Proportion Of Ovarian Cancer Cases Research Articles

Trends in extent of surgical cytoreduction for patients with ovarian cancer.

To identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with extended surgical cytoreduction in the treatment of ovarian cancer. A retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database identified women hospitalized for surgery to remove an ovarian malignancy between 2013 and 2017. Extended cytoreduction (ECR) was defined as surgery involving the bowel, liver, diaphragm, bladder, stomach, or spleen. Chi-square and logistic regression were used to analyze patient and hospital demographics related to ECR, and trends were assessed using the Cochran-Armitage test. Of the estimated 79,400 patients undergoing ovarian cancer surgery, 22% received ECR. Decreased adjusted odds of ECR were found in patients with lower Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores (OR 0.61, p<0.001 for ECI 2, versus ECI≥3) or residence outside the top income quartile (OR 0.71, p<0.001 for Q1, versus Q4), and increased odds were seen at hospitals with high ovarian cancer surgical volume (OR 1.25, p<0.001, versus low volume). From 2013 to 2017, there was a decrease in the proportion of cases with extended procedures (19% to 15%, p<0.001). There were significant decreases in the proportion of cases with small bowel, colon, and rectosigmoid resections (p<0.001). Patients who underwent ECR were more likely treated at a high surgical volume hospital (37% vs 31%, p<0.001) over the study period. For their hospital admission, patients who underwent ECR had increased mortality (1.6% vs. 0.5%, p<0.001), length of stay (9.6 days vs. 5.2 days, p<0.001), and mean cost ($32,132 vs. $17,363, p<0.001). Likelihood of ECR was associated with increased medical comorbidity complexity, higher income, and undergoing the procedure at high surgical volume hospitals. The proportion of ovarian cancer cases with ECR has decreased from 2013-17, with more cases performed at high surgical volume hospitals.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer patients from Belarus: update

BackgroundMutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are well-established risk factors for breast and ovarian cancer. In Central-Eastern European counties, the founder mutations in the BRCA1 are responsible for a significant proportion of ovarian cancer cases, however, regional differences in the frequencies of various mutations may exist. The spectrum and frequency of BRCA1/2 mutations between ovarian cancer patients have not yet been precisely established in Belarus.MethodsTwo hundred fourteen consecutive unselected cases of ovarian cancer patients from the region of West Belarus were examined. We studied 13 founder mutations in BRCA1 (c.5266dupC, c.4035delA, c.5251C > T, c.181 T > G, c.676delT, c.68_69delAG, c.3700_3704delGTAAA, c.1687C > T, c.3756_3759delGTCT) and in BRCA2 (c.658_659delGT, c.7913_7917delTTCCT, c.3847_3848delGT, c.5946delT) characteristic for Central European population.ResultsA BRCA1 or BRCA2 founder mutations were detected in 54 of the 214 (25.2%) ovarian cancer cases. The BRCA1 c.5266dupC mutation was detected in 28 patients, followed by c.4035delA mutation observed in 18 patients. BRCA1 c.3756_3759delGTCT, c.68_69delAG, and c.1687C > T were found in 3, 2, and 1 women, respectively. BRCA2 c.658_659delGT mutation was detected in 2 ovarian cancer patients. The median age of diagnosis of the 54 hereditary ovarian cancers was 57.5 years.ConclusionsThe frequency of 13 causative BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations in West Belarus was higher than in other Slavic countries. Testing of BRCA1 (c.5266dupC, c.4035delA, c.3756_3759delGTCT, c.68_69delAG, c.1687C > T as well as c.181 T > G) and BRCA2 (c.658_659delGT) mutations should be considered an inexpensive and sensitive test panel for this population.

Nanoparticles loading porphyrin sensitizers in improvement of photodynamic therapy for ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer, the malignant tumor with the highest mortality rate in gynecological tumors, leads to a poor prognosis due to tumor metastasis. At present, the main treatment for ovarian cancer is the combination of cytoreduction surgery and chemotherapy. But the surgery is insufficient to solve the extensive transfer of tumor in the abdominal cavity and a large proportion of ovarian cancer cases have shown resistance to chemotherapy. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a viable treatment option for a wide range of applications, especially in malignant tumors. Porphyrin sensitizers, as the most widely used photosensitive agents, have the following advantages: short photosensitive period and high singlet oxygen production. However, most studies have found that it is difficult to achieve high loading rates of photosensitive agents, thus effective concentration in target tissue is suboptimal and the lethal ability is greatly reduced. In this article, we review several studies that nanoparticles loading porphyrin sensitizers for photodynamic therapy of ovarian cancer. We collected relevant literature from PUBMED and reviewed their research content. The application of nanotechnology to PDT in ovarian cancer can reduce the non-specific toxicity of photosensitive agents and increase stability and delivery efficiency. The combination with nanotechnology can cover the shortcomings of photodynamic therapy, but the specific efficacy still needs a large number of experiments to prove.

Frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 causative founder variants in ovarian cancer patients in South-East Poland

BackgroundCausative variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are well-established risk factors for breast and ovarian cancer. In Poland, the causative founder variants in the BRCA1 are responsible for a significant proportion of ovarian cancer cases, however, regional differences in the frequencies of various mutations may exist. The spectrum and frequency of BRCA1/2 mutations between ovarian cancer patients have not yet been studied in the region of South-East Poland.MethodsWe examined 158 consecutive unselected cases of ovarian cancer patients from the region of Podkarpacie. We studied 13 Polish causative founder variants in BRCA1 (c.5266dupC, c.4035delA, c.5251C > T, c.181 T > G, c.676delT, c.68_69delAG, c.3700_3704delGTAAA, c.1687C > T, c.3756_3759delGTCT) and in BRCA2 (c.658_659delGT, c.7910_7914delCCTTT, c.3847_3848delGT, c.5946delT).ResultsA BRCA1 causative founder variants were detected in 10 of the 158 (6.3%) ovarian cancer cases. BRCA2 causative founder variants were not observed. The c.5266dupC mutation was detected in 6 patients, c.181 T > G mutation in 3 patients and the c.676delT mutation in 1 patient. The median age of diagnosis of the 10 hereditary ovarian cancers was 55.5 years of age.ConclusionsThe frequency of 13 causative founder variants in Podkarpacie was lower than in other regions of Poland. Testing of three BRCA1 mutations (c.5266dupC, c.181 T > G, c.676delT) should be considered a sensitive test panel.

Auto-antibodies against P53—a useful complementary biomarker for ovarian cancer screening?

More than 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed in late stage, when 5-year survival is less than 30%. Cases diagnosed at early stage have markedly better survival outcomes (1), and this survival difference has prompted extensive research on methods for early detection and ovarian cancer screening. Current strategies for earlierstage detection of ovarian cancer use a combination of blood-based biomarkers and trans-vaginal ultrasound (TVUS) imaging. To date, the best available biomarker for ovarian cancer is ovarian tumor-associated antigen CA125; however, CA125 demonstrates limited sensitivity for early stage disease. While the vast majority (~80%) of ovarian tumors express CA125, only 50–60% of women with early stage cancers have elevated circulating CA125 levels (concentrations >35 U/mL) at presentation, possibly because small tumors may not shed sufficient amounts of CA125 into the circulation (2). In prospective studies using prediagnosis samples, we (3) and others (4,5) have found that CA125 provides good diagnostic discrimination for ovarian cancer only when blood samples had been taken relatively shortly (≤6 months) before diagnosis, and that it mostly detected tumors that were clinically advanced at the time of diagnosis. Similar observations were made for human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), the second best available ovarian cancer marker to date (3-5). In screening trials, the combination of CA125 with TVUS provided either no reduction in ovarian cancer mortality [Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO), USA] (6), or only a modest and marginally significant reduction when using an algorithm (“Risk of Ovarian Cancer”, ROCA) based on serial CA125 measurements [United Kingdom Collaborative Trial on Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)] (7). Although the prospective ROCA algorithm clearly improves sensitivity of screening by CA125, a substantial proportion of ovarian cancer cases remain undetected by this method, underscoring the need for complementary and more sensitive biomarkers for the detection of earlier-stage ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer: epidemiology and risk factors

The present overview of ovarian cancer epidemiology summarizes the main results for a network of case-control studies in Italy and from the Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian Cancer. There are consistent inverse relations between parity, oral contraceptive use and the risk of ovarian cancer. For other menstrual and hormonal factors (i.e. early age at menarche and late menopause), there are established associations, but of limited impact on ovarian cancer incidence on a population level. Serous and endometrioid ovarian cancers (but not mucinous or clear cell types) are related to current and recent use of hormone replacement therapy in menopause. There are no strong associations with alcohol and tobacco overall, but a direct link for tobacco with (borderline) mucinous cancers, of limited impact, however, on overall ovarian cancer mortality. There are direct associations of ovarian cancer risk with height and BMI, as well as possible relations with selected dietary factors - in the absence, however, of consistent findings - and a possible inverse association with physical activity. There is a strong association with a family history of ovarian cancer (and a few selected other neoplasms, including colorectum and endometrium). Recognized risk factors explain only a limited proportion of ovarian cancer cases on a population level. A key reason for the recent favourable trends of ovarian cancer incidence and mortality in several high-income countries is the widespread use of oral contraceptive in the generations born after 1930.

Novel and recurrent BRCA2 mutations in Italian breast/ovarian cancer families widen the ovarian cancer cluster region boundaries to exons 13 and 14

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer are mainly linked to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes which confer a similar cumulative risk of developing breast cancer. Importantly, while BRCA2 mutation carriers generally have a lower cumulative risk for ovarian cancer, mutations clustered in the central portion of BRCA2 are associated with a higher proportion of ovarian compared with breast cancer cases. The boundaries of this ovarian cancer cluster region (OCCR) have been tentatively defined within a 3.3kb region of BRCA2 exon 11, and herein, we reassessed these boundaries using our series of Italian breast/ovarian cancer families. We used direct sequencing to investigate BRCA mutations in 367 breast/ovarian cancer families. We also studied the association between the location of the mutations and the ovarian cancer phenotype in our cohort of BRCA2-mutated families. We observed the novel c.7309_7309delA frameshift mutation and the c.7007G>A deleterious mutation in BRCA2 exons 14 and 13, respectively, in five independent Italian families characterized by a high proportion of ovarian cancer cases. Of note, a significantly higher proportion of ovarian versus breast cancer cases was associated not only with mutations in the previously defined OCCR (OR=5.91; p=0.004), but also with the exon 13-14 region (OR=7.37; p=0.001) in our BRCA2-mutated families. Our data provide initial evidence for a novel putative OCCR in BRCA2 exons 13-14.

Ovarian carcinoma associated with endometriosis

ObjectivesPrevious studies have suggested an association between endometriosis and development of ovarian cancer. A study was performed to evaluate the cases of ovarian carcinoma associated with endometriosis. Study designThe study includes patients with ovarian carcinoma associated with endometriosis diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 at Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. A total of 1086 patients who underwent surgical staging for ovarian carcinoma were analyzed retrospectively for the presence of histologically documented endometriosis. The clinical and pathological characteristics of 45 ovarian carcinoma patients associated with endometriosis were evaluated including histologic subtype, stage and grade. ResultsOvarian carcinoma was found to be associated with endometriosis in 4.1% (45/1086) of the cases. Of them, 17 patients (37.8%) had clear cell, 15 (33.3%) had endometrioid, 6 (13.3%) had serous papillary, 4 (8.9%) had mucinous and the remaining 3 patients had an undifferentiated subtype of ovarian carcinoma. Twenty-three (51.1%) patients had stage I, 4 (8.9%) had stage II and 18 (40.0%) had stage III disease. The frequency of coexistence of endometriosis was 20.4% (17/83) for clear cell carcinoma and 9.3% (15/161) for endometrioid cell carcinoma. ConclusionsOnly a small proportion of ovarian cancer cases were found to be associated with endometriosis. Endometriosis was most frequently associated with clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinoma. Ovarian carcinoma associated with endometriosis seems to represent a distinct disease entity with different histological subtypes, early presentation and a relatively favorable outcome.

Abstract 1678: European ancestry and ovarian cancer: Testing for their association using case control data

Abstract Population stratification in case-control studies can result from differences in ancestral make-up between cases and controls due to sampling variation. Ancestry is therefore routinely estimated and controlled for in these studies. Although less common, it is also possible for ancestry to truly be associated to the disease of interest. Controlling for ancestry can then compromise the power to detect variants that underlie both ancestry and disease. Using data from a multi-center case-control study of epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) among women of European-American ethnicity in which case-control samples were drawn from four geographically distinct North-American sites, we developed a three-step method to investigate whether the stratification observed across the four sites is due to chance or to a non-spurious association between European ancestry and OC. First, we collapsed genome-wide data into two principal components (PCs) that represent the major axes of European ancestral variation, which correspond to north-south and to west-east geographical clines. Next, we determined the discriminant function based on these two PCs that best separates cases and controls for each individual study site and we used the largest angle between the four discriminant function vectors as a measure of similarity ranging from 0 degrees, where all four vectors are exactly the same, to 180 degrees where two of the vectors face exactly opposite directions. If stratification is due to sampling, it is unlikely that the four sites will present similar discriminant functions by chance alone. We then gauged significance of similarity by permuting the case control status across individuals within each site and recalculating the maximum angle between the discriminant function vectors, thus obtaining a null distribution for the statistic. We found that all four sites present the greatest separation between cases and controls on the west-east axis of ancestral variation, with a higher proportion of ovarian cancer cases presenting western ancestry. The largest angle between the four discriminant function vectors observed was of 36.5 degrees. Permutation testing showed this level of similarity between the functions to have a p-value &amp;lt; 0.01 and suggests that OC risk is somehow tied to European ancestry. It remains to be seen whether shared culture or other exposures such as parity or oral contraceptive use explain this connection or whether genetic variants underlie it and are potentially being missed due to routine ancestry control in association testing. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1678. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-1678

The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

The age-specific proportion of breast and ovarian cancer in the general population that is likely to be due to a breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility gene(s) is estimated. In addition, the age-specific penetrance of ovarian cancer for women predicted to be carriers of a susceptibility gene is calculated using population-based data. Data are from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study, a population-based, case-control study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control, which includes 4730 breast cancer cases aged 20 to 54 years. Information regarding the occurrence of breast and ovarian cancer was collected for mothers and sisters of the cases during an in-home interview. The probability of being a breast cancer susceptibility gene carrier was calculated for each of the breast cancer cases using information on the family history of breast cancer. The calculated risk of ovarian cancer in the first-degree relatives of breast cancer cases with a high probability of being a gene carrier is compared with that seen in first-degree relatives of breast cancer cases with a low probability of being a gene carrier and used to calculate the proportion of ovarian cancer cases that are likely to be due to a breast/ovarian susceptibility gene(s) as well as the age-specific risk of developing ovarian cancer for gene carriers. Approximately 10% of ovarian cancer cases and 7% of breast cancer cases in the general population are estimated to be carriers of a breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility gene; these women are found primarily in families characterized by multiple cases of the early onset of breast cancer. The proportion of breast cancer cases predicted to be attributable to the gene decreases markedly with age; approximately 33% of cases age 20-29 years compared with approximately 2% of cases age 70-79 years. The proportion of ovarian cancer cases predicted to be due to the susceptibility gene ranges from 14% among patients diagnosed in their 30s to 7% among those diagnosed in their 50s. Carriers are predicted to have at least 15 times the age-specific risk of ovarian cancer of noncarriers. Among women predicted to carry the gene, the cumulative risk of developing ovarian cancer by the age of 59 years is approximately 10%. The estimates provided may prove helpful to clinicians until such time as large-scale population-based screening for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes is possible.