Migraine Prophylaxis Research Articles

Preventive effect of greater occipital nerve block on patients with episodic migraine: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Since the data regarding the efficacy of greater occipital in episodic migraines are rare, we aimed to examine the efficacy of greater occipital block in the prophylaxis of episodic migraines without aura and compare different injectable drug regimens. In a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, adult patients suffering from episodic migraines without aura were randomized to one of the following: triamcinolone, lidocaine, triamcinolone plus lidocaine, and saline. Patients were assessed at baseline, one week, two weeks, and four weeks after the injection for severity and duration of headaches and side effects. Fifty-five patients completed the study. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated that the severity and duration decreased significantly after the greater occipital block (P < 0.001, P = 0.001 respectively) in all four groups. However, there was no difference between groups at any study time points (P > 0.05). In paired sample T-test, only groups 2 and 3 with lidocaine as a part of the injection showed a significant decrease in frequency compared to the baseline (P = 0.002, P = 0.019). Three patients reported side effects with a possible association with triamcinolone. Greater occipital block with a local anesthetic significantly decreases the number of attacks in episodic migraine, whereas no injection was superior to the placebo in regards to the duration and severity of the headaches.Trial Registration Information: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT). Registration number: IRCT2017070334879N1. https://www.irct.ir/trial/26537.

OnabotulinumtoxinA for the prophylactic treatment of headaches in adult patients with chronic migraine: a safety evaluation

ABSTRACT Introduction Existing oral prophylaxis for chronic migraine (CM) are often ineffective or poorly-tolerated. OnabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) is approved for headache prophylaxis in CM patients and ameliorates headaches in those refractory to multiple preventatives. Areas covered We appraise evidence regarding action mechanisms, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of onabotA in CM prophylaxis. We critically evaluate salient clinical and real-world studies demonstrating its efficacy in improving multiple aspects of CM. We discuss safety, tolerability and adverse events (AEs) of onabotA for CM prophylaxis from clinical trials, post-authorisation studies and meta-analyses, including novel pregnancy safety data and comparisons with oral prophylactics. We explore areas of future interest, particularly onabotA safety and efficacy in the context of novel antibody-based prophylaxis. Expert opinion Clinical and real-world evidence demonstrate onabotA safety, tolerability and efficacy for CM prophylaxis. Most AEs are mild/moderate and self-limiting, with few serious AEs and no treatment-related deaths. Common AEs include neck pain, ptosis, muscle weakness and stiffness. Modifying existing responder-criteria enables more patients to benefit from onabotA. OnabotA shows superior safety and efficacy to oral preventatives and appears safe in pregnancy. Future pregnancy-risk register will clarify pregnancy and lactation safety further. Future research comparing onabotA safety and efficacy with newly-emergent antibody-based prophylaxis is keenly awaited.

Pizotifen for the treatment of migraine. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction Pizotifen is an oral drug developed many years ago for the prophylaxis of migraine. Trials on pizotifen are decades old, and there has never been a systematic review and meta-analyses of data from these clinical studies. Methods This is a systematic review and meta-analyses on pizotifen's efficacy and safety for prophylactic migraine treatment. We considered for inclusion only randomized clinical trials (RCTs). A comprehensive electronic search was performed without language, date or publication status restrictions in the formal electronic databases, clinical trial registration platforms and grey literature. Results There were eight RCTs of pizotifen compared either to placebo or to other drugs. Very low certainty of evidence showed that pizotifen seems to be superior to placebo regarding clinical symptoms improvement (Relative risk [RR] 6.00; 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.63 to 22.03; p = 0.007), but not inferior to naproxen, flunarizine, valproate or clonidine. Weight gain was the most frequent adverse event of pizotifen but there was no difference with placebo (RR 1.92; 95% CI 0.30 to 12.38; 2 RCTs; 142 participants; I2 = 67%; p = 0.49). Conclusion The RCTs of pizotifen were decades old. It is a safe and potentially efficacious inexpensive drug that deserves a better designed, modern clinical trial before being dismissed as an option for migraine therapy. PROSPERO Register: CRD42020194347.

Treatment responses to erenumab in onabotulinumtoxinA-refractory chronic migraine: Long-term real-world experience from a specialist headache centre

Erenumab is a novel humanised anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor monoclonal antibody efficacious in chronic migraine (CM) prophylaxis. We investigate long-term real-world erenumab efficacy in converting OnabotulinumtoxinA-refractory CM to episodic migraine (EM).

Botulinum toxin type A wear-off phenomenon in chronic migraine patients: how long does the maximum efficiency last?

Botulinum toxin Type A (BoNTA) is a successful treatment for chronic migraine prophylaxis. We aimed to evaluate the monthly change of effectiveness of BoNTA treatment. A total of 80 patients (70 females and 10 males) with chronic migraine were included. In our study protocol, we applied to 155 U across 31 fixed-sites and if the patient had pain, 40 U dose injections were applied across 8 specific head/neck muscle areas. Headache days and analgesic intake were noted before the BoNTA injection and during the interviews at the first, second, and third months after the BoNTA injection. The mean age was 37.59 ± 7.60 and 87.5% of the patients were female. The mean number of headache days/month before BoNTA was 18.95±2.69, decreasing to 10.55±3.15 days/month in the first month (p<0.001), 9.31±2.43 days/month in the second month (p<0.001), and increased to 11.97±3.27 days/month in the third month (p<0.001). The mean analgesic intake before BoNTA was 11.48±4.68 tablets/month, while it decreased to 6.53±2.72 tablets/month in the first month (p<0.001) and 5.40±2.46 tablets/month in the second month (p<0.001). In the third month, it was 5.85±2.59 tablets/month (p<0.001). There was a significant increase in pain medication use from the second to the third month (p<0.001). In our study, there was a significant reduction in analgesic intake and headache days in the first and second months after BoNTA injection, and an increase was observed in the third month.

Migraine evolution after the cessation of CGRP(-receptor) antibody prophylaxis: a prospective, longitudinal cohort study

BackgroundNational and international guidelines recommend stopping migraine prophylaxis with CGRP(-receptor) monoclonal antibodies after 6–12 months of successful therapy. In this study, we aimed to analyze the course of migraine for four months after the cessation of CGRP(-receptor) antibodies use.MethodsThis longitudinal cohort study included patients with migraine who received a CGRP-(receptor) antibody for ≥8 months before treatment cessation. We analyzed headache data in the four-week period prior to mAb treatment initiation (baseline), in the month before the last mAb injection, in weeks 5–8 and 13–16 after last treatment. Primary endpoint of the study was the change of monthly migraine days from the month before last treatment to weeks 13–16. Secondary endpoints were changes in monthly headache days and monthly days with acute medication use.ResultsA total of 62 patients equally distributed between prophylaxis with the CGRP-receptor antibody erenumab and the CGRP antibodies galcanezumab or fremanezumab participated in the study. Patients reported 8.2 ± 6.6 monthly migraine days in the month before last treatment. Monthly migraine days gradually increased to 10.3 ± 6.8 in weeks 5–8 (p = 0.001) and to 12.5 ± 6.6 in weeks 13–16 (p < 0.001) after drug cessation. Monthly migraine days in weeks 13–16 were not different from baseline values (−0.8 ± 5.4; p > 0.999). Monthly headache days and monthly days with acute medication use showed a similar pattern.ConclusionsThe cessation of CGRP(-receptor) antibodies migraine prophylaxis was associated with a significant increase of migraine frequency and acute medication intake over time.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of High Rate rTMS Versus rTMS and Amitriptyline in Chronic Migraine

The patients with chronic migraine (CM) respond poorly to pharmacological agents including tricyclic antidepressants, beta-blockers, anticonvulsants, calcium channel blockers, flunarizine, and melatonin. The combination of 2 or more pharmacological agents has not shown better efficacy but increased side effects. High rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been reported effective in episodic migraine and converts CM to episodic migraine. A combination of high rate rTMS with a pharmacological agent may be more effective compared to rTMS alone. We evaluate the efficacy and safety of 10 Hz rTMS compared to rTMS and amitriptyline in CM. Randomized controlled trial. Tertiary care teaching institute in India. Patients with CM as per International Classification of Headache Disorder third edition (ICHD-3) beta criteria were included whose age was between 18 years and 55 years. CM was defined if there were 15 headache days per month and at least 8 of these attacks having migraine characteristics for a period of more than 3 months. Patients with major psychiatric, other neurological or systemic disease, and those on migraine prophylaxis were excluded. The demographic details, frequency of headache attacks and headache days per month, migraine triggers, and associated symptoms were noted. The severity of headache was noted using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale and the number of abortive drugs per month was noted. CM patients were randomly assigned to rTMS (group I) or rTMS and amitriptyline (group II). 10 Hz rTMS was applied using a figure of eight magnetic stimulation coil. The coil was placed over the left frontal cortex corresponding to the hot spot of the right abductor digiti minimi, which is approximately 7 cm lateral from the midline and 2 cm anterior to interaural line. The motor threshold was measured, and 70% of it was used for rTMS. Ten trains of 10 Hz rTMS, each train comprising of 60 pulses with an inter-train interval of 45 seconds were delivered in one session. Three such sessions were delivered on an alternate day and were repeated every month for 3 months. Amitriptyline was prescribed in a dose of 10mg, increased to 25mg after 2 weeks; thereafter increase in dose to 50 mg was optional. The primary outcome was > 50% reduction in headache days, and secondary outcomes were the reduction in severity of headache, abortive drug, and side effects. Forty-one patients were included in group I and 42 in group II, and their baseline characteristics were comparable. A higher proportion of group II patients had more than 50% reduction in headache days at 3 months (76.2 vs 31.7%; P < 0.001) compared to group I. More than 50% reduction in headache severity was also greater in group II compared to group I at 3 months (47.6% vs 19.5%; P = 0.01). Side effects were comparable, and none had to be withdrawn. A higher proportion of patients was shifted from group I to group II. Combination of rTMS and amitriptyline is safe and more effective in CM compared to rTMS alone.

Revised guidelines of the French headache society for the diagnosis and management of migraine in adults. Part 2: Pharmacological treatment.

The French Headache Society proposes updated French guidelines for the management of migraine. This article presents the second part of the guidelines, which is focused on the pharmacological treatment of migraine, including both the acute treatment of attacks and the prophylaxis of episodic migraine as well as chronic migraine with and without medication overuse. The specific situations that can be encountered in women with migraine are also discussed, including pregnancy, menstrual migraine, contraception and hormonal replacement therapy.

Future prophylactic treatments in migraine: Beyond anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants.

Migraine is ranked as a leading cause of years lived with disability among all neurological disorders. Therapies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling pathway, including monoclonal antibodies against the receptor or ligand and small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants), are today approved for migraine prophylaxis with additional compounds expected to be introduced to the market soon. In this review, we consider other putative prophylactic migraine drugs in development, including compounds targeting G-protein coupled receptors, glutamate, ion channels, and neuromodulatory devices. Emergence of these new interventions could complement our current treatment armamentarium for migraine management.

The efficacy of topiramate and flunarizine hydrochloride for prophylactic treatment of vestibular migraine

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate and flunarizine hydrochloride in the prophylactic treatment of vestibular migraine prophylaxis. Methods:47 patients with confirmed or probable vestibular migraine（VM） treated at the vertigo clinic of our neurology department from August 2020 to April 2021 were reviewed, and 42 patients were finally included. They were divided into topiramate group （n=22） and flunarizine hydrochloride group （n=20）. The two groups were treated with topiramate 50 mg daily and flunarizine hydrochloride 10 mg daily, respectively. The visual analogue scale, vertigo duration, vertigo frequency, and Dizziness Handicap Inventory （DHI） scores of patients with VM before and 3 months after treatment were compared. The anxiety screening scale （GAD-7） and depression screening scale （PHQ-9） were recorded to assess the improvement of patients' anxiety and depression, and the occurrence of adverse events. Results:Topiramate and flunarizine hydrochloride effectively reduced vertigo intensity, vertigo duration, and vertigo frequency in VM patients （P<0.05）. Meanwhile, total DHI score, DHI physical （DHI-P）, DHI emotional （DHI-E）, DHI functional （DHI-F）, PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were significantly decreased（P<0.05）. Furthermore, topiramate was superior to flunarizine hydrochloride in reducing vertigo intensity, vertigo duration, vertigo frequency, DHI-P, and DHI-F, while there was no significant difference between two drugs in improving patients' mood（P>0.05）. No serious adverse events were reported in either group. Conclusion:This study suggests that topiramate and flunarizine hydrochloride are safe and effective in the prevention of VM, and the daily dose of topiramate 50 mg is superior to the daily dose of flunarizine hydrochloride 10 mg. However, there was no significant difference between the two drugs in terms of mood improvement.

Propranolol modulation of tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ channels in dural afferent neurons

Propranolol, a representative adrenergic β-receptor antagonist, is widely used to prevent migraine attacks. Although propranolol is well known to inhibit tetrodotoxin-resistant (TTX-R) Na+ channels in cardiac myocytes, it is unclear whether the drug modulates these channels expressed in dural afferent neurons. In this study, we examined the effects of propranolol on TTX-R Na+ channels in medium-sized dural afferent neurons identified by the fluorescent dye DiI. The TTX-R Na+ currents (INa) were recorded from acutely isolated DiI-positive neurons using a whole-cell patch clamp technique under voltage-clamp conditions. Propranolol inhibited the noninactivating steady-state component more potently than the peak component of transient TTX-R INa. Propranolol also potently inhibited the slow voltage ramp-induced TTX-R INa in a concentration-dependent manner, suggesting that it preferentially inhibited the noninactivating or persistent INa in DiI-positive neurons. Propranolol had little effect on voltage dependence, but it increased the extent of the use-dependent inhibition of TTX-R Na+ channels. Propranolol also accelerated the onset of inactivation and retarded recovery from inactivation in these channels. Under current-clamp conditions, propranolol decreased the number of action potentials elicited by depolarizing current stimuli. In conclusion, the propranolol-mediated preferential inhibition of persistent INa and modulation of the inactivation kinetics of TTX-R Na+ channels might represent additional mechanisms for migraine prophylaxis.

Migraine Features in Patients With Isolated Aural Fullness and Proposal for a New Diagnosis.

To compare the presence of migraine features between patients with isolated aural fullness (AF) who meet the diagnostic criteria for migraine headache and those who do not, and to propose diagnostic criteria for migraine-related AF based on our results. We performed a retrospective study of patients presenting to a tertiary-care neurotology clinic between 2014 and 2020 with migraine-related AF. This was defined as isolated, prolonged aural fullness concurrent with migraine features once other etiologies were ruled out via examination, audiometry, and imaging. Migraine features were compared between patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for migraine headache and those not meeting the criteria. Seventy-seven patients with migraine-related AF were included. The mean age was 56 ± 15 years and 55 (71%) patients were female. Eleven (14%) patients fulfilled the criteria for migraine headache (migraine group). Of the 66 patients who did not meet the criteria (nonmigraine group), 17 (26%) met 4/5 criteria, and 32 (48%) met 3/5 criteria, for a total of 49 (74%) patients. The migraine and nonmigraine groups were only different in 5 of 20 features, including family history of migraine (p = 0.007), sound sensitivity (p < 0.001), mental fogginess (p = 0.008), visual motion sensitivity (p = 0.008), and light sensitivity (p < 0.001). There are minimal differences in the overall prevalence of migraine features between patients with migraine-related AF who meet and do not meet the diagnostic criteria for migraine. Our findings suggest that the criteria may be too stringent and exclude many patients from potentially benefitting from treatment with migraine prophylaxis.

Physical inactivity and headache disorders: Cross-sectional analysis in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).

Physical inactivity has been linked to headache disorders but estimates based on the current World Health Organization physical activity guidelines are unknown. To test the associations between headache disorders and physical inactivity in the ELSA-Brasil cohort. In a cross-sectional analysis, linear (continuous variables) and logistic regression models (categorical variables) tested the associations of physical activity levels in the leisure time, commuting time, and combined leisure time physical activity + commuting time physical activity domains with headache disorders, adjusted for the effects of sociodemographic data, cardiovascular risk variables, psychiatric disorders, and migraine prophylaxis medication. Of 15,105 participants, 14,847 (54.4% women) provided data on physical activity levels and headache. Higher physical activity levels (continuous values) in the leisure time physical activity domain associated with lower migraine and tension-type headache occurrence and lower headache attack frequency, while in the commuting time physical activity domain it associated with more frequent headache attacks. Compared to people who met World Health Organization physical activity levels in the leisure time physical activity or combining leisure time physical activity + commuting time physical activity domains (i.e. ≥150 min.wk-1 of moderate and/or ≥75 min.wk-1 of vigorous physical activity), physical inactivity associated with higher migraine occurrence, while somewhat active (i.e. not meeting World Health Organization recommendations) associated with higher migraine and tension-type headache occurrence. Physical inactivity in the commuting time physical activity domain associated with higher tension-type headache in men and lower migraine in women. Physical inactivity within vigorous leisure time physical activity intensity, but not moderate leisure time physical activity, associated with higher migraine, mostly in women. Finally, physical inactivity associated with higher headache attack frequency regardless headache subtype. Physical inactivity and unmet World Health Organization physical activity levels associate with primary headaches, with heterogeneous associations regarding headache subtype, sex, physical activity domain/intensity, and headache frequency in the ELSA-Brasil study.

Role of memantine in the prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine: A systematic review.

The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy and safety of memantine for the prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine. Migraine is a prevalent chronic disease with significant costs to the health care system. Although various prophylactic treatment options are available, these medications have limitations based on efficacy, potential side effects, and patient preference. Memantine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist used in dementia treatment that may have potential benefit for migraine prophylaxis. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was conducted to identify relevant published studies through December 2020 using the search terms: migraine disorders, migraine, headache disorders, or headache and memantine. Studies selected for the systematic review included prospective, interventional designs and evaluated memantine for prophylaxis of migraine. Animal studies, case reports, abstracts, review articles, protocols without results, and studies not written in English were excluded. Data were extracted using a standardized systematic process and included author, publication date, study design, sample size, patient characteristics, treatment regimen, clinical efficacy outcomes, and adverse drug effects. Four articles were identified for inclusion representing two prospective open-label studies and two randomized, double-blind trials, evaluating 183 patients on memantine overall. A reduction in number of migraine days and headache severity were shown in all four studies in the participants treated with memantine. The most common adverse effects included somnolence, sedation, and nausea, none of which were severe. The studies in this review establish that memantine has the potential for use as a treatment option for episodic migraine. Additional long-term studies using an active comparator would be useful to further elucidate its role.

Acute Angle-Closure Crisis Secondary to Topiramate-Induced Ciliochoroidal Effusion With Underlying Plateau Iris Configuration

Objective: The development of ciliochoroidal effusions and secondary acute angle-closure crisis (AACC) is an uncommon side effect of topiramate, a common antiepileptic now FDA-approved for migraine prophylaxis. The mechanisms that underlie the development of ciliochoroidal effusions after topiramate use remain unclear. Materials and Methods: Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) was also performed in all participants after stopping topiramate. Results: Six patient cases are presented with medication-induced AACC following the initiation or escalation of topiramate. Ciliochoroidal effusions were confirmed by gray-scale sonography in all patients at presentation. The images revealed either plateau iris configuration or atypical plateau iris configuration. Plateau iris configuration is defined by presence of an anteriorly rotated ciliary body processes and an absent posterior sulcus. Atypical plateau iris configuration refers to when the iris inserts directly into the ciliary body face. This case series, of medication-induced angle-closure crisis, suggests that plateau iris configuration is a shared anatomical feature in the development of topiramate-induced ciliochoroidal effusions.

Levetiracetam for the Prophylaxis of Migraine in Adults.

Migraine is the second most common primary headache disorder after tension-type headache and is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Cortical spreading depression involves neuronal excitation and inhibition and is involved in pathophysiology of migraine. Many anti-epileptic drugs act by inhibiting Cortical Spreading Depression and block desensitization. Anti-convulsants are commonly used in Migraine prophylaxis and the ones being more effective than placebo include Sodium Valproate and Topiramate. Levetiracetam has unique mechanism as it targets hyper-excitable neurons by binding to synaptic vesicle protein. This results in inhibition of neurotransmitter release thus decreases hyper-excitability. Levetiracetam has minimal side effect profile (dizziness, somnolence and mood changes) and it can be well tolerated by patients. In this review, a total of seven studies were included (four open-label trials and three randomized-control trials) which evaluated the role of Levetiracetam in the prophylaxis of migraine in adult patients. On review of this evidence, Levetiracetam appears to be effective in treating migraine with and without aura and is considered safe because of its limited side effects. There was a significant reduction in the frequency, severity, and duration of migraine with a high responder rate. Levetiracetam was well tolerated with minimal side effects and no reported interactions. However, larger randomized controlled trials are needed and these studies should be done on special population to see the outcomes. In addition, studies for extended-release formulations should also be done.

Experimental and Clinical Evidence of the Effectiveness of Riboflavin on Migraines.

Riboflavin, a water-soluble member of the B-vitamin family, plays a vital role in producing energy in mitochondria and reducing inflammation and oxidative stress. Migraine pathogenesis includes neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Therefore, riboflavin is increasingly being recognized for its preventive effects on migraines. However, there is no concrete evidence supporting its use because the link between riboflavin and migraines and the underlying mechanisms remains obscure. This review explored the current experimental and clinical evidence of conditions involved in migraine pathogenesis and discussed the role of riboflavin in inhibiting these conditions. Experimental research has demonstrated elevated levels of various oxidative stress markers and pro-inflammatory cytokines in migraines, and riboflavin’s role in reducing these marker levels. Furthermore, clinical research in migraineurs showed increased marker levels and observed riboflavin’s effectiveness in reducing migraines. These findings suggest that inflammation and oxidative stress are associated with migraine pathogenesis, and riboflavin may have neuroprotective effects through its clinically useful anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative stress properties. Riboflavin’s safety and efficacy suggests its usefulness in migraine prophylaxis; however, insufficient evidence necessitates further study.

Assessment of the Effect of Erenumab on Efficacy and Quality-of-Life Parameters in a Cohort of Migraine Patients With Treatment Failure in Cyprus.

Erenumab is the first human monoclonal antibody to be approved as a selective therapy for migraine prophylaxis in adults. This study assessed, in a real-world setting, the efficacy of erenumab and its impact on the quality of life (QoL) of Cypriot migraine patients who had failed several treatments in the past. Erenumab was prescribed as a stand-alone or as an add-on therapy to 16 patients with chronic migraine. The first component of the study examined migraine parameters before and after erenumab therapy and included an interim 3-month subjective assessment. In the second component, the patients were asked to complete the validated Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire—Version 2.1 (MSQ V2.1) during the last month of their individual treatment as a measure of the QoL. The results showed a statistically significant improvement in almost all migraine parameters following erenumab treatment. In the 3-month-interval assessment, 81.3% of the patients reported an improvement in their mental well-being, anxiety, and depression levels, with more than 80% of the patients reporting an improvement in almost all assessed migraine parameters. MSQ V2.1 indicated a good health status in all three domains (mean values > 60 on a scale 0–100), with the “role function preventative” domain having the highest health scores (85). Over a period of 6 months, erenumab was safe, well-tolerated, and effective in preventing migraine symptoms and improving HR-QoL. We conclude that this novel medication, which is not yet part of the national formulary in Cyprus, may be a cost-effective solution in reducing the disease burden of chronic migraine.

Erenumab-aooe: A promising monoclonal antibody for prophylactic pharmacotherapy in migraine.

Migraine is one form of disorder affecting the quality of life of patient. The term chronic migraine refers to a clinical condition summarized by migraines headache on fifteen days usually per monthly episode. Most commonly patients on pharmacotherapy of migraine include Ergot derivatives, Opioids, and Analgesics for a period range of ten days per month. The CGRP is involved in pathology and physiology of origin of neurovascular headaches via migraine at both peripheral and central levels. The CGRP is highly expressed in trigeminal neurons (small myelinated Ad and unmyelinated C fibers) co-localized with other neuropeptides (e.g., substance P). The CGRP levels are increased into external jugular venous blood ipsilateral to pain during headache phase of migraine attack. Also the saliva and serum CGRP levels are increased during migraine and interracially in patients with CM. Scope: Erenumab-aooe, CGRPr antagonist, being the latest approved drug administered via subcutaneous route as 70 mg per month for prophylactic regime of migraine in adult patients, the results documented as per clinical trials data are very promising and thus Erenumab-aooe is an emerging hope to improve quality of life. Conclusion: CM is not fully treated as the pharmacotherapy response is at the poor level and also limited pharmacotherapy is available, however the emergence of Erenumab- aooe, CGRPr antagonist as the one of the latest drug approval for the prophylaxis of migraine in adults.

Delivery of care for migraine in the Asian Oceanian region: A cross-sectional study.

To determine the current availability of care for headaches, in particular migraine in the Asian Oceanian region. A questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study from August 2020 to February 2021, surveyed country representatives from the member countries of the Asian Oceanian Association of Neurology. The items of the survey were influenced by the findings and recommendations of the 2011 Atlas of Headache by Lifting the Burden and the World Health Organization. Respondents from all of the 21 member countries of the Asian Oceanian Association of Neurology and 3 other Asian countries participated in this survey. All countries have an established neurological association except for Brunei where there are only 6 neurologists. Thirteen countries (54%) have a dedicated council for headaches. The majority have no subspecialty training program for headaches (75%). Prevalence studies are available in 14 countries while 10 out of the 24 have clinical practice guidelines. Among the 6 countries who offer subspecialty training for headache, only 3 countries cater foreign neurologists. Most of the countries have a wide selection of non-specific migraine drugs. All countries except for Mongolia have at least 1 triptan but non-oral forms for triptans are only available in 8 countries. Monoclonal antibody for migraine prophylaxis is available in 12 out of 24 countries (50%). The majority of respondents agree that migraine is under-diagnosed and under-treated by non-neurologists and that more time should be allotted for lectures dedicated to primary headaches in medical schools. The survey showed the scarcity of clinical guidelines, subspecialty training, dedicated headache clinics, and patient advocacy organization for the care of headache patients in the participating countries. Acute and prophylactic medications approved for migraine are available in most countries but approved non-pharmacologic devices are lacking. The recommendations in the 2011 Atlas of Headache Disorders are still to be achieved.