BRCA1 Promoter Methylation Research Articles

BRCA promoter methylation in triple-negative breast cancer is preserved in xenograft models and represents a potential therapeutic marker for PARP inhibitors.

Most triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) are sporadic in nature and often associated with dysfunction of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Since somatic BRCA mutations are rare in breast cancer (BC), this dysfunction frequently is the result of BRCA promoter methylation. Despite the phenotypic similarities of these tumors to those with germline or somatic BRCA mutation, the evidence of response to PARP inhibitors is unclear. We analyzed the prevalence of BRCA promoter methylation in 29 BC metastases through the well-established Illumina Infinium EPIC Human Methylation Bead Chip. In cases with BRCA methylation, the xenograft of the same tumor was tested. Additionally, we compared BC xenografts with an identified BRCA methylation to their matched primary tumors and subsequently investigated the efficacy of PARP inhibitors on tumor organoids from a BRCA2 promoter-methylated BC. BRCA2 promotor hypermethylation was identified in one pleural metastasis of a young patient as well as in the xenograft tissue. We also identified five more xenograft models with BRCA2 promotor hypermethylation. Analysis of one matched primary tumor confirmed the same BRCA2 methylation. PARP inhibitor treatment of tumor organoids derived from the BRCA2 methylated xenograft tumor tissue of the young patient showed a significant decline in cell viability, similar to organoids with somatic BRCA1 mutation, while having no effect on organoids with BRCA1 wildtype. BRCA promotor hypermethylation seems to be a rare event in metastatic BC but is preserved in subsequent xenograft models and might represent an attractive therapeutic marker for PARP inhibitors.

The molecular significance of BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood cells in women with breast cancer in West Algeria

IntroductionEpigenetic alterations, in particular DNA methylation, are the most important mechanism that silences tumor suppressor genes during carcinogenesis. Methylation of the BRCA1 promoter in peripheral blood is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. In the present study, we aimed, for the first time in western Algeria, to investigate the role of BRCA1 CpG promoter methylation in peripheral blood cells (PBCs) among breast cancer patients, as a potential biomarker for detecting breast cancer risk at an early age.Material and methodsThe methylation profile of the BRCA1 gene promoter and its frequency in PBCs, derived from 39 breast cancer patients, was explored by methylation-specific PCR (MSPCR). The association between methylation profiles and clinicopathological features was evaluated with SPSS statistics software to estimate a convenient biomarker for early detection of breast cancer.ResultsMSPCR results demonstrated that the methylation frequency of the BRCA1 gene promoter detected in PBCs is significantly higher than in other populations. It was observed in 23 of 39 (58.97%) breast cancer patients.ConclusionsOur study showed that the methylation of the BRCA1 gene promoter detected in PBCs’ DNA could have potential utility in clinical diagnostics as a new biomarker for breast cancer risk in Algerian women and for early detection.

Is it time to add BRCA1 promoter methylation testing in the arsenal of ovarian cancer diagnostic tools?

Is it time to add BRCA1 promoter methylation testing in the arsenal of ovarian cancer diagnostic tools?

High-level tumour methylation of BRCA1 and RAD51C is required for homologous recombination deficiency in solid cancers.

In ovarian and breast cancer, promoter methylation of BRCA1 or RAD51C is a promising biomarker for PARP inhibitor response, as high levels lead to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Yet the extent and role of such methylation in other cancers is not clear. This study comprehensively investigated promoter methylation of eight homologous recombination repair genes across 23 solid cancer types. Here, we showed that BRCA1 methylated cancers were associated with reduced gene expression, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), TP53 mutations and genomic features of HRD. We identified BRCA1 methylation in 3% of the copy-number high subtype of endometrial cancer, and as a rare event in six other cancer types, including lung squamous cell, pancreatic, bladder and stomach cancer. RAD51C promoter methylation was widespread across multiple cancer types, but HRD features were only observed for cases which contained high-level tumour methylation and LOH of RAD51C. While RAD51C methylation was frequent in stomach adenocarcinoma (6%) and low-grade glioma (2.5%), it was mostly detected at a low tumour level, suggestive of heterozygous methylation, and was associated with CpG island methylator phenotype. Our findings indicate that high-level tumour methylation of BRCA1 and RAD51C should be explored as a PARP inhibitor biomarker across multiple cancers.

Prognostic value of BRCA1 promoter methylation for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

ObjectiveBRCA1 promoter methylation (BRCA1pm) is suspected to alter prognosis of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of this epigenetic modification. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, monocentric study from 11/2006 to 08/2018. Patients with EOC and available status concerning somatic BRCA1/2 mutation and BRCA1pm were included. Three groups were defined: patients without BRCA1/2 mutation or BRCA1pm, patients with BRCA1/2 mutation and patients with BRCA1pm. BRCA1/2 mutations were analyzed in current care settings by next-generation sequencing (NGS). BRCA1pm analysis was assessed and quantified from bisulfite converted DNAs using fluorescent methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fragment analysis. All patients signed a consent form and the study was authorized by a Personal Protection Committee. Descriptive statistics were used to describe groups. Multivariate analysis was performed using the logistic regression model and including the variables that could be known at the time of diagnosis and that were significant at univariate analysis. Survival was compared between the groups. Kaplan-Mayer curves were used to express the differences in survival that were compared using log rank tests. Results145 patients were included: 95 (65.5 %) patients without BRCA1/2 mutation or BRCA1pm, 32 (22.1 %) patients with BRCA1/2 mutation, 18 (12.4 %) patients with BRCA1pm. Median survival was decreased in patients with BRCA1pm. Comparison of survival revealed a significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.0078) with a worse prognosis for patients with a BRCA1pm. ConclusionBRCA1pm in patients with EOC is an independent factor associated with a decreased overall survival. SynopsisBRCA1 promotor methylation in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer is an independent factor associated with a decreased overall survival.

Long-term outcomes of young, node-negative, chemotherapy-naïve, triple-negative breast cancer patients according to BRCA1 status

BackgroundDue to the abundant usage of chemotherapy in young triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, the unbiased prognostic value of BRCA1-related biomarkers in this population remains unclear. In addition, whether BRCA1-related biomarkers modify the well-established prognostic value of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) is unknown. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of young, node-negative, chemotherapy-naïve TNBC patients according to BRCA1 status, taking sTILs into account.MethodsWe included 485 Dutch women diagnosed with node-negative TNBC under age 40 between 1989 and 2000. During this period, these women were considered low-risk and did not receive chemotherapy. BRCA1 status, including pathogenic germline BRCA1 mutation (gBRCA1m), somatic BRCA1 mutation (sBRCA1m), and tumor BRCA1 promoter methylation (BRCA1-PM), was assessed using DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. sTILs were assessed according to the international guideline. Patients’ outcomes were compared using Cox regression and competing risk models.ResultsAmong the 399 patients with BRCA1 status, 26.3% had a gBRCA1m, 5.3% had a sBRCA1m, 36.6% had tumor BRCA1-PM, and 31.8% had BRCA1-non-altered tumors. Compared to BRCA1-non-alteration, gBRCA1m was associated with worse overall survival (OS) from the fourth year after diagnosis (adjusted HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.18–3.75), and this association attenuated after adjustment for second primary tumors. Every 10% sTIL increment was associated with 16% higher OS (adjusted HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78–0.90) in gBRCA1m, sBRCA1m, or BRCA1-non-altered patients and 31% higher OS in tumor BRCA1-PM patients. Among the 66 patients with tumor BRCA1-PM and ≥ 50% sTILs, we observed excellent 15-year OS (97.0%; 95% CI, 92.9–100%). Conversely, among the 61 patients with gBRCA1m and < 50% sTILs, we observed poor 15-year OS (50.8%; 95% CI, 39.7–65.0%). Furthermore, gBRCA1m was associated with higher (adjusted subdistribution HR, 4.04; 95% CI, 2.29–7.13) and tumor BRCA1-PM with lower (adjusted subdistribution HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19–0.95) incidence of second primary tumors, compared to BRCA1-non-alteration.ConclusionsAlthough both gBRCA1m and tumor BRCA1-PM alter BRCA1 gene transcription, they are associated with different outcomes in young, node-negative, chemotherapy-naïve TNBC patients. By combining sTILs and BRCA1 status for risk classification, we were able to identify potential subgroups in this population to intensify and optimize adjuvant treatment.

Male breast cancer: No evidence for mosaic BRCA1 promoter methylation involvement

Breast cancers (BC) are rare in men and are often caused by constitutional predisposing factors. In women, mosaic BRCA1 promoter methylations (MBPM) are frequent events, detected in 4–8% of healthy subjects. This constitutional epimutation increases risk of early-onset and triple-negative BC. However, the role of MBPM in male BC predisposition has never been assessed. We screened 40 blood samples from men affected by BC, and performed extensive tumour analysis on MBPM-positive patients. We detected two patients carrying MBPM. Surprisingly, tumour analysis revealed that neither of these two male BCs were caused by the constitutional BRCA1 epimutations carried by the patients.

Analytical sensitivity of a method is critical in detection of low-level BRCA1 constitutional epimutation

Recent reports based on a substantial number of cases, warrant need for population-based research to determine implications of constitutional methylation of tumor suppressor genes such as BRCA1 occurring in healthy tissue in the prediction of cancer. However, the detection of the constitutional methylation in DNA extracted from blood has already been shown to be technologically challenging, mainly because epimutations appear to be present in blood at a very low level. The analytical sensitivity required for low-level methylation detection can be provided by NGS, but this technique is still labor and cost-intensive. We assessed if PCR-based MS-HRM and BeadChip microarray technologies, which are standardized and cost-effective technologies for methylation changes screening, provide a sufficient level of analytical sensitivity for constitutional BRCA1 methylation detection in blood samples. The study included whole blood samples from 67 healthy women, 35 with previously confirmed and 32 with no detectable BRCA1 promoter methylation for which we performed both MS-HRM based BRCA1 gene methylation screening and genome wide methylation profiling with EPIC microarray. Our results shown, that low-level BRCA1 methylation can be effectively detected in DNA extracted from blood by PCR-based MS-HRM. At the same time, EPIC microarray does not provide conclusive results to unambiguously determine the presence of BRCA1 constitutional methylation in MS-HRM epimutation positive samples. The analytical sensitivity of MS-HRM is sufficient to detect low level BRCA1 constitutional epimutation in DNA extracted from blood and BeadChip technology-based microarrays appear not to provide that level of analytical sensitivity.

Homologous Recombination Deficiency Across Subtypes of Primary Breast Cancer.

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is highly prevalent in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and associated with response to PARP inhibition (PARPi). Here, we studied the prevalence of HRD in non-TNBC to assess the potential for PARPi in a wider group of patients with breast cancer. HRD status was established using targeted gene panel sequencing (360 genes) and BRCA1 methylation analysis of pretreatment biopsies from 201 patients with primary breast cancer in the phase II PETREMAC trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02624973). HRD was defined as mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, BARD1, or PALB2 and/or promoter methylation of BRCA1 (strict definition; HRD-S). In secondary analyses, a wider definition (HRD-W) was used, examining mutations in 20 additional genes. Furthermore, tumor BRCAness (multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification), PAM50 subtyping, RAD51 nuclear foci to test functional HRD, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL), and PD-L1 analyses were performed. HRD-S was present in 5% of non-TNBC cases (n = 9 of 169), contrasting 47% of the TNBC tumors (n = 15 of 32). HRD-W was observed in 23% of non-TNBC (n = 39 of 169) and 59% of TNBC cases (n = 19 of 32). Of 58 non-TNBC and 30 TNBC biopsies examined for RAD51 foci, 4 of 4 (100%) non-TNBC and 13 of 14 (93%) TNBC cases classified as HRD-S had RAD51 low scores. In contrast, 4 of 17 (24%) non-TNBC and 15 of 19 (79%) TNBC biopsies classified as HRD-W exhibited RAD51 low scores. Of nine non-TNBC tumors with HRD-S status, only one had a basal-like PAM50 signature. There was a high concordance between HRD-S and either BRCAness, high TIL density, or high PD-L1 expression (each P < .001). The prevalence of HRD in non-TNBC suggests that therapy targeting HRD should be evaluated in a wider breast cancer patient population. Strict HRD criteria should be implemented to increase diagnostic precision with respect to functional HRD.

Contribution of constitutional BRCA1 promoter methylation to early-onset and familial breast cancer patients from Pakistan.

Constitutional BRCA1 promoter methylation has been identified as a potential risk factor for breast cancer (BC) in the Caucasian population. However, this data is lacking for BC patients of Asian origin. Therefore, we assessed the contribution of constitutional BRCA1 promoter methylation in Pakistani BC patients. A total of 385 BRCA1/2-negative index BC patients (197 early-onset BC (≤ 30years), 152 familial BC, 17 familial BC and ovarian cancer, 19 male BC) and 107 healthy controls were screened for the constitutional BRCA1 promoter methylation by methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting assay. Overall, 131 patients displayed triple-negative BC (TNBC) and 254 non-TNBC phenotypes. The prevalence of BRCA1 promoter methylation was calculated based on clinicopathological characteristics using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Constitutional BRCA1 promoter methylation was identified in 19.5% (75/385) of BC patients and 13.1% (14/107) of controls. The frequency of methylation was higher in early-onset BC (23.4% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.035) and TNBC patients (29.0% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.004) compared to controls. Methylation was also more prevalent in patients with high-grade than low-grade tumors (21.7% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.034) and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative than PR-positive tumors (26.0% vs. 13.9%, P = 0.004). Constitutional BRCA1 promoter methylation remained independently associated with TNBC phenotype (odds ratio 1.99; 95% CI 1.12-3.54; P = 0.02) after adjusting for BC diagnosis age, tumor grade, ER, and PR status. Constitutional BRCA1 promoter methylation is associated with TNBC and can serve as a non-invasive blood-based biomarker for Pakistani TNBC patients.

An integrated analysis of microRNAs regulating DNA damage response in triple-negative breast cancer

BackgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a clinical challenge due to its aggressive phenotype and limited treatment options for the patients. Many TNBC patients show an inherent defect in the DNA repair capacity primarily by acquiring germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes leading to Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD). Epigenetic modifications such as BRCA1 promoter methylation and miRNA expression targeting DNA repair pathway genes have contributed to the HRD phenotype in TNBC. Hence, we aimed to identify microRNAs that are associated with HRD status in the TCGA-BRCA project.Materials and methodsWe implemented a miRNA prediction strategy for identifying miRNAs targeting HR pathway genes using an in silico predicted and experimentally validated list from published literature for their association with genomic instability and factors affecting HRD. In silico analysis was performed to study miRNA expression patterns regulated by DNA methylation and TMB status in the TNBC patients from TCGA-BRCA project. Finally, we analysed selected miRNA expression with immune cell infiltration pattern in the TNBC patient cohort.ResultsOur study identified miRNAs associated with HRD, tumour mutation burden (TMB), and immune cell infiltration. Identified miRNA signatures were associated with the miR-17 ~ 92 cluster, miR-106b ~ 25 cluster, and miR-200b ~ 429 cluster. Pathway analysis of selected miRNAs suggested their association with altered immune cell infiltration in TNBC.ConclusionOur study identified 6 ‘HRD associated miRNAs’ such as miR-106b, miR-93, miR-17, miR-20a, miR-200b, and miR-429 as novel miRNA-based signatures associated with HR deficiency in TNBC.

Detection of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) using a novel genomic and epigenomic liquid biopsy assay in patients with breast cancer.

556 Background: Homologous recombination and repair (HRR) deficiency (HRD) is characterized by genomic instability associated with dysfunction in BRCA1/2 or other HRR genes. Patients with breast cancer harboring an HRD phenotype with or without HRR mutations have derived clinical benefit from PARPi therapy. We have previously shown that GuardantINFINITY, a novel genomic and epigenomic liquid biopsy assay, can identify HRR SNVs, indels, rearrangements, copy number loss, reversions, and BRCA1 promoter methylation for patient selection and resistance monitoring, a major challenge for PARPi treatment. Here, we present a method of predicting HRD status by cfDNA using GuardantINFINITY in patients with advanced breast cancer. Methods: We developed a probabilistic genomic model to predict HRD status, inferred from genome-wide somatic SNV, indel, and CNV signatures indicative of BRCA1/2 deficiency, including large-scale state transitions (LST), whole-genome tumor loss of heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI). A second probabilistic model, based on targeted measurements of genomic and epigenetic changes was learned from a subset of clinical samples to enhance the genomic model. The model was trained and tested on a cohort of over 12,000 GuardantOMNI and GuardantINFINITY clinical breast cancer samples to assess the sensitivity of accurately detecting deficiency in select HRR-genes ( BRCA1/2, PALB2, RAD51D). The aggregated predictive model was validated on an independent cohort of breast cancer samples. Results: The model based on genomic and epigenetic signals identified HRR-gene deficiency in a breast cancer cohort with a estimated 95% LoD of 22.5% tumor fraction and an AUC of 0.75 across all tumor fractions, an improvement in sensitivity over when only the genomic model is used (AUC of 0.7, 95% LoD of 28%). Specificity remained high for both models (100%, n = 83) in cancer free samples. Application of this model in a cohort of 1,101 patients with unselected breast cancer identified 390 patients with an HRD phenotype, of whom 192 patients had a known HRR-gene mutation. Of the 201 patients with a known pathogenic mutation in an HRR gene, 49 also had co-occurring LoH in the same gene, indicating biallelic loss. Conclusions: In this analysis, we demonstrate that a probabilistic model of genomic and methylation predictors can detect HRD status in patients with breast cancer from cfDNA using GuardantINFINITY. Additional analytical and clinical studies to further evaluate this model are ongoing. With HRD prediction, GuardantINFINITY provides a comprehensive minimally-invasive solution for PARPi and DNA damage treatment selection, longitudinal monitoring, and an exploratory platform for investigating epigenetic signals that may underpin resistance.

Homologous recombination deficiency derived from whole-genome sequencing predicts platinum response in triple-negative breast cancers

The high frequency of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is the main rationale of testing platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), however, the existing methods to identify HRD are controversial and there is a medical need for predictive biomarkers. We assess the in vivo response to platinum agents in 55 patient-derived xenografts (PDX) of TNBC to identify determinants of response. The HRD status, determined from whole genome sequencing, is highly predictive of platinum response. BRCA1 promoter methylation is not associated with response, in part due to residual BRCA1 gene expression and homologous recombination proficiency in different tumours showing mono-allelic methylation. Finally, in 2 cisplatin sensitive tumours we identify mutations in XRCC3 and ORC1 genes that are functionally validated in vitro. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the genomic HRD is predictive of platinum response in a large cohort of TNBC PDX and identify alterations in XRCC3 and ORC1 genes driving cisplatin response.

Abstract 6603: BRCA1 promoter methylation in sporadic breast cancer patients detected by liquid biopsy

Abstract Background: BRCA1 promoter methylation (PM) is an early initiating event in cancer, occurring in 3 to 65.2% of all breast tumors, and 30 to 65% of triple negative tumors. BRCA1 PM has been associated with defective homologous recombination repair (HRR), early onset of breast and ovarian cancer, and improved clinical response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Historically, there has been no diagnostic assay that comprehensively evaluates both BRCA1 PM and genomic alterations in cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Here, we describe the novel detection of BRCA1 PM and genomic alterations in a cohort of patients with breast cancer using GuardantINFINITY, a liquid biopsy assay interrogating 800+ genes and genome-wide methylation detection. Method: We assessed for BRCA1 PM in ctDNA from 274 patients with late-stage breast cancer. Genomic sequencing of 800+ genes and PM profiling of 398 genes was performed by GuardantINFINITY. The positive calling threshold for PM was established by comparing cell-free DNA derived from patients with cancer and cancer-free donors. The limit of detection (LoD) was determined through in silico and experimental titrations of ctDNA from clinical samples and cell lines with known gene PM into the plasma of cancer-free donors. Results: Among the 274 patients with advanced breast cancer, 8 (2.9%) had germline pathogenic mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM. BRCA1 PM was detected in 11/274 (4.0%) patients at the predefined threshold of &amp;gt;99% specificity. BRCA1 PM detection in this cohort was 8.9% (8/90) when excluding samples with low tumor shedding (&amp;lt;1% epigenomic tumor fraction in cfDNA). Among the 11 patients with BRCA1 PM detected in ctDNA, one had a co-occurring somatic BRCA1 nonsense variant (p.S361*); none of the remaining patients with BRCA1 PM had another HRR-related mutation detected in cfDNA. Among patients without BRCA1 PM detected, pathogenic somatic alterations were detected in BRCA2, ATM, and CHEK2 in 25 (9.4%) patients. In silico simulations using clinical samples with BRCA1 PM indicated an LoD of 0.0408%. BRCA1 PM was not detected in 3210 individual and mixed cancer-free clinical samples, indicating a high specificity for BRCA1 PM calls. Conclusion: GuardantINFINITY, a plasma-based diagnostic assay, detected both BRCA1 PM and genomic alterations in this unspecified advanced breast cancer cohort. The BRCA1 PM detection rates of 4.0-8.9% are consistent with values previously reported in the literature. As BRCA1 PM has important prognostic and therapeutic implications for the management of breast (as well as ovarian) cancers, additional studies are warranted to further describe the PM patterns across breast cancer subtypes and how these patterns both influence and are influenced by disease evolution and therapeutic response. Liquid biopsy thus serves as a suitable method to noninvasively identify and monitor changes in both genomics and epigenomics. Citation Format: Jennifer Yen, Sai Chen, Colby Jenkins, Brooke Overstreet, Yu Fu, Jun Zhao, Tingting Jiang, Leylah Drusbosky, Stephen Pettitt, Michael Dorschner, Lauren Lawrence, Han-Yu Chuang, Andrew Tutt. BRCA1 promoter methylation in sporadic breast cancer patients detected by liquid biopsy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6603.

Abstract 966: Exploration of a novel HRD signature (HRDsig) as a biomarker for rucaparib benefit in ARIEL2

Abstract Introduction: The ARIEL2 (Parts 1 and 2) all-comers study tested the effectiveness of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive or resistant/refractory relapsed high-grade ovarian cancer. Pre-specified analyses identified associations of BRCA1/2 mutation status and genomic LOH (gLOH) with prolonged PFS. Recently, a novel scar-based measure of HRD was described [HRDsig; AACR #1249], and we retrospectively examined its predictive value in the ARIEL2 study. Methods: ARIEL2 (CO-338-017; NCT01891344) was an international multicenter, two-part, phase 2 open-label study conducted across 64 sites. Tumor tissues were profiled with comprehensive genomic profiling for all classes of alterations in at least 287 genes (FoundationOne®). HRDsig was called using a machine learning based algorithm with a broad set of genome-wide copy number and short variant features, independent of gLOH (AACR 2022 #1249). Survival analysis was limited to samples where both gLOH and HRDsig could be evaluated (n=394). Hazard ratios were estimated using a univariate Cox proportional hazards model and objective response rates (ORR) were compared using Fisher’s exact test. gLOH high was defined using a cutoff of 16%, based on ARIEL2 and subsequently FDA approved as a complementary diagnostic. BRCA1 promoter methylation was quantified by digital droplet PCR. Results: HRDsig(+) was identified in 56% (251/449) of cases, including 92% (108/117) of those with deleterious BRCA1/2 alterations and 43% (143/332) of BRCAwt. In the intention to treat (ITT) and in pts with platinum sensitive (plat-sen) disease, HRDsig(+) was predictive of PFS benefit on rucaparib (ITT HR = 0.63 [0.50-0.80], p&amp;lt;0.001; plat-sen HR = 0.44 [0.32-0.60]; p&amp;lt;0.001), similar to gLOH-high (ITT HR = 0.70 [0.56-0.87], p=0.0016; plat-sen HR 0.55 [0.41-0.74], p&amp;lt;0.001). In BRCAwt pts with plat-sen disease (n=179), HRDsig was predictive of objective response and PFS on rucaparib, (ORR 28% in HRDsig(+) vs 10% in HRDsig(-), p=0.002; PFS HR = 0.66 [0.48-0.91]; p=0.012). Tumors with RAD51C/D alterations (5/5; 100%) were identified as HRDsig(+). Most other HRR alterations showed little association with HRDsig, including ATM (0/5 HRDsig(+)), and CHEK2 (0/4 HRDsig(+)). Additionally, 33 BRCAwt pts were identified as BRCA1 methylation positive in the cohort, with 32/33 (97%) identified as HRDsig(+), similar to gLOH-high (30/33; 91%). Conclusions: HRDsig(+) was associated with rucaparib benefit overall and in BRCAwt pts with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer in this study. HRDsig(+) status exhibited strong association with deficiency caused by both epigenetic (BRCA1 methylation) and genetic (HRR mutation) mechanisms. Additional studies should further explore the utility of this biomarker for pt selection in ovarian cancer and other relevant cancer types to inform the use of PARP inhibitors or other DNA damaging agents. Citation Format: Ethan S. Sokol, Russell W. Madison, Dexter X. Jin, Kuei Ting Chen, Zoe Fleischmann, Justin Newberg, Alexa Shrock, David Fabrizio, Jie He, Neeru Bhardwaj, Kevin K. Lin, Iain A. McNeish, Elizabeth M. Swisher. Exploration of a novel HRD signature (HRDsig) as a biomarker for rucaparib benefit in ARIEL2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 966.

BRCA1-methylated triple negative breast cancers previously exposed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy form RAD51 foci and respond poorly to olaparib.

About 15% of Triple-Negative-Breast-Cancer (TNBC) present silencing of the BRCA1 promoter methylation and are assumed to be Homologous Recombination Deficient (HRD). BRCA1-methylated (BRCA1-Me) TNBC could, thus, be eligible to treatment based on PARP-inhibitors or Platinum salts. However, their actual HRD status is discussed, as these tumors are suspected to develop resistance after chemotherapy exposure. We interrogated the sensitivity to olaparib vs. carboplatin of 8 TNBC Patient-Derived Xenografts (PDX) models. Four PDX corresponded to BRCA1-Me, of which 3 were previously exposed to NeoAdjuvant-Chemotherapy (NACT). The remaining PDX models corresponded to two BRCA1-mutated (BRCA1-Mut) and two BRCA1-wild type PDX that were respectively included as positive and negative controls. The HRD status of our PDX models was assessed using both genomic signatures and the functional BRCA1 and RAD51 nuclear foci formation assay. To assess HR restoration associated with olaparib resistance, we studied pairs of BRCA1 deficient cell lines and their resistant subclones. The 3 BRCA1-Me PDX that had been exposed to NACT responded poorly to olaparib, likewise BRCA1-WT PDX. Contrastingly, 3 treatment-naïve BRCA1-deficient PDX (1 BRCA1-Me and 2 BRCA1-mutated) responded to olaparib. Noticeably, the three olaparib-responsive PDX scored negative for BRCA1- and RAD51-foci, whereas all non-responsive PDX models, including the 3 NACT-exposed BRCA1-Me PDX, scored positive for RAD51-foci. This suggested HRD in olaparib responsive PDX, while non-responsive models were HR proficient. These results were consistent with observations in cell lines showing a significant increase of RAD51-foci in olaparib-resistant subclones compared with sensitive parental cells, suggesting HR restoration in these models. Our results thus support the notion that the actual HRD status of BRCA1-Me TNBC, especially if previously exposed to chemotherapy, may be questioned and should be verified using the BRCA1- and RAD51-foci assay.

Abstract PD5-01: PD5-01 Genomic and epigenomic BRCA alterations predict adaptive resistance and response to platinum-based therapy in triple negative breast cancer and ovarian carcinoma

Abstract Background. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), induced by germline and somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations (BRCAmut) and by BRCA1 promoter methylation (BRCA1meth), has been associated with better response to platinum agents in both triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and ovarian carcinoma (OvCa). A major conundrum arising from recent studies is why patients with BRCA1meth cancers do more poorly compared to those with BRCAmut cancers given the biologically equivalent HRD in both states. Here, we address this question by performing detailed genomic analyses of primary TNBC and OvCa cohorts and through patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and their derivative cell lines. Methods. Both new and publicly available cohorts of primary TNBC and OvCa encompassing 499 individuals treated with a combination of platinum and taxane chemotherapy were analyzed by whole genome and transcriptome sequencing as well as limited epigenetic analyses. A cohort of 43 PDX models of TNBC was genomically characterized and responses to both single agent platinum and docetaxel were evaluated in vivo. PDX longitudinal studies were performed to assess the dynamics of BRCA1 methylation following treatment. Results. Genomic analyses revealed that BRCA1mut and BRCA1meth cancers share the same pattern of BRCA1-linked genomic rearrangements. Nonetheless, in all four primary cancer cohorts examined we found that patients with BRCAmut cancers, but not those with BRCA1meth cancers, had significantly better response outcomes compared to those with BRCA proficient cancers. A separate analysis of PDX TNBCs with BRCA1 promoter methylation showed that PDXs derived from treatment naïve cancers had complete methylation of the BRCA1 promoter, whereas those derived from post-treatment cancers invariably had only partial methylation. Compared to PDXs with complete methylation, those with partial methylation had a lower response rate to in vivo platinum-based therapy, but not to docetaxel. Using single cell clonal expansions from BRCA1meth PDX models, we confirmed that partial methylation was the result of demethylation of one of the BRCA1 promoter alleles and not of the outgrowth of a non-methylated clone. Exposure of TNBC PDXs with complete methylation to a single course of platinum therapy resulted in the emergence of an unmethylated BRCA1 promoter allele, which associated with an increase in BRCA1 expression. We confirmed that platinum treatment results in progressive loss of BRCA1 methylation and restoration of BRCA1 expression in the clinical setting, by studying the BRCA1 status of a longitudinal series of four TNBC PDX models established from the same patient at different stages of her clinical history. Differential gene expression analysis revealed an increased immune transcriptional signal, especially an elevated M1 macrophage signature, associated with enhanced response to platinum therapy only in patients with BRCA proficient cancers, in both TNBC and OvCa. Integrating both the strength of this cancer immune signature and the presence of BRCA mutations resulted in more accurate predictions of response when compared to either HRD or BRCA status alone. Conclusions. These results suggest that unlike BRCAmut cancers, where BRCA deficiency is more genetically stable, BRCA1meth cancers are highly adaptive to genotoxin exposure resulting in demethylation of one allele, recovery of BRCA1 expression and acquired insensitivity to platinum. On the other end, a high immune transcriptional signature identifies patients with BRCA proficient cancers that are more likely to benefit from platinum therapy. Taken together, our study underscores the importance of characterizing molecular heterogeneity to optimize predictive precision in assigning response probabilities in TNBC and OvCa. Citation Format: Francesca Menghi, Kalyan Banda, Pooja Kumar, Robert Straub, Lacey E. Dobrolecki, Isabel Rodriguez, Susan E. Yost, Harshpreet Chandok, Marc Radke, George Somlo, Yuan Yuan, Michael T. Lewis, Elizabeth Swisher, Edison Liu. PD5-01 Genomic and epigenomic BRCA alterations predict adaptive resistance and response to platinum-based therapy in triple negative breast cancer and ovarian carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-01.

Abstract P6-10-04: Homologous recombination deficiency across subtypes of primary breast cancer

Abstract Background: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is highly prevalent in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and predictive of response to PARP inhibition in the primary setting (Eikesdal et al, Ann Oncol, 2021). However, the prevalence of HRD across breast cancer subtypes has not been established. Methods: Pretreatment tumor biopsies from 201 patients (32 TNBC and 169 non-TNBC) with primary breast cancer in the phase II PETREMAC trial (ClinicalTrials #NCT02624973) were examined. These samples underwent targeted cancer gene panel sequencing and BRCA1 promoter methylation analysis to assess HRD status defined by homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations and/or BRCA1 promoter methylation. HRR genes included BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, BARD1, and PALB2 by strict definition (HRR-S), and additionally ABL1, ATM, ATR, ATRX, BLM, CDK12, CHEK1, EMSY, ERCC4, FANCA, FANCC, FANCD2, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, MEN1, MRE11, NBN, PTEN, and SETD2 by wider definition (HRR-W). HRD strict (HRD-S) was defined as biallelic gene inactivation by HRR-S mutations or BRCA1 methylation. Finally, tumors underwent PAM50 gene expression subtyping and evaluation of functional HRD by RAD51 nuclear foci analysis, for which a low score has been associated with HRD. Results: HRD-S was present in 13% of the breast cancers (total: n= 27/201; TNBC: 15/32; 47%; non-TNBC: 12/169; 7%), whereas HRD-W (HRR-W or BRCA1 methylation) was observed in 29% (total: n=58/201; TNBC: 19/32; 59%; non-TNBC: 39/169; 23%). Among 190 tumors analyzed for PAM50 intrinsic subtype, HRD-S was detected in 3/60 and 4/48 (5% and 8%) of tumors classified as luminal A and B, respectively, 1/35 (3%) of HER2-enriched, 4/21 (19%) of normal-like, and 12/26 (46%) of basal-like tumors. Out of 58 non-TNBC biopsies examined by RAD51 staining, four (7%) were classified as HRD-S and all these were scored as RAD51 low. The remaining 54 non-TNBC samples were homologous recombination proficient, and none of these exhibited functional HRD by RAD51 low scores. All four HRD-S/RAD51 low tumors were hormone receptor-positive, HER2 negative, and belonged to the luminal A (n=1), luminal B (n=2), and basal-like (n=1) subtypes, with HRD caused by germline BRCA1 (gBRCA1), gBRCA2, somatic BRCA1 mutations and BRCA1 methylation, respectively. Conclusion: The prevalence of HRD across all breast cancer subtypes suggests that HRD analysis and therapy targeting such DNA repair defects should be tested in future clinical trials. Citation Format: Christina Engebrethsen, Synnøve Yndestad, Andrea Herencia-Ropero, Oleksii Nikolaienko, Olav Karsten Vintermyr, Reidun K. Lillestøl, Laura Minsaas, Beryl Leirvaag, Gjertrud Iversen, Bjørnar Gilje, Egil Blix, Helge Espelid, Steinar Lundgren, Jürgen Geisler, Liv Jorunn Vassbotn, Hildegunn S. Aase, Turid Aas, Alba Llop-Guevara, Violeta Serra, Per Eystein Lønning, Stian Knappskog, Hans Petter Eikesdal. Homologous recombination deficiency across subtypes of primary breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-04.

Characterization of BRCA Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer.

BRCA testing is recommended in all Ovarian Cancer (OC) patients, but the optimal approach is debated. The landscape of BRCA alterations was explored in 30 consecutive OC patients: 6 (20.0%) carried germline pathogenic variants, 1 (3.3%) a somatic mutation of BRCA2, 2 (6.7%) unclassified germline variants in BRCA1, and 5 (16.7%) hypermethylation of the BRCA1 promoter. Overall, 12 patients (40.0%) showed BRCA deficit (BD), due to inactivation of both alleles of either BRCA1 or BRCA2, while 18 (60.0%) had undetected/unclear BRCA deficit (BU). Regarding sequence changes, analysis performed on Formalin-Fixed-Paraffin-Embedded tissue through a validated diagnostic protocol showed 100% accuracy, compared with 96.3% for Snap-Frozen tissue and 77.8% for the pre-diagnostic Formalin-Fixed-Paraffin-Embedded protocol. BD tumors, compared to BU, showed a significantly higher rate of small genomic rearrangements. After a median follow-up of 60.3 months, the mean PFS was 54.9 ± 27.2 months in BD patients and 34.6 ± 26.7 months in BU patients (p = 0.055). The analysis of other cancer genes in BU patients identified a carrier of a pathogenic germline variant in RAD51C. Thus, BRCA sequencing alone may miss tumors potentially responsive to specific treatments (due to BRCA1 promoter methylation or mutations in other genes) while unvalidated FFPE approaches may yield false-positive results.

Pyrosequencing Assay for BRCA1 Methylation Analysis: Results from a Cross-Validation Study

Epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs) harboring germline or somatic pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes show sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. It has been suggested that BRCA1 promoter methylation is perhaps a better determinant of therapy response, because of its intrinsic dynamic feature, with respect to genomic scars or gene mutation. Conflicting evidence was reported so far, and the lack of a validated assay to measure promoter methylation was considered a main confounding factor in data interpretation. To contribute to the validation process of a pyrosequencing assay for BRCA1 promoter methylation, 109 EOCs from two Italian centers were reciprocally blindly investigated. By comparing two different pyrosequencing assays, addressing a partially overlapping region of BRCA1 promoter, an almost complete concordance of results was obtained. Moreover, the clinical relevance of this approach was also supported by the finding of BRCA1 transcript down-regulation in BRCA1-methylated EOCs. These findings could lead to the development of a simple and cheap pyrosequencing assay for diagnostics, easily applicable to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. This technique may be implemented in routine clinical practice in the near future to identify EOCs sensitive to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy, thus increasing the subset of women affected by EOCs who could benefit from such treatment.