Statement of problem. The most important requirement for an interim crown is suitable marginal adaptation. Purpose. This in vitro study compared vertical discrepancies of margins for complete crowns made with six provisional materials (Provipont, Protemp Garant, Unifast LC, Triad VLC, Splintline, and Jet). Material and Methods. A direct technique was used to fabricate 60 provisional complete crowns on prepared molars with a polyvinyl siloxane impression and a vacuum-formed polypropylene sheet as matrices. A measuring microscope was used to measure vertical marginal discrepancies at ×100. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U tests (α = 0.05). Results. Significant differences were found between resinous materials tested ( p = 0.0002) and multiple comparisons tests indicated no significant difference between Splintline and Protemp Garant; Provipont, Unifast LC, and Triad VLC; and Unifast LC, Triad, and Jet provisional materials. Conclusions. This study indicated that provisional crowns fabricated with Splintline and Protemp Garant interim restorative materials recorded the least marginal discrepancies. (J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:482-5.)