Objective: Up to 80% of prostate cancer cases are indolent that pose a minimal risk for morbidity and mortality throughout the life of the patient. Cancer-specific survival of the patients just followed up and those who received curative treatment were found to be similar, especially in the low-risk category. Active surveillance was described to preserve the quality of life of the patients and to protect them from the side effects of curative treatments. It has become increasingly used in low and very low risk. Although there are many studies on this subject with a large number of patients in the literature, we aimed to present our first results in this study. Material and Methods: The data of the patients, that were included in the active surveillance program between January 2012 and April 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer according to D'Amico criteria (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 1, prostate-specific antigen <10 ng/mL, stage cT1c-T2a) via a minimum 12 core transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy due to suspicious digital rectal examination and/or prostate-specific antigen elevation. Results: Thirty-six patients, who preferred active surveillance were included in the study. The mean age and prostate-specific antigen values of the patients were 66.38±8.02 years and 5.63±2.3 ng/mL, respectively. The median follow- up was 18.4 (minimum 1.63-maximum 82.4) months. In the initial biopsy, the cancer was detected in one core in 25 (69.4%), two cores in 10 (27.8%), and three cores in one (2.8%) of the patients. A total of 7 (19.4%) cases had received curative treatment. 3 cases had progression in pathological parameters and 4 cases chose to have active treatment. Conclusion: Our initial results with active surveillance are similar to the literature. Per the literature, the number of patients that chose active surveillance has increased.