Molossops neglectus Williams and Genoways (1980) was described on the basis of one female from 1 km S, 2 km E Powaka, Suriname, now deposited in the Carnegie Museum of Natural History (CM 53864). It was previously known only from the type locality (Eisenberg, 1989). To date, males of this species have not been described. We recently collected two males in Perui, and subsequently discovered unreported specimens at the National Museum of Natural History in Washington (USNM) and the Natural History Museum, London (BM). These specimens reveal a much broader geographic range that extends to Brazil and Peru, and provide the first data on sexual dimorphism for this remarkable, but poorly known, species. The earliest record of M. neglectus is an adult male cataloged on 21 July 1851 as part of Lord Derby's collection (BM 51.7.21.19). Unfortunately, it is without data. The skull is fragmented and the braincase, right mandible, and anterior third of the left mandible are missing. On 11 March 1963, Philip Humphrey shot a juvenile male near Belem, Para, Brazil (USNM 335843). The bat was flying over secondary growth near primary lowland rain forest at about 0615 h. This specimen represents the first record of the species from Brazil. Belem is ca. 1,200 km southeast of the type locality in Suriname (Fig. 1). The skull of this specimen is also broken, but most of the trenchant features are visible. In August 1968, Merlin Tuttle collected two pregnant females from San Juan, Oxapampa, Pasco, Perui (USNM 364484 and 364485). Although Tuttle (1970) reported them as M. temmincki, they actually represent the first records of M. neglectus from Perui. This locality is about 2,800 km southwest of the type locality, and 3,200 from Belem, Brazil (Fig. 1). Both specimens have complete skulls. In July 1989, we collected one male in a mist net set about 20 m above the ground, and in December 1990, we collected a second male 25 m above the ground. The collecting site was a clearing in primary forest at the Centro de Investigaci6n Jenaro Herrera, Requena, Loreto, Perui. The specimens were deposited in the Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (MUSM 5517; 6573). The narrow clearing had been clear-cut in May-June 1989 as part of a study of forest regeneration after logging. The records of M. neglectus now known (Fig. 1) probably represent only the eastern and western margins of the true distribution. We suspect it will eventually be shown to occur in Venezuela and Colombia as well. Its occurrence in the heart of the Amazon basin may be less likely, as there are other bat species (e.g., Pteronotus gymnonotus, Micronycteris daviesi, Lichonycteris obscura, Vampyressa pusilla, and Promops centralis) that occur in northern South America and extend southward down both sides of the Amazon basin, but have as yet been unrecorded from the central part of the basin (Koopman, 1982; Mok et al., 1982). Molossid bats frequently are difficult to collect using standard techniques, and their apparent distribution patterns may be in part a reflection of our inability to detect their presence. Until the central part of the Amazon basin has been sampled systematically, the distribution patterns of many such species will remain enigmatic. The females of M. neglectus (holotype and specimens from San Juan, Peru) are similar in size (length of forearm, in mm, 35.70, 35.65, 35.75; condylobasal lengths, in mm, 15.40, 15.55, 15.95, respectively). The subadult male from Brazil is slightly larger than the females (length of forearm, 36.60 mm; condylobasal length, 16.65 mm). The adult males from Loreto are considerably larger than the other specimens (length of forearm, 38.20 mm in both; condylobasal lengths, 17.00 and 17.52 mm). Distinct sexual dimorphism is common in the family Molossidae. Any assessment of geographic variation in this species must await accumulation of additional specimens. The lower canines are short and the posterior keel is reduced in the females, and to a lesser extent in the juvenile male. These teeth are longer and much more robust in the adult males, but without an appreciable posterior keel. The upper incisors are long, but not prognathous. They are separated in females, and restricted