Prostate Cancer Predisposition Research Articles

The guidelines for clinical practice for carriers of germline mutations in hereditary breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer predisposition genes BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2 (4.2024).

The Guidelines for Clinical Practice for carriers of pathogenic variants in clinically relevant cancer predisposition genes define the steps of primary and secondary prevention that should be provided to these individuals at high risk of developing hereditary cancer in the Czech Republic. The drafting of the guidelines was organized by the Oncogenetics Working Group of the Society for Medical Genetics and Genomics of J. E. Purkyně Czech Medical Society (SLG ČLS JEP) in cooperation with the representatives of oncology and oncogynecology. The guidelines are based on the current recommendations of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and take into account the capacity of the Czech healthcare system.

BUB1B monoallelic germline variants contribute to prostate cancer predisposition by triggering chromosomal instability

BackgroundProstate cancer (PrCa) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men. Variants in known moderate- to high-penetrance genes explain less than 5% of the cases arising at early-onset (< 56 years) and/or with familial aggregation of the disease. Considering that BubR1 is an essential component of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint, we hypothesized that monoallelic BUB1B variants could be sufficient to fuel chromosomal instability (CIN), potentially triggering (prostate) carcinogenesis.MethodsTo unveil BUB1B as a new PrCa predisposing gene, we performed targeted next-generation sequencing in germline DNA from 462 early-onset/familial PrCa patients and 1,416 cancer patients fulfilling criteria for genetic testing for other hereditary cancer syndromes. To explore the pan-cancer role of BUB1B, we used in silico BubR1 molecular modeling, in vitro gene-editing, and ex vivo patients’ tumors and peripheral blood lymphocytes.ResultsRare BUB1B variants were found in ~ 1.9% of the early-onset/familial PrCa cases and in ~ 0.6% of other cancer patients fulfilling criteria for hereditary disease. We further show that BUB1B variants lead to decreased BubR1 expression and/or stability, which promotes increased premature chromatid separation and, consequently, triggers CIN, driving resistance to Taxol-based therapies.ConclusionsOur study shows that different BUB1B variants may uncover a trigger for CIN-driven carcinogenesis, supporting the role of BUB1B as a (pan)-cancer predisposing gene with potential impact on genetic counseling and treatment decision-making.

Association Study between rs10486567, rs13149290, rs1545985 and rs6983267 with Incidence of Prostate Adenocarcinoma Among Iranians

Introduction: Prostate cancer is the second most frequent malignancy after lung cancer among men, accounting for 7% of new cancers diagnosed around the world (15% in developed regions). This disease has become more prevalent in Iran over the past few decades, moving up the rankings from 13th in 1986 to 4th in 2005 and finally reaching third place in a recent study in 2016. The purpose of this study is to investigate the association of rs10486567, rs13149290, rs6983267, and rs1545985 with prostate cancer predisposition in the Iranian population. Due to the genetic heterogeneity, each of the SNP should be studied separately in various communities. Material and Methods: This study was conducted as a case-control study on 200 patients referred to Hashminejad Hospital in Tehran. 103 men with prostate adenocarcinoma were selected as case, and 97 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were selected as control. In this research, according to FAVORGENE-Taiwan extraction kit instructions, genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytesTetra-primer ARMS-PCR method was used for SNP genotyping. Results: The significance level at the first stage was p-value≤0.4. rs10486567 (p-value = 0.802) and rs6983267 (p-value = 0.684). Based on the additive and multiplicative genetic model, no association of these polymorphisms with prostate adenocarcinoma was observed. As a result, rs10486567 and rs6983267 were removed at this stage. rs13149290 (p-value=0.4) and rs1545985 (p-value=0.4) at this stage were selected for the next stage. At the second stage rs13149290 (p-value=0.043) showed a significant difference in the comparison between the two groups, but this difference was not observed in relation to rs1545985 (p-value=0.392) rs1545985 was not associated with prostate adenocarcinoma in the additive genetic model. According to P=0.013 and OR (95% CI) =3.837 (1.306-11.268), rs13149290 polymorphism is associated with prostate adenocarcinoma in the additive genetic model (TT vs. CC). Conclusion: As a result of this study, it was observed that rs13149290 is associated with prostate cancer in the Iranian population. Also this polymorphism is associated with Gleason score=7 and PSA ≤4. Prostate cancer as an exposure effect is heterogeneous between different PSA levels. It is suggested that this polymorphism be investigated in a larger population and in each ethnic group separately.

GATA2 co-opts TGFβ1/SMAD4 oncogenic signaling and inherited variants at 6q22 to modulate prostate cancer progression

BackgroundAberrant somatic genomic alteration including copy number amplification is a hallmark of cancer genomes. We previously profiled genomic landscapes of prostate cancer (PCa), yet the underlying causal genes with prognostic potential has not been defined. It remains unclear how a somatic genomic event cooperates with inherited germline variants contribute to cancer predisposition and progression.MethodsWe applied integrated genomic and clinical data, experimental models and bioinformatic analysis to identify GATA2 as a highly prevalent metastasis-associated genomic amplification in PCa. Biological roles of GATA2 in PCa metastasis was determined in vitro and in vivo. Global chromatin co-occupancy and co-regulation of GATA2 and SMAD4 was investigated by coimmunoprecipitation, ChIP-seq and RNA-seq assays. Tumor cellular assays, qRT-PCR, western blot, ChIP, luciferase assays and CRISPR-Cas9 editing methods were performed to mechanistically understand the cooperation of GATA2 with SMAD4 in promoting TGFβ1 and AR signaling and mediating inherited PCa risk and progression.ResultsIn this study, by integrated genomics and experimental analysis, we identified GATA2 as a prevalent metastasis-associated genomic amplification to transcriptionally augment its own expression in PCa. Functional experiments demonstrated that GATA2 physically interacted and cooperated with SMAD4 for genome-wide chromatin co-occupancy and co-regulation of PCa genes and metastasis pathways like TGFβ signaling. Mechanistically, GATA2 was cooperative with SMAD4 to enhance TGFβ and AR signaling pathways, and activated the expression of TGFβ1 via directly binding to a distal enhancer of TGFβ1. Strinkingly, GATA2 and SMAD4 globally mediated inherited PCa risk and formed a transcriptional complex with HOXB13 at the PCa risk-associated rs339331/6q22 enhancer, leading to increased expression of the PCa susceptibility gene RFX6.ConclusionsOur study prioritizes causal genomic amplification genes with prognostic values in PCa and reveals the pivotal roles of GATA2 in transcriptionally activating the expression of its own and TGFβ1, thereby co-opting to TGFβ1/SMAD4 signaling and RFX6 at 6q22 to modulate PCa predisposition and progression.

Association study between rs1571801 and rs16260 with prostate adenocarcinoma predisposition in Iranian population

BackgroundProstatic adenocarcinoma is the most frequent malignancy among elderly men after lung cancer, which has the second incidence and the fourth mortality rate in the Iranian population. The primary objective of this study was to investigate how single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the CDH1 gene (rs16260) and DAB2IP (rs1571801) are associated with the risk of prostate cancer through a multi-stage approach.ResultsIn the first stage of the study (58 men), we compared the genotype frequency of polymorphisms rs16260 and rs1571801 in the case group to the control group to determine significant polymorphisms (P value < 0.4). No statistically significant difference was shown between the genotype frequency of rs1571801 in the case and control groups. Thus, rs1571801 polymorphism was eliminated at this stage, and only rs16260 polymorphism evaluated in the next stage. In the second stage, statistical analysis showed a significant difference between genotype frequency of rs16260 (P value = 0.037) in all participants. The effect of rs16260 on prostate cancer was not modified by age or PSA levels. Only the Gleason Score = 7 reveals a significant difference between the risk allele (A) and the allele (C) (rs16260).ConclusionsAccording to the results of this study, rs16260 is associated with prostate cancer predisposition and might be used as a potential biomarker in prostate cancer. It should be noted that these results need to be confirmed in a larger population.

Exome sequencing of affected duos and trios uncovers PRUNE2 as a novel prostate cancer predisposition gene.

Prostate cancer (PrCa) is one of the most hereditable human cancers, however, only a small fraction of patients has been shown to carry deleterious variants in known cancer predisposition genes. Whole-exome sequencing was performed in multiple affected members of 45 PrCa families to select the best candidate genes behind part of the PrCa missing hereditability. Recurrently mutated genes were prioritised, and further investigated by targeted next-generation sequencing in the whole early-onset and/or familial PrCa series of 462 patients. PRUNE2 stood out from our analysis when also considering the available data on its association with PrCa development. Ten germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in the PRUNE2 gene were identified in 13 patients. The most frequent variant was found in three unrelated patients and identical-by-descent analysis revealed that the haplotype associated with the variant is shared by all the variant carriers, supporting the existence of a common ancestor. This is the first report of pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants in PRUNE2 in PrCa patients, namely in those with early-onset/familial disease. Importantly, PRUNE2 was the most frequently mutated gene in the whole series, with a deleterious germline variant identified in 2.8% of the patients, representing a novel prostate cancer predisposition gene.

Germline mutations in prostate cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for personalized medicine.

The goal of precision medicine in prostate cancer (PCa) is to individualize the treatment according to the patient's germline mutation status. PCa has a very high rate of genetic predisposition compared with other cancers in men, with an estimated rate of cancers ascribable to hereditary factors of 5-15%. A systematic search (PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov) of English literature from 2000 to 2022, using the keywords "prostate cancer", "germline mutations", "family history", and "inheritance" was conducted, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The search identified 980 publications. Of these, 200 papers were removed before screening (duplicates, non-English literature, and publication year before 2000) and 245 records were excluded after title/abstract screening. Finally, 50 articles were included in the final analysis. We analyze the latest evidence on the genetic basis of PCa predisposition and clinical implications for more personalized screening protocols and therapeutic management of this high-prevalent cancer. Emerging data show that germline mutations in homologous recombination genes (BRCA1/2, ATM, CHECK2), in mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MLH2, MSH6), and other additional genes are associated with the development and aggressiveness of PCa. Germline testing and genetic counseling have increasingly important implications in cancer screening and therapeutic decisions making for patients affected by PCa. Patients with localized PCa and some gene mutations are more likely to develop aggressive cancer, so active treatment may be preferable to active surveillance for these patients. Moreover, in patients with metastatic PCa, these gene alterations may be useful biomarkers for predicting response to specific therapy such as PARP inhibitors, recently approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant PCa. The evidence supports recent guidelines and recommendations considering germline genetic testing for patients with a positive family history of PCa or men with high risk or metastatic disease.

Novel Germline Mutations in a Cohort of Men with Familial Prostate Cancer.

Simple SummaryIn this study, we identified germline mutations that contribute to prostate cancer development in men who have multiple relatives with prostate cancer (and other cancers). We correlated the genetic mutations found in each patient with the resulting prostate cancer characteristics. Mutations found in ATM and CHEK2 genes were associated with aggressive prostate cancer. More data is needed to confirm the prevalence and impact of these germline mutations in prostate cancer.Background: Germline mutations in BRCA2 are associated with aggressive prostate cancer. Additional information regarding the clinical phenotype of germline pathogenic variants in other prostate cancer predisposition genes is required. Clinical testing has been limited by evidence, further restricting knowledge of variants that contribute to prostate cancer development. Objective: Prostate cancer patients who were first- and second-degree relatives from multi-case prostate cancer families underwent a gene panel screen to identify novel (non-BRCA) germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes and define clinical phenotypes associated with each gene. Methods: The germline genomic DNA (gDNA) of 94 index cases with verified prostate cancer from families with a minimum of two verified prostate cancer cases was screened with an 84-cancer-gene panel. Families were recruited for multi-case breast/ovarian cancer (n = 66), or multi-case prostate cancer (n = 28). Prostate cancer characteristics associated with each gene were compared with prostate cancer cases of confirmed non-mutation carriers (BRCAX), also from multi-case prostate cancer families (n = 111), and with data from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry (PCOR). Results: Ninety-four prostate cancer index cases underwent gene panel testing; twenty-two index cases (22/94; 23%) were found to carry a class 4–5 (C4/5) variant. Six of twenty-two (27%) variants were not clinically notifiable, and seven of twenty-two (31.8%) variants were in BRCA1/2 genes. Nine of twenty-two (40.9%) index cases had variants identified in ATM (n = 4), CHEK2 (n = 2) and HOXB13G84 (n = 3); gDNA for all relatives of these nine cases was screened for the corresponding familial variant. The final cohort comprised 15 confirmed germline mutation carriers with prostate cancer (ATM n = 9, CHEK2 n = 2, HOXB13G84 n = 4). ATM and CHEK2-associated cancers were D’Amico intermediate or high risk, comparable to our previously published BRCA2 and BRCAX prostate cancer cohort. HOXB13G84 carriers demonstrated low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer. In the BRCAX cohort, 53.2% of subjects demonstrated high-risk disease compared with 25% of the PCOR cohort. Conclusions: ATM and CHEK2 germline mutation carriers and the BRCAX (confirmed non-mutation carriers) cohort demonstrated high risk disease compared with the general population. Targeted genetic testing will help identify men at greater risk of prostate-cancer-specific mortality. Data correlating rare variants with clinical phenotype and familial predisposition will strengthen the clinical validity and utility of these results and establish these variants as significant in prostate cancer detection and management.

A Healthy Lifestyle in Men at Increased Genetic Risk for Prostate Cancer

BackgroundProstate cancer is the most heritable cancer. There is a need to identify possible modifiable factors for men at an increased risk of prostate cancer due to genetic factors. ObjectiveTo examine whether men at an increased genetic risk of prostate cancer can offset their risk of disease or disease progression by adhering to a healthy lifestyle. Design, setting, and participantsWe prospectively followed 12 411 genotyped men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1993–2019) and the Physicians’ Health Study (1983–2010). Genetic risk of prostate cancer was quantified using a polygenic risk score (PRS). A healthy lifestyle was defined by healthy weight, vigorous physical activity, not smoking, and a healthy diet. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisOverall and lethal prostate cancer events (metastatic disease/prostate cancer–specific death) were analyzed using time-to-event analyses estimating hazard ratios (HRs) and lifetime risks. Results and limitationsDuring 27 yr of follow-up, 3005 overall prostate cancer and 435 lethal prostate cancer events were observed. The PRS enabled risk stratification not only for overall prostate cancer, but also for lethal disease with a four-fold difference between men in the highest and lowest quartiles (HR, 4.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.16–5.89). Among men in the highest PRS quartile, adhering to a healthy lifestyle was associated with a decreased rate of lethal prostate cancer (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36–0.86) compared with having an unhealthy lifestyle, translating to a lifetime risk of 1.6% (95% CI, 0.8–3.1%) among the healthy and 5.3% (95% CI, 3.6–7.8%) among the unhealthy. Adhering to a healthy lifestyle was not associated with a decreased risk of overall prostate cancer. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that a genetic predisposition for prostate cancer is not deterministic for a poor cancer outcome. Maintaining a healthy lifestyle may provide a way to offset the genetic risk of lethal prostate cancer. Patient summaryThis study examined whether the genetic risk of prostate cancer can be attenuated by a healthy lifestyle including a healthy weight, regular exercise, not smoking, and a healthy diet. We observed that adherence to a healthy lifestyle reduced the risk of metastatic disease and prostate cancer death among men at the highest genetic risk. We conclude that men at a high genetic risk of prostate cancer may benefit from adhering to a healthy lifestyle.

Inherited Mutations in Chinese Men With Prostate Cancer.

Although China accounts for 7.8% of worldwide new prostate cancer (PCa) cases and 14.5% of new deaths according to GLOBOCAN 2020, the risk of PCa associated with germline mutations is poorly defined, hampered in part by lack of nationwide evidence. Here, we sequenced 19 PCa predisposition genes in 1,836 Chinese patients with PCa and estimated disease risk associated with inherited mutations. Patients were recruited from 4 tertiary cancer centers (n=1,160) and a commercial laboratory (n=676). Germline DNA was sequenced using a multigene panel, and pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) mutation frequencies in patients with PCa were compared with populations from the gnomAD (Genome Aggregation Database) and ChinaMAP (China Metabolic Analytics Project) databases. Clinical characteristics and progression-free survival were assessed by mutation status. Of 1,160 patients from hospitals, 89.7% had Gleason scores ≥8, and 65.6% had metastases. P/LP mutations were identified in 8.49% of Chinese patients with PCa. Association with PCa risk was significant for mutations in ATM (odds ratio [OR], 5.9; 95% CI, 3.1-11.1), BRCA2 (OR, 15.3; 95% CI, 10.0-23.2), MSH2 (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 4.2-59.6), and PALB2 (OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 2.7-13.2). Compared with those without mutations, patients with mutations in ATM, BRCA2, MSH2, or PALB2 showed a poor outcome with treatment using androgen deprivation therapy and abiraterone (hazard ratio, 2.19 [95% CI, 1.34-3.58] and 2.47 [95% CI, 1.23-4.96], respectively) but similar benefit from docetaxel. The present multicenter study confirmed that a significant proportion of Chinese patients with PCa had inherited mutations and identified predisposition genes in this underreported ethnicity. These data provide empirical evidence for precision prevention and prognostic estimation in Chinese patients with PCa.

Parallel Reporter Assays Identify Altered Regulatory Role of rs684232 in Leading to Prostate Cancer Predisposition.

Functional characterization of cancer risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has become a big challenge. To identify the regulatory risk SNPs that can lead to transcriptional misregulation, we performed parallel reporter gene assays with both alleles of 213 prostate cancer risk-associated GWAS SNPs in 22Rv1 cells. We disclosed 32 regulatory SNPs that exhibited different regulatory activities with two alleles. For one of the regulatory SNPs, rs684232, we found that the variation altered chromatin binding of transcription factor FOXA1 on the DNA region and led to aberrant gene expression of VPS53, FAM57A, and GEMIN4, which play vital roles in prostate cancer malignancy. Our findings reveal the roles and underlying mechanism of rs684232 in prostate cancer progression and hold great promise in benefiting prostate cancer patients with prognostic prediction and target therapies.

A Rare Variant in ERF (rs144812092) Predisposes to Prostate and Bladder Cancers in an Extended Pedigree.

Simple SummaryHere we applied a powerful predisposition candidate gene identification strategy to identify rare variants shared by two related bladder cancer cases who were members of pedigrees exhibiting a significant excess of bladder cancers. We sequenced the exomes of pairs of related bladder cancer cases belonging to high-risk bladder cancer pedigrees to identify rare, shared variants shared as candidates for predisposition. A rare, shared variant in ERF was also found to show significant association with bladder cancer risk in an independent population, was present in other prostate cancer-affected members in the pedigree, and showed evidence for altering the function of the associated protein. This evidence supports ERF (ETS2 Repressor Factor) as a bladder and prostate cancer predisposition gene.Pairs of related bladder cancer cases who belong to pedigrees with an excess of bladder cancer were sequenced to identify rare, shared variants as candidate predisposition variants. Candidate variants were tested for association with bladder cancer risk. A validated variant was assayed for segregation to other related cancer cases, and the predicted protein structure of this variant was analyzed. This study of affected bladder cancer relative pairs from high-risk pedigrees identified 152 bladder cancer predisposition candidate variants. One variant in ERF (ETS Repressing Factor) was significantly associated with bladder cancer risk in an independent population, was observed to segregate with bladder and prostate cancer in relatives, and showed evidence for altering the function of the associated protein. This finding of a rare variant in ERF that is strongly associated with bladder and prostate cancer risk in an extended pedigree both validates ERF as a cancer predisposition gene and shows the continuing value of analyzing affected members of high-risk pedigrees to identify and validate rare cancer predisposition variants.

Prevalence of comprehensive DNA damage repair gene germline mutations in Chinese prostate cancer patients.

Germline DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiency has been associated with increased cancer risk, poor prognosis and therapeutic opportunity for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the landscape of germline mutations in PCa covering comprehensive DDR genes has not been reported. We performed whole-exome sequencing in 246 patients who meet the National Cancer Center Network guidelines for genetic testing and analyzed variants in 276 DDR genes, which was from the Cancer Genome Atlas. A total of 79 deleterious germline alterations in 60 DDR genes were identified in 31% (76/246) patients. Mutations were found in nine DDR pathways, including 11.8% men in homologous recombination repair (HR) pathways, 2.4% men in mismatch repair (MMR) pathway and 16.7% (41/246) patients in non-HR/MMR pathways. In HRR and MMR pathways, mutations were mostly identified in BRCA2 (5.3%), HFM1 (0.8%), ZSWIM7 (0.8%), MSH2 (0.8%) and MSH3 (0.8%). When compared with the cancer-free cohort, POLN and POLG conferred high risk to PCa with odds ratio 6.9 and 20.5, respectively. We provided a comprehensive view of germline DDR gene mutations in PCa patients. We also identified two potential PCa predisposition genes: POLN and POLG, which have not been reported in the Western population, confirming the necessity of customizing a multigene panel for Chinese PCa patients.

Role of Calcium Signaling in Prostate Cancer Progression: Effects on Cancer Hallmarks and Bone Metastatic Mechanisms.

Advanced prostate cancers that progress to tumor metastases are often considered incurable or difficult to treat. The etiology of prostate cancers is multi-factorial. Among other factors, de-regulation of calcium signals in prostate tumor cells mediates several pathological dysfunctions associated with tumor progression. Calcium plays a relevant role on tumor cell death, proliferation, motility-invasion and tumor metastasis. Calcium controls molecular factors and signaling pathways involved in the development of prostate cancer and its progression. Such factors and pathways include calcium channels and calcium-binding proteins. Nevertheless, the involvement of calcium signaling on prostate cancer predisposition for bone tropism has been relatively unexplored. In this regard, a diversity of mechanisms triggers transient accumulation of intracellular calcium in prostate cancer cells, potentially favoring bone metastases development. New therapies for the treatment of prostate cancer include compounds characterized by potent and specific actions that target calcium channels/transporters or pumps. These novel drugs for prostate cancer treatment encompass calcium-ATPase inhibitors, voltage-gated calcium channel inhibitors, transient receptor potential (TRP) channel regulators or Orai inhibitors. This review details the latest results that have evaluated the relationship between calcium signaling and progression of prostate cancer, as well as potential therapies aiming to modulate calcium signaling in prostate tumor progression.

Germline DNA Repair Gene Mutations in Young-onset Prostate Cancer Cases in the UK: Evidence for a More Extensive Genetic Panel

BackgroundRare germline mutations in DNA repair genes are associated with prostate cancer (PCa) predisposition and prognosis. ObjectiveTo quantify the frequency of germline DNA repair gene mutations in UK PCa cases and controls, in order to more comprehensively evaluate the contribution of individual genes to overall PCa risk and likelihood of aggressive disease. Design, setting, and participantsWe sequenced 167 DNA repair and eight PCa candidate genes in a UK-based cohort of 1281 young-onset PCa cases (diagnosed at ≤60yr) and 1160 selected controls. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisGene-level SKAT-O and gene-set adaptive combination of p values (ADA) analyses were performed separately for cases versus controls, and aggressive (Gleason score ≥8, n=201) versus nonaggressive (Gleason score ≤7, n=1048) cases. Results and limitationsWe identified 233 unique protein truncating variants (PTVs) with minor allele frequency <0.5% in controls in 97 genes. The total proportion of PTV carriers was higher in cases than in controls (15% vs 12%, odds ratio [OR]=1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.64, p=0.036). Gene-level analyses selected NBN (pSKAT-O=2.4×10−4) for overall risk and XPC (pSKAT-O=1.6×10−4) for aggressive disease, both at candidate-level significance (p<3.1×10−4 and p<3.4×10−4, respectively). Gene-set analysis identified a subset of 20 genes associated with increased PCa risk (OR=3.2, 95% CI 2.1–4.8, pADA=4.1×10−3) and four genes that increased risk of aggressive disease (OR=11.2, 95% CI 4.6–27.7, pADA=5.6×10−3), three of which overlap the predisposition gene set. ConclusionsThe union of the gene-level and gene-set-level analyses identified 23 unique DNA repair genes associated with PCa predisposition or risk of aggressive disease. These findings will help facilitate the development of a PCa-specific sequencing panel with both predictive and prognostic potential. Patient summaryThis large sequencing study assessed the rate of inherited DNA repair gene mutations between prostate cancer patients and disease-free men. A panel of 23 genes was identified, which may improve risk prediction or treatment pathways in future clinical practice.

Targeted next generation sequencing identifies functionally deleterious germline mutations in novel genes in early-onset/familial prostate cancer.

Considering that mutations in known prostate cancer (PrCa) predisposition genes, including those responsible for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer and Lynch syndromes, explain less than 5% of early-onset/familial PrCa, we have sequenced 94 genes associated with cancer predisposition using next generation sequencing (NGS) in a series of 121 PrCa patients. We found monoallelic truncating/functionally deleterious mutations in seven genes, including ATM and CHEK2, which have previously been associated with PrCa predisposition, and five new candidate PrCa associated genes involved in cancer predisposing recessive disorders, namely RAD51C, FANCD2, FANCI, CEP57 and RECQL4. Furthermore, using in silico pathogenicity prediction of missense variants among 18 genes associated with breast/ovarian cancer and/or Lynch syndrome, followed by KASP genotyping in 710 healthy controls, we identified “likely pathogenic” missense variants in ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2 and TP53. In conclusion, this study has identified putative PrCa predisposing germline mutations in 14.9% of early-onset/familial PrCa patients. Further data will be necessary to confirm the genetic heterogeneity of inherited PrCa predisposition hinted in this study.

Inherited Mutations in Men Undergoing Multigene Panel Testing for Prostate Cancer: Emerging Implications for Personalized Prostate Cancer Genetic Evaluation.

Multigene panels are commercially available for the evaluation of prostate cancer (PCA) predisposition, which necessitates tailored genetic counseling (GC) for men. Here we describe emerging results of Genetic Evaluation of Men, prospective multigene testing study in PCA to inform personalized genetic counseling, with emerging implications for referrals, cancer screening, and precision therapy. Eligibility criteria for men affected by or at high risk for PCA encompass age, race, family history (FH), and PCA stage/grade. Detailed demographic, clinical, and FH data were obtained from participants and medical records. Multigene testing was conducted after GC. Mutation rates were summarized by eligibility criteria and compared across FH data. The 95% CI of mutation prevalence was constructed by using Poisson distribution. Of 200 men enrolled, 62.5% had PCA. Eleven (5.5%; 95% CI, 3.0% to 9.9%) had mutations; 63.6% of mutations were in DNA repair genes. FH of breast cancer was significantly associated with mutation status (P = .004), and FH that met criteria for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome was significantly associated with PCA (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.05 to 5.18). Variants of uncertain significance were reported in 70 men (35.0%). Among mutation carriers, 45.5% had personal/FH concordant with the gene. A tailored GC model was developed based on emerging findings. Multigene testing for PCA identifies mutations mostly in DNA repair genes, with implications for precision therapy. The study highlights the importance of comprehensive genetic evaluation for PCA beyond metastatic disease, including early-stage disease with strong FH. Detailed FH is important for referrals of men for genetic evaluation. The results inform precision GC and cancer screening for men and their male and female blood relatives.

RE: Germline Mutations in the Kallikrein 6 Region and Predisposition for Aggressive Prostate Cancer.

RE: Germline Mutations in the Kallikrein 6 Region and Predisposition for Aggressive Prostate Cancer.

Inherited determinants of early recurrent somatic mutations in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is a highly heritable molecularly and clinically heterogeneous disease. To discover germline events involved in prostate cancer predisposition, we develop a computational approach to nominate heritable facilitators of somatic genomic events in the context of the androgen receptor signaling. Here, we use a ranking score and benign prostate transcriptomes to identify a non-coding polymorphic regulatory element at 7p14.3 that associates with DNA repair and hormone-regulated transcript levels and with an early recurrent prostate cancer-specific somatic mutation in the Speckle-Type POZ protein (SPOP) gene. The locus shows allele-specific activity that is concomitantly modulated by androgen receptor and by CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) beta (CEBPB). Deletion of this locus via CRISPR-Cas9 leads to deregulation of the genes predicted to interact with the 7p14.3 locus by Hi-C chromosome conformation capture data. This study suggests that a polymorphism at 7p14.3 may predispose to SPOP mutant prostate cancer subclass through a hormone-dependent DNA damage response.

Germline Mutations in the Kallikrein 6 Region and Predisposition for Aggressive Prostate Cancer.

There is a need for markers that can specifically identify individuals at increased risk of harboring aggressive forms of prostate cancer (PCa). We surveyed the Kallikrein ( KLK ) region ( KLK 1-15) for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with aggressive PCa (Gleason Score ≥ 8) in 1858 PCa patients. Discovery cohorts (Swiss arm of the European Randomized Study of Screening for PCa, n = 379; Toronto, Canada, n = 540) and a validation cohort (Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian [PLCO] screening trial, n = 939) were analyzed. Fine-mapping within the KLK region was carried out by genotyping and imputation in the discovery cohort, whereas PLCO data were provided through database of Genotypes and Phenotypes ( dbGaP ). The influence of SNPs of interest on biochemical-free survival was evaluated in a cohort of localized PCa from the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC; n = 130) analyzed with next-generation sequencing. Single- and multi-SNP association studies, as well as haplotype analyses, were performed. All statistical tests were two-sided. Several SNPs in very strong linkage disequilibrium in the KLK 6 region and located within the same haplotype (rs113640578, rs79324425, rs11666929, rs28384475, rs3810287), identified individuals at increased risk of aggressive PCa in both discovery (odds ratio [OR] = 3.51-3.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.01 to 6.36, P = 1.0x10 -5 -8.4x10 -6 ) and validation (OR = 1.89-1.96, 95% CI = 0.99 to 3.71, P = .04-.05) cohorts. The overall test of haplotype association was highly statistically significant in each cohort ( P = 3.5x10 -4 and .006, respectively) and in the three data sets combined ( P = 2.3x10 -5 ). These germline SNPs independently predicted relapse in the ICGC cohort (hazard ratio = 3.15, 95% CI = 1.57 to 6.34, P = .001). Our fine-mapping study has identified novel loci in the KLK 6 region strongly associated with aggressive PCa.