%) as well as palliative intent (46.1%) treatment. Conclusions: Between January 2021 and June 2023, PCa patients had a median delay of approximately three weeks in obtaining a PSMA PET scan that was ordered urgently for the determination of their PCa treatment. Such delays can significantly impact health outcomes and often result in redundant conventional imaging. This retrospective study represents the first step in a quality improvement project to reduce delays to PSMA PETs and enable the development of a timely treatment plan to improve patient outcomes in our diverse patient population.

Quality metrics analysis in patients who received Lutetium-177 PSMA-617 (177Lu–PSMA) therapy in a real-world practice setting.

e17049 Background: 177Lu–PSMA is a radiolabeled small molecule that delivers β radiation to cells expressing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). It has been approved for use in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCPRC) in 3/2022, based on VISION study. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label for 177Lu–PSMA requires prior therapy with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) and taxane-based chemotherapy as well as presence of at least one PSMA-positive tumor with uptake greater than normal liver and no PSMA-negative lesions on a PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) scan. In the VISION study, PSMA PET was performed within 4 weeks of therapy start. Further, patient received either 177Lu–PSMA plus protocol permitted standard of care (SOC), including ARPI, or SOC alone. Given the relatively recent approval of this therapy, real-world familiarity with administration of this agent may not be optimal. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 25 patients with mCRPC who received 177Lu–PSMA therapy since 3/2022 at the University of California Irvine (24/25) and Hoag Hospital (1/25) was performed. Multiple variables were analyzed and compared to the FDA label for this agent as well as design of the VISION study. Results: All patients in this study had received an ARPI and at least one taxane chemotherapy prior to 177Lu–PSMA. A PSMA-PET scan was obtained prior to 177Lu–PSMA therapy in all patients. The timing of the scan was within 4 weeks of starting 177Lu–PSMA therapy in only 5/25 (20.0%) patients. The average time from PSMA PET scan to 177Lu–PSMA therapy start was 66 days [range: 18 - 326 days]. None of the PSMA PET scan reports included a baseline liver standardized uptake value (SUV) or mentioned whether any lesions were non PSMA-avid. All reports provided SUV values for some, but not all, PSMA-avid lesions. The average maximum SUV of the most PSMA-avid lesion noted on the reports was 34.7. All PSMA PET scans were retrospectively reviewed by a nuclear medicine specialist and the average maximum SUV of the most PSMA-avid lesion on re-review was 42.0 (p &lt;0.05). During 177Lu–PSMA therapy, co-administration of ARPI occurred in 10/24 (23.8%) of patients. Conclusions: This study highlights the differences in quality metrics between patients who received 177Lu–PSMA therapy in a real-world practice setting compared to the FDA label for this agent and VISION study design. Differences included lack of uniform PSMA PET scan reporting, timing of obtaining pre-treatment PSMA PET imaging, and co-administration of ARPI. Development of institutional algorithms around administration of 177Lu–PSMA therapy may be needed.

Protocol for CHAMPION study: a prospective study of maximal-cytoreductive therapies for patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer who achieve oligopersistent metastases during systemic treatment with apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy

BackgroundThe proposed trial is to examine the feasibility of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-guided cytoreduction plus apalutamide and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) at oligometastatic state.MethodsCHAMPION (NCT05717582) is an open-label, single-arm, phase II trial, planning to enroll newly diagnosed mHSPC cases with oligometastases (≤ 10 distant metastatic sites in conventional imaging). Patients will receive 6 cycles of apalutamide plus ADT. Patients with oligometastatic disease at PSMA PET/CT after 3 treatment cycles will receive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy. PSMA PET/CT-guided metastasis-directed external radiation therapy will be determined by the investigators. Apalutamide plus ADT will be continued for 2 weeks postoperatively. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA), no disease progression, and no symptom deterioration after 6 cycles of apalutamide plus ADT. Secondary endpoints include the percentage of patients with PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL and oligometastases by the end of 3 treatment cycles, PSA response rate, and safety. Fleming’s two-stage group sequential design will be adopted in the study, where the null hypothesis is that the rate of patients with an undetectable PSA is ≤ 40% after 6 cycles of treatment, while the alternate hypothesis is an undetectable PSA of > 60%; with one-sided α = 0.05, power = 0.80, and an assumed dropout rate of 10%, the required number of patients for an effective analysis is 47. Enrolment in the study commenced in May 2023.DiscussionThe multi-modal therapy based on treatment response may improve the prognosis of newly diagnosed mHSPC patients with oligometastases.Trial registrationThe study is registered with Clinical Trials.Gov (NCT05717582). Registered on 8th February 2023.

Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography for Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer and Surgical Guidance: A Prospective Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Survivors of surgically managed prostate cancer may experience urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Our aim was to determine if 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography CT (PSMA-PET) in addition to multiparametric (mp) MRI scans improved surgical decision-making for nonnerve-sparing or nerve-sparing approach. We prospectively enrolled 50 patients at risk for extraprostatic extension (EPE) who were scheduled for prostatectomy. After mpMRI and PSMA-PET images were read for EPE prediction, surgeons prospectively answered questionnaires based on mpMRI and PSMA-PET scans on the decision for nerve-sparing or nonnerve-sparing approach. Final whole-mount pathology was the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated and McNemar's test was used to compare imaging modalities. The median age and PSA were 61.5 years and 7.0 ng/dL. The sensitivity for EPE along the posterior neurovascular bundle was higher for PSMA-PET than mpMRI (86% vs 57%, P = .03). For MRI, the specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curves were 77%, 40%, 87%, and 0.67, and for PSMA-PET were 73%, 46%, 95%, and 0.80. PSMA-PET and mpMRI reads differed on 27 nerve bundles, with PSMA-PET being correct in 20 cases and MRI being correct in 7 cases. Surgeons predicted correct nerve-sparing approach 74% of the time with PSMA-PET scan in addition to mpMRI compared to 65% with mpMRI alone (P = .01). PSMA-PET scan was more sensitive than mpMRI for EPE along the neurovascular bundles and improved surgical decisions for nerve-sparing approach. Further study of PSMA-PET for surgical guidance is warranted in the unfavorable intermediate-risk or worse populations. NCT04936334.

Role of Ga68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer Imaging

Role of Ga68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer Imaging

Beyond Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography PRIMARY Score in a Composite (P) Score for More Accurate Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score is standard of care for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnosis. The PRIMARY score (prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]-positron emission tomography [PET]/CT) also has high diagnostic accuracy for csPCa. This study aimed to develop an easily calculated combined (P) score for csPCa detection (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] ≥2) incorporating separately read PI-RADS and PRIMARY scores, with external validation. Two datasets of men with suspected PCa, no prior biopsy, recent MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT, and subsequent transperineal biopsy were evaluated. The development sample (n = 291, 56% csPCa) a prospective trial and the validation sample (n = 227, 67% csPCa) a multicenter retrospective database. Primary outcome was detection of csPCa (ISUP ≥2), with ISUP ≥ 3 cancer detection a secondary outcome. Score performance was evaluated by area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and decision curve analysis. The 5-point combined (P) score was developed in a prospective dataset. In the validation dataset, csPCa was identified in 0%, 20%, 52%, 96%, and 100% for P score 1 to 5. The area under the curve was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96), higher than PI-RADS 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93, P = .039) and PRIMARY score alone 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.89, P < .001). Splitting scores at 1/2 (negative) vs 3/4/5 (positive), P score sensitivity was 94% (95% CI: 89-97) compared to PI-RADS 89% (95% CI: 83-93) and PRIMARY score 86% (95% CI: 79-91). For ISUP ≥ 3, P score sensitivity was 99% (95% CI: 95-100) vs 94% (95% CI: 88-98) and 92% (95% CI: 85-97) for PI-RADS and PRIMARY scores respectively. A maximum standardized uptake value > 12 (P score 5) was ISUP ≥ 2 in all cases with 93% ISUP ≥ 3. The P score is easily calculated and improves accuracy for csPCa over both PI-RADS and PRIMARY scores. It should be considered when PSMA-PET is undertaken for diagnosis.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Oncological Applications beyond Prostate Cancer in Comparison to Other Radiopharmaceuticals.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed on the surface of tumor cells in most of the patients affected by prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa). However, PSMA expression has also been demonstrated in the endothelial cells of newly formed vessels of various solid tumors, suggesting a role for PSMA in neoangiogenesis. In this scenario, gallium-68 (68Ga) or fluoro-18 (18F)-labeled PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) may play a role in tumors other than PCa, generally evaluated employing other radiopharmaceuticals targeting different pathways. This review aims to investigate the detection rate of PSMA-PET compared to other radiopharmaceuticals (especially [18F]FDG) in non-prostate tumors to identify patients who may benefit from the use of such a theragnostic agent. We performed a bibliographic search on three different databases until February 2024 using the following terms: "positron emission tomography", "PET", "PET/CT", "Prostate-specific membrane antigen", "PSMA", "non-prostate", "not prostate cancer", "solid tumor", "FDG", "Fluorodeoxyglucose", "FAPi", "FET", "MET", "DOPA", "choline", "FCH", "FES", "DOTATOC", "DOTANOC", and "DOTATATE". Only original articles edited in English with at least 10 patients were included. Out of a total of 120 articles, only 25 original articles comparing PSMA with other radiotracers were included in this study. The main evidence was demonstrated in renal cell carcinoma, where PSMA showed a higher detection rate compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT, with implications for patient management. PSMA PET may also improve the assessment of other entities, such as gliomas, in defining regions of early neoangiogenesis. Further data are needed to evaluate the potential role of PSMA-PET in triple-negative breast cancer as a novel therapeutic vascular target. Finally, unclear applications of PSMA-PET include thyroid and gastrointestinal tumors. The present review shows the potential use of PSMA-labeled PET/CT in solid tumors beyond PCa, underlining its value over other radiopharmaceuticals (mainly [18F]FDG). Prospective clinical trials with larger sample sizes are crucial to further investigate these possible clinical applications.

The additional value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT SUVmax in predicting ISUP GG ≥ 2 and ISUP GG ≥ 3 prostate cancer in biopsy.

Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increases the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) maximum standardized uptake value(SUVmax) of the prostate may offer additional value in predicting the likelihood of csPCa in biopsy. A single-center cohort study involving patients with biopsy-proven PCa who underwent both MRI and PSMA PET/CT between 2020 and 2021. Logistic regression models were developed for International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2 and GG ≥ 3 using noninvasive prebiopsy parameters: age, (log-)prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, PI-RADS 5 lesion presence, extraprostatic extension (EPE) on MRI, and SUVmax of the prostate. Models with and without SUVmax were compared using Likelihood ratio tests and area under the curve (AUC). DeLong's test was used to compare the AUCs. The study included 386 patients, with 262 (68%) having ISUP GG ≥ 2 and 180 (47%) having ISUP GG ≥ 3. Including SUVmax significantly improved both models' goodness of fit (p < 0.001). The GG ≥ 2 model had a higher AUC with SUVmax 89.16% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.06%-92.26%) than without 87.34% (95% CI: 83.93%-90.76%) (p = 0.026). Similarly, the GG ≥ 3 model had a higher AUC with SUVmax 82.51% (95% CI: 78.41%-86.6%) than without 79.33% (95% CI: 74.84%-83.83%) (p = 0.003). The SUVmax inclusion improved the GG ≥ 3 model's calibration at higher probabilities. SUVmax of the prostate on PSMA PET/CT potentially improves diagnostic accuracy in predicting the likelihood of csPCa in prostate biopsy.

Biochemical Response of

BackgroundIn a subset of patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa), salvage surgery with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioguided surgery (PSMA-RGS) seems to be of value. ObjectiveTo evaluate whether a lower level of postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA; <0.1 ng/ml) is predictive of therapy-free survival (TFS) following salvage PSMA-RGS. Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study evaluated patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and oligorecurrent PCa on PSMA positron emission tomography treated with PSMA-RGS in three tertiary care centers (2014–2022). InterventionPSMA-RGS. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisPostsalvage surgery PSA response was categorized as <0.1, 0.1–<0.2, or >0.2 ng/ml. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression models evaluated TFS according to PSA response. Results and limitationsAmong 553 patients assessed, 522 (94%) had metastatic soft tissue lesions removed during PSMA-RGS. At 2–16 wk after PSMA-RGS, 192, 62, and 190 patients achieved PSA levels of <0.1, 0.1–<0.2, and >0.2 ng/ml, respectively. At 2 yr of follow-up, TFS rate was 81.1% versus 56.1% versus 43.1% (p < 0.001) for patients with PSA <0.1 versus 0.1–<0.2 versus >0.2 ng/ml. In multivariable analyses, PSA levels of 0.1–0.2 ng/ml (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.9, confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–3.1) and ≥0.2 ng/ml (HR: 3.2, CI: 2.2–4.6, p < 0.001) independently predicted the need for additional therapy after PSMA-RGS. The main limitation is the lack of a control group. ConclusionsFor patients after salvage PSMA-RGS, a lower biochemical response (PSA <0.1 ng/ml) seems to predict longer TFS. This insight may help in counseling patients postoperatively as well as guiding the timely selection of additional therapy. Patient summaryWe studied what happened to prostate cancer patients in three European centers who had salvage surgery using a special method called prostate-specific membrane antigen–targeted radioguidance. We found that patients who had low prostate-specific antigen levels soon after surgery were less likely to need further treatment for a longer time.

A Comparison of Globally Applied Prognostic Risk Groups and the Prevalence of Metastatic Disease on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer

BackgroundVarious risk classification systems (RCSs) are used globally to stratify newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) into prognostic groups. ObjectiveTo compare the predictive value of different prognostic subgroups (low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease) within the RCSs for detecting metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for primary staging, and to assess whether further subdivision of subgroups would be beneficial. Design, setting, and participantsPatients with newly diagnosed PCa, in whom PSMA-PET/CT was performed between 2017 and 2022, were studied retrospectively. Patients were stratified into risk groups based on four RCSs: European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG), and Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe prevalence of metastatic disease on PSMA-PET/CT was compared among the subgroups within the four RCSs. Results and limitationsIn total, 2630 men with newly diagnosed PCa were studied. Any metastatic disease was observed in 35% (931/2630) of patients. Among patients classified as having intermediate- and high-risk disease, the prevalence of metastases ranged from approximately 12% to 46%. Two RCSs further subdivided these groups. According to the NCCN, metastatic disease was observed in 5.8%, 13%, 22%, and 62% for favorable intermediate-, unfavorable intermediate-, high-, and very-high-risk PCa, respectively. Regarding the CPG, these values were 6.9%, 13%, 21%, and 60% for the corresponding risk groups. ConclusionsThis study underlines the importance of nuanced risk stratification, recommending the further subdivision of intermediate- and high-risk disease given the notable variation in the prevalence of metastatic disease. PSMA-PET/CT for primary staging should be reserved for patients with unfavorable intermediate- or higher-risk disease. Patient summaryThe use of various risk classification systems in patients with prostate cancer helps identify those at a higher risk of having metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary staging.