Propensity-matched Analysis Research Articles

Bronchial Blocker Versus Endobronchial Intubation in Young Children Undergoing One-Lung Ventilation: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation in young children carry significant risks. Approaches to one-lung ventilation in young children include endobronchial intubation (mainstem intubation) and use of a bronchial blocker. We hypothesized that endobronchial intubation is associated with a greater prevalence of airway complications compared to use of a bronchial blocker. The Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group database was queried from 2004 to 2022 for one-lung ventilation cases in children, 2 months to 3 years of age, inclusive. Airway notes and free-text comments were manually reviewed for airway complications. Documented airway complications were considered the primary outcome and were divided into "Moderate" and "Critical." Moderate airway complications were bronchial blocker or endotracheal tube movement leading to loss of isolation, hypoxemia requiring ventilatory intervention, bronchial blocker migration into the trachea, significant impairment of ventilation, and other. Critical complications included reintubation or airway replacement intraoperatively, complete endotracheal tube occlusion, cardiac arrest or airway-related bradycardia, and procedure aborted due to an airway issue. An adjusted propensity score-matched analysis was then used to assess the impact of a bronchial blocker on the outcomes of moderate and critical complications. After exclusions, 704 patients were included in the primary analysis. In unadjusted analyses, no statistically significant difference was observed in moderate airway complications between endobronchial intubation and bronchial blocker cohorts: 37 of 444 (8.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9%-11.3%) vs 28 of 260 (10.8%; 95% CI, 7.3%-15.2%) with P = .281. In the unadjusted analysis, the prevalence of critical airway complications was significantly higher in the endobronchial intubation cohort compared to the bronchial blocker cohort: 28 of 444 (6.3%; 95% CI, 4.2%-9.0%) vs 5 of 260 (1.9%; 95% CI, 0.6%-4.4%) with P = .008. In the propensity-matched cohort analysis, endobronchial intubation was associated with a slightly increased risk of critical complications compared to use of a bronchial blocker: 14 of 243 (5.8%; 95% CI, 2.8%-8.7%) vs 5 of 243 (2.1%; 95% CI, 0.3%-3.8%) with P = .035. Endobronchial intubation might be associated with a slightly increased risk of critical airway complications compared to use of a bronchial blocker in young children undergoing thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation. Further, prospective studies are needed before a definitive change in practice is recommended.

Investigating synergy between beta-blockers and transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: preliminary data from a propensity matched analysis

PurposeFavorable clinical outcomes have been reported with the adjunct use of beta-blockers in cancer treatment, hypothetically secondary to their anti-angiogenic/anti-proliferative effects. Hereby, we investigate whether there is synergy between beta-blockers and TACE in the treatment of HCC. Methods36 HCC patients on beta-blockers (mean dose of 48 mg daily) at the time of first-line treatment with TACE at our institution were retrospectively identified out of a cohort of 221 patients between 2008 and 2019. Using propensity scoring, a matched cohort of 36 patients not exposed to beta-blockers was generated based on age, gender, ethnicity, etiology of liver disease, BCLC, child Pugh score, PS/ECOG, cirrhosis, largest mass treated, type of TACE and treated liver segments. Tumor response was assessed at 1st and 2nd post-TACE imaging timepoints (1.4 and 4.1 months on average respectively). Variables were compared using chi-square test and Student's t-test. Kaplan-Meier transplant-free survival plots were generated using IBM® SPSS® software. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate survival predictors. A p values < 0.05 was considered significant. ResultsComparing the control and beta-blocker cohorts, there were no differences in baseline characteristics, post-TACE imaging timepoints, tumor response or transplant free survival (p > 0.05). Tumor size was found to be a predictor of survival when the two cohorts were combined (p = 0.03). ConclusionTransplant-free survival and HCC response to first-line TACE treatment were similar in the control and beta-blocker groups. Large tumor sizes were associated with higher mortality in combined analysis of the cohorts.

Early statin use is associated with improved survival and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and recent ischaemic stroke: A propensity-matched analysis of a global federated health database.

Statins reduce recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke. The benefits of statins in patients with AF and recent IS remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the benefits of statins in patients with AF and recent IS. This retrospective, cohort study was conducted using deidentified electronic medical records within TriNetX platform. Patients with AF and recent IS, who received statins within 28 days of their index stroke were propensity score-matched with those who did not. Patients were followed up for up to 2 years. Primary outcomes were the 2-year risk of recurrent IS, all-cause mortality and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, recurrent IS, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and acute myocardial infarction (MI). Secondary outcomes were the 2-year risk of TIA, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), acute MI, and hospital readmission. Cox regression analyses were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Of 20,902 patients with AF and recent IS, 7500 (35.9%) received statins within 28 days of their stroke and 13,402 (64.1%) did not. 11,182 patients (mean age 73.7 ± 11.5; 5277 (47.2%) female) remained after propensity score matching. Patients who received early statins had significantly lower risk of recurrent IS (HR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0.41-0.48, p < 0.001), mortality (HR: 0.75, 95%CI: 0.66-0.84, p < 0.001), the composite outcome (HR: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.45-0.52, p < 0.001), TIA (HR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.30-0.44, p < 0.001), ICH (HR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.47-0.72, p < 0.001 ), acute MI (HR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.30-0.42, p < 0.001) and hospital readmission (HR: 0.46, 95%CI: 0.42-0.50, <0.001). Beneficial effects of early statins were evident in the elderly, different ethnic groups, statin dose intensity, and AF subtypes, large vessel occlusion and embolic strokes and within the context of statin lipophilicity, optimal LDL-cholesterol levels, various cardiovascular comorbidities, treatment with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy, and NIHSS 0-5 and NIHSS > 5 subgroups. Patients with AF and recent IS, who received early statins, had a lower risk of recurrent stroke, death, and other cardiovascular outcomes including ICH, compared to those who did not.

Associations between acute kidney injury and bone fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common. An AKI episode may disrupt the normal mineral bone balance maintained by normal kidney function, thereby modifying the risk of developing bone fractures. However, it remains unclear whether an AKI episode is associated with the risk of bone fractures. Using retrospective cohort study from an Australian Local Health District, we examined the association between an AKI episode and bone fractures using patient data between 2008 and 2017. Time-varying Cox proportional hazards and propensity-matched analysis were used to examine the association. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to capture the impact of confirmed AKI status and AKI severity. Of 123 426 included patients, 14 549 (12%) had an AKI episode and 12 505 (10%) had a bone fracture. In the unadjusted analysis, AKI was associated with bone fractures [hazard ratio (HR) 1.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.88-2.11]. This association persisted in the adjusted analysis (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.41-1.59) and propensity-matched dataset (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.59-1.83). The sensitivity analysis yielded similar results, with the AKI patients having a higher risk of fractures compared with no AKI patients in the adjusted analysis (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.25-1.43) and in the propensity-matched dataset (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.33-1.55). Similar results were seen in the subsidiary sensitivity analysis excluding patients without baseline creatinine. We did not find an increased risk of bone fractures with increasing AKI severity (P=.7). Interaction tests demonstrated a significant association between sex and age category with AKI status and fractures, but not CKD stage or osteoporosis. AKI is associated with a greater risk of bone fractures. This could have implications for managing and screening for bone disease in patients post-AKI episode. This association should be examined in other cohorts and populations for verification.

Reconstructing Failure: Assessing Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes Following Loss of Initial Breast Reconstruction.

Breast reconstruction failure, defined as the removal of a prosthetic device or flap without immediate replacement, can be traumatic for patients. We aim to describe the progression of patients who experience tissue expander (TE), implant, or autologous breast reconstructive failure and assess the patient reported outcomes (PROs) among patients who undergo additional reconstruction. Patients undergoing TE, implant, or autologous breast reconstruction between 2017 and 2022 were included, and patients with reconstructive failures were identified. Outcomes of interests included (1) receipt of additional reconstruction and (2) BREAST-Q scores 1-year after reconstructive failure. We also performed a propensity-matched analysis between patients who undergo secondary reconstruction and patients who had an uncomplicated reconstruction. 4,258 TE, 4,420 implant, and 1,545 autologous breast reconstruction patients were included. Of patients who experienced reconstructive failures, 49.5% of TE, 4.8% of implant, and 53.8% of autologous patients underwent secondary reconstruction. Age, psychiatric diagnosis, chemotherapy, radiation, and mastectomy type were associated with increased likelihood of secondary reconstruction. Between patients with and without additional reconstruction, higher Psychosocial Well-being trended towards the former cohort (61 [Interquartile Range: 56, 80] vs 50 [46, 65], p=0.085). Propensity-matched analysis demonstrated comparable PROs at 1-year after definite reconstruction. Less than half of reconstructive failure patients undergo an additional reconstruction. Patients with secondary reconstruction may have improved Psychosocial Well-being than those who do not and comparable PROs to those who had uncomplicated initial reconstruction. Surgeons should counsel patients with reconstructive failures that although traumatizing, secondary reconstruction may be beneficial.

458. THORACOSCOPY VERSUS ENDOSCOPY IN THE TREATMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL LEIOMYOMA: A SINGLE-CENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Abstract Background Esophageal leiomyoma, also called Esophageal Smooth Muscle Tumor (SMT), is one of the most common benign tumors of the esophagus. Surgical treatment is the most widely used method, including thoracic surgery such as thoracotomy, and VATS, and endoscopic surgery such as ESD and STER. We aimed to conduct a retrospective analysis of all esophageal leiomyoma surgeries in our center to assist decision-making in minimally invasive surgery for leiomyomas. Methods From January 2015 to September 2023 patients with pathologically diagnosed esophageal leiomyoma at our hospital were retrospectively enrolled. Those who had any pathological malignant component or lack of detailed clinical information were excluded. At the same time, a 1:1 propensity matching analysis was conducted for thoracoscopy and endoscopic surgery. The matching factors included age, gender, tumor location, and size and the caliper was set as 0.2. Results Finally, 1376 patients were included, of whom 153 underwent thoracic surgery and 1223 underwent endoscopic treatment. Endoscopic surgeries were mainly composed of ESD (54.5%) and STER (45.5%), with respective proportions, of which 2 cases used thoracoscopic-assisted endoscopic resection. In the surgical group, 131 patients, accounting for 85.6%, underwent thoracoscopic surgery, of which 65 patients (42.5%) used endoscopic-assisted examination during the operation. In terms of operation time, endoscopic resection was shorter than surgical surgery (44.9 ±39.7 versus 109.4 ± 67.9 min, p&amp;lt;0.001). Similarly, for the postoperative hospitalization days, endoscopic resection was shorter than surgical surgery (2.0 [1.0, 3.0] versus 5.0 [3.0, 6.0] days, p&amp;lt;0.001), we also found that the maximum diameter of surgical resection specimens was significantly larger than that of endoscopic surgery (1.3 [0.8, 2.5] versus 5.0 [3.5, 7.0] cm, p &amp;lt;0.001). After PSM, the operation duration (p=0.031) and hospital stay (p&amp;lt;0.001) were still statistically different between the surgical treatment group and the endoscopic group. Conclusion Most esophageal leiomyomas can be resected endoscopically, which can shorten the operation duration and hospital stay compared with thoracic surgery. When the maximum diameter of the tumor is too large or near important organs, thoracic surgery should be the first choice. In order to prevent possible esophageal mucosal damage, thoracoscopic surgery combined with intraoperative endoscopy examination is a safe and effective surgical treatment method.

Single vs Double Lung Transplantation in Older Adults: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

BackgroundSingle lung transplantation (SLT) is associated with worse long-term outcomes than bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) but is often performed for older adults at risk of not tolerating BLT. Research QuestionHow do the outcomes of SLT and BLT compare among older adult recipients? Study Design and MethodsThe Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database (2005-2022) was queried for lung transplant recipients aged ≥65 years. Patients were stratified by whether they underwent BLT or SLT, and propensity matched. Baseline characteristics and morbidity were compared with frequentist statistics. Survival was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier estimation. Risk factors for mortality were identified with Cox regression. ResultsOf 9,904 included patients, 4,829 (48.8%) underwent SLT. SLT patients had lower lung allocation scores (39.6 v. 40.6, p<0.001), more interstitial lung disease (74.4% v. 64.6%, p<0.001) and lower rates of bridging (0.7% v. 2.4%, p<0.001). Groups did not differ significantly by sex, body mass index, or donor characteristics. Propensity matching resulted in 2,539 patients in each group. On matched analysis, SLT patients had shorter lengths of stay (14 v. 18 d), lower reintubation rates (14.7% v. 19.8%), and less postoperative dialysis use (4.2% v. 6.4%) (all p<0.001). SLT patients had comparable survival at 30-days (97.6% v. 97.3%, p=0.414) and 1-year (85.5% v. 86.3%, p=0.496), but lower survival at 5-years (45.4% v. 53.4%, p<0.001) on matched analysis. SLT was a risk factor for 5-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.19, p<0.001). InterpretationIn older adults, SLT is associated with less morbidity and comparable early survival relative to BLT, but lower five-year survival. SLT is reasonable to perform in older adults at high risk for BLT.

The Open Abdomen After Intra-abdominal Contamination in Emergency General Surgery

IntroductionDelayed fascial closure (DFC) is an increasingly utilized technique in emergency general surgery (EGS), despite a lack of data regarding its benefits. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of DFC versus immediate fascial closure (IFC) in EGS patients with intra-abdominal contamination. MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted using the 2013-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Adult EGS patients who underwent an exploratory laparotomy with intra-abdominal contamination [wound classification III (contaminated) or IV (dirty)] were included. Patients with agreed upon indications for DFC were excluded. A propensity-matched analysis was performed. The primary outcome was 30-d mortality. ResultsWe identified 36,974 eligible patients. 16.8% underwent DFC, of which 51.7% were female, and the median age was 64 y. After matching, there were 6213 pairs. DFC was associated with a higher risk of mortality (15.8% versus 14.2%, P = 0.016), pneumonia (11.7% versus 10.1%, P = 0.007), pulmonary embolism (1.9% versus 1.6%, P = 0.03), and longer hospital stay (11 versus 10 d, P < 0.001). No significant differences in postoperative sepsis and deep surgical site infection rates between the two groups were observed. Subgroup analyses by preoperative diagnosis (diverticulitis, perforation, and undifferentiated sepsis) showed that DFC was associated with longer hospital stay in all subgroups, with a higher mortality rate in patients with diverticulitis (8.1% versus 6.1%, P = 0.027). ConclusionsIn the presence of intra-abdominal contamination, DFC is associated with longer hospital stay and higher rates of mortality and morbidity. DFC was not associated with decreased risk of infectious complications. Further studies are needed to clearly define the indications of DFC.

Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Propensity-Matched Nationwide Analysis

Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Propensity-Matched Nationwide Analysis

PE041 Comparing the outcomes of ductal versus acinar adenocarcinoma in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Propensity-matched analysis of a prostate cancer referral center

PE041 Comparing the outcomes of ductal versus acinar adenocarcinoma in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Propensity-matched analysis of a prostate cancer referral center

The effect of total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine on long-term survival in unilateral T3/T4 follicular thyroid carcinoma: insights from a propensity-matched retrospective analysis.

Follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) is the second most common thyroid malignancy and is particularly aggressive in advanced stages such as T3 and T4. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival outcomes of total thyroidectomy (TT) and radioactive iodine therapy (RAIT) in unilateral T3 or T4 FTC using propensity score-matched analysis. Utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified patients diagnosed with T3 or T4 FTC and categorized them into two cohorts, namely those who were treated with TT and those who were not (non-TT). The non-TT group was further analyzed to determine the impact of RAIT on survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to adjust for confounding variables. Survival analysis, including Kaplan-Meier survival curves and landmark analysis, evaluated the effects on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). A total of 2,957 patients were included, with 2,271 (76.8%) undergoing TT and 686 (23.2%) receiving alternative treatments. Before and after PSM, there were no significant differences in OS and CSS between the two groups. Post-PSM landmark analysis revealed that beyond 90 months, the TT group had superior CSS compared with the non-TT group (P=0.06). Cox multivariate regression identified follicular adenocarcinoma trabecular [hazard ratio (HR) =4.7041; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1218-19.727] and minimally invasive follicular carcinoma (HR =2.0202; 95% CI: 1.2140-3.362) as independent risk factors affecting prognosis. In the second part of the study, 671 patients were analyzed, namely 197 (29.4%) who received RAIT and 474 (70.6%) who did not. Landmark analysis indicated that after 30 months, the RAIT group had superior CSS compared with the non-RAIT group (P<0.05). TT does not improve the survival rates of patients with stage T3/T4 FTC. For those patients who have not undergone TT, RAIT proves beneficial for CSS; however, further in-depth studies are required.

Characteristics and outcomes of atrial fibrillation detected before and after acute ischemic stroke.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) can be known before the stroke (KAF) or be newly detected after stroke (AFDAS). It is unknown whether the outcome of stroke differs between KAF and AFDAS. We performed a propensity-matched analysis to investigate the outcome of patients with AFDAS and their counterparts with KAF. We analysed a consecutive series of patients enrolled into the EIDASAF study, a single centre, retrospective study of ischemic stroke patients with a diagnosis of AF before or after the event who had been admitted to the Hyperacute Stroke Unit of Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust between 2010 and 2017. Overall, our cohort included 959 patients with AF and acute ischemic stroke. After propensity score matching, 547 patients were matched (404 KAF group and 143 AFDAS group). The rates of in hospital death and of haemorrhagic transformation were significantly higher in KAF patients compared to AFDAS patients. Logistic regression analysis did not reveal a statistically significant influence of AF subtypes on the outcome of death. However, in logistic regression analysis KAF was associated with increased probability of haemorrhagic transformation (OR 9.64; CI 1.29-71.68, p = 0.022) after the index event. KAF is associated with an increased risk of haemorrhagic transformation but not of death when compared to AFDAS.

Traditional craniotomy versus current minimally invasive surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: A propensity-matched analysis.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and craniotomy (CI) are the current treatments for spontaneous supratentorial cerebral haemorrhage (SSTICH). To compare the efficacy and safety of MIS and CI for the treatment of SSTICH. Clinical and imaging data of 557 consecutive patients with SSTICH who underwent MIS or CI between January 2017 and December 2022 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into two subgroups: The MIS group and CI group. Propensity score matching was performed to minimise case selection bias. The primary outcome was a dichotomous prognostic (favourable or unfavourable) outcome based on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months; an mRS score of 0-2 was considered favourable. In both conventional statistical and binary logistic regression analyses, the MIS group had a better outcome. The outcome of propensity score matching was unexpected (odds ratio: 0.582; 95%CI: 0.281-1.204; P = 0.144), which indicated that, after excluding the interference of each confounder, different surgical modalities were more effective, and there was no significant difference in their prognosis. Deciding between MIS and CI should be made based on the individual patient, considering the hematoma size, degree of midline shift, cerebral swelling, and preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale score.

Single-Port Extraperitoneal vs. Multiport Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

(1) Background: Since the introduction of the purpose-built Single Port (SP) robotic platform, there has been an ongoing debate regarding its advantages compared to the established multi-port (MP) system. The goal of this present study is to compare the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of SP Extraperitoneal robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus that of MP Transperitoneal RARP approach at a high-volume tertiary center. (2) Methods: Based on a retrospective review of the prospectively maintained IRB-approved database, 925 patients successfully underwent RARP by a single experienced robotic surgeon. A 4:1 propensity-matched analysis based on the baseline prostate cancer International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group, clinical stage, and preoperative Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was performed, which yielded a cohort of 606 patients-485 in the SP EP and 121 in the MP TP approaches. Of note, the SP EP approach also included the traditional Extraperitoneal (n = 259, 53.4%) and the novel Transvesical (TV) approaches (n = 226, 46.6%). (3) Results: The overall operative time was slightly longer in the SP cohort, with a mean of 198.9 min compared to 181.5 min for the MP group (p < 0.001). There were no intraoperative complications with the MP approach and only one during the SP approach. The SP EP technique demonstrated significant benefits, encompassing reduced intraoperative blood loss (SP 125.1 vs. MP 215.9 mL), shorter length of hospital stay (SP 12.6 vs. MP 31.9 h), reduced opioid use at the time of discharge (SP 14.4% vs. MP 85.1%), and an earlier Foley catheter removal (SP 6 vs. MP 8 days). From an oncological perspective, the rate of positive surgical margins remained comparable across both groups (p = 0.84). Regarding functional outcomes, the mean continence rates and Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) scores were identical between the two groups at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months respectively. (4) Conclusion: SP EP RARP demonstrates similar performance to MP TP RARP in terms of oncologic and functional outcomes. However, SP EP RARP offers several advantages in reducing the overall hospital stay, decreasing postoperative pain and hence the overall opioid use, as well as shortening the time to catheter removal, all of which translates to reduced morbidity and facilitates the transition to outpatient surgery.

Perioperative and mid-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis of 842 patients.

Comparing the safety, effectiveness, and mid-term survival rates of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (VAMIE). A total of 842 patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy were analyzed, including 694 patients in VAMIE group and 148 in RAMIE group. PSM analysis was applied to generate matched pairs for further comparison. Operative outcomes, postoperative complications and Mid-term outcomes were compared between all patients in matched groups. After 1:4 PSM, 148 patients in the RAMIE and 592 patients in the VAMIE. Compared to VAMIE, RAMIE exhibited earlier removal of chest and neck drainage tubes, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and a higher number of lymph node dissections. However, the surgical duration of RAMIE was longer than that of VAMIE. Postoperative complications were no statistically significant between the RAMIE and VAMIE groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the 3-year OS and DFS between the two groups. Compared to VAMIE, RAMIE emerges as a viable and safe surgical approach and suggests RAMIE as a potential alternative to minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypass Activity use in cardiac surgery: A propensity matched analysis of safety outcomes.

Bleeding during cardiac surgery may be refractory to standard interventions. Off-label use of Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypass Activity (FEIBA) has been described to treat such bleeding. However, reports of safety, particularly thromboembolic outcomes, show mixed results and reported cohorts have been small. Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2023 at Stanford Hospital were reviewed (n=3335). Patients who received FEIBA to treat post-cardiopulmonary bypass bleeding were matched with those who did not by propensity scores in a 1:1 ratio using nearest neighbor matching (n= 352 per group). The primary outcome was a composite outcome of thromboembolic complications including any one of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), unplanned coronary artery intervention, ischemic stroke, and acute limb ischemia, in the postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included renal failure, reoperation, postoperative transfusion, ICU length of stay (LOS), and 30-day mortality. 704 encounters were included in our propensity matched analysis. The mean dose of FEIBA administered was 7.3 ±5.5 units/kg. In propensity matched multivariate logistic regression models there was no statistically significant difference in odds ratios for thromboembolic outcomes, ICU LOS, or mortality. Patients who received >750 units of FEIBA had an increased odds ratio for acute renal failure (OR 4.14; 95% CI 1.61 to 10.36, p <0.001). In multivariate linear regression, patients receiving FEIBA were transfused more plasma and cryoprecipitate postoperatively. However, only the dose range of 501-750 units was associated with an increase in transfusion of RBCs (β 2.73; 95% CI 0.68 to 4.78; p=0.009), and platelets (β 1.74; 95% CI 0.85 to 2.63; p <0.001). Low dose FEIBA administration during cardiac surgery does not increase risk of thromboembolic events, ICU LOS, or mortality in a propensity matched cohort. Higher doses were associated with increased acute renal failure and postoperative transfusion. Further studies are required to establish the efficacy of activated factor concentrates to treat refractory bleeding during cardiac surgery.

Impact of Acute Heart Failure in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML): Propensity-Matched Analysis of National Inpatient Sample

Impact of Acute Heart Failure in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML): Propensity-Matched Analysis of National Inpatient Sample

CML-486 Impact of Acute Heart Failure in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML): Propensity-Matched Analysis of National Inpatient Sample

CML-486 Impact of Acute Heart Failure in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML): Propensity-Matched Analysis of National Inpatient Sample

Outcomes of Covid-19 among patients with ischemic heart disease: A propensity matched analysis

BackgroundPrior research has linked cardiovascular diseases with higher COVID-19 mortality and worse hospital outcomes, particularly in severe heart failure. Large population-based data regarding the impact of pre-existing ischemic heart disease (IHD) on COVID-19 outcomes is not well established. ObjectiveTo study the impact of COVID-19 infection on IHD hospital mortality and other outcomes. MethodsThe study included a patient cohort from the 2020 and 2021 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Propensity score matching was used to match the study cohort (COVID-19 with IHD) to controls (COVID-19 without IHD) using a 1:1 matching ratio. The outcomes analyzed were in-hospital mortality, rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), acute myocardial injury (AMI), cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, tracheal intubation, pulmonary embolism (PE), ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization charges. ResultsA total of 2,532,652 patients met the inclusion criteria (1,199,008 females [47.3 %), predominantly Caucasian 1,456,203 (57.5 %); mean [SD] age 63, (5.4), including 29,315 (1.1 %) patients with a history of IHD. Following propensity matching, 4,772 COVID-19 patients with and without IHD were matched. IHD patients had higher rates of AMI (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.75, 95 % CI 3.27–4.31, p < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (aOR 2.89, 95 % CI 1.60–5.19, p < 0.001), VT (aOR 3.26, 95 % CI 2.48–4.29, p < 0.001), and VF (aOR 2.23, 95 % CI 1.25–3.99, p < 0.001). The odds ratios of in-hospital mortality, AKI, PE, mechanical ventilation, tracheal intubation, and resource use were not significantly different. ConclusionA history of IHD does not impact COVID-19 mortality but increases the risk of in-hospital cardiac complications.

Comparison of combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis with intravenous thrombolysis alone in stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy: a propensity-matched analysis

BackgroundA combination of intravenous (IVT) or intra-arterial (IAT) thrombolysis with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) has been investigated. However, there is limited...