The many articles in the literature concerning cineroentgenography of the gastrointestinal tract attest to continued interest in this technic (1, 2, 5–7, 9–11). Image intensifiers, to which cineroentgenography owes its practicability, are becoming standard equipment in both the hospital and office practice of radiology. Cineroentgenography has been advocated instead of spot-films at strategic intervals in the gastrointestinal examination (5). It has been used to supplement conventional roentgenography during rapid movements such as swallowing (1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 12). It probably is employed most often as a supplementary study, when the results of the conventional examination are inconclusive (3, 11, 12). Diagnoses based on cineroentgenography alone have been compared with those based on spot-films of the stomach and duodenum, and on a combination of spot-films and cineroentgenography (3). To our knowledge, however, no comparison has been reported between separate cineroentgenographic and conventional upper gastrointestinal roentgen studies (fluoroscopy, spot-films, and overhead tube films) in the same patient. Material and Methods One hundred and three patients who had been studied in a conventional roentgen examination were chosen for cineroentgenography by one of the authors (A. R. M.). In 75 a variety of gastric and duodenal lesions were demonstrated on the conventional films; in the remaining 28 the findings were normal. The roentgenographic diagnosis was the sole basis for selection; age, sex, or clinical condition of the patients was not considered. The investigator who performed and interpreted the cineroentgenographic study and reviewed the clinical and laboratory data was unaware of the findings of the conventional examination. Cineroentgenography was performed with a 9-inch Picker image intensifier, a Picker x-ray machine, and a 16-mm. Kodak Cine Special camera. The Kodak Plus X film employed was processed by a Picker automatic unit with Kodak Liquid Developer. The first films were made with the patient in the upright position and the stomach empty. The passage of the first swallow of barium through the cardioesophageal junction was recorded at the rate of 30 frames per second. The remainder of the examination was performed at 15 frames per second. The initial swallow was followed by a recording of the gastric rugal folds in both the upright and prone positions. The stomach was then filled and studied in the upright position. The gastric fundus and the antrum and duodenal bulb were examined in the supine position. This was followed by an examination of the lower esophagus in the prone oblique position. With the patient in the same position, the filled stomach was then scanned. Efforts to demonstrate a hiatus hernia were made in every instance.