Patient In Prone Position Research Articles

Prone Positioning in Patients With COVID-19: Analysis of Multicenter Registry Data and Meta-analysis of Aggregate Data.

Evidence suggests a beneficial effect of prone positioning (PP) in COVID-19. Meta-analysis of individual (7 investigators' groups) and aggregate data (PubMed/EMBASE) regarding the impact of PP on the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PO2/FiO2) in patients with COVID-19. Among 121 patients (mean age±SD 59.1±10.7 years, 55% males, 57% intubated) the mean post-versus pre- PP PO2/FiO2 difference was: (i) 50.4±64.3 mmHg, p<0.01, (ii) similar in awake (58.7±72.1 mmHg) versus intubated patients (44.1±57.5 mmHg, p=NS), (iii) inversely correlated with body mass index (r=-0.43, p<0.01). Meta-analysis of 23 studies (n=547, weighted age 58.3±4.1, 73% males, 59% intubated) showed a pooled PO2/FiO2 difference of 61.8 [95% confidence intervals=49.9-73.6] mmHg. Meta-regression analysis revealed no associations with baseline demographics, the time in PP before assessment, and the risk of bias of the studies. PP seems to improve oxygenation of patients with COVID-19.

Falcotentorial meningiomas: Optimal surgical planning and intraoperative challenges – case report

Meningiomas arising from the falcotentorial junction are rare, and the selection of the optimal surgical approach is essential. We report a 41-year-old man presented with progressive left paresis in the lower limbs. An MRI showed a solid mass inside the third ventricle in contact with the falcotentorial dural junction. The tumor was removed by the transtentorial/transfalcine occipital approach, performed with the patient in the three-quarter prone position. The tumor was devascularized from the tentorium, then debulked and finally dissected. The affected falx and tentorium were resected, but all of patent dural venous sinuses were preserved. The tumor was a subtotal resect. Choosing the surgical approach is essential for the safe and effective removal of an FTM and preoperative imaging analysis should identify the tumor’s anatomical relations and guide toward the least disruptive route that preserves the neurovascular structures. This article aims to report a successfully treated FTM.

Blood circulation changes associated with switching to non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients

Background. Various methods of respiratory support in combination with prone positioning have been used during the COVID-19 pandemic. The effects of combination of these two factors on hemodynamics are of interest for clinical practitioners.The aim: to evaluate the effect of prone positioning on hemodynamics in COVID-19 patients depending on the method of respiratory support.Materials and methods. The study included 17 patients of both sexes diagnosed with COVID-19-associated community-acquired polysegmental viral and bacterial pneumonia with progressive respiratory failure. The study consisted of two stages. During the first stage, the patients were receiving respiratory support with humidified oxygen (3–7 liters per minute). The second stage was initiated after switching to noninvasive ventilation (NIV). The measurements were performed using a technique of volumetric compression oscillometry on a non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring system KAP CGosm-Globus (Russia).Results. The study showed that prone positioning in patients with severe COVID-19 when switching from oxygen therapy to NIV resulted in a change in the diastolic blood pressure difference module from 2.5 (1.0; 8.2) to 8.0 (5.7; 14.0) (p = 0.016). Escalation of respiratory support led to the changes in the left ventricular outflow tract velocity difference module from 11.5 (9.5; 34.2) to 31.0 (15.7; 42.0) (p = 0.049).Conclusions. Patients with community-acquired polysegmental viral and bacterial pneumonia associated with COVID-19 demonstrated changes in diastolic blood pressure and left ventricular outflow tract velocity as a result of prone positioning following switching from oxygen therapy to NIV.

Effect of Prone Positioning on Oxygen Saturation in COVID-19 Patients in Sri Aurobindo Hospital, Indore

Background: Physiotherapeutic intervention body positioning have been observed to increase oxygen saturation. In COVID-19 patients, we intended to investigate how the prone position worked in conjunction with conventional respiratory physiotherapy. The objective was to determine the effect of prone position along with conventional respiratory physiotherapy on SpO2 of COVID-19 patients in Aurobindo hospital, Indore district.&#x0D; Methods: The Ministry of Health, Government of India, authorized the rules for collecting data from infected patients. In this study, 400 patients between the ages of 20 and 80 years old were recruited from Sri Aurobindo Hospital in the Indore district, all of them had a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and required oxygen treatment. SpO2 data was collected as a baseline. Patients were helped into the prone position after baseline data collection and conventional respiratory physiotherapy. Clinical data was obtained again after using the prone posture in conjunction with conventional respiratory physiotherapy. To demonstrate the various prone variations, a patient information sheet was supplied. At 0 and 60 minutes after the exercise, oxygen saturation was measured.&#x0D; Results: Between April 2020 to June 2020, we assessed SpO2 of 400 Patients pre and post prone position along with conventional respiratory physiotherapy. Prone positioning was feasible. Oxygenation was significantly improved from supine to prone position. The data were processed for mean and standard deviation. It was analyzed that there was difference in pre to post value of mean, from 95.685 to 98.123 with standard deviation from 1.645to 1.445. The result shows significant improvement in SpO2 after applying prone positioning in patients infected with COVID-19. The findings suggest that prone positioning is both possible and beneficial in increasing blood oxygenation in awake COVID-19 patients. Further study is needed to find the technique's potential value in terms of enhancing overall respiratory and global outcomes.&#x0D; Conclusion: The difference between the saturation of the two position was significant.

Physiological effects and subjective tolerability of prone positioning in COVID-19 and healthy hypoxic challenge.

BackgroundProne positioning has a beneficial role in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients receiving ventilation but lacks evidence in awake non-ventilated patients, with most studies being retrospective, lacking control populations and information on subjective tolerability.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, single-centre study of prone positioning in awake non-ventilated patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia. The primary outcome was change in peripheral oxygenation in prone versus supine position. Secondary outcomes assessed effects on end-tidal CO2, respiratory rate, heart rate and subjective symptoms. We also recruited healthy volunteers to undergo proning during hypoxic challenge.Results238 hospitalised patients with pneumonia were screened; 55 were eligible with 25 COVID-19 patients and three non-COVID-19 patients agreeing to undergo proning – the latter insufficient for further analysis. 10 healthy control volunteers underwent hypoxic challenge. Patients with COVID-19 had a median age of 64 years (interquartile range 53–75). Proning led to an increase in oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) compared to supine position (difference +1.62%; p=0.003) and occurred within 10 min of proning. There were no effects on end-tidal CO2, respiratory rate or heart rate. There was an increase in subjective discomfort (p=0.003), with no difference in breathlessness. Among healthy controls undergoing hypoxic challenge, proning did not lead to a change in SpO2 or subjective symptom scores.ConclusionIdentification of suitable patients with COVID-19 requiring oxygen supplementation from general ward environments for awake proning is challenging. Prone positioning leads to a small increase in SpO2 within 10 min of proning though is associated with increased discomfort.

Mechanical ventilation and prone positioning in pregnant patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: experience at a quaternary referral center

BackgroundWe present the care of 17 consecutive pregnant patients who required mechanical ventilation for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia at a quaternary referral center in the United States. We retrospectively describe the management of these patients, maternal and fetal outcomes, as well as the feasibility of prone positioning and delivery. MethodsBetween March 2020 and June 2021, all pregnant and postpartum patients who were mechanically ventilated for COVID-19 pneumonia were identified. Details of their management including prone positioning, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and complications were noted. ResultsSeventeen pregnant patients required mechanical ventilation for COVID-19. Thirteen patients received prone positioning, with a total of 49 prone sessions. One patient required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. All patients in this series survived until at least discharge. Nine patients delivered while mechanically ventilated, and all neonates survived, subsequently testing negative for SARS-CoV-2. There was one spontaneous abortion. Four emergent cesarean deliveries were prompted by refractory maternal hypoxemia or non-reassuring fetal heart rate after maternal intubation. ConclusionsOverall, maternal and neonatal survival were favorable even in the setting of severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation. Prone positioning was well tolerated although the impact of prone positioning or fetal delivery on maternal oxygenation and ventilation are unclear.

Thoracoscopy Approach in Prone Position for Esophagoplasty in Children.

Congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) is a very rare clinical condition found in 1 per 25,000 to 50,000 live births. There are three histological types of CES described: tracheobronchial remnants, fibromuscular stenosis (FMS), and membranous stenosis. The first-line treatment in most cases is the conservative treatment (dilatation with a Savary bougie or balloon), but in some CES types, dilatation may be ineffective or result in esophageal perforation with serious complications or lethal outcome. Resection of the stenotic segment and end-to-end esophageal anastomosis was formerly presented as the most common surgical treatment option for CES. However, esophagoplasty is a safe and feasible alternative for surgical treatment of esophageal stenosis in children. Our aim is to report two cases of FMS submitted to thoracoscopic esophagoplasty. Both cases started with dysphagia and refusal after transition to solid diet, at 6 months old, and the radiological examination showed stricture of the distal esophagus. Esophagoplasty was performed with the patients in prone position. The stenotic esophageal wall was incised longitudinally and transverse synthesis was performed. After surgery, the patients had prompt recovery, without recurrent stenosis, remaining asymptomatic, with good diet acceptance.

The "Dolphin" Prone Position in Awake COVID-19 Patients.

The "Dolphin" Prone Position in Awake COVID-19 Patients.

Effectiveness of Prone Positioning in Patients with COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

The prone position is a non-invasive technique resulting from the mobilization of the patient, where the person is lying horizontally face down. This technique has been used since the 1970s, but it has gained great relevance in the last year owing to the COVID-19 pandemic with the use of invasive mechanical ventilation. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of the prone position in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome as a consequence of the COVID-19 disease who are mechanically ventilated and admitted to the intensive care unit. To demonstrate the nursing care carried out and to identify the respiratory benefits of the prone position in this type of patient. Data sources, study eligibility criteria: The search for articles was carried out from January 2018 to June 2021, in five databases (Pubmed, Google Scholar, Scielo, Dialnet, and WOS), based on the clinical question, using the keywords derived from the DeCS and MeSH thesauri, combined with the Boolean operators “AND”, “NOT”, and “OR”. The search was limited to publications from the last 6 years, in English. Results: After applying the selection criteria and evaluating the quality of the methodology, 12.14% (n = 21) of the 173 results were included with filters: 3 bibliographic reviews, 1 narrative review, 2 systematic review, 7 descriptive (4 series of cases and 3 of cross section), and 8 analytical (6 of cohorts and 2 of cases and controls). Conclusions and implications of key findings: The prone position in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome improves oxygenation, in conjunction with invasive mechanical ventilation, from the second cycle and in prolonged pronation episodes. This technique improves oxygenation by increasing alveolar recruitment and inspiratory capacity in the dorsal pulmonary areas.

Short and long-term complications due to standard and extended prone position cycles in CoViD-19 patients

ObjectiveTo investigate short and long-term complications due to standard (≤24 hours) and extended (>24 hours) prone position in COVID-19 patients. MethodsRetrospective cohort study conducted in an Italian general intensive care unit. We enrolled patients on invasive mechanical ventilation and treated with prone positioning. We recorded short term complications from the data chart and long-term complications from the scheduled follow-up visit, three months after intensive care discharge. ResultsA total of 96 patients were included in the study. Median time for each prone positioning cycle (302 cycles) was equal to 18 (16–32) hours. In 37 (38%) patients at least one cycle of extended pronation was implemented. Patients with at least one pressure sore due to prone position were 38 (40%). Patients with pressure sores showed a statistically significative difference in intensive care length of stay, mechanical ventilation days, numbers of prone position cycles, total time spent in prone position and the use of extended prone position, compared to patients without pressure sores. All lesions were low grade. Cheekbones (18%) and chin (10%) were the most affected sites. Follow-up visit, scheduled three months after intensive care discharge, was possible in 58 patients. All patients were able to have all 12 muscle groups examined using theMedical Research Council scale examination. No patient reported sensory loss or presence of neuropathic pain for upper limbs. ConclusionsExtended prone position is feasible and might reduce the workload on healthcare workers without significant increase of major prone position related complications.

Successful recovery from COVID-19 pneumonia with awake early self-proning

BackgroundSince COVID-19 global pandemic, “early awake proning in non-intubated patients with COVID-19” has been suggested as anecdotal evidence. Hereby, we report an awake and non-intubated patient with COVID-19 pneumonia who was successfully managed with early self-proning.Case presentationA 68-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a respiratory distress. He was non-smoker and denied any significant past medical history. His chest computed tomography scan showed “ground glass opacities” and “consolidation areas” located especially in the peripheral sites of both lungs which were consistent with a coronavirus pneumonia and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction amplification by a nasopharyngeal swab sample for SARS-Cov-2 was also positive. His initial therapy with hdroxychloroquine and favipiravir was started. Due to deterioration of the patient’s oxygenation, he was transferred to the intensive care unit for further treatment with non-invasive mechanical ventilation on supine position and intermittent “awake early self-proning positioning” was applied. Additionally, antibiotherapy, anticoagulant therapy, and convalescent plasma therapy were also administered to the patient. On the 17th day of the ICU admission, he was transferred back to the ward. And the patient was discharged from the hospital on the 19th day of his initial admission.ConclusionsAlthough some case reports and small case series initially noted potential improvement in oxygenation by awake proning, further research is required to evaluate the exact benefits and proper applications of prone positioning in awake patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Transperineal abdominoperineal resection in the prone jackknife position in male patients with low rectal cancer.

In male patients with low rectal cancer undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR), successful dissection of the anterior anorectum is key to reducing the risk of circumferential resection margin involvement, intraoperative bowel perforation, and local recurrence, but it is challenging. To overcome difficulties dissecting the anterior anorectum, we present a safe and feasible procedure using a transperineal endoscopic approach during APR (TpAPR). The male patient is placed in the prone jackknife position. TpAPR precedes the procedure from an abdominal approach. We use some pelvic tissues as clear anatomical landmarks to dissect the anterior anorectum. The key steps of this procedure are shown in the video. The identification of a clear anatomical dissection plane of the anterior anorectum is difficult because of the complex surgical anatomy of the region. Clear anatomical landmarks for dissection of the anterior anorectum are necessary for safe implementation of this procedure. Therefore, TpAPR in the prone jackknife position can be performed to obtain better visualization of each anatomical landmark at a glance.

PRONE POSITIONING IN NONINTUBATED PATIENTS WITH COVID-19: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

TOPIC: Chest Infections TYPE: Original Investigations PURPOSE: Prone positioning (PP) in awake patients has been recently proposed as an adjunctive treatment for spontaneously breathing non-intubated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requiring oxygen therapy to reduce the risk of intubation. However, the magnitude of the effect of PP on clinical outcomes (e.g., the risk of endotracheal intubation, intensive care unit [ICU] admission, or mortality) in these patients remains uncertain. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of PP to improve the clinical outcomes in non-intubated patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through February 24, 2020 for all the studies all studies that all compared PP versus no PP in non-intubated patients with COVID-19. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of endotracheal intubation. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) rates. Pooled odds risk (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained by the Mantel-Haenszel method within a random-effect model. RESULTS: A total of five studies (two randomized controlled trials and three observational studies), involving 470 non-intubated patients with COVID-19 (185 patients received PP and 285 did not) were included. The mean age was 59.82 years, and males represented 67% of total patients. The follow-up period ranged from 14 to 30 days. The endotracheal intubation rate was similar between PP and control groups (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.41-1.35, P = 0.33, I2 = 20%). There was no difference in the in-hospital mortality rate between the two groups (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.16-2.85, P = 0.60, I2 = 60%). Four studies reported the risk of ICU admission and demonstrated no difference between the two groups (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.30-1.95, P = 0.58, I2 = 37%). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that prone positioning in non-intubated COVID-19 patients did not reduce the risk of endotracheal intubation. Furthermore, PP failed to reduce in-hospital mortality and ICU admission rates. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Although our meta-analysis showed that prone positioning might not reduce the risks of intubation, in-hospital mortality, or ICU admission rate in spontaneously breathing non-intubated COVID-19 patients, more large-scale trials with a standardized protocol for prone positioning are needed to better evaluate the effectiveness of prone positioning in this select population. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Ragheb Assaly, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Hazem Ayesh, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Azizullah Beran Beran, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Sami Ghazaleh, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Waleed Khokher, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Saif-Eddin Malhas, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Aadil Maqsood, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Reem Matar, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Mohammed Mhanna, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Omar Sajdeya, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Omar Srour, source=Web Response

Changes in Oxygenation and Clinical Outcomes with Awake Prone Positioning in Patients with Suspected COVID-19 In Low-Resource Settings: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

This study aimed to describe the use of awake prone positioning (APP) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in patients with suspected coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and respiratory failure in a limited-resource setting. This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients aged ≥18 years old who were placed in an awake prone position due to hypoxemic respiratory failure and suspected COVID-19. The patients were selected from a tertiary center in Cartagena, Colombia, between March 1, 2020, and August 31, 2020. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables were collated, and all the variables were compared between the groups. The median age of the participants was 63 (IQR, 48.8-73) years (survivors: 59 [IQR, 43.568] years vs. non-survivors: 70 [IQR, 63-78] years, P ≤ .001). Of the 1470 patients admitted for respiratory symptoms, 732 (49.8%) were hospitalized for more than 24 h, and 212 patients developed respiratory failure and required COT and APP (overall hospital mortality, 34% [73/212]). The mean rank difference in PaO2/FiO2 before and after APP was higher in the survivors than in the non-survivors (201.1-252.6, mean rank difference = 51.5, P = .001 vs. 134.1-172.4, mean rank difference = 38.28, P = .24, respectively). While using COT in conjunction with APP can improve respiratory failure in patients with suspected COVID-19 in low-resource settings, persistent hypoxemia after APP can identify patients with higher mortality risk. More evidence is needed to establish the role of this strategy.

Physiotherapy-assisted prone or modified prone positioning in ward-based patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

ObjectivesTo evaluate short-term change in oxygenation and feasibility of physiotherapy-assisted prone or modified prone positioning in awake, ward-based patients with COVID-19. DesignRetrospective observational cohort study. SettingGeneral wards, single-centre tertiary hospital in Australia. ParticipantsPatients were included if ≥18 years, had COVID-19, required FiO2 ≥ 0.28 or oxygen flow rate ≥4 l/minute and consented to positioning. Main outcome measures: Feasibility measures included barriers to therapy, assistance required, and comfort. Short-term change in oxygenation (SpO2) and oxygen requirements before and 15 minutes after positioning. ResultsThirteen patients, mean age 75 (SD 14) years; median Clinical Frailty Scale score 6 (IQR 4 to 7) participated in 32 sessions of prone or modified prone positioning from a total of 125 ward-based patients admitted with COVID-19 who received physiotherapy intervention. Nine of thirteen patients (69%) required physiotherapy assistance and modified positions were utilised in 8/13 (62%). SpO2 increased in 27/32 sessions, with a mean increase from 90% (SD 5) pre-positioning to 94% (SD 4) (mean difference 4%; 95%CI 3 to 5%) after 15 minutes. Oxygen requirement decreased in 14/32 sessions, with a mean pre-positioning requirement of 8 l/minute (SD 4) to 7 l/minute (SD 4) (mean difference 2 l/minute; 95%CI 1 to 3 l/minute) after 15 minutes. In three sessions oxygen desaturation and discomfort occurred but resolved immediately by returning supine. ConclusionPhysiotherapy-assisted prone or modified prone positioning may be a feasible option leading to short-term improvements in oxygenation in awake, ward-based patients with hypoxemia due to COVID-19. Further research exploring longerterm health outcomes and safety is required.

Caloric Intake with High Ratio of Enteral Nutrition Associated with Lower Hospital Mortality for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Prone Position Therapy.

Positioning patients in the prone position leads to reduced hospital mortality rates for those with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). What constitutes the optimal feeding strategy for prone patients with ARDS is controversial. We conducted a retrospective study that enrolled 110 prone patients with ARDS in two medical intensive care units (ICUs) from September 2015 to November 2018. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥20 years, diagnosis of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, diagnosis of ARDS within 72 h of ICU admission, placement in a prone position within the first 7 days of ICU admission, and ICU stay of more than 7 days. Exclusion criteria were as follows: nil per os orders because of gastrointestinal bleeding or hemodynamic instability, and ventilator dependency because of chronic respiratory failure. The consecutive daily enteral nutrition(EN)/EN + parenteral nutrition(PN) ratio could predict hospital mortality rates within the first 7 days of admission when using generalized estimating equations (p = 0.013). A higher average EN/EN + PN ratio within the first 7 days predicted (hazard ratio: 0.97, confidence interval: 0.96–0.99) lower hospital mortality rates. To reduce hospital mortality rates, caloric intake with a higher EN ratio may be considered for patients in prone positions with ARDS.

Early versus late awake prone positioning in non-intubated patients with COVID-19

BackgroundAwake prone positioning (APP) is widely used in the management of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The primary objective of this study was to compare the outcome of COVID-19 patients who received early versus late APP.MethodsPost hoc analysis of data collected for a randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04325906). Adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 who received APP for at least one hour were included. Early prone positioning was defined as APP initiated within 24 h of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) start. Primary outcomes were 28-day mortality and intubation rate.ResultsWe included 125 patients (79 male) with a mean age of 62 years. Of them, 92 (73.6%) received early APP and 33 (26.4%) received late APP. Median time from HFNC initiation to APP was 2.25 (0.8–12.82) vs 36.35 (30.2–75.23) hours in the early and late APP group (p < 0.0001), respectively. Average APP duration was 5.07 (2.0–9.05) and 3.0 (1.09–5.64) hours per day in early and late APP group (p < 0.0001), respectively. The early APP group had lower mortality compared to the late APP group (26% vs 45%, p = 0.039), but no difference was found in intubation rate. Advanced age (OR 1.12 [95% CI 1.0–1.95], p = 0.001), intubation (OR 10.65 [95% CI 2.77–40.91], p = 0.001), longer time to initiate APP (OR 1.02 [95% CI 1.0–1.04], p = 0.047) and hydrocortisone use (OR 6.2 [95% CI 1.23–31.1], p = 0.027) were associated with increased mortality.ConclusionsEarly initiation (< 24 h of HFNC use) of APP in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 improves 28-day survival.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04325906.

Increasing Rates of Prone Positioning in Acute Care Patients with COVID-19.

BackgroundProne positioning improves mortality in patients intubated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and has been proposed as a treatment for nonintubated patients with COVID-19 outside the ICU. However, there are substantial patient and operational barriers to prone positioning on acute floors. The objective of this project was to increase the frequency of prone positioning among acute care patients with COVID-19.MethodsThe researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of all adult patients admitted to the acute care floors with COVID-19 respiratory failure. A run chart was used to quantify the frequency of prone positioning over time. For the subset of patients assisted by a dedicated physical therapy team, oxygen before and after positioning was compared. The initiative consisted of four separate interventions: (1) nursing, physical therapy, physician, and patient education; (2) optimization of supply management and operations; (3) an acute care prone positioning team; and (4) electronic health record optimization.ResultsFrom March 9, 2020, to August 26, 2020, 176/875 (20.1%) patients were placed in prone position. Among these, 43 (24.4%) were placed in the prone position by the physical therapy team. Only 2/94 (2.1%) eligible patients admitted in the first two weeks of the pandemic were ever documented in prone position. After launching the initiative, weekly frequency peaked at 13/28 (46.4%). Mean oxygen saturation was 91% prior to prone positioning vs. 95.2% after (p < 0.001) in those positioned by physical therapy.ConclusionA multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative increased frequency of prone positioning by proactively addressing barriers in knowledge, equipment, training, and information technology.

Engineering Prone Patient Positioning for Spine Surgery to Reduce Risk of Clinician Injury

Operating room throughput variability with spinal procedures revealed task inefficiency and potential safety concerns. Using the DMAIC framework (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control), a transdisciplinary team conducted a quality improvement (QI) research project to identify and address safety concerns with prone patient positioning. The main problem with patient positioning was undefined standard practice. Clinicians reported prone patient positioning for spinal surgery patients is physically demanding. Thus, the team conducted a rapid upper limb assessment for injury risk during patient positioning and identified a greater risk of clinician injury in the manual transfer process. The QI research team recommended the mechanical process of rotating patients with the Jackson Table to improve workload for the Surgical Team and developed training and design enhancements to support this workflow. The DMAIC quality framework enabled clinician collaboration with researchers to develop interventions to support a standardized process during prone patient positioning with the Jackson Table.

MP65-11 DOES SUPINE PCNL REQUIRE LESS ANESTHESIA? A DETAILED EVALUATION OF ANESTHETIC USE AND DURATION

You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Surgical Therapy V (MP65)1 Sep 2021MP65-11 DOES SUPINE PCNL REQUIRE LESS ANESTHESIA? A DETAILED EVALUATION OF ANESTHETIC USE AND DURATION Areeba Sadiq, Christine Liaw, Johnathan Khusid, Blair Gallante, William Atallah, and Mantu Gupta Areeba Sadiq Areeba Sadiq More articles by this author , Christine LiawChristine Liaw More articles by this author , Johnathan KhusidJohnathan Khusid More articles by this author , Blair GallanteBlair Gallante More articles by this author , William AtallahWilliam Atallah More articles by this author , and Mantu GuptaMantu Gupta More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002105.11AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) can be performed in the prone or supine position. Proponents of supine claim it is less invasive and requires less anesthesia. For the first time, we assessed differences in anesthetic duration and use between the supine and prone positions. METHODS: Our prospectively maintained Endourology database identified a total of 223 PCNL cases from January 2019 to October 2020 performed by a single surgeon, of which 86 (39%) were supine and 137 (61%) were prone. Data included demographics, tract size (24F or 16.5F), stone burden, staghorn presence, use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or endotracheal tube (ETT), anesthesia time, procedure time, and intraoperative doses of paralytic (rocuronium) and narcotic (fentanyl). Patients with anatomic abnormalities were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Chi-squared test, and linear regression modeling. RESULTS: There was no difference in age, gender, race, ASA, or BMI between supine and prone groups. There were differences in stone burden (median 20mm vs 30mm, p=0.001), tract size (24F: 61% vs 84.7%, p<0.001), and presence of staghorn (8.1% vs 21.9%, p=0.004). Supine position was more likely to have an LMA (41% vs 0%, p<0.001). Even after controlling for stone burden, tract size, presence of staghorn, and BMI, the supine position had 14 minutes shorter anesthesia time (1.23-26.8, p=0.032), and 12 minutes shorter operative time (-0.044-23.9, p=0.051) compared to prone. When controlling for these factors and total anesthesia time, supine patients received 20mg less rocuronium (13.2-26.8, p<0.001) and 38mcg less fentanyl (14.5-62.2, p=0.002) when compared to patients in prone position. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, when controlling for stone and patient factors, supine PCNL required less anesthesia time than prone. Furthermore, when controlling for differences in anesthesia time, supine patients received less paralytic and less narcotic during the procedure. These results suggest advantages intrinsic to patient positioning and may help guide surgeons decision making to help minimize anesthetic use and duration. Source of Funding: None © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e1123-e1124 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Areeba Sadiq More articles by this author Christine Liaw More articles by this author Johnathan Khusid More articles by this author Blair Gallante More articles by this author William Atallah More articles by this author Mantu Gupta More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...